Theorem lflnegl 39908

Description: A functional plus its negative is the zero functional. (This is specialized for the purpose of proving ldualgrp 39978, and we do not define a general operation here.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lflnegcl.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
lflnegcl.r	⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
lflnegcl.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (invg‘𝑅)
lflnegcl.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐼‘(𝐺‘𝑥)))
lflnegcl.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)
lflnegcl.w	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)
lflnegcl.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)
lflnegl.p	⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)
lflnegl.o	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lflnegl	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∘f + 𝐺) = (𝑉 × { 0 }))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐺   𝑥,𝐼   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑉   𝑥,𝑊   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   + (𝑥)   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑁(𝑥)   0 (𝑥)

Proof of Theorem lflnegl

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lflnegcl.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
2	1	fvexi 6899	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑉 ∈ V
3	2	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ V)
4		lflnegcl.w	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)
5		lflnegcl.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)
6		lflnegcl.r	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
7		eqid 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝑅) = (Base‘𝑅)
8		lflnegcl.f	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)
9	6, 7, 1, 8	lflf 39895	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) → 𝐺:𝑉⟶(Base‘𝑅))
10	4, 5, 9	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑉⟶(Base‘𝑅))
11		lflnegl.o	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)
12	11	fvexi 6899	. . 3 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
13	12	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ V)
14		lflnegcl.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (invg‘𝑅)
15	6	lmodring 21039	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)
16		ringgrp 20364	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)
17	4, 15, 16	3syl 19	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)
18	7, 14, 17	grpinvf1o 19119	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼:(Base‘𝑅)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑅))
19		f1of 6824	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼:(Base‘𝑅)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑅) → 𝐼:(Base‘𝑅)⟶(Base‘𝑅))
20	18, 19	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼:(Base‘𝑅)⟶(Base‘𝑅))
21		lflnegcl.n	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐼‘(𝐺‘𝑥)))
22	21	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐼‘(𝐺‘𝑥))))
23		lflnegl.p	. . . 4 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)
24	7, 23, 11, 14	grplinv 19100	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)) → ((𝐼‘𝑦) + 𝑦) = 0 )
25	17, 24	sylan 592	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)) → ((𝐼‘𝑦) + 𝑦) = 0 )
26	3, 10, 13, 20, 22, 25	caofinvl 7716	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∘f + 𝐺) = (𝑉 × { 0 }))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  Vcvv 3457  {csn 4591   ↦ cmpt 5194   × cxp 5661  ⟶wf 6536  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6539  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7419   ∘_f cof 7682  Basecbs 17291  +_gcplusg 17332  Scalarcsca 17335  0_gc0g 17514  Grpcgrp 19044  inv_gcminusg 19045  Ringcrg 20359  LModclmod 21031  LFnlclfn 39889

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rmo 3371  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-riota 7376  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423  df-mpo 7424  df-of 7684  df-map 8832  df-0g 17516  df-mgm 18720  df-sgrp 18809  df-mnd 18825  df-grp 19047  df-minusg 19048  df-ring 20361  df-lmod 21033  df-lfl 39890

This theorem is used by:  ldualgrplem  39977