Theorem idlnegcl 38223

Description: An ideal is closed under negation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
idlnegcl.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
idlnegcl.2	⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idlnegcl	⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐼)

Proof of Theorem idlnegcl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idlnegcl.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
2		eqid 2736	. . . 4 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran 𝐺
3	1, 2	idlss 38217	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → 𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺)
4		ssel2 3928	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺)
5		eqid 2736	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (2nd ‘𝑅) = (2nd ‘𝑅)
6		idlnegcl.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺)
7		eqid 2736	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)) = (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))
8	1, 5, 2, 6, 7	rngonegmn1l 38142	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴))
9	4, 8	sylan2 593	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴))
10	9	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴))
11	3, 10	syldanl 602	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴))
12	1	rneqi 5886	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran (1st ‘𝑅)
13	12, 5, 7	rngo1cl 38140	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)) ∈ ran 𝐺)
14	1, 2, 6	rngonegcl 38128	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)) ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺)
15	13, 14	mpdan 687	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺)
16	15	ad2antrr 726	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺)
17	1, 5, 2	idllmulcl 38221	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺)) → ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴) ∈ 𝐼)
18	17	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺) → ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴) ∈ 𝐼)
19	16, 18	mpdan 687	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴) ∈ 𝐼)
20	11, 19	eqeltrd 2836	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐼)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113   ⊆ wss 3901  ran crn 5625  ‘cfv 6492  (class class class)co 7358  1^st c1st 7931  2^nd c2nd 7932  GIdcgi 30565  invcgn 30566  RingOpscrngo 38095  Idlcidl 38208

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2708  ax-rep 5224  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pow 5310  ax-pr 5377  ax-un 7680

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3350  df-reu 3351  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-sbc 3741  df-csb 3850  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-iun 4948  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-mpt 5180  df-id 5519  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-riota 7315  df-ov 7361  df-1st 7933  df-2nd 7934  df-grpo 30568  df-gid 30569  df-ginv 30570  df-ablo 30620  df-ass 38044  df-exid 38046  df-mgmOLD 38050  df-sgrOLD 38062  df-mndo 38068  df-rngo 38096  df-idl 38211

This theorem is referenced by:  idlsubcl  38224