Theorem axdc2 10451

Description: An apparent strengthening of ax-dc 10448 (but derived from it) which shows that there is a denumerable sequence 𝑔 for any function that maps elements of a set 𝐴 to nonempty subsets of 𝐴 such that 𝑔(𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐹(𝑔(𝑥)) for all 𝑥 ∈ ω. The finitistic version of this can be proven by induction, but the infinite version requires this new axiom. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
axdc2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axdc2	⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔,𝑘   𝑔,𝐹,𝑘

Proof of Theorem axdc2

Dummy variables ℎ 𝑠 𝑡 𝑥 𝑦 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		axdc2.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		eleq1w 2849	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
3	2	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		fveq2 6888	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝐹‘𝑠) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
5	4	eleq2d 2852	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠) ↔ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
6		eleq1w 2849	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑦 → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
7	5, 6	sylan9bb 519	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
8	3, 7	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))))
9	8	cbvopabv 5189	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑠, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
10		fveq2 6888	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → (ℎ‘𝑛) = (ℎ‘𝑥))
11	10	cbvmptv 5220	. 2 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ (ℎ‘𝑛)) = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ (ℎ‘𝑥))
12	1, 9, 11	axdc2lem 10450	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2961  ∀wral 3082  Vcvv 3458   ∖ cdif 3905  ∅c0 4289  𝒫 cpw 4567  {csn 4594  {copab 5178   ↦ cmpt 5197  suc csuc 6369  ⟶wf 6539  ‘cfv 6543  ωcom 7871

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745  ax-dc 10448

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-pss 3928  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-tr 5224  df-id 5561  df-eprel 5566  df-po 5574  df-so 5575  df-fr 5619  df-we 5621  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-ord 6370  df-on 6371  df-lim 6372  df-suc 6373  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-fv 6551  df-om 7872  df-1o 8462

This theorem is used by:  axdc3lem4  10455