Theorem bnj929 35566

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35640. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj929.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj929.4	⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜑)
bnj929.7	⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
bnj929.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj929.13	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
bnj929.50	⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj929	⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑″)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑛   𝑅,𝑓,𝑛   𝑓,𝑋,𝑛

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝐴(𝑝)   𝐶(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝐷(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝑅(𝑝)   𝐺(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝑋(𝑝)   𝜑′(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜑″(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj929

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj645 35381	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
2		bnj334 35344	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
3		bnj257 35338	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
4	2, 3	bitri 278	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
5		bnj345 35345	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
6		bnj253 35335	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
7	4, 5, 6	3bitri 300	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
8	7	simp1bi 1163	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛))
9		bnj929.13	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
10		bnj929.50	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V
11	9, 10	bnj927 35400	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑝)
12	11	fnfund 6640	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → Fun 𝐺)
13	8, 12	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → Fun 𝐺)
14	9	bnj931 35401	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺
15	14	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺)
16		bnj268 35340	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
17		bnj253 35335	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
18	16, 17	bitr3i 280	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
19	18	simp1bi 1163	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛))
20		fndm 6642	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 → dom 𝑓 = 𝑛)
21		bnj929.10	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
22	21	bnj529 35372	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → ∅ ∈ 𝑛)
23		eleq2 2849	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝑓 = 𝑛 → (∅ ∈ dom 𝑓 ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝑛))
24	23	biimpar 483	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom 𝑓 = 𝑛 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝑛) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
25	20, 22, 24	syl2anr 609	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
26	19, 25	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
27	13, 15, 26	bnj1502 35478	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝐺‘∅) = (𝑓‘∅))
28		bnj929.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
29		bnj929.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜑)
30		bnj929.7	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
31	9	bnj918 35397	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V
32	28, 29, 30, 31	bnj934 35565	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐺‘∅) = (𝑓‘∅)) → 𝜑″)
33	1, 27, 32	syl2anc 596	1 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑″)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  Vcvv 3450  [wsbc 3738   ⊆ wss 3895   ∖ cdif 4045   ∪ cun 4149  ∅c0 4278  {csn 4583  ⟨cop 4589  dom cdm 5650  suc csuc 6364  Fun wfun 6532   Fn wfn 6533  ‘cfv 6538  ωcom 7877   ∧ w-bnj17 35317   predc-bnj14 35319

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7751  ax-reg 9586

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3896  df-pss 4014  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-tr 5212  df-id 5545  df-eprel 5550  df-po 5558  df-so 5559  df-fr 5603  df-we 5605  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-res 5662  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-fv 6546  df-om 7878  df-bnj17 35318

This theorem is used by:  bnj944  35568