Theorem elo12r 15724

Description: Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elo12r	⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐶   𝑥,𝐹   𝑥,𝑀

Proof of Theorem elo12r

Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		breq1 5109	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐶 → (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥))
2	1	imbi1d 344	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐶 → ((𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚) ↔ (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚)))
3	2	ralbidv 3189	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐶 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚)))
4		breq2 5110	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀))
5	4	imbi2d 343	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚) ↔ (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)))
6	5	ralbidv 3189	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)))
7	3, 6	rspc2ev 3592	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚))
8	7	3expa 1136	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚))
9	8	3adant1 1148	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚))
10		elo12 15723	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚)))
11	10	3ad2ant1 1151	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑚)))
12	9, 11	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090   ⊆ wss 3900   class class class wbr 5106  ⟶wf 6554  ‘cfv 6558  ℂcc 11225  ℝcr 11226   ≤ cle 11371  abscabs 15430  𝑂(1)co1 15682

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775  ax-cnex 11283  ax-resscn 11284  ax-pre-lttri 11301  ax-pre-lttrn 11302

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-nel 3066  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-ov 7446  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-er 8745  df-pm 8878  df-en 9002  df-dom 9003  df-sdom 9004  df-pnf 11372  df-mnf 11373  df-xr 11374  df-ltxr 11375  df-le 11376  df-ico 13509  df-o1 15686

This theorem is used by:  o1resb  15762  o1of2  15809  o1cxp  27332