Theorem axdc2 10451

Description: An apparent strengthening of ax-dc 10448 (but derived from it) which shows that there is a denumerable sequence 𝑔 for any function that maps elements of a set 𝐴 to nonempty subsets of 𝐴 such that 𝑔(𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐹(𝑔(𝑥)) for all 𝑥 ∈ ω. The finitistic version of this can be proven by induction, but the infinite version requires this new axiom. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
axdc2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axdc2	⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔,𝑘   𝑔,𝐹,𝑘

Proof of Theorem axdc2

Dummy variables ℎ 𝑠 𝑡 𝑥 𝑦 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		axdc2.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		eleq1w 2843	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
3	2	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		fveq2 6878	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝐹‘𝑠) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
5	4	eleq2d 2846	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑥 → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠) ↔ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
6		eleq1w 2843	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑦 → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
7	5, 6	sylan9bb 519	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → (𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
8	3, 7	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑠 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))))
9	8	cbvopabv 5178	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑠, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑠))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
10		fveq2 6878	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → (ℎ‘𝑛) = (ℎ‘𝑥))
11	10	cbvmptv 5209	. 2 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ (ℎ‘𝑛)) = (𝑥 ∈ ω ↦ (ℎ‘𝑥))
12	1, 9, 11	axdc2lem 10450	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2955  ∀wral 3076  Vcvv 3450   ∖ cdif 3896  ∅c0 4279  𝒫 cpw 4557  {csn 4584  {copab 5167   ↦ cmpt 5186  suc csuc 6359  ⟶wf 6529  ‘cfv 6533  ωcom 7862

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7736  ax-dc 10448

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-ord 6360  df-on 6361  df-lim 6362  df-suc 6363  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-fv 6541  df-om 7863  df-1o 8455

This theorem is used by:  axdc3lem4  10455