Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Jonathan Ben-Naim < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  bnj601 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem bnj601 31871
Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 31872. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
bnj601.1 (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj601.2 (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj601.3 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj601.4 (𝜒 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑥𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓)))
bnj601.5 (𝜃 ↔ ∀𝑚𝐷 (𝑚 E 𝑛[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒))
Assertion
Ref Expression
bnj601 (𝑛 ≠ 1o → ((𝑛𝐷𝜃) → 𝜒))
Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑦   𝐷,𝑓,𝑖   𝑅,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑦   𝑥,𝑓,𝑚,𝑛   𝜑,𝑖,𝑚   𝜓,𝑚
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑛)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝜃(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐷(𝑥,𝑦,𝑚,𝑛)   𝑅(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bnj601
Dummy variables 𝑝 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 bnj601.1 . 2 (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2 bnj601.2 . 2 (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3 bnj601.3 . 2 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
4 bnj601.4 . 2 (𝜒 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑥𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓)))
5 bnj601.5 . 2 (𝜃 ↔ ∀𝑚𝐷 (𝑚 E 𝑛[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒))
6 biid 253 . 2 ([𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑)
7 biid 253 . 2 ([𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓)
8 biid 253 . 2 ([𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒)
9 bnj602 31866 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑧 → pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))
109cbviunv 4829 . . . . . 6 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)
1110opeq2i 4677 . . . . 5 𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩ = ⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩
1211sneqi 4446 . . . 4 {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} = {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
1312uneq2i 4018 . . 3 (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
14 dfsbcq 3676 . . 3 ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) → ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑))
1513, 14ax-mp 5 . 2 ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑)
16 dfsbcq 3676 . . 3 ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) → ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓))
1713, 16ax-mp 5 . 2 ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓)
18 dfsbcq 3676 . . 3 ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) → ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒))
1913, 18ax-mp 5 . 2 ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒)
2013eqcomi 2780 . 2 (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
21 biid 253 . 2 ((𝑓 Fn 𝑚[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓))
22 biid 253 . 2 ((𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝𝑚) ↔ (𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝𝑚))
23 biid 253 . 2 ((𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) ↔ (𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
24 biid 253 . 2 ((𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 = suc 𝑖) ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 = suc 𝑖))
25 biid 253 . 2 ((𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖) ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖))
26 eqid 2771 . 2 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
27 eqid 2771 . 2 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
28 eqid 2771 . 2 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
29 eqid 2771 . 2 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
301, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 20bnj600 31870 1 (𝑛 ≠ 1o → ((𝑛𝐷𝜃) → 𝜒))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 198  wa 387  w3a 1069   = wceq 1508  wcel 2051  ∃!weu 2584  wne 2960  wral 3081  [wsbc 3674  cdif 3819  cun 3820  c0 4172  {csn 4435  cop 4441   ciun 4788   class class class wbr 4925   E cep 5312  suc csuc 6028   Fn wfn 6180  cfv 6185  ωcom 7394  1oc1o 7896  w-bnj17 31636   predc-bnj14 31638   FrSe w-bnj15 31642
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1759  ax-4 1773  ax-5 1870  ax-6 1929  ax-7 1966  ax-8 2053  ax-9 2060  ax-10 2080  ax-11 2094  ax-12 2107  ax-13 2302  ax-ext 2743  ax-rep 5045  ax-sep 5056  ax-nul 5063  ax-pow 5115  ax-pr 5182  ax-un 7277  ax-reg 8849
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 835  df-3or 1070  df-3an 1071  df-tru 1511  df-fal 1521  df-ex 1744  df-nf 1748  df-sb 2017  df-mo 2548  df-eu 2585  df-clab 2752  df-cleq 2764  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3088  df-rab 3090  df-v 3410  df-sbc 3675  df-csb 3780  df-dif 3825  df-un 3827  df-in 3829  df-ss 3836  df-pss 3838  df-nul 4173  df-if 4345  df-pw 4418  df-sn 4436  df-pr 4438  df-tp 4440  df-op 4442  df-uni 4709  df-iun 4790  df-br 4926  df-opab 4988  df-mpt 5005  df-tr 5027  df-id 5308  df-eprel 5313  df-po 5322  df-so 5323  df-fr 5362  df-we 5364  df-xp 5409  df-rel 5410  df-cnv 5411  df-co 5412  df-dm 5413  df-rn 5414  df-res 5415  df-ima 5416  df-ord 6029  df-on 6030  df-lim 6031  df-suc 6032  df-iota 6149  df-fun 6187  df-fn 6188  df-f 6189  df-f1 6190  df-fo 6191  df-f1o 6192  df-fv 6193  df-om 7395  df-1o 7903  df-bnj17 31637  df-bnj14 31639  df-bnj13 31641  df-bnj15 31643
This theorem is referenced by:  bnj852  31872
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator