ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  fproddivapf Unicode version

Theorem fproddivapf 12398
Description: The quotient of two finite products. A version of fproddivap 12397 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
fproddivf.kph  |-  F/ k
ph
fproddivf.a  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  Fin )
fproddivf.b  |-  ( (
ph  /\  k  e.  A )  ->  B  e.  CC )
fproddivf.c  |-  ( (
ph  /\  k  e.  A )  ->  C  e.  CC )
fproddivf.ap0  |-  ( (
ph  /\  k  e.  A )  ->  C #  0 )
Assertion
Ref Expression
fproddivapf  |-  ( ph  ->  prod_ k  e.  A  ( B  /  C
)  =  ( prod_
k  e.  A  B  /  prod_ k  e.  A  C ) )
Distinct variable group:    A, k
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( k)    B( k)    C( k)

Proof of Theorem fproddivapf
Dummy variable  j is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 nfcv 2392 . . . 4  |-  F/_ j
( B  /  C
)
2 nfcsb1v 3180 . . . . 5  |-  F/_ k [_ j  /  k ]_ B
3 nfcv 2392 . . . . 5  |-  F/_ k  /
4 nfcsb1v 3180 . . . . 5  |-  F/_ k [_ j  /  k ]_ C
52, 3, 4nfov 6115 . . . 4  |-  F/_ k
( [_ j  /  k ]_ B  /  [_ j  /  k ]_ C
)
6 csbeq1a 3156 . . . . 5  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  B  =  [_ j  /  k ]_ B )
7 csbeq1a 3156 . . . . 5  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  C  =  [_ j  /  k ]_ C )
86, 7oveq12d 6103 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  ( B  /  C )  =  ( [_ j  / 
k ]_ B  /  [_ j  /  k ]_ C
) )
91, 5, 8cbvprodi 12327 . . 3  |-  prod_ k  e.  A  ( B  /  C )  =  prod_ j  e.  A  ( [_ j  /  k ]_ B  /  [_ j  /  k ]_ C )
109a1i 9 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  prod_ k  e.  A  ( B  /  C
)  =  prod_ j  e.  A  ( [_ j  /  k ]_ B  /  [_ j  /  k ]_ C ) )
11 fproddivf.a . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  Fin )
12 fproddivf.kph . . . . . 6  |-  F/ k
ph
13 nfvd 1582 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ k  j  e.  A )
1412, 13nfan1 1617 . . . . 5  |-  F/ k ( ph  /\  j  e.  A )
152nfel1 2403 . . . . 5  |-  F/ k
[_ j  /  k ]_ B  e.  CC
1614, 15nfim 1625 . . . 4  |-  F/ k ( ( ph  /\  j  e.  A )  ->  [_ j  /  k ]_ B  e.  CC )
17 eleq1w 2299 . . . . . 6  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  (
k  e.  A  <->  j  e.  A ) )
1817anbi2d 468 . . . . 5  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  (
( ph  /\  k  e.  A )  <->  ( ph  /\  j  e.  A ) ) )
196eleq1d 2307 . . . . 5  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  ( B  e.  CC  <->  [_ j  / 
k ]_ B  e.  CC ) )
2018, 19imbi12d 234 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  (
( ( ph  /\  k  e.  A )  ->  B  e.  CC )  <-> 
( ( ph  /\  j  e.  A )  ->  [_ j  /  k ]_ B  e.  CC ) ) )
21 fproddivf.b . . . 4  |-  ( (
ph  /\  k  e.  A )  ->  B  e.  CC )
2216, 20, 21chvarfv 1752 . . 3  |-  ( (
ph  /\  j  e.  A )  ->  [_ j  /  k ]_ B  e.  CC )
234nfel1 2403 . . . . 5  |-  F/ k
[_ j  /  k ]_ C  e.  CC
2414, 23nfim 1625 . . . 4  |-  F/ k ( ( ph  /\  j  e.  A )  ->  [_ j  /  k ]_ C  e.  CC )
257eleq1d 2307 . . . . 5  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  ( C  e.  CC  <->  [_ j  / 
k ]_ C  e.  CC ) )
2618, 25imbi12d 234 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  (
( ( ph  /\  k  e.  A )  ->  C  e.  CC )  <-> 
( ( ph  /\  j  e.  A )  ->  [_ j  /  k ]_ C  e.  CC ) ) )
27 fproddivf.c . . . 4  |-  ( (
ph  /\  k  e.  A )  ->  C  e.  CC )
2824, 26, 27chvarfv 1752 . . 3  |-  ( (
ph  /\  j  e.  A )  ->  [_ j  /  k ]_ C  e.  CC )
29 nfcv 2392 . . . . . 6  |-  F/_ k #
30 nfcv 2392 . . . . . 6  |-  F/_ k
0
314, 29, 30nfbr 4177 . . . . 5  |-  F/ k
[_ j  /  k ]_ C #  0
3214, 31nfim 1625 . . . 4  |-  F/ k ( ( ph  /\  j  e.  A )  ->  [_ j  /  k ]_ C #  0 )
337breq1d 4140 . . . . 5  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  ( C #  0  <->  [_ j  /  k ]_ C #  0 )
)
3418, 33imbi12d 234 . . . 4  |-  ( k  =  j  ->  (
( ( ph  /\  k  e.  A )  ->  C #  0 )  <->  ( ( ph  /\  j  e.  A
)  ->  [_ j  / 
k ]_ C #  0 ) ) )
35 fproddivf.ap0 . . . 4  |-  ( (
ph  /\  k  e.  A )  ->  C #  0 )
3632, 34, 35chvarfv 1752 . . 3  |-  ( (
ph  /\  j  e.  A )  ->  [_ j  /  k ]_ C #  0 )
3711, 22, 28, 36fproddivap 12397 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  prod_ j  e.  A  ( [_ j  /  k ]_ B  /  [_ j  /  k ]_ C
)  =  ( prod_
j  e.  A  [_ j  /  k ]_ B  /  prod_ j  e.  A  [_ j  /  k ]_ C ) )
38 nfcv 2392 . . . . . 6  |-  F/_ j B
3938, 2, 6cbvprodi 12327 . . . . 5  |-  prod_ k  e.  A  B  =  prod_ j  e.  A  [_ j  /  k ]_ B
4039eqcomi 2242 . . . 4  |-  prod_ j  e.  A  [_ j  / 
k ]_ B  =  prod_ k  e.  A  B
4140a1i 9 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  prod_ j  e.  A  [_ j  /  k ]_ B  =  prod_ k  e.  A  B )
42 nfcv 2392 . . . . 5  |-  F/_ j C
437equcoms 1760 . . . . . 6  |-  ( j  =  k  ->  C  =  [_ j  /  k ]_ C )
4443eqcomd 2244 . . . . 5  |-  ( j  =  k  ->  [_ j  /  k ]_ C  =  C )
454, 42, 44cbvprodi 12327 . . . 4  |-  prod_ j  e.  A  [_ j  / 
k ]_ C  =  prod_ k  e.  A  C
4645a1i 9 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  prod_ j  e.  A  [_ j  /  k ]_ C  =  prod_ k  e.  A  C )
4741, 46oveq12d 6103 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  ( prod_ j  e.  A  [_ j  /  k ]_ B  /  prod_ j  e.  A  [_ j  /  k ]_ C )  =  (
prod_ k  e.  A  B  /  prod_ k  e.  A  C ) )
4810, 37, 473eqtrd 2275 1  |-  ( ph  ->  prod_ k  e.  A  ( B  /  C
)  =  ( prod_
k  e.  A  B  /  prod_ k  e.  A  C ) )
Colors of variables:    wff set class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 104    = wceq 1402   F/wnf 1513    e. wcel 2209   [_csb 3147   class class class wbr 4130  (class class class)co 6085   Fincfn 7022   CCcc 8177   0cc0 8179   # cap 8909    / cdiv 9002   prod_cprod 12317
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-coll 4246  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-iinf 4735  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-mulrcl 8278  ax-addcom 8279  ax-mulcom 8280  ax-addass 8281  ax-mulass 8282  ax-distr 8283  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-0lt1 8285  ax-1rid 8286  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-precex 8289  ax-cnre 8290  ax-pre-ltirr 8291  ax-pre-ltwlin 8292  ax-pre-lttrn 8293  ax-pre-apti 8294  ax-pre-ltadd 8295  ax-pre-mulgt0 8296  ax-pre-mulext 8297  ax-arch 8298  ax-caucvg 8299
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rmo 2536  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-if 3639  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-iun 4014  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-tr 4230  df-id 4438  df-po 4441  df-iso 4442  df-iord 4511  df-on 4513  df-ilim 4514  df-suc 4516  df-iom 4738  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-f1o 5384  df-fv 5385  df-isom 5386  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-recs 6576  df-irdg 6641  df-frec 6662  df-1o 6687  df-oadd 6691  df-er 6807  df-en 7023  df-dom 7024  df-fin 7025  df-pnf 8362  df-mnf 8363  df-xr 8364  df-ltxr 8365  df-le 8366  df-sub 8499  df-neg 8500  df-reap 8903  df-ap 8910  df-div 9003  df-inn 9305  df-2 9363  df-3 9364  df-4 9365  df-n0 9564  df-z 9645  df-uz 9922  df-q 10020  df-rp 10055  df-fz 10412  df-fzo 10550  df-seqfrec 10885  df-exp 10976  df-ihash 11215  df-cj 11607  df-re 11608  df-im 11609  df-rsqrt 11764  df-abs 11765  df-clim 12045  df-proddc 12318
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator