Theorem xmettri2 24201

Description: Triangle inequality for the distance function of an extended metric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xmettri2	⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem xmettri2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elfvdm 6922	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → 𝑋 ∈ dom ∞Met)
2		isxmet 24185	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom ∞Met → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))))
3	1, 2	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))))
4	3	ibi 267	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐷:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))))
5		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))) → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
6	5	2ralimi 3117	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑥𝐷𝑦) = 0 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
7	4, 6	simpl2im 503	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
8		oveq1 7412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) = (𝐴𝐷𝑦))
9		oveq2 7413	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝐷𝑥) = (𝑧𝐷𝐴))
10	9	oveq1d 7420	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) = ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)))
11	8, 10	breq12d 5154	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) ↔ (𝐴𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦))))
12		oveq2 7413	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐷𝑦) = (𝐴𝐷𝐵))
13		oveq2 7413	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑧𝐷𝑦) = (𝑧𝐷𝐵))
14	13	oveq2d 7421	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) = ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵)))
15	12, 14	breq12d 5154	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) ↔ (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵))))
16		oveq1 7412	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝑧𝐷𝐴) = (𝐶𝐷𝐴))
17		oveq1 7412	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝑧𝐷𝐵) = (𝐶𝐷𝐵))
18	16, 17	oveq12d 7423	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵)) = ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵)))
19	18	breq2d 5153	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝐵)) ↔ (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
20	11, 15, 19	rspc3v 3622	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ ((𝑧𝐷𝑥) +𝑒 (𝑧𝐷𝑦)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
21	7, 20	syl5 34	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
22	21	3comr 1122	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵))))
23	22	impcom 407	1 ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ≤ ((𝐶𝐷𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶𝐷𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  ∀wral 3055   class class class wbr 5141   × cxp 5667  dom cdm 5669  ⟶wf 6533  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7405  0cc0 11112  ℝ^*cxr 11251   ≤ cle 11253   +_𝑒 cxad 13096  ∞Metcxmet 21225

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2697  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pow 5356  ax-pr 5420  ax-un 7722  ax-cnex 11168  ax-resscn 11169

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-sbc 3773  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-pw 4599  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-uni 4903  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-mpt 5225  df-id 5567  df-xp 5675  df-rel 5676  df-cnv 5677  df-co 5678  df-dm 5679  df-rn 5680  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7408  df-oprab 7409  df-mpo 7410  df-map 8824  df-xr 11256  df-xmet 21233

This theorem is referenced by:  mettri2  24202  xmetge0  24205  xmetsym  24208  xmetpsmet  24209  xmettri  24212  xmetres2  24222  prdsxmetlem  24229  imasf1oxmet  24236  xblss2  24263  xmstri2  24327  comet  24377