Theorem issubg 19192

Description: The subgroup predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
issubg.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
issubg	⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))

Proof of Theorem issubg

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-subg 19189	. . 3 ⊢ SubGrp = (𝑤 ∈ Grp ↦ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
2	1	mptrcl 7000	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
3		simp1 1152	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
4		fveq2 6882	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑤) = (Base‘𝐺))
5		issubg.b	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
6	4, 5	eqtr4di 2822	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑤) = 𝐵)
7	6	pweqd 4584	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) = 𝒫 𝐵)
8		oveq1 7418	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠))
9	8	eleq1d 2854	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → ((𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp ↔ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp))
10	7, 9	rabeqbidv 3441	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
11	5	fvexi 6896	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
12	11	pwex 5352	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 𝐵 ∈ V
13	12	rabex 5310	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ∈ V
14	10, 1, 13	fvmpt 6990	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (SubGrp‘𝐺) = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
15	14	eleq2d 2855	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ 𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp}))
16		oveq2 7419	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆))
17	16	eleq1d 2854	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → ((𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp ↔ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
18	17	elrab 3659	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
19	11	elpw2 5305	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)
20	19	anbi1i 635	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
21	18, 20	bitri 278	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
22	15, 21	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
23		ibar 537	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ((𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))))
24	22, 23	bitrd 282	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))))
25		3anass 1109	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
26	24, 25	bitr4di 292	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
27	2, 3, 26	pm5.21nii 381	1 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  {crab 3423   ⊆ wss 3913  𝒫 cpw 4567  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7411  Basecbs 17269   ↾_s cress 17290  Grpcgrp 19000  SubGrpcsubg 19186

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5337  ax-pr 5405

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4877  df-br 5114  df-opab 5178  df-mpt 5197  df-id 5557  df-xp 5668  df-rel 5669  df-cnv 5670  df-co 5671  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674  df-ima 5675  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7414  df-subg 19189

This theorem is referenced by:  subgss  19193  subgid  19194  subggrp  19195  subgrcl  19197  issubg2  19208  resgrpisgrp  19214  subsubg  19216  pgrpsubgsymgbi  19478  opprsubg  20434  subrngsubg  20637  subrgsubg  20662  subdrgint  20884  suborng  20957  cphsubrglem  25305  algextdeglem8  34059