Theorem axdc2 10455

Description: An apparent strengthening of ax-dc 10452 (but derived from it) which shows that there is a denumerable sequence 𝑔 for any function that maps elements of a set 𝐴 to nonempty subsets of 𝐴 such that 𝑔(𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐹(𝑔(𝑥)) for all 𝑥 ∈ ω. The finitistic version of this can be proven by induction, but the infinite version requires this new axiom. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
axdc2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axdc2	⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔,𝑘   𝑔,𝐹,𝑘

Proof of Theorem axdc2

Dummy variables ℎ 𝑠 𝑡 𝑥 𝑦 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		axdc2.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		eleq1w 2845	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
3	2	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		fveq2 6882	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝐹‘𝑠) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
5	4	eleq2d 2848	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠) ↔ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
6		eleq1w 2845	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑦 → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
7	5, 6	sylan9bb 519	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
8	3, 7	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))))
9	8	cbvopabv 5182	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑠, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
10		fveq2 6882	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → (ℎ‘𝑛) = (ℎ‘𝑥))
11	10	cbvmptv 5213	. 2 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ (ℎ‘𝑛)) = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ (ℎ‘𝑥))
12	1, 9, 11	axdc2lem 10454	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2957  ∀wral 3078  Vcvv 3453   ∖ cdif 3899  ∅c0 4282  𝒫 cpw 4560  {csn 4587  {copab 5171   ↦ cmpt 5190  suc csuc 6363  ⟶wf 6533  ‘cfv 6537  ωcom 7866

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740  ax-dc 10452

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-fv 6545  df-om 7867  df-1o 8459

This theorem is used by:  axdc3lem4  10459