Theorem bnj929 35432

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35506. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj929.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj929.4	⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜑)
bnj929.7	⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
bnj929.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj929.13	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
bnj929.50	⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj929	⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑″)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑛   𝑅,𝑓,𝑛   𝑓,𝑋,𝑛

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝐴(𝑝)   𝐶(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝐷(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝑅(𝑝)   𝐺(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝑋(𝑝)   𝜑′(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜑″(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj929

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj645 35247	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
2		bnj334 35210	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
3		bnj257 35204	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
4	2, 3	bitri 278	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
5		bnj345 35211	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
6		bnj253 35201	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
7	4, 5, 6	3bitri 300	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑))
8	7	simp1bi 1163	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛))
9		bnj929.13	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
10		bnj929.50	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V
11	9, 10	bnj927 35266	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑝)
12	11	fnfund 6637	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → Fun 𝐺)
13	8, 12	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → Fun 𝐺)
14	9	bnj931 35267	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺
15	14	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺)
16		bnj268 35206	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
17		bnj253 35201	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
18	16, 17	bitr3i 280	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
19	18	simp1bi 1163	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛))
20		fndm 6639	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 → dom 𝑓 = 𝑛)
21		bnj929.10	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
22	21	bnj529 35238	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → ∅ ∈ 𝑛)
23		eleq2 2851	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝑓 = 𝑛 → (∅ ∈ dom 𝑓 ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝑛))
24	23	biimpar 483	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom 𝑓 = 𝑛 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝑛) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
25	20, 22, 24	syl2anr 609	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
26	19, 25	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → ∅ ∈ dom 𝑓)
27	13, 15, 26	bnj1502 35344	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝐺‘∅) = (𝑓‘∅))
28		bnj929.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
29		bnj929.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜑)
30		bnj929.7	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
31	9	bnj918 35263	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V
32	28, 29, 30, 31	bnj934 35431	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐺‘∅) = (𝑓‘∅)) → 𝜑″)
33	1, 27, 32	syl2anc 596	1 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑″)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3453  [wsbc 3742   ∖ cdif 3899   ∪ cun 3900   ⊆ wss 3902  ∅c0 4282  {csn 4587  ⟨cop 4593  dom cdm 5659  suc csuc 6363  Fun wfun 6531   Fn wfn 6532  ‘cfv 6537  ωcom 7865   ∧ w-bnj17 35183   predc-bnj14 35185

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739  ax-reg 9567

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-res 5671  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-fv 6545  df-om 7866  df-bnj17 35184

This theorem is used by:  bnj944  35434