Theorem mireq 29017

Description: Equality deduction for point inversion. Theorem 7.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 50. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mirval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
mirval.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
mirval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
mirval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
mirval.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)
mirval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
mirval.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
mirfv.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)
mirmir.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
mireq.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
mireq.d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (𝑀‘𝐶))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mireq	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem mireq

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mirval.p	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		mirval.d	. . 3 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		mirval.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4		mirval.l	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
5		mirval.s	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)
6		mirval.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
7		mirval.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
8		mirfv.m	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)
9		mireq.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
10	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	mircl 29013	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃)
11		mirmir.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11	mirfv 29008	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))))
13		mireq.d	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (𝑀‘𝐶))
14	12, 13	eqtr3d 2797	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶))
15	1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 7	mirreu3 29006	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵)))
16		oveq2 7422	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)))
17	16	eqeq1d 2762	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵)))
18		oveq1 7421	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝑧𝐼𝐵) = ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))
19	18	eleq2d 2846	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)))
20	17, 19	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵)) ↔ ((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))))
21	20	riota2 7396	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑀‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) → (((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)) ↔ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶)))
22	10, 15, 21	syl2anc 596	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)) ↔ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶)))
23	14, 22	mpbird 260	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)))
24	23	simpld 500	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
25	24	eqcomd 2766	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)))
26	23	simprd 501	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))
27	1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 7, 11, 26	tgbtwncom 28831	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼(𝑀‘𝐶)))
28	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 25, 27	ismir 29011	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐶)))
29	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	mirmir 29014	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = 𝐶)
30	28, 29	eqtrd 2795	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃!wreu 3363  ‘cfv 6533  ℩crio 7370  (class class class)co 7414  Basecbs 17302  distcds 17352  TarskiGcstrkg 28769  Itvcitv 28775  LineGclng 28776  pInvGcmir 29004

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-riota 7371  df-ov 7417  df-trkgc 28790  df-trkgb 28791  df-trkgcb 28792  df-trkg 28795  df-mir 29005

This theorem is used by:  mirhl  29031  mirbtwnhl  29032  colperpexlem3  29088  prlngmid2  29319