P. 156 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 15501-15600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	abs2difabsd 15501	Absolute value of difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵))) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	abs3difd 15502	Absolute value of differences around common element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) + (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐵))))
Theorem	abs3lemd 15503	Lemma involving absolute value of differences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) < (𝐷 / 2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐵)) < (𝐷 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) < 𝐷)
Theorem	reusq0 15504*	A complex number is the square of exactly one complex number iff the given complex number is zero. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥↑2) = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 = 0))
Theorem	bhmafibid1cn 15505	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity for complex numbers. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) Generalization for complex numbers proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid2cn 15506	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity for complex numbers. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) Generalization for complex numbers proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid1 15507	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. Remark: The proof uses a different approach than the proof of bhmafibid1cn 15505, and is a little bit shorter. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid2 15508	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
5.10  Elementary limits and convergence
5.10.1  Superior limit (lim sup)
Syntax	clsp 15509	Extend class notation to include the limsup function.
class lim sup
Definition	df-limsup 15510*	Define the superior limit of an infinite sequence of extended real numbers. Definition 12-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 175. See limsupval 15513 for its value. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 11-Sep-2020.)
⊢ lim sup = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑥 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgord 15511	Ordering property of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐵[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) ≤ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐴[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupcl 15512	Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	limsupval 15513*	The superior limit of an infinite sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers, which is the infimum of the set of suprema of all upper infinite subsequences of 𝐹. Definition 12-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 175. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgf 15514*	Closure of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ*
Theorem	limsupgval 15515*	Value of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℝ → (𝐺‘𝑀) = sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑀[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgle 15516*	The defining property of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((𝐺‘𝐶) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)))
Theorem	limsuple 15517*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
Theorem	limsuplt 15518*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴))
Theorem	limsupval2 15519*	The superior limit, relativized to an unbounded set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf((𝐺 “ 𝐴), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgre 15520*	If a sequence of real numbers has upper bounded limit supremum, then all the partial suprema are real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) < +∞) → 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	limsupbnd1 15521*	If a sequence is eventually at most 𝐴, then the limsup is also at most 𝐴. (The converse is only true if the less or equal is replaced by strictly less than; consider the sequence 1 / 𝑛 which is never less or equal to zero even though the limsup is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	limsupbnd2 15522*	If a sequence is eventually greater than 𝐴, then the limsup is also greater than 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
5.10.2  Limits
Syntax	cli 15523	Extend class notation with convergence relation for limits.
class ⇝
Syntax	crli 15524	Extend class notation with real convergence relation for limits.
class ⇝𝑟
Syntax	co1 15525	Extend class notation with the set of all eventually bounded functions.
class 𝑂(1)
Syntax	clo1 15526	Extend class notation with the set of all eventually upper bounded functions.
class ≤𝑂(1)
Definition	df-clim 15527*	Define the limit relation for complex number sequences. See clim 15533 for its relational expression. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.)
⊢ ⇝ = {⟨𝑓, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝑓‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑘) − 𝑦)) < 𝑥))}
Definition	df-rlim 15528*	Define the limit relation for partial functions on the reals. See rlim 15534 for its relational expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ⇝𝑟 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑥⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑧 ≤ 𝑤 → (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑤) − 𝑥)) < 𝑦))}
Definition	df-o1 15529*	Define the set of eventually bounded functions. We don't bother to build the full conception of big-O notation, because we can represent any big-O in terms of 𝑂(1) and division, and any little-O in terms of a limit and division. We could also use limsup for this, but it only works on integer sequences, while this will work for real sequences or integer sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(abs‘(𝑓‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚}
Definition	df-lo1 15530*	Define the set of eventually upper bounded real functions. This fills a gap in 𝑂(1) coverage, to express statements like 𝑓(𝑥) ≤ 𝑔(𝑥) + 𝑂(𝑥) via (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)) / 𝑥) ∈ ≤𝑂(1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ ≤𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚}
Theorem	climrel 15531	The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ Rel ⇝
Theorem	rlimrel 15532	The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ Rel ⇝𝑟
Theorem	clim 15533*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. This means that for any real 𝑥, no matter how small, there always exists an integer 𝑗 such that the absolute difference of any later complex number in the sequence and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	rlim 15534*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number function 𝐹 is 𝐶, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐶, in the real sense. This means that for any real 𝑥, no matter how small, there always exists a number 𝑦 such that the absolute difference of any number in the function beyond 𝑦 and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	rlim2 15535*	Rewrite rlim 15534 for a mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim2lt 15536*	Use strictly less-than in place of less equal in the real limit predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim3 15537*	Restrict the range of the domain bound to reals greater than some 𝐷 ∈ ℝ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐷[,)+∞)∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	climcl 15538	Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	rlimpm 15539	Closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ))
Theorem	rlimf 15540	Closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℂ)
Theorem	rlimss 15541	Domain closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	rlimcl 15542	Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	clim2 15543*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴, with more general quantifier restrictions than clim 15533. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	clim2c 15544*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))
Theorem	clim0 15545*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	clim0c 15546*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥))
Theorem	rlim0 15547*	Express the predicate 𝐵(𝑧) converges to 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim0lt 15548*	Use strictly less-than in place of less equal in the real limit predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑧 → (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	climi 15549*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶))
Theorem	climi2 15550*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶)
Theorem	climi0 15551*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers to zero. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝐶)
Theorem	rlimi 15552*	Convergence at infinity of a function on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑅))
Theorem	rlimi2 15553*	Convergence at infinity of a function on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐷[,)+∞)∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑅))
Theorem	ello1 15554*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	ello12 15555*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello12r 15556*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1f 15557	An eventually upper bounded function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℝ)
Theorem	lo1dm 15558	An eventually upper bounded function's domain is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	lo1bdd 15559*	The defining property of an eventually upper bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	ello1mpt 15560*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello1mpt2 15561*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐶[,)+∞)∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello1d 15562*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1bdd2 15563*	If an eventually bounded function is bounded on every interval 𝐴 ∩ (-∞, 𝑦) by a function 𝑀(𝑦), then the function is bounded on the whole domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	lo1bddrp 15564*	Refine o1bdd2 15580 to give a strictly positive upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	elo1 15565*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	elo12 15566*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	elo12r 15567*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1f 15568	An eventually bounded function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℂ)
Theorem	o1dm 15569	An eventually bounded function's domain is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	o1bdd 15570*	The defining property of an eventually bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	lo1o1 15571	A function is eventually bounded iff its absolute value is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (abs ∘ 𝐹) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)))
Theorem	lo1o12 15572*	A function is eventually bounded iff its absolute value is eventually upper bounded. (This function is useful for converting theorems about ≤𝑂(1) to 𝑂(1).) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (abs‘𝐵)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)))
Theorem	elo1mpt 15573*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	elo1mpt2 15574*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐶[,)+∞)∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	elo1d 15575*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1lo1 15576*	A real function is eventually bounded iff it is eventually lower bounded and eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))))
Theorem	o1lo12 15577*	A lower bounded real function is eventually bounded iff it is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)))
Theorem	o1lo1d 15578*	A real eventually bounded function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	icco1 15579*	Derive eventual boundedness from separate upper and lower eventual bounds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑀[,]𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1bdd2 15580*	If an eventually bounded function is bounded on every interval 𝐴 ∩ (-∞, 𝑦) by a function 𝑀(𝑦), then the function is bounded on the whole domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	o1bddrp 15581*	Refine o1bdd2 15580 to give a strictly positive upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	climconst 15582*	An (eventually) constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	rlimconst 15583*	A constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐵)
Theorem	rlimclim1 15584	Forward direction of rlimclim 15585. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ dom 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	rlimclim 15585	A sequence on an upper integer set converges in the real sense iff it converges in the integer sense. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	climrlim2 15586*	Produce a real limit from an integer limit, where the real function is only dependent on the integer part of 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = (⌊‘𝑥) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)
Theorem	climconst2 15587	A constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⊆ 𝑍    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑍 × {𝐴}) ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	climz 15588	The zero sequence converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (ℤ × {0}) ⇝ 0
Theorem	rlimuni 15589	A real function whose domain is unbounded above converges to at most one limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	rlimdm 15590	Two ways to express that a function has a limit. (The expression ( ⇝𝑟 ‘𝐹) is sometimes useful as a shorthand for "the unique limit of the function 𝐹"). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 ‘𝐹)))
Theorem	climuni 15591	An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	fclim 15592	The limit relation is function-like, and with codomain the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ⇝ :dom ⇝ ⟶ℂ
Theorem	climdm 15593	Two ways to express that a function has a limit. (The expression ( ⇝ ‘𝐹) is sometimes useful as a shorthand for "the unique limit of the function 𝐹"). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ ( ⇝ ‘𝐹))
Theorem	climeu 15594*	An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit. (Contributed by NM, 25-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → ∃!𝑥 𝐹 ⇝ 𝑥)
Theorem	climreu 15595*	An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit. (Contributed by NM, 25-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝑥)
Theorem	climmo 15596*	An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ∃*𝑥 𝐹 ⇝ 𝑥
Theorem	rlimres 15597	The restriction of a function converges if the original converges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐴)
Theorem	lo1res 15598	The restriction of an eventually upper bounded function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1res 15599	The restriction of an eventually bounded function is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	rlimres2 15600*	The restriction of a function converges if the original converges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)