Theorem axdc2 10557

Description: An apparent strengthening of ax-dc 10554 (but derived from it) which shows that there is a denumerable sequence 𝑔 for any function that maps elements of a set 𝐴 to nonempty subsets of 𝐴 such that 𝑔(𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐹(𝑔(𝑥)) for all 𝑥 ∈ ω. The finitistic version of this can be proven by induction, but the infinite version requires this new axiom. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
axdc2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axdc2	⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔,𝑘   𝑔,𝐹,𝑘

Proof of Theorem axdc2

Dummy variables ℎ 𝑠 𝑡 𝑥 𝑦 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		axdc2.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		eleq1w 2847	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
3	2	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		fveq2 6911	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝐹‘𝑠) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
5	4	eleq2d 2850	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠) ↔ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
6		eleq1w 2847	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑦 → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
7	5, 6	sylan9bb 519	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
8	3, 7	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))))
9	8	cbvopabv 5182	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑠, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
10		fveq2 6911	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → (ℎ‘𝑛) = (ℎ‘𝑥))
11	10	cbvmptv 5213	. 2 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ (ℎ‘𝑛)) = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ (ℎ‘𝑥))
12	1, 9, 11	axdc2lem 10556	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3080  Vcvv 3454   ∖ cdif 4048  ∅c0 4281  𝒫 cpw 4560  {csn 4588  {copab 5171   ↦ cmpt 5190  suc csuc 6385  ⟶wf 6557  ‘cfv 6561  ωcom 7904

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5332  ax-pr 5396  ax-un 7778  ax-dc 10554

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5551  df-eprel 5556  df-po 5564  df-so 5565  df-fr 5609  df-we 5611  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-res 5668  df-ima 5669  df-ord 6386  df-on 6387  df-lim 6388  df-suc 6389  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6563  df-fn 6564  df-f 6565  df-fv 6569  df-om 7905  df-1o 8507

This theorem is used by:  axdc3lem4  10561