ixxss1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ixxss1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ixxss1 13079

Description: Subset relationship for intervals of extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
ixx.1	⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
ixxss1.2	⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑇𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
ixxss1.3	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴𝑊𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑇𝑤) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ixxss1	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) → (𝐵𝑃𝐶) ⊆ (𝐴𝑂𝐶))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴 𝑤,𝐶,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝑤,𝑂 𝑤,𝐵,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝑤,𝑃 𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧 𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧 𝑥,𝑇,𝑦,𝑧 𝑤,𝑊 Allowed substitution hints: 𝑃(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧) 𝑅(𝑤) 𝑆(𝑤) 𝑇(𝑤) 𝑂(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧) 𝑊(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

**Proof of Theorem ixxss1**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ixxss1.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑇𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
2	1	elixx3g 13074	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐵𝑇𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶)))
3	2	simplbi 497	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) → (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*))
4	3	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*))
5	4	simp3d 1142	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*)
6		simplr 765	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐴𝑊𝐵)
7	2	simprbi 496	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) → (𝐵𝑇𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶))
8	7	adantl 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → (𝐵𝑇𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶))
9	8	simpld 494	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐵𝑇𝑤)
10		simpll 763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*)
11	4	simp1d 1140	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*)
12		ixxss1.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴𝑊𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑇𝑤) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤))
13	10, 11, 5, 12	syl3anc 1369	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → ((𝐴𝑊𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑇𝑤) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤))
14	6, 9, 13	mp2and 695	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤)
15	8	simprd 495	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝑤𝑆𝐶)
16	4	simp2d 1141	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*)
17		ixx.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
18	17	elixx1 13070	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶)))
19	10, 16, 18	syl2anc 583	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶)))
20	5, 14, 15, 19	mpbir3and 1340	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶))
21	20	ex 412	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) → (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) → 𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶)))
22	21	ssrdv 3931	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) → (𝐵𝑃𝐶) ⊆ (𝐴𝑂𝐶))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 ∧ w3a 1085 = wceq 1541 ∈ wcel 2109 {crab 3069 ⊆ wss 3891 class class class wbr 5078 (class class class)co 7268 ∈ cmpo 7270 ℝ^*cxr 10992

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1801 ax-4 1815 ax-5 1916 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2014 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-10 2140 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2174 ax-ext 2710 ax-sep 5226 ax-nul 5233 ax-pr 5355 ax-un 7579 ax-cnex 10911 ax-resscn 10912

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1786 df-nf 1790 df-sb 2071 df-mo 2541 df-eu 2570 df-clab 2717 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2817 df-nfc 2890 df-ne 2945 df-ral 3070 df-rex 3071 df-rab 3074 df-v 3432 df-sbc 3720 df-csb 3837 df-dif 3894 df-un 3896 df-in 3898 df-ss 3908 df-nul 4262 df-if 4465 df-pw 4540 df-sn 4567 df-pr 4569 df-op 4573 df-uni 4845 df-iun 4931 df-br 5079 df-opab 5141 df-mpt 5162 df-id 5488 df-xp 5594 df-rel 5595 df-cnv 5596 df-co 5597 df-dm 5598 df-rn 5599 df-res 5600 df-ima 5601 df-iota 6388 df-fun 6432 df-fn 6433 df-f 6434 df-fv 6438 df-ov 7271 df-oprab 7272 df-mpo 7273 df-1st 7817 df-2nd 7818 df-xr 10997

This theorem is referenced by: iooss1 13096 limsupgord 15162 pnfnei 22352 dvfsumrlimge0 25175 dvfsumrlim2 25177 tanord1 25674 rlimcnp 26096 rlimcnp2 26097 dchrisum0lem2a 26646 pntleml 26740 pnt 26743 liminfgord 43249

W3C validator