Theorem xmetunirn 14537

Description: Two ways to express an extended metric on an unspecified base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xmetunirn	⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))

Proof of Theorem xmetunirn

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 𝑑 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fnmap 6711	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ↑𝑚 Fn (V × V)
2		xrex 9925	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ℝ* ∈ V
3		sqxpexg 4776	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 × 𝑥) ∈ V)
4	3	elv 2764	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 × 𝑥) ∈ V
5		fnovex 5952	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( ↑𝑚 Fn (V × V) ∧ ℝ* ∈ V ∧ (𝑥 × 𝑥) ∈ V) → (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∈ V)
6	1, 2, 4, 5	mp3an 1348	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∈ V
7	6	rabex 4174	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (((𝑦𝑑𝑧) = 0 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦𝑑𝑧) ≤ ((𝑤𝑑𝑦) +𝑒 (𝑤𝑑𝑧)))} ∈ V
8		df-xmet 14043	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∞Met = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (((𝑦𝑑𝑧) = 0 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦𝑑𝑧) ≤ ((𝑤𝑑𝑦) +𝑒 (𝑤𝑑𝑧)))})
9	7, 8	fnmpti 5383	. . . 4 ⊢ ∞Met Fn V
10		fnunirn 5811	. . . 4 ⊢ (∞Met Fn V → (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥)))
11	9, 10	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥))
12		id 19	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥))
13		xmetdmdm 14535	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝑥 = dom dom 𝐷)
14	13	fveq2d 5559	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → (∞Met‘𝑥) = (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
15	12, 14	eleqtrd 2272	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
16	15	rexlimivw 2607	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
17	11, 16	sylbi 121	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
18		elex 2771	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → 𝐷 ∈ V)
19		dmexg 4927	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ V → dom 𝐷 ∈ V)
20		dmexg 4927	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝐷 ∈ V → dom dom 𝐷 ∈ V)
21	18, 19, 20	3syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → dom dom 𝐷 ∈ V)
22		fvssunirng 5570	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom dom 𝐷 ∈ V → (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) ⊆ ∪ ran ∞Met)
23	21, 22	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) ⊆ ∪ ran ∞Met)
24	23	sseld 3179	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → 𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met))
25	24	pm2.43i 49	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → 𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met)
26	17, 25	impbii 126	1 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2164  ∀wral 2472  ∃wrex 2473  {crab 2476  Vcvv 2760   ⊆ wss 3154  ∪ cuni 3836   class class class wbr 4030   × cxp 4658  dom cdm 4660  ran crn 4661   Fn wfn 5250  ‘cfv 5255  (class class class)co 5919   ↑_𝑚 cmap 6704  0cc0 7874  ℝ^*cxr 8055   ≤ cle 8057   +_𝑒 cxad 9839  ∞Metcxmet 14035

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4148  ax-pow 4204  ax-pr 4239  ax-un 4465  ax-setind 4570  ax-cnex 7965  ax-resscn 7966

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ne 2365  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2987  df-csb 3082  df-dif 3156  df-un 3158  df-in 3160  df-ss 3167  df-pw 3604  df-sn 3625  df-pr 3626  df-op 3628  df-uni 3837  df-iun 3915  df-br 4031  df-opab 4092  df-mpt 4093  df-id 4325  df-xp 4666  df-rel 4667  df-cnv 4668  df-co 4669  df-dm 4670  df-rn 4671  df-res 4672  df-ima 4673  df-iota 5216  df-fun 5257  df-fn 5258  df-f 5259  df-fv 5263  df-ov 5922  df-oprab 5923  df-mpo 5924  df-1st 6195  df-2nd 6196  df-map 6706  df-pnf 8058  df-mnf 8059  df-xr 8060  df-xmet 14043

This theorem is referenced by:  isxms2  14631