P. 74 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7301-7400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	3nelsucpw1 7301	Three is not an element of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ¬ 3o ∈ suc 𝒫 1o
Theorem	sucpw1nss3 7302	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not a subset of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (¬ EXMID → ¬ suc 𝒫 1o ⊆ 3o)
Theorem	3nsssucpw1 7303	Negated excluded middle implies that 3o is not a subset of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (¬ EXMID → ¬ 3o ⊆ suc 𝒫 1o)
Theorem	onntri35 7304*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. There are five equivalent statements: (1) ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥), (2) ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On(𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥), (3) ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥), (4) ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥), and (5) ¬ ¬ EXMID. That these are all equivalent is expressed by (1) implies (3) (onntri13 7305), (3) implies (5) (onntri35 7304), (5) implies (1) (onntri51 7307), (2) implies (4) (onntri24 7309), (4) implies (5) (onntri45 7308), and (5) implies (2) (onntri52 7311). Another way of stating this is that EXMID is equivalent to trichotomy, either the 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 or the 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 form, as shown in exmidontri 7306 and exmidontri2or 7310, respectively. Thus ¬ ¬ EXMID is equivalent to (1) or (2). In addition, ¬ ¬ EXMID is equivalent to (3) by onntri3or 7312 and (4) by onntri2or 7313. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ¬ ¬ EXMID)
Theorem	onntri13 7305	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	exmidontri 7306*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri51 7307*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ EXMID → ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri45 7308*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → ¬ ¬ EXMID)
Theorem	onntri24 7309	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	exmidontri2or 7310*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri52 7311*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ EXMID → ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri3or 7312*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri2or 7313*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
2.6.46  Apartness relations
Syntax	wap 7314	Apartness predicate symbol.
wff 𝑅 Ap 𝐴
Definition	df-pap 7315*	Apartness predicate. A relation 𝑅 is an apartness if it is irreflexive, symmetric, and cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝑅 Ap 𝐴 ↔ ((𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))))
Syntax	wtap 7316	Tight apartness predicate symbol.
wff 𝑅 TAp 𝐴
Definition	df-tap 7317*	Tight apartness predicate. A relation 𝑅 is a tight apartness if it is irreflexive, symmetric, cotransitive, and tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Ap 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	dftap2 7318*	Tight apartness with the apartness properties from df-pap 7315 expanded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))))
Theorem	tapeq1 7319	Equality theorem for tight apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 TAp 𝐴))
Theorem	tapeq2 7320	Equality theorem for tight apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 TAp 𝐵))
Theorem	netap 7321*	Negated equality on a set with decidable equality is a tight apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)} TAp 𝐴)
Theorem	2onetap 7322*	Negated equality is a tight apartness on 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 2o ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 2o) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)} TAp 2o
Theorem	2oneel 7323*	∅ and 1o are two unequal elements of 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ⟨∅, 1o⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 2o ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 2o) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)}
Theorem	2omotaplemap 7324*	Lemma for 2omotap 7326. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 2o ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 2o) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣))} TAp 2o)
Theorem	2omotaplemst 7325*	Lemma for 2omotap 7326. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 2o ∧ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	2omotap 7326	If there is at most one tight apartness on 2o, excluded middle follows. Based on online discussions by Tom de Jong, Andrew W Swan, and Martin Escardo. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 2o → EXMID)
Theorem	exmidapne 7327*	Excluded middle implies there is only one tight apartness on any class, namely negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (EXMID → (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)}))
Theorem	exmidmotap 7328*	The proposition that every class has at most one tight apartness is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥)
PART 3  CHOICE PRINCIPLES We have already introduced the full Axiom of Choice df-ac 7273 but since it implies excluded middle as shown at exmidac 7276, it is not especially relevant to us. In this section we define countable choice and dependent choice, which are not as strong as thus often considered in mathematics which seeks to avoid full excluded middle.
3.1  Countable Choice and Dependent Choice
3.1.1  Introduce Countable Choice
Syntax	wacc 7329	Formula for an abbreviation of countable choice.
wff CCHOICE
Definition	df-cc 7330*	The expression CCHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of countable choice, analogous to df-ac 7273 for full choice. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (CCHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥(dom 𝑥 ≈ ω → ∃𝑓(𝑓 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑓 Fn dom 𝑥)))
Theorem	ccfunen 7331*	Existence of a choice function for a countably infinite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	cc1 7332*	Countable choice in terms of a choice function on a countably infinite set of inhabited sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (CCHOICE → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ≈ ω ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧) → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧))
Theorem	cc2lem 7333*	Lemma for cc2 7334. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ ({𝑛} × (𝐹‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ (2nd ‘(𝑓‘(𝐴‘𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn ω ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑔‘𝑛) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)))
Theorem	cc2 7334*	Countable choice using sequences instead of countable sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn ω ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑔‘𝑛) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)))
Theorem	cc3 7335*	Countable choice using a sequence F(n) . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 29-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑓‘𝑛) ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	cc4f 7336*	Countable choice by showing the existence of a function 𝑓 which can choose a value at each index 𝑛 such that 𝜒 holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑛𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑁⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝜒))
Theorem	cc4 7337*	Countable choice by showing the existence of a function 𝑓 which can choose a value at each index 𝑛 such that 𝜒 holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 1-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑁⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝜒))
Theorem	cc4n 7338*	Countable choice with a simpler restriction on how every set in the countable collection needs to be inhabited. That is, compared with cc4 7337, the hypotheses only require an A(n) for each value of 𝑛, not a single set 𝐴 which suffices for every 𝑛 ∈ ω. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝜒))
PART 4  REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBERS This section derives the basics of real and complex numbers. To construct the real numbers constructively, we follow two main sources. The first is Metamath Proof Explorer, which has the advantage of being already formalized in metamath. Its disadvantage, for our purposes, is that it assumes the law of the excluded middle throughout. Since we have already developed natural numbers ( for example, nna0 6532 and similar theorems ), going from there to positive integers (df-ni 7371) and then positive rational numbers (df-nqqs 7415) does not involve a major change in approach compared with the Metamath Proof Explorer. It is when we proceed to Dedekind cuts that we bring in more material from Section 11.2 of [HoTT], which focuses on the aspects of Dedekind cuts which are different without excluded middle or choice principles. With excluded middle, it is natural to define a cut as the lower set only (as Metamath Proof Explorer does), but here we define the cut as a pair of both the lower and upper sets, as [HoTT] does. There are also differences in how we handle order and replacing "not equal to zero" with "apart from zero". When working constructively, there are several possible definitions of real numbers. Here we adopt the most common definition, as two-sided Dedekind cuts with the properties described at df-inp 7533. The Cauchy reals (without countable choice) fail to satisfy ax-caucvg 7999 and the MacNeille reals fail to satisfy axltwlin 8094, and we do not develop them here. For more on differing definitions of the reals, see the introduction to Chapter 11 in [HoTT] or Section 1.2 of [BauerHanson].
4.1  Construction and axiomatization of real and complex numbers
4.1.1  Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers
Syntax	cnpi 7339	The set of positive integers, which is the set of natural numbers ω with 0 removed. Note: This is the start of the Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers.
class N
Syntax	cpli 7340	Positive integer addition.
class +N
Syntax	cmi 7341	Positive integer multiplication.
class ·N
Syntax	clti 7342	Positive integer ordering relation.
class <N
Syntax	cplpq 7343	Positive pre-fraction addition.
class +pQ
Syntax	cmpq 7344	Positive pre-fraction multiplication.
class ·pQ
Syntax	cltpq 7345	Positive pre-fraction ordering relation.
class <pQ
Syntax	ceq 7346	Equivalence class used to construct positive fractions.
class ~Q
Syntax	cnq 7347	Set of positive fractions.
class Q
Syntax	c1q 7348	The positive fraction constant 1.
class 1Q
Syntax	cplq 7349	Positive fraction addition.
class +Q
Syntax	cmq 7350	Positive fraction multiplication.
class ·Q
Syntax	crq 7351	Positive fraction reciprocal operation.
class *Q
Syntax	cltq 7352	Positive fraction ordering relation.
class <Q
Syntax	ceq0 7353	Equivalence class used to construct nonnegative fractions.
class ~Q0
Syntax	cnq0 7354	Set of nonnegative fractions.
class Q0
Syntax	c0q0 7355	The nonnegative fraction constant 0.
class 0Q0
Syntax	cplq0 7356	Nonnegative fraction addition.
class +Q0
Syntax	cmq0 7357	Nonnegative fraction multiplication.
class ·Q0
Syntax	cnp 7358	Set of positive reals.
class P
Syntax	c1p 7359	Positive real constant 1.
class 1P
Syntax	cpp 7360	Positive real addition.
class +P
Syntax	cmp 7361	Positive real multiplication.
class ·P
Syntax	cltp 7362	Positive real ordering relation.
class <P
Syntax	cer 7363	Equivalence class used to construct signed reals.
class ~R
Syntax	cnr 7364	Set of signed reals.
class R
Syntax	c0r 7365	The signed real constant 0.
class 0R
Syntax	c1r 7366	The signed real constant 1.
class 1R
Syntax	cm1r 7367	The signed real constant -1.
class -1R
Syntax	cplr 7368	Signed real addition.
class +R
Syntax	cmr 7369	Signed real multiplication.
class ·R
Syntax	cltr 7370	Signed real ordering relation.
class <R
Definition	df-ni 7371	Define the class of positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
⊢ N = (ω ∖ {∅})
Definition	df-pli 7372	Define addition on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ +N = ( +o ↾ (N × N))
Definition	df-mi 7373	Define multiplication on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ·N = ( ·o ↾ (N × N))
Definition	df-lti 7374	Define 'less than' on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <N = ( E ∩ (N × N))
Theorem	elni 7375	Membership in the class of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	pinn 7376	A positive integer is a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → 𝐴 ∈ ω)
Theorem	pion 7377	A positive integer is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	piord 7378	A positive integer is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → Ord 𝐴)
Theorem	niex 7379	The class of positive integers is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
⊢ N ∈ V
Theorem	0npi 7380	The empty set is not a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ N
Theorem	elni2 7381	Membership in the class of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	1pi 7382	Ordinal 'one' is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
⊢ 1o ∈ N
Theorem	addpiord 7383	Positive integer addition in terms of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 +N 𝐵) = (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	mulpiord 7384	Positive integer multiplication in terms of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 ·N 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	mulidpi 7385	1 is an identity element for multiplication on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → (𝐴 ·N 1o) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ltpiord 7386	Positive integer 'less than' in terms of ordinal membership. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	ltsopi 7387	Positive integer 'less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2014.)
⊢ <N Or N
Theorem	pitric 7388	Trichotomy for positive integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <N 𝐴)))
Theorem	pitri3or 7389	Trichotomy for positive integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <N 𝐴))
Theorem	ltdcpi 7390	Less-than for positive integers is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → DECID 𝐴 <N 𝐵)
Theorem	ltrelpi 7391	Positive integer 'less than' is a relation on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <N ⊆ (N × N)
Theorem	dmaddpi 7392	Domain of addition on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ dom +N = (N × N)
Theorem	dmmulpi 7393	Domain of multiplication on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ dom ·N = (N × N)
Theorem	addclpi 7394	Closure of addition of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 +N 𝐵) ∈ N)
Theorem	mulclpi 7395	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 ·N 𝐵) ∈ N)
Theorem	addcompig 7396	Addition of positive integers is commutative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 +N 𝐵) = (𝐵 +N 𝐴))
Theorem	addasspig 7397	Addition of positive integers is associative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N ∧ 𝐶 ∈ N) → ((𝐴 +N 𝐵) +N 𝐶) = (𝐴 +N (𝐵 +N 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulcompig 7398	Multiplication of positive integers is commutative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 ·N 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·N 𝐴))
Theorem	mulasspig 7399	Multiplication of positive integers is associative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N ∧ 𝐶 ∈ N) → ((𝐴 ·N 𝐵) ·N 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·N (𝐵 ·N 𝐶)))
Theorem	distrpig 7400	Multiplication of positive integers is distributive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N ∧ 𝐶 ∈ N) → (𝐴 ·N (𝐵 +N 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·N 𝐵) +N (𝐴 ·N 𝐶)))