Theorem xmettri2 24264

Description: Triangle inequality for the distance function of an extended metric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xmettri2	⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem xmettri2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elfvdm 6929	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → 𝑋 ∈ dom ∞Met)
2		isxmet 24248	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom ∞Met → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))))
3	1, 2	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))))
4	3	ibi 266	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))))
5		simpr 483	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))) → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
6	5	2ralimi 3113	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
7	4, 6	simpl2im 502	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
8		oveq1 7423	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) = (𝐴𝐷𝑦))
9		oveq2 7424	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝐷𝑥) = (𝑧𝐷𝐴))
10	9	oveq1d 7431	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) = ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
11	8, 10	breq12d 5156	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) ↔ (𝐴𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))
12		oveq2 7424	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐷𝑦) = (𝐴𝐷𝐵))
13		oveq2 7424	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑧𝐷𝑦) = (𝑧𝐷𝐵))
14	13	oveq2d 7432	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) = ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵)))
15	12, 14	breq12d 5156	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) ↔ (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵))))
16		oveq1 7423	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝑧𝐷𝐴) = (𝐶𝐷𝐴))
17		oveq1 7423	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝑧𝐷𝐵) = (𝐶𝐷𝐵))
18	16, 17	oveq12d 7434	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵)) = ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵)))
19	18	breq2d 5155	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵)) ↔ (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
20	11, 15, 19	rspc3v 3617	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
21	7, 20	syl5 34	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
22	21	3comr 1122	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
23	22	impcom 406	1 ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  ∀wral 3051   class class class wbr 5143   × cxp 5670  dom cdm 5672  ⟶wf 6539  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7416  0cc0 11138  ℝ^*cxr 11277   ≤ cle 11279   +_𝑒 cxad 13122  ∞Metcxmet 21268

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2696  ax-sep 5294  ax-nul 5301  ax-pow 5359  ax-pr 5423  ax-un 7738  ax-cnex 11194  ax-resscn 11195

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2703  df-cleq 2717  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2931  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3420  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3769  df-dif 3942  df-un 3944  df-in 3946  df-ss 3956  df-nul 4319  df-if 4525  df-pw 4600  df-sn 4625  df-pr 4627  df-op 4631  df-uni 4904  df-br 5144  df-opab 5206  df-mpt 5227  df-id 5570  df-xp 5678  df-rel 5679  df-cnv 5680  df-co 5681  df-dm 5682  df-rn 5683  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-map 8845  df-xr 11282  df-xmet 21276

This theorem is referenced by:  mettri2  24265  xmetge0  24268  xmetsym  24271  xmetpsmet  24272  xmettri  24275  xmetres2  24285  prdsxmetlem  24292  imasf1oxmet  24299  xblss2  24326  xmstri2  24390  comet  24440