Theorem rexdif1en 9123

Description: If a set is equinumerous to a nonzero ordinal, then there exists an element in that set such that removing it leaves the set equinumerous to the predecessor of that ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and avoid ax-un 7713. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexdif1en	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑀

Proof of Theorem rexdif1en

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		encv 8929	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ suc 𝑀 ∈ V))
2	1	simpld 498	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		breng 8930	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ suc 𝑀 ∈ V) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀))
4	1, 3	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀))
5	4	ibi 269	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀)
6		sucidg 6424	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ On → 𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀)
7		f1ocnvdm 7264	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
8	7	ancoms 462	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
9	6, 8	sylan 589	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
10	9	adantll 724	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
11		vex 3457	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
12		dif1enlem 9122	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑓 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
13	11, 12	mp3anl1 1475	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
14		sneq 4589	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → {𝑥} = {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)})
15	14	difeq2d 4078	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) = (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}))
16	15	breq1d 5107	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → ((𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀))
17	16	rspcev 3580	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
18	10, 13, 17	syl2anc 593	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
19	18	ex 416	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
20	19	exlimdv 1952	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
21	5, 20	syl5 34	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
22	2, 21	sylan 589	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
23	22	ancoms 462	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
24	23	syldbl2 852	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1559  ∃wex 1798   ∈ wcel 2141  ∃wrex 3085  Vcvv 3453   ∖ cdif 3899  {csn 4579   class class class wbr 5097  ^◡ccnv 5642  Oncon0 6341  suc csuc 6343  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6515  ‘cfv 6516   ≈ cen 8918

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5253  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-nf 1803  df-sb 2090  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rex 3086  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-pw 4554  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-uni 4863  df-br 5098  df-opab 5160  df-tr 5205  df-id 5538  df-eprel 5543  df-po 5551  df-so 5552  df-fr 5596  df-we 5598  df-xp 5649  df-rel 5650  df-cnv 5651  df-co 5652  df-dm 5653  df-rn 5654  df-res 5655  df-ima 5656  df-ord 6344  df-on 6345  df-suc 6347  df-iota 6472  df-fun 6518  df-fn 6519  df-f 6520  df-f1 6521  df-fo 6522  df-f1o 6523  df-fv 6524  df-en 8922

This theorem is referenced by:  findcard2  9127  enp1i  9217