![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > fthpropd | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same faithful functors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Jan-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
fullpropd.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵)) |
fullpropd.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵)) |
fullpropd.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) |
fullpropd.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) |
fullpropd.a | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) |
fullpropd.b | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) |
fullpropd.c | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) |
fullpropd.d | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
fthpropd | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Faith 𝐶) = (𝐵 Faith 𝐷)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | relfth 17856 | . 2 ⊢ Rel (𝐴 Faith 𝐶) | |
2 | relfth 17856 | . 2 ⊢ Rel (𝐵 Faith 𝐷) | |
3 | fullpropd.1 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵)) | |
4 | fullpropd.2 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵)) | |
5 | fullpropd.3 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) | |
6 | fullpropd.4 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) | |
7 | fullpropd.a | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) | |
8 | fullpropd.b | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) | |
9 | fullpropd.c | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) | |
10 | fullpropd.d | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) | |
11 | 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 | funcpropd 17847 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Func 𝐶) = (𝐵 Func 𝐷)) |
12 | 11 | breqd 5158 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝑔 ↔ 𝑓(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝑔)) |
13 | 3 | homfeqbas 17636 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐴) = (Base‘𝐵)) |
14 | 13 | raleqdv 3326 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦))) |
15 | 13, 14 | raleqbidv 3343 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦))) |
16 | 12, 15 | anbi12d 632 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑓(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)) ↔ (𝑓(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦)))) |
17 | eqid 2733 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐴) = (Base‘𝐴) | |
18 | 17 | isfth 17861 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑓(𝐴 Faith 𝐶)𝑔 ↔ (𝑓(𝐴 Func 𝐶)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦))) |
19 | eqid 2733 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝐵) = (Base‘𝐵) | |
20 | 19 | isfth 17861 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑓(𝐵 Faith 𝐷)𝑔 ↔ (𝑓(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐵)Fun ◡(𝑥𝑔𝑦))) |
21 | 16, 18, 20 | 3bitr4g 314 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓(𝐴 Faith 𝐶)𝑔 ↔ 𝑓(𝐵 Faith 𝐷)𝑔)) |
22 | 1, 2, 21 | eqbrrdiv 5792 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Faith 𝐶) = (𝐵 Faith 𝐷)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 397 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2107 ∀wral 3062 class class class wbr 5147 ◡ccnv 5674 Fun wfun 6534 ‘cfv 6540 (class class class)co 7404 Basecbs 17140 Homf chomf 17606 compfccomf 17607 Func cfunc 17800 Faith cfth 17850 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-10 2138 ax-11 2155 ax-12 2172 ax-ext 2704 ax-rep 5284 ax-sep 5298 ax-nul 5305 ax-pow 5362 ax-pr 5426 ax-un 7720 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 847 df-3an 1090 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2535 df-eu 2564 df-clab 2711 df-cleq 2725 df-clel 2811 df-nfc 2886 df-ne 2942 df-ral 3063 df-rex 3072 df-reu 3378 df-rab 3434 df-v 3477 df-sbc 3777 df-csb 3893 df-dif 3950 df-un 3952 df-in 3954 df-ss 3964 df-nul 4322 df-if 4528 df-pw 4603 df-sn 4628 df-pr 4630 df-op 4634 df-uni 4908 df-iun 4998 df-br 5148 df-opab 5210 df-mpt 5231 df-id 5573 df-xp 5681 df-rel 5682 df-cnv 5683 df-co 5684 df-dm 5685 df-rn 5686 df-res 5687 df-ima 5688 df-iota 6492 df-fun 6542 df-fn 6543 df-f 6544 df-f1 6545 df-fo 6546 df-f1o 6547 df-fv 6548 df-riota 7360 df-ov 7407 df-oprab 7408 df-mpo 7409 df-1st 7970 df-2nd 7971 df-map 8818 df-ixp 8888 df-cat 17608 df-cid 17609 df-homf 17610 df-comf 17611 df-func 17804 df-fth 17852 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |