Theorem rexdif1en 9155

Description: If a set is equinumerous to a nonzero ordinal, then there exists an element in that set such that removing it leaves the set equinumerous to the predecessor of that ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and avoid ax-un 7719. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexdif1en	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑀

Proof of Theorem rexdif1en

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		encv 8944	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ suc 𝑀 ∈ V))
2	1	simpld 494	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		breng 8945	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ suc 𝑀 ∈ V) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀))
4	1, 3	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀))
5	4	ibi 267	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀)
6		sucidg 6436	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ On → 𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀)
7		f1ocnvdm 7276	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
8	7	ancoms 458	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
9	6, 8	sylan 579	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
10	9	adantll 711	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴)
11		vex 3470	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
12		dif1enlem 9153	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑓 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
13	11, 12	mp3anl1 1451	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
14		sneq 4631	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → {𝑥} = {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)})
15	14	difeq2d 4115	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) = (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}))
16	15	breq1d 5149	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = (◡𝑓‘𝑀) → ((𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀))
17	16	rspcev 3604	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((◡𝑓‘𝑀) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝑓‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
18	10, 13, 17	syl2anc 583	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
19	18	ex 412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
20	19	exlimdv 1928	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
21	5, 20	syl5 34	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
22	2, 21	sylan 579	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
23	22	ancoms 458	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀))
24	23	syldbl2 838	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1773   ∈ wcel 2098  ∃wrex 3062  Vcvv 3466   ∖ cdif 3938  {csn 4621   class class class wbr 5139  ^◡ccnv 5666  Oncon0 6355  suc csuc 6357  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6533  ‘cfv 6534   ≈ cen 8933

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2695  ax-sep 5290  ax-nul 5297  ax-pr 5418

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2526  df-eu 2555  df-clab 2702  df-cleq 2716  df-clel 2802  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3063  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3425  df-v 3468  df-dif 3944  df-un 3946  df-in 3948  df-ss 3958  df-nul 4316  df-if 4522  df-pw 4597  df-sn 4622  df-pr 4624  df-op 4628  df-uni 4901  df-br 5140  df-opab 5202  df-tr 5257  df-id 5565  df-eprel 5571  df-po 5579  df-so 5580  df-fr 5622  df-we 5624  df-xp 5673  df-rel 5674  df-cnv 5675  df-co 5676  df-dm 5677  df-rn 5678  df-res 5679  df-ima 5680  df-ord 6358  df-on 6359  df-suc 6361  df-iota 6486  df-fun 6536  df-fn 6537  df-f 6538  df-f1 6539  df-fo 6540  df-f1o 6541  df-fv 6542  df-en 8937

This theorem is referenced by:  findcard2  9161  enp1i  9276