Theorem lflnegl 40399

Description: A functional plus its negative is the zero functional. (This is specialized for the purpose of proving ldualgrp 40469, and we do not define a general operation here.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lflnegcl.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
lflnegcl.r	⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
lflnegcl.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (invg‘𝑅)
lflnegcl.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐼‘(𝐺‘𝑥)))
lflnegcl.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)
lflnegcl.w	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)
lflnegcl.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)
lflnegl.p	⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)
lflnegl.o	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lflnegl	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∘f + 𝐺) = (𝑉 × { 0 }))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐺   𝑥,𝐼   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑉   𝑥,𝑊   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   + (𝑥)   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑁(𝑥)   0 (𝑥)

Proof of Theorem lflnegl

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lflnegcl.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
2	1	fvexi 6930	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑉 ∈ V
3	2	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ V)
4		lflnegcl.w	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)
5		lflnegcl.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)
6		lflnegcl.r	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
7		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝑅) = (Base‘𝑅)
8		lflnegcl.f	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)
9	6, 7, 1, 8	lflf 40386	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) → 𝐺:𝑉⟶(Base‘𝑅))
10	4, 5, 9	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑉⟶(Base‘𝑅))
11		lflnegl.o	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)
12	11	fvexi 6930	. . 3 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
13	12	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ V)
14		lflnegcl.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (invg‘𝑅)
15	6	lmodring 21194	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)
16		ringgrp 20515	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)
17	4, 15, 16	3syl 19	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)
18	7, 14, 17	grpinvf1o 19269	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼:(Base‘𝑅)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝑅))
19		f1of 6854	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼:(Base‘𝑅)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝑅) → 𝐼:(Base‘𝑅)⟶(Base‘𝑅))
20	18, 19	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼:(Base‘𝑅)⟶(Base‘𝑅))
21		lflnegcl.n	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐼‘(𝐺‘𝑥)))
22	21	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐼‘(𝐺‘𝑥))))
23		lflnegl.p	. . . 4 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)
24	7, 23, 11, 14	grplinv 19250	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)) → ((𝐼‘𝑦) + 𝑦) = 0 )
25	17, 24	sylan 592	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)) → ((𝐼‘𝑦) + 𝑦) = 0 )
26	3, 10, 13, 20, 22, 25	caofinvl 7757	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∘f + 𝐺) = (𝑉 × { 0 }))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  Vcvv 3454  {csn 4588   ↦ cmpt 5192   × cxp 5656  ⟶wf 6562  ⟶1-1ontowf1o 6565  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451   ∘_f cof 7723  Basecbs 17431  +_gcplusg 17472  Scalarcsca 17475  0_gc0g 17660  Grpcgrp 19194  inv_gcminusg 19195  Ringcrg 20510  LModclmod 21186  LFnlclfn 40380

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-f1 6571  df-fo 6572  df-f1o 6573  df-fv 6574  df-riota 7408  df-ov 7454  df-oprab 7455  df-mpo 7456  df-of 7725  df-map 8887  df-0g 17662  df-mgm 18866  df-sgrp 18958  df-mnd 18974  df-grp 19197  df-minusg 19198  df-ring 20512  df-lmod 21188  df-lfl 40381

This theorem is used by:  ldualgrplem  40468