Theorem issubg 17945

Description: The subgroup predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
issubg.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
issubg	⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))

Proof of Theorem issubg

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-subg 17942	. . . 4 ⊢ SubGrp = (𝑤 ∈ Grp ↦ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
2	1	dmmptss 5872	. . 3 ⊢ dom SubGrp ⊆ Grp
3		elfvdm 6465	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → 𝐺 ∈ dom SubGrp)
4	2, 3	sseldi 3825	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
5		simp1 1172	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)
6		fveq2 6433	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑤) = (Base‘𝐺))
7		issubg.b	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
8	6, 7	syl6eqr 2879	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑤) = 𝐵)
9	8	pweqd 4383	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) = 𝒫 𝐵)
10		oveq1 6912	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠))
11	10	eleq1d 2891	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → ((𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp ↔ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp))
12	9, 11	rabeqbidv 3408	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐺 → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
13	7	fvexi 6447	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
14	13	pwex 5080	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 𝐵 ∈ V
15	14	rabex 5037	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ∈ V
16	12, 1, 15	fvmpt 6529	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (SubGrp‘𝐺) = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp})
17	16	eleq2d 2892	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ 𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp}))
18		oveq2 6913	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆))
19	18	eleq1d 2891	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑆 → ((𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp ↔ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
20	19	elrab 3585	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
21	13	elpw2 5050	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)
22	21	anbi1i 619	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
23	20, 22	bitri 267	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Grp} ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))
24	17, 23	syl6bb 279	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
25		ibar 526	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ((𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))))
26	24, 25	bitrd 271	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))))
27		3anass 1122	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
28	26, 27	syl6bbr 281	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp)))
29	4, 5, 28	pm5.21nii 370	1 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Grp))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 386   ∧ w3a 1113   = wceq 1658   ∈ wcel 2166  {crab 3121   ⊆ wss 3798  𝒫 cpw 4378  dom cdm 5342  ‘cfv 6123  (class class class)co 6905  Basecbs 16222   ↾_s cress 16223  Grpcgrp 17776  SubGrpcsubg 17939

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1896  ax-4 1910  ax-5 2011  ax-6 2077  ax-7 2114  ax-8 2168  ax-9 2175  ax-10 2194  ax-11 2209  ax-12 2222  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2803  ax-sep 5005  ax-nul 5013  ax-pow 5065  ax-pr 5127

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 881  df-3an 1115  df-tru 1662  df-ex 1881  df-nf 1885  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2605  df-eu 2640  df-clab 2812  df-cleq 2818  df-clel 2821  df-nfc 2958  df-ral 3122  df-rex 3123  df-rab 3126  df-v 3416  df-sbc 3663  df-dif 3801  df-un 3803  df-in 3805  df-ss 3812  df-nul 4145  df-if 4307  df-pw 4380  df-sn 4398  df-pr 4400  df-op 4404  df-uni 4659  df-br 4874  df-opab 4936  df-mpt 4953  df-id 5250  df-xp 5348  df-rel 5349  df-cnv 5350  df-co 5351  df-dm 5352  df-rn 5353  df-res 5354  df-ima 5355  df-iota 6086  df-fun 6125  df-fv 6131  df-ov 6908  df-subg 17942

This theorem is referenced by:  subgss  17946  subgid  17947  subggrp  17948  subgrcl  17950  issubg2  17960  resgrpisgrp  17966  subsubg  17968  pgrpsubgsymgbi  18177  opprsubg  18990  subrgsubg  19142  cphsubrglem  23346  suborng  30360