Theorem relcic 49532

Description: The set of isomorphic objects is a relation. Simplifies cicer 17764 (see cicerALT 49533). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 27-Oct-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
relcic	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶))

Proof of Theorem relcic

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopab 5773	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)}
2	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)})
3		fveq2 6834	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) = ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
4	3	neeq1d 2992	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅))
5	4	rabxp 5672	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)}
6	5	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)})
7	6	releqd 5728	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Rel {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅} ↔ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)}))
8	2, 7	mpbird 257	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅})
9		isofn 17733	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Iso‘𝐶) Fn ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)))
10		fvex 6847	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘𝐶) ∈ V
11		sqxpexg 7702	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Base‘𝐶) ∈ V → ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∈ V)
12	10, 11	mp1i 13	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∈ V)
13		0ex 5242	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
14	13	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ∈ V)
15		suppvalfn 8111	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Iso‘𝐶) Fn ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∧ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V) → ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅) = {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅})
16	9, 12, 14, 15	syl3anc 1374	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅) = {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅})
17	16	releqd 5728	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Rel ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅) ↔ Rel {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅}))
18	8, 17	mpbird 257	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅))
19		cicfval 17755	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶) = ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅))
20	19	releqd 5728	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Rel ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶) ↔ Rel ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅)))
21	18, 20	mpbird 257	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 2933  {crab 3390  Vcvv 3430  ∅c0 4274  ⟨cop 4574  {copab 5148   × cxp 5622  Rel wrel 5629   Fn wfn 6487  ‘cfv 6492  (class class class)co 7360   supp csupp 8103  Basecbs 17170  Catccat 17621  Isociso 17704   ≃_𝑐 ccic 17753

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5212  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pow 5302  ax-pr 5370  ax-un 7682

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-sbc 3730  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-pw 4544  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-op 4575  df-uni 4852  df-iun 4936  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-id 5519  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-ov 7363  df-oprab 7364  df-mpo 7365  df-1st 7935  df-2nd 7936  df-supp 8104  df-inv 17706  df-iso 17707  df-cic 17754

This theorem is referenced by:  cicerALT  49533  cic1st2nd  49534