Theorem mireq 28340

Description: Equality deduction for point inversion. Theorem 7.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 50. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mirval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
mirval.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
mirval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
mirval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
mirval.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)
mirval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
mirval.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
mirfv.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)
mirmir.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
mireq.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
mireq.d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (𝑀‘𝐶))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mireq	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem mireq

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mirval.p	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		mirval.d	. . 3 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		mirval.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4		mirval.l	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
5		mirval.s	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)
6		mirval.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
7		mirval.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
8		mirfv.m	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)
9		mireq.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
10	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	mircl 28336	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃)
11		mirmir.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11	mirfv 28331	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))))
13		mireq.d	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (𝑀‘𝐶))
14	12, 13	eqtr3d 2766	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶))
15	1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 7	mirreu3 28329	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵)))
16		oveq2 7409	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)))
17	16	eqeq1d 2726	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵)))
18		oveq1 7408	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝑧𝐼𝐵) = ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))
19	18	eleq2d 2811	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)))
20	17, 19	anbi12d 630	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵)) ↔ ((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))))
21	20	riota2 7383	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑀‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) → (((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)) ↔ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶)))
22	10, 15, 21	syl2anc 583	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)) ↔ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶)))
23	14, 22	mpbird 257	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)))
24	23	simpld 494	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
25	24	eqcomd 2730	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)))
26	23	simprd 495	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))
27	1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 7, 11, 26	tgbtwncom 28163	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼(𝑀‘𝐶)))
28	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 25, 27	ismir 28334	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐶)))
29	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	mirmir 28337	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = 𝐶)
30	28, 29	eqtrd 2764	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  ∃!wreu 3366  ‘cfv 6533  ℩crio 7356  (class class class)co 7401  Basecbs 17140  distcds 17202  TarskiGcstrkg 28102  Itvcitv 28108  LineGclng 28109  pInvGcmir 28327

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2695  ax-rep 5275  ax-sep 5289  ax-nul 5296  ax-pr 5417

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2526  df-eu 2555  df-clab 2702  df-cleq 2716  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3368  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3425  df-v 3468  df-sbc 3770  df-csb 3886  df-dif 3943  df-un 3945  df-in 3947  df-ss 3957  df-nul 4315  df-if 4521  df-pw 4596  df-sn 4621  df-pr 4623  df-op 4627  df-uni 4900  df-iun 4989  df-br 5139  df-opab 5201  df-mpt 5222  df-id 5564  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6485  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-riota 7357  df-ov 7404  df-trkgc 28123  df-trkgb 28124  df-trkgcb 28125  df-trkg 28128  df-mir 28328

This theorem is referenced by:  mirhl  28354  mirbtwnhl  28355  colperpexlem3  28407