Theorem xmetunirn 14526

Description: Two ways to express an extended metric on an unspecified base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xmetunirn	⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))

Proof of Theorem xmetunirn

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 𝑑 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fnmap 6709	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ↑𝑚 Fn (V × V)
2		xrex 9922	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ℝ* ∈ V
3		sqxpexg 4775	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 × 𝑥) ∈ V)
4	3	elv 2764	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 × 𝑥) ∈ V
5		fnovex 5951	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( ↑𝑚 Fn (V × V) ∧ ℝ* ∈ V ∧ (𝑥 × 𝑥) ∈ V) → (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∈ V)
6	1, 2, 4, 5	mp3an 1348	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∈ V
7	6	rabex 4173	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (((𝑦𝑑𝑧) = 0 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦𝑑𝑧) ≤ ((𝑤𝑑𝑦) +𝑒 (𝑤𝑑𝑧)))} ∈ V
8		df-xmet 14040	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∞Met = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (((𝑦𝑑𝑧) = 0 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦𝑑𝑧) ≤ ((𝑤𝑑𝑦) +𝑒 (𝑤𝑑𝑧)))})
9	7, 8	fnmpti 5382	. . . 4 ⊢ ∞Met Fn V
10		fnunirn 5810	. . . 4 ⊢ (∞Met Fn V → (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥)))
11	9, 10	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥))
12		id 19	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥))
13		xmetdmdm 14524	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝑥 = dom dom 𝐷)
14	13	fveq2d 5558	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → (∞Met‘𝑥) = (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
15	12, 14	eleqtrd 2272	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
16	15	rexlimivw 2607	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
17	11, 16	sylbi 121	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
18		elex 2771	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → 𝐷 ∈ V)
19		dmexg 4926	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ V → dom 𝐷 ∈ V)
20		dmexg 4926	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝐷 ∈ V → dom dom 𝐷 ∈ V)
21	18, 19, 20	3syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → dom dom 𝐷 ∈ V)
22		fvssunirng 5569	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom dom 𝐷 ∈ V → (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) ⊆ ∪ ran ∞Met)
23	21, 22	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) ⊆ ∪ ran ∞Met)
24	23	sseld 3178	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → 𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met))
25	24	pm2.43i 49	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → 𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met)
26	17, 25	impbii 126	1 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2164  ∀wral 2472  ∃wrex 2473  {crab 2476  Vcvv 2760   ⊆ wss 3153  ∪ cuni 3835   class class class wbr 4029   × cxp 4657  dom cdm 4659  ran crn 4660   Fn wfn 5249  ‘cfv 5254  (class class class)co 5918   ↑_𝑚 cmap 6702  0cc0 7872  ℝ^*cxr 8053   ≤ cle 8055   +_𝑒 cxad 9836  ∞Metcxmet 14032

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4147  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238  ax-un 4464  ax-setind 4569  ax-cnex 7963  ax-resscn 7964

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ne 2365  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2986  df-csb 3081  df-dif 3155  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-iun 3914  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-mpt 4092  df-id 4324  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-res 4671  df-ima 4672  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-f 5258  df-fv 5262  df-ov 5921  df-oprab 5922  df-mpo 5923  df-1st 6193  df-2nd 6194  df-map 6704  df-pnf 8056  df-mnf 8057  df-xr 8058  df-xmet 14040

This theorem is referenced by:  isxms2  14620