Theorem idlnegcl 38357

Description: An ideal is closed under negation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
idlnegcl.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
idlnegcl.2	⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idlnegcl	⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐼)

Proof of Theorem idlnegcl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idlnegcl.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
2		eqid 2737	. . . 4 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran 𝐺
3	1, 2	idlss 38351	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → 𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺)
4		ssel2 3917	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺)
5		eqid 2737	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (2nd ‘𝑅) = (2nd ‘𝑅)
6		idlnegcl.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺)
7		eqid 2737	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)) = (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))
8	1, 5, 2, 6, 7	rngonegmn1l 38276	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴))
9	4, 8	sylan2 594	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴))
10	9	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴))
11	3, 10	syldanl 603	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴))
12	1	rneqi 5886	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran (1st ‘𝑅)
13	12, 5, 7	rngo1cl 38274	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)) ∈ ran 𝐺)
14	1, 2, 6	rngonegcl 38262	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)) ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺)
15	13, 14	mpdan 688	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺)
16	15	ad2antrr 727	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺)
17	1, 5, 2	idllmulcl 38355	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺)) → ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴) ∈ 𝐼)
18	17	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺) → ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴) ∈ 𝐼)
19	16, 18	mpdan 688	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴) ∈ 𝐼)
20	11, 19	eqeltrd 2837	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐼)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ⊆ wss 3890  ran crn 5625  ‘cfv 6492  (class class class)co 7360  1^st c1st 7933  2^nd c2nd 7934  GIdcgi 30576  invcgn 30577  RingOpscrngo 38229  Idlcidl 38342

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5212  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pow 5302  ax-pr 5370  ax-un 7682

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3343  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-sbc 3730  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-pw 4544  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-op 4575  df-uni 4852  df-iun 4936  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-id 5519  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-riota 7317  df-ov 7363  df-1st 7935  df-2nd 7936  df-grpo 30579  df-gid 30580  df-ginv 30581  df-ablo 30631  df-ass 38178  df-exid 38180  df-mgmOLD 38184  df-sgrOLD 38196  df-mndo 38202  df-rngo 38230  df-idl 38345

This theorem is referenced by:  idlsubcl  38358