Theorem axdc3 10477

Description: Dependent Choice. Axiom DC1 of [Schechter] p. 149, with the addition of an initial value 𝐶. This theorem is weaker than the Axiom of Choice but is stronger than Countable Choice. It shows the existence of a sequence whose values can only be shown to exist (but cannot be constructed explicitly) and also depend on earlier values in the sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Jan-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
axdc3.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axdc3	⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑔‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔,𝑘   𝐶,𝑔,𝑘   𝑔,𝐹,𝑘

Proof of Theorem axdc3

Dummy variables 𝑛 𝑠 𝑡 𝑥 𝑦 𝑗 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		axdc3.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		feq1 6703	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ↔ 𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴))
3		fveq1 6896	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡‘∅) = (𝑠‘∅))
4	3	eqeq1d 2730	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → ((𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶))
5		fveq1 6896	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) = (𝑠‘suc 𝑗))
6		fveq1 6896	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡‘𝑗) = (𝑠‘𝑗))
7	6	fveq2d 6901	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) = (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)))
8	5, 7	eleq12d 2823	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → ((𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) ↔ (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗))))
9	8	ralbidv 3174	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗))))
10		suceq 6435	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → suc 𝑗 = suc 𝑘)
11	10	fveq2d 6901	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) = (𝑠‘suc 𝑘))
12		2fveq3 6902	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)) = (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))
13	11, 12	eleq12d 2823	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → ((𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)) ↔ (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘))))
14	13	cbvralvw 3231	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))
15	9, 14	bitrdi 287	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘))))
16	2, 4, 15	3anbi123d 1433	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → ((𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗))) ↔ (𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))))
17	16	rexbidv 3175	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗))) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))))
18	17	cbvabv 2801	. 2 ⊢ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} = {𝑠 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))}
19		eqid 2728	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ↦ {𝑦 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ∣ (dom 𝑦 = suc dom 𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ↾ dom 𝑥) = 𝑥)}) = (𝑥 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ↦ {𝑦 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ∣ (dom 𝑦 = suc dom 𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ↾ dom 𝑥) = 𝑥)})
20	1, 18, 19	axdc3lem4 10476	1 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑔‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1534  ∃wex 1774   ∈ wcel 2099  {cab 2705  ∀wral 3058  ∃wrex 3067  {crab 3429  Vcvv 3471   ∖ cdif 3944  ∅c0 4323  𝒫 cpw 4603  {csn 4629   ↦ cmpt 5231  dom cdm 5678   ↾ cres 5680  suc csuc 6371  ⟶wf 6544  ‘cfv 6548  ωcom 7870

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2699  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pow 5365  ax-pr 5429  ax-un 7740  ax-dc 10469

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3or 1086  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-mo 2530  df-eu 2559  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-reu 3374  df-rab 3430  df-v 3473  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-pss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-pw 4605  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4909  df-iun 4998  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-tr 5266  df-id 5576  df-eprel 5582  df-po 5590  df-so 5591  df-fr 5633  df-we 5635  df-xp 5684  df-rel 5685  df-cnv 5686  df-co 5687  df-dm 5688  df-rn 5689  df-res 5690  df-ima 5691  df-ord 6372  df-on 6373  df-lim 6374  df-suc 6375  df-iota 6500  df-fun 6550  df-fn 6551  df-f 6552  df-f1 6553  df-fo 6554  df-f1o 6555  df-fv 6556  df-om 7871  df-1o 8486

This theorem is referenced by:  axdc4lem  10478