Theorem mireq 28903

Description: Equality deduction for point inversion. Theorem 7.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 50. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mirval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
mirval.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
mirval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
mirval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
mirval.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)
mirval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
mirval.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
mirfv.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)
mirmir.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
mireq.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
mireq.d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (𝑀‘𝐶))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mireq	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem mireq

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mirval.p	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		mirval.d	. . 3 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		mirval.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4		mirval.l	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
5		mirval.s	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)
6		mirval.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
7		mirval.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
8		mirfv.m	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)
9		mireq.c	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
10	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	mircl 28899	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃)
11		mirmir.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11	mirfv 28894	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))))
13		mireq.d	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = (𝑀‘𝐶))
14	12, 13	eqtr3d 2806	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶))
15	1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 7	mirreu3 28892	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵)))
16		oveq2 7419	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)))
17	16	eqeq1d 2771	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵)))
18		oveq1 7418	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝑧𝐼𝐵) = ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))
19	18	eleq2d 2855	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)))
20	17, 19	anbi12d 643	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑀‘𝐶) → (((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵)) ↔ ((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))))
21	20	riota2 7393	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑀‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) → (((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)) ↔ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶)))
22	10, 15, 21	syl2anc 595	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)) ↔ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝐵))) = (𝑀‘𝐶)))
23	14, 22	mpbird 260	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵)))
24	23	simpld 499	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
25	24	eqcomd 2775	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐴 − (𝑀‘𝐶)))
26	23	simprd 500	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑀‘𝐶)𝐼𝐵))
27	1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 7, 11, 26	tgbtwncom 28722	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼(𝑀‘𝐶)))
28	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 25, 27	ismir 28897	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐶)))
29	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	mirmir 28900	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = 𝐶)
30	28, 29	eqtrd 2804	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  ∃!wreu 3374  ‘cfv 6537  ℩crio 7367  (class class class)co 7411  Basecbs 17268  distcds 17318  TarskiGcstrkg 28661  Itvcitv 28667  LineGclng 28668  pInvGcmir 28890

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 5242  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5405

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4877  df-iun 4962  df-br 5114  df-opab 5178  df-mpt 5197  df-id 5557  df-xp 5668  df-rel 5669  df-cnv 5670  df-co 5671  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674  df-ima 5675  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7368  df-ov 7414  df-trkgc 28682  df-trkgb 28683  df-trkgcb 28684  df-trkg 28687  df-mir 28891

This theorem is referenced by:  mirhl  28917  mirbtwnhl  28918  colperpexlem3  28971