Theorem rexdif1en 9224

Description: If a set is equinumerous to a nonzero ordinal, then there exists an element in that set such that removing it leaves the set equinumerous to the predecessor of that ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and avoid ax-un 7770. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexdif1en	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑀

Proof of Theorem rexdif1en

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		encv 9011	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ suc 𝑀 ∈ V))
2	1	simpld 494	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		breng 9012	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ suc 𝑀 ∈ V) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀))
4	1, 3	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀))
5	4	ibi 267	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀)
6		sucidg 6476	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ On → 𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀)
7		f1ocnvdm 7321	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
8	7	ancoms 458	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
9	6, 8	sylan 579	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
10	9	adantll 713	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
11		vex 3492	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
12		dif1enlem 9222	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑓 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
13	11, 12	mp3anl1 1455	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
14		sneq 4658	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → {𝑥} = {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)})
15	14	difeq2d 4149	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) = (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}))
16	15	breq1d 5176	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → ((𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀))
17	16	rspcev 3635	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
18	10, 13, 17	syl2anc 583	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
19	18	ex 412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
20	19	exlimdv 1932	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
21	5, 20	syl5 34	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
22	2, 21	sylan 579	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
23	22	ancoms 458	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
24	23	syldbl2 840	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1777   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3076  Vcvv 3488   ∖ cdif 3973  {csn 4648   class class class wbr 5166  ^◡ccnv 5699  Oncon0 6395  suc csuc 6397  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6572  ‘cfv 6573   ≈ cen 9000

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-tr 5284  df-id 5593  df-eprel 5599  df-po 5607  df-so 5608  df-fr 5652  df-we 5654  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-ord 6398  df-on 6399  df-suc 6401  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fo 6579  df-f1o 6580  df-fv 6581  df-en 9004

This theorem is referenced by:  findcard2  9230  enp1i  9341