ixxss1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ixxss1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ixxss1 13385

Description: Subset relationship for intervals of extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
ixx.1	⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
ixxss1.2	⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑇𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
ixxss1.3	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴𝑊𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑇𝑤) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ixxss1	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) → (𝐵𝑃𝐶) ⊆ (𝐴𝑂𝐶))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴 𝑤,𝐶,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝑤,𝑂 𝑤,𝐵,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝑤,𝑃 𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧 𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧 𝑥,𝑇,𝑦,𝑧 𝑤,𝑊 Allowed substitution hints: 𝑃(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧) 𝑅(𝑤) 𝑆(𝑤) 𝑇(𝑤) 𝑂(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧) 𝑊(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

**Proof of Theorem ixxss1**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ixxss1.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑇𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
2	1	elixx3g 13380	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐵𝑇𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶)))
3	2	simplbi 501	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) → (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*))
4	3	adantl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*))
5	4	simp3d 1162	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*)
6		simplr 780	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐴𝑊𝐵)
7	2	simprbi 502	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) → (𝐵𝑇𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶))
8	7	adantl 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → (𝐵𝑇𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶))
9	8	simpld 499	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐵𝑇𝑤)
10		simpll 778	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*)
11	4	simp1d 1160	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*)
12		ixxss1.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴𝑊𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑇𝑤) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤))
13	10, 11, 5, 12	syl3anc 1398	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → ((𝐴𝑊𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑇𝑤) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤))
14	6, 9, 13	mp2and 711	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤)
15	8	simprd 500	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝑤𝑆𝐶)
16	4	simp2d 1161	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*)
17		ixx.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
18	17	elixx1 13376	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶)))
19	10, 16, 18	syl2anc 595	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶)))
20	5, 14, 15, 19	mpbir3and 1361	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶))
21	20	ex 417	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) → (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) → 𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶)))
22	21	ssrdv 3943	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) → (𝐵𝑃𝐶) ⊆ (𝐴𝑂𝐶))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 400 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2143 {crab 3416 ⊆ wss 3905 class class class wbr 5109 (class class class)co 7410 ∈ cmpo 7412 ℝ^*cxr 11237

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1825 ax-4 1839 ax-5 1940 ax-6 1997 ax-7 2038 ax-8 2145 ax-9 2153 ax-10 2176 ax-11 2192 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5257 ax-nul 5269 ax-pr 5404 ax-un 7732 ax-cnex 11151 ax-resscn 11152

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1810 df-nf 1814 df-sb 2097 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2838 df-nfc 2912 df-ne 2959 df-ral 3080 df-rex 3090 df-rab 3417 df-v 3457 df-sbc 3745 df-csb 3854 df-dif 3908 df-un 3910 df-in 3912 df-ss 3922 df-nul 4287 df-if 4488 df-pw 4564 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4873 df-iun 4958 df-br 5110 df-opab 5174 df-mpt 5193 df-id 5556 df-xp 5667 df-rel 5668 df-cnv 5669 df-co 5670 df-dm 5671 df-rn 5672 df-res 5673 df-ima 5674 df-iota 6492 df-fun 6538 df-fn 6539 df-f 6540 df-fv 6544 df-ov 7413 df-oprab 7414 df-mpo 7415 df-1st 7982 df-2nd 7983 df-xr 11242

This theorem is referenced by: iooss1 13402 limsupgord 15519 pnfnei 23377 dvfsumrlimge0 26189 dvfsumrlim2 26191 tanord1 26702 rlimcnp 27130 rlimcnp2 27131 dchrisum0lem2a 27681 pntleml 27775 pnt 27778 liminfgord 46468

W3C validator