Theorem rngonegrmul 38478

Description: Negation of a product in a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ringnegmul.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
ringnegmul.2	⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅)
ringnegmul.3	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
ringnegmul.4	⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rngonegrmul	⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐻(𝑁‘𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem rngonegrmul

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ringnegmul.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
2		ringnegmul.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
3	2	rneqi 5925	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran (1st ‘𝑅)
4	1, 3	eqtri 2792	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran (1st ‘𝑅)
5		ringnegmul.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅)
6		eqid 2769	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GId‘𝐻) = (GId‘𝐻)
7	4, 5, 6	rngo1cl 38473	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (GId‘𝐻) ∈ 𝑋)
8		ringnegmul.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺)
9	2, 1, 8	rngonegcl 38461	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋)
10	7, 9	mpdan 699	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋)
11	2, 5, 1	rngoass 38440	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))
12	11	3exp2 1371	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))))))
13	12	com24 96	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → ((𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))))))
14	13	com34 92	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → ((𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))))))
15	10, 14	mpd 16	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))))
16	15	3imp 1126	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))
17	2, 5, 1	rngocl 38435	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
18	17	3expb 1136	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
19	2, 5, 1, 8, 6	rngonegmn1r 38476	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
20	18, 19	syldan 602	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
21	20	3impb 1130	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
22	2, 5, 1, 8, 6	rngonegmn1r 38476	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘𝐵) = (𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
23	22	3adant2 1147	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘𝐵) = (𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
24	23	oveq2d 7424	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐻(𝑁‘𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))
25	16, 21, 24	3eqtr4d 2814	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐻(𝑁‘𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  ran crn 5660  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7408  1^st c1st 7980  2^nd c2nd 7981  GIdcgi 30779  invcgn 30780  RingOpscrngo 38428

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 5239  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5268  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7730

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-riota 7365  df-ov 7411  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-grpo 30782  df-gid 30783  df-ginv 30784  df-ablo 30834  df-ass 38377  df-exid 38379  df-mgmOLD 38383  df-sgrOLD 38395  df-mndo 38401  df-rngo 38429

This theorem is referenced by:  rngosubdi  38479