| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 200 of 513) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31550) |
(31551-33073) |
(33074-51270) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | lsmub1 19901 | Subgroup sum is an upper bound of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmub2 19902 | Subgroup sum is an upper bound of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmunss 19903 | Union of subgroups is a subset of subgroup sum. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑇 ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmless1 19904 | Subset implies subgroup sum subset. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈) ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmless2 19905 | Subset implies subgroup sum subset. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊆ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmless12 19906 | Subset implies subgroup sum subset. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈)) → (𝑅 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊆ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmidm 19907 | Subgroup sum is idempotent. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑈) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | lsmlub 19908 | The least upper bound property of subgroup sum. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → ((𝑆 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈) ↔ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊆ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmss1 19909 | Subgroup sum with a subset. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | lsmss1b 19910 | Subgroup sum with a subset. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmss2 19911 | Subgroup sum with a subset. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | lsmss2b 19912 | Subgroup sum with a subset. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑈 ⊆ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmass 19913 | Subgroup sum is associative. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → ((𝑅 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑅 ⊕ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))) | ||
| Theorem | mndlsmidm 19914 | Subgroup sum is idempotent for monoids. This corresponds to the observation in [Lang] p. 6. (Contributed by AV, 27-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Mnd → (𝐵 ⊕ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lsm01 19915 | Subgroup sum with the zero subgroup. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → (𝑋 ⊕ { 0 }) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lsm02 19916 | Subgroup sum with the zero subgroup. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → ({ 0 } ⊕ 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | subglsm 19917 | The subgroup sum evaluated within a subgroup. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSSum‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑇𝐴𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lssnle 19918 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than". (chnlei 32117 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑇 ↔ 𝑇 ⊊ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))) | ||
| Theorem | lsmmod 19919 | The modular law holds for subgroup sum. Similar to part of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑆 ⊕ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈)) = ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmmod2 19920 | Modular law dual for subgroup sum. Similar to part of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmpropd 19921* | If two structures have the same components (properties), they have the same subspace structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (LSSum‘𝐾) = (LSSum‘𝐿)) | ||
| Theorem | cntzrecd 19922 | Commute the "subgroups commute" predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | lsmcntz 19923 | The "subgroups commute" predicate applied to a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)))) | ||
| Theorem | lsmcntzr 19924 | The "subgroups commute" predicate applied to a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑇) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)))) | ||
| Theorem | lsmdisj 19925 | Disjointness from a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 })) | ||
| Theorem | lsmdisj2 19926 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 }) | ||
| Theorem | lsmdisj3 19927 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 }) | ||
| Theorem | lsmdisjr 19928 | Disjointness from a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 })) | ||
| Theorem | lsmdisj2r 19929 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈) ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) | ||
| Theorem | lsmdisj3r 19930 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) | ||
| Theorem | lsmdisj2a 19931 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) ↔ ((𝑇 ∩ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }))) | ||
| Theorem | lsmdisj2b 19932 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑈) ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) ↔ ((𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }))) | ||
| Theorem | lsmdisj3a 19933 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) ↔ ((𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }))) | ||
| Theorem | lsmdisj3b 19934 | Association of the disjointness constraint in a subgroup sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝑆 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑆 ∩ 𝑇) = { 0 }) ↔ ((𝑆 ∩ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = { 0 } ∧ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }))) | ||
| Theorem | subgdisj1 19935 | Vectors belonging to disjoint commuting subgroups are uniquely determined by their sum. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | subgdisj2 19936 | Vectors belonging to disjoint commuting subgroups are uniquely determined by their sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | subgdisjb 19937 | Vectors belonging to disjoint commuting subgroups are uniquely determined by their sum. Analogous to opth 5449, this theorem shows a way of representing a pair of vectors. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | pj1fval 19938* | The left projection function (for a direct product of group subspaces). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇𝑃𝑈) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 𝑧 = (𝑥 + 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | pj1val 19939* | The left projection function (for a direct product of group subspaces). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) → ((𝑇𝑃𝑈)‘𝑋) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 𝑋 = (𝑥 + 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | pj1eu 19940* | Uniqueness of a left projection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 𝑋 = (𝑥 + 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | pj1f 19941 | The left projection function maps a direct subspace sum onto the left factor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝑃𝑈):(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)⟶𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | pj2f 19942 | The right projection function maps a direct subspace sum onto the right factor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈𝑃𝑇):(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)⟶𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | pj1id 19943 | Any element of a direct subspace sum can be decomposed into projections onto the left and right factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) → 𝑋 = (((𝑇𝑃𝑈)‘𝑋) + ((𝑈𝑃𝑇)‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | pj1eq 19944 | Any element of a direct subspace sum can be decomposed uniquely into projections onto the left and right factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ (((𝑇𝑃𝑈)‘𝑋) = 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑈𝑃𝑇)‘𝑋) = 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | pj1lid 19945 | The left projection function is the identity on the left subspace. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝑇𝑃𝑈)‘𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | pj1rid 19946 | The left projection function is the zero operator on the right subspace. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) → ((𝑇𝑃𝑈)‘𝑋) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | pj1ghm 19947 | The left projection function is a group homomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝑃𝑈) ∈ ((𝐺 ↾s (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) GrpHom 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | pj1ghm2 19948 | The left projection function is a group homomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (proj1‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝑃𝑈) ∈ ((𝐺 ↾s (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) GrpHom (𝐺 ↾s 𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | lsmhash 19949 | The order of the direct product of groups. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) = { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) = ((♯‘𝑇) · (♯‘𝑈))) | ||
| Syntax | cefg 19950 | Extend class notation with the free group equivalence relation. |
| class ~FG | ||
| Syntax | cfrgp 19951 | Extend class notation with the free group construction. |
| class freeGrp | ||
| Syntax | cvrgp 19952 | Extend class notation with free group injection. |
| class varFGrp | ||
| Definition | df-efg 19953* | Define the free group equivalence relation, which is the smallest equivalence relation ≈ such that for any words 𝐴, 𝐵 and formal symbol 𝑥 with inverse invg𝑥, 𝐴𝐵 ≈ 𝐴𝑥(invg𝑥)𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ~FG = (𝑖 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑟 Er Word (𝑖 × 2o) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Word (𝑖 × 2o)∀𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑥))∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑖 ∀𝑧 ∈ 2o 𝑥𝑟(𝑥 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“〈𝑦, 𝑧〉〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉”〉〉))}) | ||
| Definition | df-frgp 19954 | Define the free group on a set 𝐼 of generators, defined as the quotient of the free monoid on 𝐼 × 2o (representing the generator elements and their formal inverses) by the free group equivalence relation df-efg 19953. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ freeGrp = (𝑖 ∈ V ↦ ((freeMnd‘(𝑖 × 2o)) /s ( ~FG ‘𝑖))) | ||
| Definition | df-vrgp 19955* | Define the canonical injection from the generating set 𝐼 into the base set of the free group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ varFGrp = (𝑖 ∈ V ↦ (𝑗 ∈ 𝑖 ↦ [〈“〈𝑗, ∅〉”〉]( ~FG ‘𝑖))) | ||
| Theorem | efgmval 19956* | Value of the formal inverse operation for the generating set of a free group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 2o) → (𝐴𝑀𝐵) = 〈𝐴, (1o ∖ 𝐵)〉) | ||
| Theorem | efgmf 19957* | The formal inverse operation is an endofunction on the generating set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑀:(𝐼 × 2o)⟶(𝐼 × 2o) | ||
| Theorem | efgmnvl 19958* | The inversion function on the generators is an involution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) → (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | efgrcl 19959 | Lemma for efgval 19961. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐼 ∈ V ∧ 𝑊 = Word (𝐼 × 2o))) | ||
| Theorem | efglem 19960* | Lemma for efgval 19961. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑟(𝑟 Er 𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑥))∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 ∀𝑧 ∈ 2o 𝑥𝑟(𝑥 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“〈𝑦, 𝑧〉〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉”〉〉)) | ||
| Theorem | efgval 19961* | Value of the free group construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ∼ = ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑟 Er 𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑥))∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 ∀𝑧 ∈ 2o 𝑥𝑟(𝑥 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“〈𝑦, 𝑧〉〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉”〉〉))} | ||
| Theorem | efger 19962 | Value of the free group construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ∼ Er 𝑊 | ||
| Theorem | efgi 19963 | Value of the free group construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 2o)) → 𝐴 ∼ (𝐴 splice 〈𝑁, 𝑁, 〈“〈𝐽, 𝐾〉〈𝐽, (1o ∖ 𝐾)〉”〉〉)) | ||
| Theorem | efgi0 19964 | Value of the free group construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐴)) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐴 ∼ (𝐴 splice 〈𝑁, 𝑁, 〈“〈𝐽, ∅〉〈𝐽, 1o〉”〉〉)) | ||
| Theorem | efgi1 19965 | Value of the free group construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐴)) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐴 ∼ (𝐴 splice 〈𝑁, 𝑁, 〈“〈𝐽, 1o〉〈𝐽, ∅〉”〉〉)) | ||
| Theorem | efgtf 19966* | Value of the free group construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝑇‘𝑋) = (𝑎 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑋)), 𝑏 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑋 splice 〈𝑎, 𝑎, 〈“𝑏(𝑀‘𝑏)”〉〉)) ∧ (𝑇‘𝑋):((0...(♯‘𝑋)) × (𝐼 × 2o))⟶𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | efgtval 19967* | Value of the extension function, which maps a word (a representation of the group element as a sequence of elements and their inverses) to its direct extensions, defined as the original representation with an element and its inverse inserted somewhere in the string. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑋)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) → (𝑁(𝑇‘𝑋)𝐴) = (𝑋 splice 〈𝑁, 𝑁, 〈“𝐴(𝑀‘𝐴)”〉〉)) | ||
| Theorem | efgval2 19968* | Value of the free group construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) ⇒ ⊢ ∼ = ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑟 Er 𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥) ⊆ [𝑥]𝑟)} | ||
| Theorem | efgi2 19969* | Value of the free group construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran (𝑇‘𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∼ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | efgtlen 19970* | Value of the free group construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ran (𝑇‘𝑋)) → (♯‘𝐴) = ((♯‘𝑋) + 2)) | ||
| Theorem | efginvrel2 19971* | The inverse of the reverse of a word composed with the word relates to the identity. (This provides an explicit expression for the representation of the group inverse, given a representative of the free group equivalence class.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 ++ (𝑀 ∘ (reverse‘𝐴))) ∼ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | efginvrel1 19972* | The inverse of the reverse of a word composed with the word relates to the identity. (This provides an explicit expression for the representation of the group inverse, given a representative of the free group equivalence class.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝑀 ∘ (reverse‘𝐴)) ++ 𝐴) ∼ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | efgsf 19973* | Value of the auxiliary function 𝑆 defining a sequence of extensions starting at some irreducible word. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆:{𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))}⟶𝑊 | ||
| Theorem | efgsdm 19974* | Elementhood in the domain of 𝑆, the set of sequences of extensions starting at an irreducible word. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ dom 𝑆 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∧ (𝐹‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝐹‘(𝑖 − 1))))) | ||
| Theorem | efgsval 19975* | Value of the auxiliary function 𝑆 defining a sequence of extensions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ dom 𝑆 → (𝑆‘𝐹) = (𝐹‘((♯‘𝐹) − 1))) | ||
| Theorem | efgsdmi 19976* | Property of the last link in the chain of extensions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ dom 𝑆 ∧ ((♯‘𝐹) − 1) ∈ ℕ) → (𝑆‘𝐹) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝐹‘(((♯‘𝐹) − 1) − 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | efgsval2 19977* | Value of the auxiliary function 𝑆 defining a sequence of extensions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Word 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (𝐴 ++ 〈“𝐵”〉) ∈ dom 𝑆) → (𝑆‘(𝐴 ++ 〈“𝐵”〉)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | efgsrel 19978* | The start and end of any extension sequence are related (i.e. evaluate to the same element of the quotient group to be created). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ dom 𝑆 → (𝐹‘0) ∼ (𝑆‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | efgs1 19979* | A singleton of an irreducible word is an extension sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → 〈“𝐴”〉 ∈ dom 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | efgs1b 19980* | Every extension sequence ending in an irreducible word is trivial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐷 ↔ (♯‘𝐴) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | efgsp1 19981* | If 𝐹 is an extension sequence and 𝐴 is an extension of the last element of 𝐹, then 𝐹 + 〈“𝐴”〉 is an extension sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ dom 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑆‘𝐹))) → (𝐹 ++ 〈“𝐴”〉) ∈ dom 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | efgsres 19982* | An initial segment of an extension sequence is an extension sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ dom 𝑆 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (1...(♯‘𝐹))) → (𝐹 ↾ (0..^𝑁)) ∈ dom 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | efgsfo 19983* | For any word, there is a sequence of extensions starting at a reduced word and ending at the target word, such that each word in the chain is an extension of the previous (inserting an element and its inverse at adjacent indices somewhere in the sequence). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆:dom 𝑆⟶onto𝑊 | ||
| Theorem | efgredlema 19984* | The reduced word that forms the base of the sequence in efgsval 19975 is uniquely determined, given the ending representation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑆∀𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑆((♯‘(𝑆‘𝑎)) < (♯‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) → ((𝑆‘𝑎) = (𝑆‘𝑏) → (𝑎‘0) = (𝑏‘0)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((♯‘𝐴) − 1) ∈ ℕ ∧ ((♯‘𝐵) − 1) ∈ ℕ)) | ||
| Theorem | efgredlemf 19985* | Lemma for efgredleme 19987. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑆∀𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑆((♯‘(𝑆‘𝑎)) < (♯‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) → ((𝑆‘𝑎) = (𝑆‘𝑏) → (𝑎‘0) = (𝑏‘0)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (((♯‘𝐴) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (((♯‘𝐵) − 1) − 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (𝐵‘𝐿) ∈ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | efgredlemg 19986* | Lemma for efgred 19992. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑆∀𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑆((♯‘(𝑆‘𝑎)) < (♯‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) → ((𝑆‘𝑎) = (𝑆‘𝑏) → (𝑎‘0) = (𝑏‘0)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (((♯‘𝐴) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (((♯‘𝐵) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (0...(♯‘(𝐴‘𝐾)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (0...(♯‘(𝐵‘𝐿)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑃(𝑇‘(𝐴‘𝐾))𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = (𝑄(𝑇‘(𝐵‘𝐿))𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(𝐴‘𝐾)) = (♯‘(𝐵‘𝐿))) | ||
| Theorem | efgredleme 19987* | Lemma for efgred 19992. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑆∀𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑆((♯‘(𝑆‘𝑎)) < (♯‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) → ((𝑆‘𝑎) = (𝑆‘𝑏) → (𝑎‘0) = (𝑏‘0)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (((♯‘𝐴) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (((♯‘𝐵) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (0...(♯‘(𝐴‘𝐾)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (0...(♯‘(𝐵‘𝐿)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑃(𝑇‘(𝐴‘𝐾))𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = (𝑄(𝑇‘(𝐵‘𝐿))𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘𝐾) = (𝐵‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑄 + 2))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐶) = (((𝐵‘𝐿) prefix 𝑄) ++ ((𝐴‘𝐾) substr 〈(𝑄 + 2), (♯‘(𝐴‘𝐾))〉))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴‘𝐾) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑆‘𝐶)) ∧ (𝐵‘𝐿) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑆‘𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | efgredlemd 19988* | The reduced word that forms the base of the sequence in efgsval 19975 is uniquely determined, given the ending representation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑆∀𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑆((♯‘(𝑆‘𝑎)) < (♯‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) → ((𝑆‘𝑎) = (𝑆‘𝑏) → (𝑎‘0) = (𝑏‘0)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (((♯‘𝐴) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (((♯‘𝐵) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (0...(♯‘(𝐴‘𝐾)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (0...(♯‘(𝐵‘𝐿)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑃(𝑇‘(𝐴‘𝐾))𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = (𝑄(𝑇‘(𝐵‘𝐿))𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘𝐾) = (𝐵‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑄 + 2))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐶) = (((𝐵‘𝐿) prefix 𝑄) ++ ((𝐴‘𝐾) substr 〈(𝑄 + 2), (♯‘(𝐴‘𝐾))〉))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) | ||
| Theorem | efgredlemc 19989* | The reduced word that forms the base of the sequence in efgsval 19975 is uniquely determined, given the ending representation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑆∀𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑆((♯‘(𝑆‘𝑎)) < (♯‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) → ((𝑆‘𝑎) = (𝑆‘𝑏) → (𝑎‘0) = (𝑏‘0)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (((♯‘𝐴) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (((♯‘𝐵) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (0...(♯‘(𝐴‘𝐾)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (0...(♯‘(𝐵‘𝐿)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑃(𝑇‘(𝐴‘𝐾))𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = (𝑄(𝑇‘(𝐵‘𝐿))𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘𝐾) = (𝐵‘𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑄) → (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0))) | ||
| Theorem | efgredlemb 19990* | The reduced word that forms the base of the sequence in efgsval 19975 is uniquely determined, given the ending representation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑆∀𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑆((♯‘(𝑆‘𝑎)) < (♯‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) → ((𝑆‘𝑎) = (𝑆‘𝑏) → (𝑎‘0) = (𝑏‘0)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (((♯‘𝐴) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (((♯‘𝐵) − 1) − 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (0...(♯‘(𝐴‘𝐾)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (0...(♯‘(𝐵‘𝐿)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑃(𝑇‘(𝐴‘𝐾))𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = (𝑄(𝑇‘(𝐵‘𝐿))𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘𝐾) = (𝐵‘𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | efgredlem 19991* | The reduced word that forms the base of the sequence in efgsval 19975 is uniquely determined, given the ending representation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑆∀𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑆((♯‘(𝑆‘𝑎)) < (♯‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) → ((𝑆‘𝑎) = (𝑆‘𝑏) → (𝑎‘0) = (𝑏‘0)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | efgred 19992* | The reduced word that forms the base of the sequence in efgsval 19975 is uniquely determined, given the terminal point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑆 ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘𝐵)) → (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) | ||
| Theorem | efgrelexlema 19993* | If two words 𝐴, 𝐵 are related under the free group equivalence, then there exist two extension sequences 𝑎, 𝑏 such that 𝑎 ends at 𝐴, 𝑏 ends at 𝐵, and 𝑎 and 𝐵 have the same starting point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ 𝐿 = {〈𝑖, 𝑗〉 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (◡𝑆 “ {𝑖})∃𝑑 ∈ (◡𝑆 “ {𝑗})(𝑐‘0) = (𝑑‘0)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝐿𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ (◡𝑆 “ {𝐴})∃𝑏 ∈ (◡𝑆 “ {𝐵})(𝑎‘0) = (𝑏‘0)) | ||
| Theorem | efgrelexlemb 19994* | If two words 𝐴, 𝐵 are related under the free group equivalence, then there exist two extension sequences 𝑎, 𝑏 such that 𝑎 ends at 𝐴, 𝑏 ends at 𝐵, and 𝑎 and 𝐵 have the same starting point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ 𝐿 = {〈𝑖, 𝑗〉 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (◡𝑆 “ {𝑖})∃𝑑 ∈ (◡𝑆 “ {𝑗})(𝑐‘0) = (𝑑‘0)} ⇒ ⊢ ∼ ⊆ 𝐿 | ||
| Theorem | efgrelex 19995* | If two words 𝐴, 𝐵 are related under the free group equivalence, then there exist two extension sequences 𝑎, 𝑏 such that 𝑎 ends at 𝐴, 𝑏 ends at 𝐵, and 𝑎 and 𝐵 have the same starting point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 → ∃𝑎 ∈ (◡𝑆 “ {𝐴})∃𝑏 ∈ (◡𝑆 “ {𝐵})(𝑎‘0) = (𝑏‘0)) | ||
| Theorem | efgredeu 19996* | There is a unique reduced word equivalent to a given word. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃!𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 𝑑 ∼ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | efgred2 19997* | Two extension sequences have related endpoints iff they have the same base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑆) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) ∼ (𝑆‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0))) | ||
| Theorem | efgcpbllema 19998* | Lemma for efgrelex 19995. Define an auxiliary equivalence relation 𝐿 such that 𝐴𝐿𝐵 if there are sequences from 𝐴 to 𝐵 passing through the same reduced word. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ 𝐿 = {〈𝑖, 𝑗〉 ∣ ({𝑖, 𝑗} ⊆ 𝑊 ∧ ((𝐴 ++ 𝑖) ++ 𝐵) ∼ ((𝐴 ++ 𝑗) ++ 𝐵))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋𝐿𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ((𝐴 ++ 𝑋) ++ 𝐵) ∼ ((𝐴 ++ 𝑌) ++ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | efgcpbllemb 19999* | Lemma for efgrelex 19995. Show that 𝐿 is an equivalence relation containing all direct extensions of a word, so is closed under ∼. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) & ⊢ 𝐿 = {〈𝑖, 𝑗〉 ∣ ({𝑖, 𝑗} ⊆ 𝑊 ∧ ((𝐴 ++ 𝑖) ++ 𝐵) ∼ ((𝐴 ++ 𝑗) ++ 𝐵))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∼ ⊆ 𝐿) | ||
| Theorem | efgcpbl 20000* | Two extension sequences have related endpoints iff they have the same base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 = ( I ‘Word (𝐼 × 2o)) & ⊢ ∼ = ( ~FG ‘𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼, 𝑧 ∈ 2o ↦ 〈𝑦, (1o ∖ 𝑧)〉) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑣)), 𝑤 ∈ (𝐼 × 2o) ↦ (𝑣 splice 〈𝑛, 𝑛, 〈“𝑤(𝑀‘𝑤)”〉〉))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ∖ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ran (𝑇‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ (Word 𝑊 ∖ {∅}) ∣ ((𝑡‘0) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑡))(𝑡‘𝑘) ∈ ran (𝑇‘(𝑡‘(𝑘 − 1))))} ↦ (𝑚‘((♯‘𝑚) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑋 ∼ 𝑌) → ((𝐴 ++ 𝑋) ++ 𝐵) ∼ ((𝐴 ++ 𝑌) ++ 𝐵)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |