Theorem issubg 18999

Description: The subgroup predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
issubg.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
issubg	⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))

Proof of Theorem issubg

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-subg 18996	. . 3 ⊢ SubGrp = (𝑤 ∈ Grp ↦ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
2	1	mptrcl 7002	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
3		simp1 1137	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
4		fveq2 6887	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑤) = (Base‘𝐺))
5		issubg.b	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
6	4, 5	eqtr4di 2791	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑤) = 𝐵)
7	6	pweqd 4617	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) = 𝒫 𝐵)
8		oveq1 7410	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠))
9	8	eleq1d 2819	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → ((𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp ↔ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp))
10	7, 9	rabeqbidv 3450	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
11	5	fvexi 6901	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
12	11	pwex 5376	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 𝐵 ∈ V
13	12	rabex 5330	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ∈ V
14	10, 1, 13	fvmpt 6993	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (SubGrp‘𝐺) = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
15	14	eleq2d 2820	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ 𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp}))
16		oveq2 7411	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆))
17	16	eleq1d 2819	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → ((𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp ↔ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
18	17	elrab 3681	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
19	11	elpw2 5343	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)
20	19	anbi1i 625	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
21	18, 20	bitri 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
22	15, 21	bitrdi 287	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
23		ibar 530	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ((𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))))
24	22, 23	bitrd 279	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))))
25		3anass 1096	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
26	24, 25	bitr4di 289	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
27	2, 3, 26	pm5.21nii 380	1 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   ∧ w3a 1088   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107  {crab 3433   ⊆ wss 3946  𝒫 cpw 4600  ‘cfv 6539  (class class class)co 7403  Basecbs 17139   ↾_s cress 17168  Grpcgrp 18814  SubGrpcsubg 18993

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 5297  ax-nul 5304  ax-pow 5361  ax-pr 5425

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-dif 3949  df-un 3951  df-in 3953  df-ss 3963  df-nul 4321  df-if 4527  df-pw 4602  df-sn 4627  df-pr 4629  df-op 4633  df-uni 4907  df-br 5147  df-opab 5209  df-mpt 5230  df-id 5572  df-xp 5680  df-rel 5681  df-cnv 5682  df-co 5683  df-dm 5684  df-rn 5685  df-res 5686  df-ima 5687  df-iota 6491  df-fun 6541  df-fv 6547  df-ov 7406  df-subg 18996

This theorem is referenced by:  subgss  19000  subgid  19001  subggrp  19002  subgrcl  19004  issubg2  19014  resgrpisgrp  19020  subsubg  19022  pgrpsubgsymgbi  19268  opprsubg  20154  subrgsubg  20356  subdrgint  20406  cphsubrglem  24675  suborng  32401  subrngsubg  46663