Theorem rexdif1en 9181

Description: If a set is equinumerous to a nonzero ordinal, then there exists an element in that set such that removing it leaves the set equinumerous to the predecessor of that ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and avoid ax-un 7738. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexdif1en	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑀

Proof of Theorem rexdif1en

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		encv 8970	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ suc 𝑀 ∈ V))
2	1	simpld 493	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		breng 8971	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ suc 𝑀 ∈ V) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀))
4	1, 3	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀))
5	4	ibi 266	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀)
6		sucidg 6445	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ On → 𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀)
7		f1ocnvdm 7290	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
8	7	ancoms 457	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
9	6, 8	sylan 578	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
10	9	adantll 712	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
11		vex 3467	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
12		dif1enlem 9179	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑓 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
13	11, 12	mp3anl1 1451	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
14		sneq 4634	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → {𝑥} = {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)})
15	14	difeq2d 4114	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) = (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}))
16	15	breq1d 5153	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → ((𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀))
17	16	rspcev 3601	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
18	10, 13, 17	syl2anc 582	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
19	18	ex 411	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
20	19	exlimdv 1928	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
21	5, 20	syl5 34	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
22	2, 21	sylan 578	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
23	22	ancoms 457	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
24	23	syldbl2 839	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1773   ∈ wcel 2098  ∃wrex 3060  Vcvv 3463   ∖ cdif 3936  {csn 4624   class class class wbr 5143  ^◡ccnv 5671  Oncon0 6364  suc csuc 6366  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6542  ‘cfv 6543   ≈ cen 8959

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2696  ax-sep 5294  ax-nul 5301  ax-pr 5423

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2703  df-cleq 2717  df-clel 2802  df-ne 2931  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-reu 3365  df-rab 3420  df-v 3465  df-dif 3942  df-un 3944  df-in 3946  df-ss 3956  df-nul 4319  df-if 4525  df-pw 4600  df-sn 4625  df-pr 4627  df-op 4631  df-uni 4904  df-br 5144  df-opab 5206  df-tr 5261  df-id 5570  df-eprel 5576  df-po 5584  df-so 5585  df-fr 5627  df-we 5629  df-xp 5678  df-rel 5679  df-cnv 5680  df-co 5681  df-dm 5682  df-rn 5683  df-res 5684  df-ima 5685  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-suc 6370  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-en 8963

This theorem is referenced by:  findcard2  9187  enp1i  9302