Theorem invfun 17725

Description: The inverse relation is a function, which is to say that every morphism has at most one inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
invfval.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
invfval.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)
invfval.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
invss.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
invss.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
invfun	⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (𝑋𝑁𝑌))

Proof of Theorem invfun

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 ℎ are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		invfval.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
2		invfval.n	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)
3		invfval.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
4		invss.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
5		invss.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
6		eqid 2737	. . . 4 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
7	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6	invss 17722	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝑁𝑌) ⊆ ((𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) × (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)))
8		relxp 5643	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ((𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) × (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋))
9		relss 5732	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋𝑁𝑌) ⊆ ((𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) × (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)) → (Rel ((𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) × (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)) → Rel (𝑋𝑁𝑌)))
10	7, 8, 9	mpisyl 21	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel (𝑋𝑁𝑌))
11		eqid 2737	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Sect‘𝐶) = (Sect‘𝐶)
12	3	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
13	5	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
14	4	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
15	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 11	isinv 17721	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ↔ (𝑓(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑔(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝑓)))
16	15	simplbda 499	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔) → 𝑔(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝑓)
17	16	adantrr 718	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝑔(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝑓)
18	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 11	isinv 17721	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ ↔ (𝑓(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)ℎ ∧ ℎ(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝑓)))
19	18	simprbda 498	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑓(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)ℎ)
20	19	adantrl 717	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝑓(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)ℎ)
21	1, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20	sectcan 17716	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝑔 = ℎ)
22	21	ex 412	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑔 = ℎ))
23	22	alrimiv 1929	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀ℎ((𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑔 = ℎ))
24	23	alrimivv 1930	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑓∀𝑔∀ℎ((𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑔 = ℎ))
25		dffun2 6503	. 2 ⊢ (Fun (𝑋𝑁𝑌) ↔ (Rel (𝑋𝑁𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑓∀𝑔∀ℎ((𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑔 = ℎ)))
26	10, 24, 25	sylanbrc 584	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (𝑋𝑁𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1540   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ⊆ wss 3890   class class class wbr 5086   × cxp 5623  Rel wrel 5630  Fun wfun 6487  ‘cfv 6493  (class class class)co 7361  Basecbs 17173  Hom chom 17225  Catccat 17624  Sectcsect 17705  Invcinv 17706

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5213  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pow 5303  ax-pr 5371  ax-un 7683

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3343  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-sbc 3730  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-pw 4544  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-op 4575  df-uni 4852  df-iun 4936  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-id 5520  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-rn 5636  df-res 5637  df-ima 5638  df-iota 6449  df-fun 6495  df-fn 6496  df-f 6497  df-f1 6498  df-fo 6499  df-f1o 6500  df-fv 6501  df-riota 7318  df-ov 7364  df-oprab 7365  df-mpo 7366  df-1st 7936  df-2nd 7937  df-cat 17628  df-cid 17629  df-sect 17708  df-inv 17709

This theorem is referenced by:  inviso1  17727  invf  17729  invco  17732  idinv  17750  ffthiso  17892  fuciso  17939  setciso  18052  catciso  18072  rngciso  20609  ringciso  20643  rngcisoALTV  48768  ringcisoALTV  48802