Theorem relcic 49077

Description: The set of isomorphic objects is a relation. Simplifies cicer 17708 (see cicerALT 49078). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 27-Oct-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
relcic	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶))

Proof of Theorem relcic

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopab 5759	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)}
2	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)})
3		fveq2 6817	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) = ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
4	3	neeq1d 2987	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅))
5	4	rabxp 5659	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)}
6	5	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)})
7	6	releqd 5714	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Rel {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅} ↔ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)}))
8	2, 7	mpbird 257	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅})
9		isofn 17677	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Iso‘𝐶) Fn ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)))
10		fvex 6830	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘𝐶) ∈ V
11		sqxpexg 7683	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Base‘𝐶) ∈ V → ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∈ V)
12	10, 11	mp1i 13	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∈ V)
13		0ex 5240	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
14	13	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ∈ V)
15		suppvalfn 8093	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Iso‘𝐶) Fn ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∧ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V) → ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅) = {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅})
16	9, 12, 14, 15	syl3anc 1373	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅) = {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅})
17	16	releqd 5714	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Rel ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅) ↔ Rel {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅}))
18	8, 17	mpbird 257	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅))
19		cicfval 17699	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶) = ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅))
20	19	releqd 5714	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Rel ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶) ↔ Rel ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅)))
21	18, 20	mpbird 257	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2928  {crab 3395  Vcvv 3436  ∅c0 4278  ⟨cop 4577  {copab 5148   × cxp 5609  Rel wrel 5616   Fn wfn 6471  ‘cfv 6476  (class class class)co 7341   supp csupp 8085  Basecbs 17115  Catccat 17565  Isociso 17648   ≃_𝑐 ccic 17697

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-rep 5212  ax-sep 5229  ax-nul 5239  ax-pow 5298  ax-pr 5365  ax-un 7663

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-reu 3347  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3737  df-csb 3846  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4279  df-if 4471  df-pw 4547  df-sn 4572  df-pr 4574  df-op 4578  df-uni 4855  df-iun 4938  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-id 5506  df-xp 5617  df-rel 5618  df-cnv 5619  df-co 5620  df-dm 5621  df-rn 5622  df-res 5623  df-ima 5624  df-iota 6432  df-fun 6478  df-fn 6479  df-f 6480  df-f1 6481  df-fo 6482  df-f1o 6483  df-fv 6484  df-ov 7344  df-oprab 7345  df-mpo 7346  df-1st 7916  df-2nd 7917  df-supp 8086  df-inv 17650  df-iso 17651  df-cic 17698

This theorem is referenced by:  cicerALT  49078  cic1st2nd  49079