Theorem mireq 28942

Description: Equality deduction for point inversion. Theorem 7.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 50. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mirval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
mirval.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
mirval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
mirval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
mirval.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)
mirval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
mirval.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
mirfv.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)
mirmir.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
mireq.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
mireq.d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (𝑀‘𝐶))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mireq	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem mireq

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mirval.p	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		mirval.d	. . 3 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		mirval.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4		mirval.l	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
5		mirval.s	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)
6		mirval.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
7		mirval.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
8		mirfv.m	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)
9		mireq.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
10	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	mircl 28938	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃)
11		mirmir.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11	mirfv 28933	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))))
13		mireq.d	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (𝑀‘𝐶))
14	12, 13	eqtr3d 2800	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶))
15	1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 7	mirreu3 28931	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵)))
16		oveq2 7418	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)))
17	16	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵)))
18		oveq1 7417	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝑧𝐼𝐵) = ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))
19	18	eleq2d 2849	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)))
20	17, 19	anbi12d 643	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵)) ↔ ((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))))
21	20	riota2 7392	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑀‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) → (((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)) ↔ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶)))
22	10, 15, 21	syl2anc 595	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)) ↔ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶)))
23	14, 22	mpbird 260	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)))
24	23	simpld 499	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
25	24	eqcomd 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)))
26	23	simprd 500	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))
27	1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 7, 11, 26	tgbtwncom 28757	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼(𝑀‘𝐶)))
28	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 25, 27	ismir 28936	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐶)))
29	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	mirmir 28939	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = 𝐶)
30	28, 29	eqtrd 2798	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ∃!wreu 3367  ‘cfv 6536  ℩crio 7366  (class class class)co 7410  Basecbs 17264  distcds 17314  TarskiGcstrkg 28696  Itvcitv 28702  LineGclng 28703  pInvGcmir 28929

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-riota 7367  df-ov 7413  df-trkgc 28717  df-trkgb 28718  df-trkgcb 28719  df-trkg 28722  df-mir 28930

This theorem is referenced by:  mirhl  28956  mirbtwnhl  28957  colperpexlem3  29013  prlngmid2  29211