Theorem bnj929 35133

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35207. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj929.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj929.4	⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜑)
bnj929.7	⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
bnj929.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj929.13	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
bnj929.50	⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj929	⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑″)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑛   𝑅,𝑓,𝑛   𝑓,𝑋,𝑛

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐴(𝑝)   𝐶(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑅(𝑝)   𝐺(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑋(𝑝)   𝜑′(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜑″(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj929

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj645 34948	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
2		bnj334 34911	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
3		bnj257 34905	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
4	2, 3	bitri 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
5		bnj345 34912	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
6		bnj253 34902	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
7	4, 5, 6	3bitri 299	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
8	7	simp1bi 1152	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛))
9		bnj929.13	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
10		bnj929.50	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V
11	9, 10	bnj927 34967	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑝)
12	11	fnfund 6590	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → Fun 𝐺)
13	8, 12	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → Fun 𝐺)
14	9	bnj931 34968	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺
15	14	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺)
16		bnj268 34907	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
17		bnj253 34902	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
18	16, 17	bitr3i 279	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
19	18	simp1bi 1152	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛))
20		fndm 6592	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 → dom 𝑓 = 𝑛)
21		bnj929.10	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
22	21	bnj529 34939	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → ∅ ∈ 𝑛)
23		eleq2 2830	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝑓 = 𝑛 → (∅ ∈ dom 𝑓 ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝑛))
24	23	biimpar 479	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom 𝑓 = 𝑛 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝑛) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
25	20, 22, 24	syl2anr 604	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
26	19, 25	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
27	13, 15, 26	bnj1502 35045	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝐺‘∅) = (𝑓‘∅))
28		bnj929.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
29		bnj929.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜑)
30		bnj929.7	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
31	9	bnj918 34964	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V
32	28, 29, 30, 31	bnj934 35132	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐺‘∅) = (𝑓‘∅)) → 𝜑″)
33	1, 27, 32	syl2anc 591	1 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑″)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 397   ∧ w3a 1093   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121  Vcvv 3433  [wsbc 3725   ∖ cdif 3882   ∪ cun 3883   ⊆ wss 3885  ∅c0 4264  {csn 4558  ⟨cop 4564  dom cdm 5621  suc csuc 6316  Fun wfun 6483   Fn wfn 6484  ‘cfv 6489  ωcom 7810   ∧ w-bnj17 34884   predc-bnj14 34886

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-12 2191  ax-ext 2713  ax-sep 5221  ax-pr 5365  ax-un 7682  ax-reg 9501

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-3or 1094  df-3an 1095  df-tru 1551  df-fal 1561  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2075  df-mo 2545  df-eu 2575  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-ne 2937  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3066  df-rab 3394  df-v 3435  df-sbc 3726  df-dif 3888  df-un 3890  df-in 3892  df-ss 3902  df-pss 3905  df-nul 4265  df-if 4458  df-pw 4534  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4842  df-br 5076  df-opab 5138  df-tr 5183  df-id 5516  df-eprel 5521  df-po 5529  df-so 5530  df-fr 5574  df-we 5576  df-xp 5627  df-rel 5628  df-cnv 5629  df-co 5630  df-dm 5631  df-res 5633  df-ord 6317  df-on 6318  df-suc 6320  df-iota 6445  df-fun 6491  df-fn 6492  df-fv 6497  df-om 7811  df-bnj17 34885

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj944  35135