Theorem fthpropd 17939

Description: If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same faithful functors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fullpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵))
fullpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵))
fullpropd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))
fullpropd.4	⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))
fullpropd.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
fullpropd.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)
fullpropd.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)
fullpropd.d	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fthpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Faith 𝐶) = (𝐵 Faith 𝐷))

Proof of Theorem fthpropd

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relfth 17927	. 2 ⊢ Rel (𝐴 Faith 𝐶)
2		relfth 17927	. 2 ⊢ Rel (𝐵 Faith 𝐷)
3		fullpropd.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵))
4		fullpropd.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵))
5		fullpropd.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))
6		fullpropd.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))
7		fullpropd.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
8		fullpropd.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)
9		fullpropd.c	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)
10		fullpropd.d	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)
11	3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10	funcpropd 17918	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Func 𝐶) = (𝐵 Func 𝐷))
12	11	breqd 5110	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝑔 ↔ 𝑓(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝑔))
13	3	homfeqbas 17711	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐴) = (Base‘𝐵))
14	13	raleqdv 3319	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)))
15	13, 14	raleqbidv 3335	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)))
16	12, 15	anbi12d 641	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑓(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)) ↔ (𝑓(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦))))
17		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐴) = (Base‘𝐴)
18	17	isfth 17932	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓(𝐴 Faith 𝐶)𝑔 ↔ (𝑓(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)))
19		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐵) = (Base‘𝐵)
20	19	isfth 17932	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓(𝐵 Faith 𝐷)𝑔 ↔ (𝑓(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)))
21	16, 18, 20	3bitr4g 316	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓(𝐴 Faith 𝐶)𝑔 ↔ 𝑓(𝐵 Faith 𝐷)𝑔))
22	1, 2, 21	eqbrrdiv 5764	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Faith 𝐶) = (𝐵 Faith 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1559   ∈ wcel 2141  ∀wral 3075   class class class wbr 5099  ^◡ccnv 5644  Fun wfun 6511  ‘cfv 6517  (class class class)co 7392  Basecbs 17228  Hom_f chomf 17681  comp_fccomf 17682   Func cfunc 17870   Faith cfth 17921

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5226  ax-sep 5245  ax-nul 5255  ax-pow 5321  ax-pr 5389  ax-un 7714

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-nf 1803  df-sb 2090  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rex 3086  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-uni 4865  df-iun 4950  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-mpt 5181  df-id 5540  df-xp 5651  df-rel 5652  df-cnv 5653  df-co 5654  df-dm 5655  df-rn 5656  df-res 5657  df-ima 5658  df-iota 6473  df-fun 6519  df-fn 6520  df-f 6521  df-f1 6522  df-fo 6523  df-f1o 6524  df-fv 6525  df-riota 7349  df-ov 7395  df-oprab 7396  df-mpo 7397  df-1st 7966  df-2nd 7967  df-map 8805  df-ixp 8876  df-cat 17683  df-cid 17684  df-homf 17685  df-comf 17686  df-func 17874  df-fth 17923

This theorem is referenced by: (None)