Theorem rngonegrmul 37115

Description: Negation of a product in a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ringnegmul.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
ringnegmul.2	⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅)
ringnegmul.3	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
ringnegmul.4	⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rngonegrmul	⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐻(𝑁‘𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem rngonegrmul

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ringnegmul.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
2		ringnegmul.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
3	2	rneqi 5935	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran (1st ‘𝑅)
4	1, 3	eqtri 2758	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran (1st ‘𝑅)
5		ringnegmul.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅)
6		eqid 2730	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GId‘𝐻) = (GId‘𝐻)
7	4, 5, 6	rngo1cl 37110	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (GId‘𝐻) ∈ 𝑋)
8		ringnegmul.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺)
9	2, 1, 8	rngonegcl 37098	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋)
10	7, 9	mpdan 683	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋)
11	2, 5, 1	rngoass 37077	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))
12	11	3exp2 1352	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))))))
13	12	com24 95	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → ((𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))))))
14	13	com34 91	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → ((𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))))))
15	10, 14	mpd 15	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))))
16	15	3imp 1109	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))
17	2, 5, 1	rngocl 37072	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
18	17	3expb 1118	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
19	2, 5, 1, 8, 6	rngonegmn1r 37113	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
20	18, 19	syldan 589	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
21	20	3impb 1113	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
22	2, 5, 1, 8, 6	rngonegmn1r 37113	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘𝐵) = (𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
23	22	3adant2 1129	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘𝐵) = (𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
24	23	oveq2d 7427	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐻(𝑁‘𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))
25	16, 21, 24	3eqtr4d 2780	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐻(𝑁‘𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 394   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2104  ran crn 5676  ‘cfv 6542  (class class class)co 7411  1^st c1st 7975  2^nd c2nd 7976  GIdcgi 30010  invcgn 30011  RingOpscrngo 37065

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-11 2152  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5284  ax-sep 5298  ax-nul 5305  ax-pr 5426  ax-un 7727

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2532  df-eu 2561  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2808  df-nfc 2883  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rmo 3374  df-reu 3375  df-rab 3431  df-v 3474  df-sbc 3777  df-csb 3893  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-uni 4908  df-iun 4998  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-mpt 5231  df-id 5573  df-xp 5681  df-rel 5682  df-cnv 5683  df-co 5684  df-dm 5685  df-rn 5686  df-res 5687  df-ima 5688  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6544  df-fn 6545  df-f 6546  df-f1 6547  df-fo 6548  df-f1o 6549  df-fv 6550  df-riota 7367  df-ov 7414  df-1st 7977  df-2nd 7978  df-grpo 30013  df-gid 30014  df-ginv 30015  df-ablo 30065  df-ass 37014  df-exid 37016  df-mgmOLD 37020  df-sgrOLD 37032  df-mndo 37038  df-rngo 37066

This theorem is referenced by:  rngosubdi  37116