Theorem invfun 17661

Description: The inverse relation is a function, which is to say that every morphism has at most one inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
invfval.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
invfval.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)
invfval.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
invfval.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
invfval.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
invfun	⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (𝑋𝑁𝑌))

Proof of Theorem invfun

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 ℎ are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		invfval.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
2		invfval.n	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)
3		invfval.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
4		invfval.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
5		invfval.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
6		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
7	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6	invss 17658	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝑁𝑌) ⊆ ((𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) × (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)))
8		relxp 5656	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ((𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) × (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋))
9		relss 5742	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋𝑁𝑌) ⊆ ((𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) × (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)) → (Rel ((𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌) × (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)) → Rel (𝑋𝑁𝑌)))
10	7, 8, 9	mpisyl 21	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel (𝑋𝑁𝑌))
11		eqid 2731	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Sect‘𝐶) = (Sect‘𝐶)
12	3	adantr 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
13	5	adantr 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
14	4	adantr 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
15	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 11	isinv 17657	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ↔ (𝑓(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑔(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝑓)))
16	15	simplbda 500	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔) → 𝑔(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝑓)
17	16	adantrr 715	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝑔(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝑓)
18	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 11	isinv 17657	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ ↔ (𝑓(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)ℎ ∧ ℎ(𝑌(Sect‘𝐶)𝑋)𝑓)))
19	18	simprbda 499	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑓(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)ℎ)
20	19	adantrl 714	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝑓(𝑋(Sect‘𝐶)𝑌)ℎ)
21	1, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20	sectcan 17652	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ)) → 𝑔 = ℎ)
22	21	ex 413	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑔 = ℎ))
23	22	alrimiv 1930	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀ℎ((𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑔 = ℎ))
24	23	alrimivv 1931	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑓∀𝑔∀ℎ((𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑔 = ℎ))
25		dffun2 6511	. 2 ⊢ (Fun (𝑋𝑁𝑌) ↔ (Rel (𝑋𝑁𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑓∀𝑔∀ℎ((𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝑔 ∧ 𝑓(𝑋𝑁𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑔 = ℎ)))
26	10, 24, 25	sylanbrc 583	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (𝑋𝑁𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1539   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106   ⊆ wss 3913   class class class wbr 5110   × cxp 5636  Rel wrel 5643  Fun wfun 6495  ‘cfv 6501  (class class class)co 7362  Basecbs 17094  Hom chom 17158  Catccat 17558  Sectcsect 17641  Invcinv 17642

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2702  ax-rep 5247  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5325  ax-pr 5389  ax-un 7677

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3351  df-reu 3352  df-rab 3406  df-v 3448  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3859  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4288  df-if 4492  df-pw 4567  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4961  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5536  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-iota 6453  df-fun 6503  df-fn 6504  df-f 6505  df-f1 6506  df-fo 6507  df-f1o 6508  df-fv 6509  df-riota 7318  df-ov 7365  df-oprab 7366  df-mpo 7367  df-1st 7926  df-2nd 7927  df-cat 17562  df-cid 17563  df-sect 17644  df-inv 17645

This theorem is referenced by:  inviso1  17663  invf  17665  invco  17668  idinv  17686  ffthiso  17830  fuciso  17878  setciso  17991  catciso  18011  rngciso  46400  rngcisoALTV  46412  ringciso  46451  ringcisoALTV  46475