Theorem fthpropd 17917

Description: If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same faithful functors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fullpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵))
fullpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵))
fullpropd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))
fullpropd.4	⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))
fullpropd.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
fullpropd.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)
fullpropd.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)
fullpropd.d	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fthpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Faith 𝐶) = (𝐵 Faith 𝐷))

Proof of Theorem fthpropd

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relfth 17905	. 2 ⊢ Rel (𝐴 Faith 𝐶)
2		relfth 17905	. 2 ⊢ Rel (𝐵 Faith 𝐷)
3		fullpropd.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵))
4		fullpropd.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵))
5		fullpropd.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))
6		fullpropd.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))
7		fullpropd.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
8		fullpropd.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)
9		fullpropd.c	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)
10		fullpropd.d	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)
11	3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10	funcpropd 17896	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Func 𝐶) = (𝐵 Func 𝐷))
12	11	breqd 5163	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝑔 ↔ 𝑓(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝑔))
13	3	homfeqbas 17683	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐴) = (Base‘𝐵))
14	13	raleqdv 3323	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)))
15	13, 14	raleqbidv 3340	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)))
16	12, 15	anbi12d 630	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑓(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)) ↔ (𝑓(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦))))
17		eqid 2728	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐴) = (Base‘𝐴)
18	17	isfth 17910	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓(𝐴 Faith 𝐶)𝑔 ↔ (𝑓(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)))
19		eqid 2728	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐵) = (Base‘𝐵)
20	19	isfth 17910	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓(𝐵 Faith 𝐷)𝑔 ↔ (𝑓(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)))
21	16, 18, 20	3bitr4g 313	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓(𝐴 Faith 𝐶)𝑔 ↔ 𝑓(𝐵 Faith 𝐷)𝑔))
22	1, 2, 21	eqbrrdiv 5800	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Faith 𝐶) = (𝐵 Faith 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  ∀wral 3058   class class class wbr 5152  ^◡ccnv 5681  Fun wfun 6547  ‘cfv 6553  (class class class)co 7426  Basecbs 17187  Hom_f chomf 17653  comp_fccomf 17654   Func cfunc 17847   Faith cfth 17899

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2699  ax-rep 5289  ax-sep 5303  ax-nul 5310  ax-pow 5369  ax-pr 5433  ax-un 7746

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2529  df-eu 2558  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-reu 3375  df-rab 3431  df-v 3475  df-sbc 3779  df-csb 3895  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4327  df-if 4533  df-pw 4608  df-sn 4633  df-pr 4635  df-op 4639  df-uni 4913  df-iun 5002  df-br 5153  df-opab 5215  df-mpt 5236  df-id 5580  df-xp 5688  df-rel 5689  df-cnv 5690  df-co 5691  df-dm 5692  df-rn 5693  df-res 5694  df-ima 5695  df-iota 6505  df-fun 6555  df-fn 6556  df-f 6557  df-f1 6558  df-fo 6559  df-f1o 6560  df-fv 6561  df-riota 7382  df-ov 7429  df-oprab 7430  df-mpo 7431  df-1st 7999  df-2nd 8000  df-map 8853  df-ixp 8923  df-cat 17655  df-cid 17656  df-homf 17657  df-comf 17658  df-func 17851  df-fth 17901

This theorem is referenced by: (None)