Theorem relcic 49823

Description: The set of isomorphic objects is a relation. Simplifies cicer 17858 (see cicerALT 49824). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 27-Oct-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
relcic	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶))

Proof of Theorem relcic

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopab 5811	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)}
2	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)})
3		fveq2 6881	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) = ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
4	3	neeq1d 3017	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅))
5	4	rabxp 5709	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)}
6	5	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)})
7	6	releqd 5765	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Rel {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅} ↔ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ≠ ∅)}))
8	2, 7	mpbird 260	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅})
9		isofn 17827	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Iso‘𝐶) Fn ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)))
10		fvex 6894	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘𝐶) ∈ V
11		sqxpexg 7750	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Base‘𝐶) ∈ V → ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∈ V)
12	10, 11	mp1i 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∈ V)
13		0ex 5270	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
14	13	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ∅ ∈ V)
15		suppvalfn 8160	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Iso‘𝐶) Fn ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∧ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V) → ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅) = {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅})
16	9, 12, 14, 15	syl3anc 1398	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅) = {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅})
17	16	releqd 5765	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Rel ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅) ↔ Rel {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝐶) × (Base‘𝐶)) ∣ ((Iso‘𝐶)‘𝑓) ≠ ∅}))
18	8, 17	mpbird 260	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅))
19		cicfval 17849	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶) = ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅))
20	19	releqd 5765	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Rel ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶) ↔ Rel ((Iso‘𝐶) supp ∅)))
21	18, 20	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → Rel ( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143   ≠ wne 2958  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3455  ∅c0 4286  ⟨cop 4595  {copab 5173   × cxp 5659  Rel wrel 5666   Fn wfn 6531  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410   supp csupp 8152  Basecbs 17264  Catccat 17715  Isociso 17798   ≃_𝑐 ccic 17847

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-supp 8153  df-inv 17800  df-iso 17801  df-cic 17848

This theorem is referenced by:  cicerALT  49824  cic1st2nd  49825