Theorem bnj929 34950

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj929.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj929.4	⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜑)
bnj929.7	⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
bnj929.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj929.13	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
bnj929.50	⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj929	⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑″)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑛   𝑅,𝑓,𝑛   𝑓,𝑋,𝑛

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐴(𝑝)   𝐶(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑅(𝑝)   𝐺(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑋(𝑝)   𝜑′(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜑″(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj929

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj645 34764	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
2		bnj334 34727	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
3		bnj257 34721	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
4	2, 3	bitri 275	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
5		bnj345 34728	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
6		bnj253 34718	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
7	4, 5, 6	3bitri 297	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
8	7	simp1bi 1146	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛))
9		bnj929.13	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
10		bnj929.50	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V
11	9, 10	bnj927 34783	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑝)
12	11	fnfund 6669	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → Fun 𝐺)
13	8, 12	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → Fun 𝐺)
14	9	bnj931 34784	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺
15	14	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺)
16		bnj268 34723	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
17		bnj253 34718	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
18	16, 17	bitr3i 277	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
19	18	simp1bi 1146	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛))
20		fndm 6671	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 → dom 𝑓 = 𝑛)
21		bnj929.10	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
22	21	bnj529 34755	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → ∅ ∈ 𝑛)
23		eleq2 2830	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝑓 = 𝑛 → (∅ ∈ dom 𝑓 ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝑛))
24	23	biimpar 477	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom 𝑓 = 𝑛 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝑛) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
25	20, 22, 24	syl2anr 597	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
26	19, 25	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
27	13, 15, 26	bnj1502 34862	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝐺‘∅) = (𝑓‘∅))
28		bnj929.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
29		bnj929.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜑)
30		bnj929.7	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
31	9	bnj918 34780	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V
32	28, 29, 30, 31	bnj934 34949	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐺‘∅) = (𝑓‘∅)) → 𝜑″)
33	1, 27, 32	syl2anc 584	1 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑″)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3480  [wsbc 3788   ∖ cdif 3948   ∪ cun 3949   ⊆ wss 3951  ∅c0 4333  {csn 4626  ⟨cop 4632  dom cdm 5685  suc csuc 6386  Fun wfun 6555   Fn wfn 6556  ‘cfv 6561  ωcom 7887   ∧ w-bnj17 34700   predc-bnj14 34702

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5296  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5432  ax-un 7755  ax-reg 9632

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3437  df-v 3482  df-sbc 3789  df-dif 3954  df-un 3956  df-in 3958  df-ss 3968  df-pss 3971  df-nul 4334  df-if 4526  df-pw 4602  df-sn 4627  df-pr 4629  df-op 4633  df-uni 4908  df-br 5144  df-opab 5206  df-tr 5260  df-id 5578  df-eprel 5584  df-po 5592  df-so 5593  df-fr 5637  df-we 5639  df-xp 5691  df-rel 5692  df-cnv 5693  df-co 5694  df-dm 5695  df-res 5697  df-ord 6387  df-on 6388  df-suc 6390  df-iota 6514  df-fun 6563  df-fn 6564  df-fv 6569  df-om 7888  df-bnj17 34701

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj944  34952