Theorem axdc3 10491

Description: Dependent Choice. Axiom DC1 of [Schechter] p. 149, with the addition of an initial value 𝐶. This theorem is weaker than the Axiom of Choice but is stronger than Countable Choice. It shows the existence of a sequence whose values can only be shown to exist (but cannot be constructed explicitly) and also depend on earlier values in the sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Jan-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
axdc3.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axdc3	⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑔‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔,𝑘   𝐶,𝑔,𝑘   𝑔,𝐹,𝑘

Proof of Theorem axdc3

Dummy variables 𝑛 𝑠 𝑡 𝑥 𝑦 𝑗 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		axdc3.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		feq1 6716	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ↔ 𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴))
3		fveq1 6905	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡‘∅) = (𝑠‘∅))
4	3	eqeq1d 2736	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → ((𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶))
5		fveq1 6905	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) = (𝑠‘suc 𝑗))
6		fveq1 6905	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡‘𝑗) = (𝑠‘𝑗))
7	6	fveq2d 6910	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) = (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)))
8	5, 7	eleq12d 2832	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → ((𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) ↔ (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗))))
9	8	ralbidv 3175	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗))))
10		suceq 6451	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → suc 𝑗 = suc 𝑘)
11	10	fveq2d 6910	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) = (𝑠‘suc 𝑘))
12		2fveq3 6911	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)) = (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))
13	11, 12	eleq12d 2832	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → ((𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)) ↔ (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘))))
14	13	cbvralvw 3234	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))
15	9, 14	bitrdi 287	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘))))
16	2, 4, 15	3anbi123d 1435	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → ((𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗))) ↔ (𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))))
17	16	rexbidv 3176	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗))) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))))
18	17	cbvabv 2809	. 2 ⊢ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} = {𝑠 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))}
19		eqid 2734	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ↦ {𝑦 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ∣ (dom 𝑦 = suc dom 𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ↾ dom 𝑥) = 𝑥)}) = (𝑥 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ↦ {𝑦 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ∣ (dom 𝑦 = suc dom 𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ↾ dom 𝑥) = 𝑥)})
20	1, 18, 19	axdc3lem4 10490	1 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑔‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1536  ∃wex 1775   ∈ wcel 2105  {cab 2711  ∀wral 3058  ∃wrex 3067  {crab 3432  Vcvv 3477   ∖ cdif 3959  ∅c0 4338  𝒫 cpw 4604  {csn 4630   ↦ cmpt 5230  dom cdm 5688   ↾ cres 5690  suc csuc 6387  ⟶wf 6558  ‘cfv 6562  ωcom 7886

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1791  ax-4 1805  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2174  ax-ext 2705  ax-sep 5301  ax-nul 5311  ax-pow 5370  ax-pr 5437  ax-un 7753  ax-dc 10483

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1539  df-fal 1549  df-ex 1776  df-nf 1780  df-sb 2062  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2566  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-reu 3378  df-rab 3433  df-v 3479  df-dif 3965  df-un 3967  df-in 3969  df-ss 3979  df-pss 3982  df-nul 4339  df-if 4531  df-pw 4606  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-uni 4912  df-iun 4997  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-mpt 5231  df-tr 5265  df-id 5582  df-eprel 5588  df-po 5596  df-so 5597  df-fr 5640  df-we 5642  df-xp 5694  df-rel 5695  df-cnv 5696  df-co 5697  df-dm 5698  df-rn 5699  df-res 5700  df-ima 5701  df-ord 6388  df-on 6389  df-lim 6390  df-suc 6391  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6564  df-fn 6565  df-f 6566  df-f1 6567  df-fo 6568  df-f1o 6569  df-fv 6570  df-om 7887  df-1o 8504

This theorem is referenced by:  axdc4lem  10492