Theorem issubg 19238

Description: The subgroup predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
issubg.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
issubg	⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))

Proof of Theorem issubg

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-subg 19235	. . 3 ⊢ SubGrp = (𝑤 ∈ Grp ↦ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
2	1	mptrcl 7003	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
3		simp1 1154	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
4		fveq2 6885	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑤) = (Base‘𝐺))
5		issubg.b	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
6	4, 5	eqtr4di 2818	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑤) = 𝐵)
7	6	pweqd 4581	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) = 𝒫 𝐵)
8		oveq1 7426	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠))
9	8	eleq1d 2850	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → ((𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp ↔ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp))
10	7, 9	rabeqbidv 3436	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
11	5	fvexi 6899	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
12	11	pwex 5353	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 𝐵 ∈ V
13	12	rabex 5311	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ∈ V
14	10, 1, 13	fvmpt 6993	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (SubGrp‘𝐺) = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
15	14	eleq2d 2851	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ 𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp}))
16		oveq2 7427	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆))
17	16	eleq1d 2850	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → ((𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp ↔ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
18	17	elrab 3652	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
19	11	elpw2 5307	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)
20	19	anbi1i 636	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
21	18, 20	bitri 278	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
22	15, 21	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
23		ibar 538	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ((𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))))
24	22, 23	bitrd 282	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))))
25		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
26	24, 25	bitr4di 292	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
27	2, 3, 26	pm5.21nii 381	1 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  {crab 3418   ⊆ wss 3906  𝒫 cpw 4564  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7419  Basecbs 17293   ↾_s cress 17314  Grpcgrp 19046  SubGrpcsubg 19232

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7422  df-subg 19235

This theorem is used by:  subgss  19239  subgid  19240  subggrp  19241  subgrcl  19243  issubg2  19254  resgrpisgrp  19260  subsubg  19262  pgrpsubgsymgbi  19524  opprsubg  20482  subrngsubg  20703  subrgsubg  20728  subdrgint  20958  suborng  21031  cphsubrglem  25389  algextdeglem8  34180