Theorem xmettri2 23086

Description: Triangle inequality for the distance function of an extended metric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xmettri2	⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem xmettri2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elfvdm 6700	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → 𝑋 ∈ dom ∞Met)
2		isxmet 23070	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom ∞Met → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))))
3	1, 2	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))))
4	3	ibi 270	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))))
5		simpr 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))) → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
6	5	2ralimi 3076	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
7	4, 6	simpl2im 507	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
8		oveq1 7171	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) = (𝐴𝐷𝑦))
9		oveq2 7172	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝐷𝑥) = (𝑧𝐷𝐴))
10	9	oveq1d 7179	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) = ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
11	8, 10	breq12d 5040	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) ↔ (𝐴𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))
12		oveq2 7172	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐷𝑦) = (𝐴𝐷𝐵))
13		oveq2 7172	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑧𝐷𝑦) = (𝑧𝐷𝐵))
14	13	oveq2d 7180	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) = ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵)))
15	12, 14	breq12d 5040	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) ↔ (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵))))
16		oveq1 7171	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝑧𝐷𝐴) = (𝐶𝐷𝐴))
17		oveq1 7171	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝑧𝐷𝐵) = (𝐶𝐷𝐵))
18	16, 17	oveq12d 7182	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵)) = ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵)))
19	18	breq2d 5039	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵)) ↔ (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
20	11, 15, 19	rspc3v 3537	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
21	7, 20	syl5 34	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
22	21	3comr 1126	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
23	22	impcom 411	1 ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1088   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2113  ∀wral 3053   class class class wbr 5027   × cxp 5517  dom cdm 5519  ⟶wf 6329  ‘cfv 6333  (class class class)co 7164  0cc0 10608  ℝ^*cxr 10745   ≤ cle 10747   +_𝑒 cxad 12581  ∞Metcxmet 20195

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1916  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2019  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2710  ax-sep 5164  ax-nul 5171  ax-pow 5229  ax-pr 5293  ax-un 7473  ax-cnex 10664  ax-resscn 10665

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2717  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3058  df-rex 3059  df-rab 3062  df-v 3399  df-sbc 3680  df-dif 3844  df-un 3846  df-in 3848  df-ss 3858  df-nul 4210  df-if 4412  df-pw 4487  df-sn 4514  df-pr 4516  df-op 4520  df-uni 4794  df-br 5028  df-opab 5090  df-mpt 5108  df-id 5425  df-xp 5525  df-rel 5526  df-cnv 5527  df-co 5528  df-dm 5529  df-rn 5530  df-iota 6291  df-fun 6335  df-fn 6336  df-f 6337  df-fv 6341  df-ov 7167  df-oprab 7168  df-mpo 7169  df-map 8432  df-xr 10750  df-xmet 20203

This theorem is referenced by:  mettri2  23087  xmetge0  23090  xmetsym  23093  xmetpsmet  23094  xmettri  23097  xmetres2  23107  prdsxmetlem  23114  imasf1oxmet  23121  xblss2  23148  xmstri2  23212  comet  23259