Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Jonathan Ben-Naim < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  bnj601 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem bnj601 32192
Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 32193. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
bnj601.1 (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj601.2 (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj601.3 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj601.4 (𝜒 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑥𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓)))
bnj601.5 (𝜃 ↔ ∀𝑚𝐷 (𝑚 E 𝑛[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒))
Assertion
Ref Expression
bnj601 (𝑛 ≠ 1o → ((𝑛𝐷𝜃) → 𝜒))
Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑦   𝐷,𝑓,𝑖   𝑅,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑦   𝑥,𝑓,𝑚,𝑛   𝜑,𝑖,𝑚   𝜓,𝑚
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑛)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝜃(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐷(𝑥,𝑦,𝑚,𝑛)   𝑅(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bnj601
Dummy variables 𝑝 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 bnj601.1 . 2 (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2 bnj601.2 . 2 (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3 bnj601.3 . 2 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
4 bnj601.4 . 2 (𝜒 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑥𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓)))
5 bnj601.5 . 2 (𝜃 ↔ ∀𝑚𝐷 (𝑚 E 𝑛[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒))
6 biid 263 . 2 ([𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑)
7 biid 263 . 2 ([𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓)
8 biid 263 . 2 ([𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒)
9 bnj602 32187 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑧 → pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))
109cbviunv 4964 . . . . . 6 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)
1110opeq2i 4806 . . . . 5 𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩ = ⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩
1211sneqi 4577 . . . 4 {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} = {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
1312uneq2i 4135 . . 3 (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
14 dfsbcq 3773 . . 3 ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) → ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑))
1513, 14ax-mp 5 . 2 ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑)
16 dfsbcq 3773 . . 3 ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) → ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓))
1713, 16ax-mp 5 . 2 ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓)
18 dfsbcq 3773 . . 3 ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) → ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒))
1913, 18ax-mp 5 . 2 ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒)
2013eqcomi 2830 . 2 (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
21 biid 263 . 2 ((𝑓 Fn 𝑚[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓))
22 biid 263 . 2 ((𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝𝑚) ↔ (𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝𝑚))
23 biid 263 . 2 ((𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) ↔ (𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
24 biid 263 . 2 ((𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 = suc 𝑖) ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 = suc 𝑖))
25 biid 263 . 2 ((𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖) ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖))
26 eqid 2821 . 2 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
27 eqid 2821 . 2 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
28 eqid 2821 . 2 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
29 eqid 2821 . 2 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
301, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 20bnj600 32191 1 (𝑛 ≠ 1o → ((𝑛𝐷𝜃) → 𝜒))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 208  wa 398  w3a 1083   = wceq 1533  wcel 2110  ∃!weu 2649  wne 3016  wral 3138  [wsbc 3771  cdif 3932  cun 3933  c0 4290  {csn 4566  cop 4572   ciun 4918   class class class wbr 5065   E cep 5463  suc csuc 6192   Fn wfn 6349  cfv 6354  ωcom 7579  1oc1o 8094  w-bnj17 31956   predc-bnj14 31958   FrSe w-bnj15 31962
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5189  ax-sep 5202  ax-nul 5209  ax-pow 5265  ax-pr 5329  ax-un 7460  ax-reg 9055
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3772  df-csb 3883  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-pss 3953  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-pw 4540  df-sn 4567  df-pr 4569  df-tp 4571  df-op 4573  df-uni 4838  df-iun 4920  df-br 5066  df-opab 5128  df-mpt 5146  df-tr 5172  df-id 5459  df-eprel 5464  df-po 5473  df-so 5474  df-fr 5513  df-we 5515  df-xp 5560  df-rel 5561  df-cnv 5562  df-co 5563  df-dm 5564  df-rn 5565  df-res 5566  df-ima 5567  df-ord 6193  df-on 6194  df-lim 6195  df-suc 6196  df-iota 6313  df-fun 6356  df-fn 6357  df-f 6358  df-f1 6359  df-fo 6360  df-f1o 6361  df-fv 6362  df-om 7580  df-1o 8101  df-bnj17 31957  df-bnj14 31959  df-bnj13 31961  df-bnj15 31963
This theorem is referenced by:  bnj852  32193
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator