P. 180 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 17901-18000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Definition	df-inito 17901*	An object A is said to be an initial object provided that for each object B there is exactly one morphism from A to B. Definition 7.1 in [Adamek] p. 101, or definition in [Lang] p. 57 (called "a universally repelling object" there). See dfinito2 17920 and dfinito3 17922 for alternate definitions depending on df-termo 17902. See dfinito4 49616 for an alternate definition using the universal property. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ InitO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ {𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑐)∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑎(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑏)})
Definition	df-termo 17902*	An object A is called a terminal object provided that for each object B there is exactly one morphism from B to A. Definition 7.4 in [Adamek] p. 102, or definition in [Lang] p. 57 (called "a universally attracting object" there). See dftermo2 17921 and dftermo3 17923 for alternate definitions depending on df-inito 17901. See dftermo4 49617 for an alternate definition using the universal property. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ TermO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ {𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑐)∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑎)})
Definition	df-zeroo 17903	An object A is called a zero object provided that it is both an initial object and a terminal object. Definition 7.7 of [Adamek] p. 103. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ZeroO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ((InitO‘𝑐) ∩ (TermO‘𝑐)))
Theorem	initofn 17904	InitO is a function on Cat. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ InitO Fn Cat
Theorem	termofn 17905	TermO is a function on Cat. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ TermO Fn Cat
Theorem	zeroofn 17906	ZeroO is a function on Cat. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ZeroO Fn Cat
Theorem	initorcl 17907	Reverse closure for an initial object: If a class has an initial object, the class is a category. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	termorcl 17908	Reverse closure for a terminal object: If a class has a terminal object, the class is a category. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	zeroorcl 17909	Reverse closure for a zero object: If a class has a zero object, the class is a category. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (ZeroO‘𝐶) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	initoval 17910*	The value of the initial object function, i.e. the set of all initial objects of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (InitO‘𝐶) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑎𝐻𝑏)})
Theorem	termoval 17911*	The value of the terminal object function, i.e. the set of all terminal objects of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (TermO‘𝐶) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏𝐻𝑎)})
Theorem	zerooval 17912	The value of the zero object function, i.e. the set of all zero objects of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ZeroO‘𝐶) = ((InitO‘𝐶) ∩ (TermO‘𝐶)))
Theorem	isinito 17913*	The predicate "is an initial object" of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝐼𝐻𝑏)))
Theorem	istermo 17914*	The predicate "is a terminal object" of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏𝐻𝐼)))
Theorem	iszeroo 17915	The predicate "is a zero object" of a category. (Contributed by AV, 3-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ (ZeroO‘𝐶) ↔ (𝐼 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))))
Theorem	isinitoi 17916*	Implication of a class being an initial object. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑂𝐻𝑏)))
Theorem	istermoi 17917*	Implication of a class being a terminal object. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!ℎ ℎ ∈ (𝑏𝐻𝑂)))
Theorem	initoid 17918	For an initial object, the identity arrow is the one and only morphism of the object to the object itself. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂𝐻𝑂) = {((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑂)})
Theorem	termoid 17919	For a terminal object, the identity arrow is the one and only morphism of the object to the object itself. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂𝐻𝑂) = {((Id‘𝐶)‘𝑂)})
Theorem	dfinito2 17920	An initial object is a terminal object in the opposite category. An alternate definition of df-inito 17901 depending on df-termo 17902. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ InitO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (TermO‘(oppCat‘𝑐)))
Theorem	dftermo2 17921	A terminal object is an initial object in the opposite category. An alternate definition of df-termo 17902 depending on df-inito 17901. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ TermO = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (InitO‘(oppCat‘𝑐)))
Theorem	dfinito3 17922	An alternate definition of df-inito 17901 depending on df-termo 17902, without dummy variables. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ InitO = (TermO ∘ (oppCat ↾ Cat))
Theorem	dftermo3 17923	An alternate definition of df-termo 17902 depending on df-inito 17901, without dummy variables. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ TermO = (InitO ∘ (oppCat ↾ Cat))
Theorem	initoo 17924	An initial object is an object. (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
Theorem	termoo 17925	A terminal object is an object. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶) → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)))
Theorem	iszeroi 17926	Implication of a class being a zero object. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (ZeroO‘𝐶)) → (𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))))
Theorem	2initoinv 17927	Morphisms between two initial objects are inverses. (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐵)) → 𝐹(𝐴(Inv‘𝐶)𝐵)𝐺)
Theorem	initoeu1 17928*	Initial objects are essentially unique (strong form), i.e. there is a unique isomorphism between two initial objects, see statement in [Lang] p. 58 ("... if P, P' are two universal objects [...] then there exists a unique isomorphism between them.". (Proposed by BJ, 14-Apr-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴(Iso‘𝐶)𝐵))
Theorem	initoeu1w 17929	Initial objects are essentially unique (weak form), i.e. if A and B are initial objects, then A and B are isomorphic. Proposition 7.3 (1) of [Adamek] p. 102. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝐵)
Theorem	initoeu2lem0 17930	Lemma 0 for initoeu2 17933. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷)) ∧ ((𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾)(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)((𝐵(Inv‘𝐶)𝐴)‘𝐾)) = (𝐺(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)((𝐵(Inv‘𝐶)𝐴)‘𝐾))) → 𝐺 = (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾))
Theorem	initoeu2lem1 17931*	Lemma 1 for initoeu2 17933. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐴) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾) ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷))) → ((∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷)) → 𝐺 = (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾)))
Theorem	initoeu2lem2 17932*	Lemma 2 for initoeu2 17933. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) ∧ (𝐹(⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ⚬ 𝐷)𝐾) ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷))) → (∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴𝐻𝐷) → ∃!𝑔 𝑔 ∈ (𝐵𝐻𝐷)))
Theorem	initoeu2 17933	Initial objects are essentially unique, if A is an initial object, then so is every object that is isomorphic to A. Proposition 7.3 (2) in [Adamek] p. 102. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (InitO‘𝐶))
Theorem	2termoinv 17934	Morphisms between two terminal objects are inverses. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐴) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴(Hom ‘𝐶)𝐵)) → 𝐹(𝐴(Inv‘𝐶)𝐵)𝐺)
Theorem	termoeu1 17935*	Terminal objects are essentially unique (strong form), i.e. there is a unique isomorphism between two terminal objects, see statement in [Lang] p. 58 ("... if P, P' are two universal objects [...] then there exists a unique isomorphism between them.". (Proposed by BJ, 14-Apr-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 ∈ (𝐴(Iso‘𝐶)𝐵))
Theorem	termoeu1w 17936	Terminal objects are essentially unique (weak form), i.e. if A and B are terminal objects, then A and B are isomorphic. Proposition 7.6 of [Adamek] p. 103. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (TermO‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐶)𝐵)
8.2  Arrows (disjointified hom-sets)
Syntax	cdoma 17937	Extend class notation to include the domain extractor for an arrow.
class doma
Syntax	ccoda 17938	Extend class notation to include the codomain extractor for an arrow.
class coda
Syntax	carw 17939	Extend class notation to include the collection of all arrows of a category.
class Arrow
Syntax	choma 17940	Extend class notation to include the set of all arrows with a specific domain and codomain.
class Homa
Definition	df-doma 17941	Definition of the domain extractor for an arrow. (Contributed by FL, 24-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ doma = (1st ∘ 1st )
Definition	df-coda 17942	Definition of the codomain extractor for an arrow. (Contributed by FL, 26-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ coda = (2nd ∘ 1st )
Definition	df-homa 17943*	Definition of the hom-set extractor for arrows, which tags the morphisms of the underlying hom-set with domain and codomain, which can then be extracted using df-doma 17941 and df-coda 17942. (Contributed by FL, 6-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Homa = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑐) × (Base‘𝑐)) ↦ ({𝑥} × ((Hom ‘𝑐)‘𝑥))))
Definition	df-arw 17944	Definition of the set of arrows of a category. We will use the term "arrow" to denote a morphism tagged with its domain and codomain, as opposed to Hom, which allows hom-sets for distinct objects to overlap. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Arrow = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ∪ ran (Homa‘𝑐))
Theorem	homarcl 17945	Reverse closure for an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	homafval 17946*	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ({𝑥} × (𝐽‘𝑥))))
Theorem	homaf 17947	Functionality of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐵 × 𝐵)⟶𝒫 ((𝐵 × 𝐵) × V))
Theorem	homaval 17948	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = ({⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩} × (𝑋𝐽𝑌)))
Theorem	elhoma 17949	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 ↔ (𝑍 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))))
Theorem	elhomai 17950	Produce an arrow from a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹)
Theorem	elhomai2 17951	Produce an arrow from a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, 𝐹⟩ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
Theorem	homarcl2 17952	Reverse closure for the domain and codomain of an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	homarel 17953	An arrow is an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ Rel (𝑋𝐻𝑌)
Theorem	homa1 17954	The first component of an arrow is the ordered pair of domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 → 𝑍 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
Theorem	homahom2 17955	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))
Theorem	homahom 17956	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))
Theorem	homadm 17957	The domain of an arrow with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (doma‘𝐹) = 𝑋)
Theorem	homacd 17958	The codomain of an arrow with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (coda‘𝐹) = 𝑌)
Theorem	homadmcd 17959	Decompose an arrow into domain, codomain, and morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐹 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
Theorem	arwval 17960	The set of arrows is the union of all the disjointified hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ∪ ran 𝐻
Theorem	arwrcl 17961	The first component of an arrow is the ordered pair of domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	arwhoma 17962	An arrow is contained in the hom-set corresponding to its domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐻(coda‘𝐹)))
Theorem	homarw 17963	A hom-set is a subset of the collection of all arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	arwdm 17964	The domain of an arrow is an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (doma‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	arwcd 17965	The codomain of an arrow is an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (coda‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	dmaf 17966	The domain function is a function from arrows to objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (doma ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵
Theorem	cdaf 17967	The codomain function is a function from arrows to objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (coda ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵
Theorem	arwhom 17968	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐽(coda‘𝐹)))
Theorem	arwdmcd 17969	Decompose an arrow into domain, codomain, and morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 = ⟨(doma‘𝐹), (coda‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
8.2.1  Identity and composition for arrows
Syntax	cida 17970	Extend class notation to include identity for arrows.
class Ida
Syntax	ccoa 17971	Extend class notation to include composition for arrows.
class compa
Definition	df-ida 17972*	Definition of the identity arrow, which is just the identity morphism tagged with its domain and codomain. (Contributed by FL, 26-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Ida = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ⟨𝑥, 𝑥, ((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥)⟩))
Definition	df-coa 17973*	Definition of the composition of arrows. Since arrows are tagged with domain and codomain, this does not need to be a quinary operation like the regular composition in a category comp. Instead, it is a partial binary operation on arrows, which is defined when the domain of the first arrow matches the codomain of the second. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ compa = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (Arrow‘𝑐), 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ (Arrow‘𝑐) ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩(comp‘𝑐)(coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩))
Theorem	idafval 17974*	Value of the identity arrow function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ⟨𝑥, 𝑥, ( 1 ‘𝑥)⟩))
Theorem	idaval 17975	Value of the identity arrow function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑋, ( 1 ‘𝑋)⟩)
Theorem	ida2 17976	Morphism part of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = ( 1 ‘𝑋))
Theorem	idahom 17977	Domain and codomain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋))
Theorem	idadm 17978	Domain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (doma‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	idacd 17979	Codomain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (coda‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	idaf 17980	The identity arrow function is a function from objects to arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼:𝐵⟶𝐴)
Theorem	coafval 17981*	The value of the composition of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ · = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩)
Theorem	eldmcoa 17982	A pair ⟨𝐺, 𝐹⟩ is in the domain of the arrow composition, if the domain of 𝐺 equals the codomain of 𝐹. (In this case we say 𝐺 and 𝐹 are composable.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺dom · 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (coda‘𝐹) = (doma‘𝐺)))
Theorem	dmcoass 17983	The domain of composition is a collection of pairs of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ dom · ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	homdmcoa 17984	If 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 and 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑍, then 𝐺 and 𝐹 are composable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺dom · 𝐹)
Theorem	coaval 17985	Value of composition for composable arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)
Theorem	coa2 17986	The morphism part of arrow composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐺 · 𝐹)) = ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹)))
Theorem	coahom 17987	The composition of two composable arrows is an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))
Theorem	coapm 17988	Composition of arrows is a partial binary operation on arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ · ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	arwlid 17989	Left identity of a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( 1 ‘𝑌) · 𝐹) = 𝐹)
Theorem	arwrid 17990	Right identity of a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 · ( 1 ‘𝑋)) = 𝐹)
Theorem	arwass 17991	Associativity of composition in a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 · 𝐺) · 𝐹) = (𝐾 · (𝐺 · 𝐹)))
8.3  Examples of categories
8.3.1  The category of sets
Syntax	csetc 17992	Extend class notation to include the category Set.
class SetCat
Definition	df-setc 17993*	Definition of the category Set, relativized to a subset 𝑢. Example 3.3(1) of [Adamek] p. 22. This is the category of all sets in 𝑢 and functions between these sets. Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. (Contributed by FL, 8-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ SetCat = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑢⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), (𝑣 ∈ (𝑢 × 𝑢), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))⟩})
Theorem	setcval 17994*	Value of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), · ⟩})
Theorem	setcbas 17995	Set of objects of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐶))
Theorem	setchomfval 17996*	Set of arrows of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))
Theorem	setchom 17997	Set of arrows of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝑌 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	elsetchom 17998	A morphism of sets is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌))
Theorem	setccofval 17999*	Composition in the category of sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓))))
Theorem	setcco 18000	Composition in the category of sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹))