P. 156 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 15501-15600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	reccn2 15501*	The reciprocal function is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (if(1 ≤ ((abs‘𝐴) · 𝐵), 1, ((abs‘𝐴) · 𝐵)) · ((abs‘𝐴) / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((1 / 𝑧) − (1 / 𝐴))) < 𝐵))
Theorem	cn1lem 15502*	A sufficient condition for a function to be continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹:ℂ⟶ℂ    &   ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐴))) ≤ (abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐴))) < 𝑥))
Theorem	abscn2 15503*	The absolute value function is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((abs‘𝑧) − (abs‘𝐴))) < 𝑥))
Theorem	cjcn2 15504*	The complex conjugate function is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((∗‘𝑧) − (∗‘𝐴))) < 𝑥))
Theorem	recn2 15505*	The real part function is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((ℜ‘𝑧) − (ℜ‘𝐴))) < 𝑥))
Theorem	imcn2 15506*	The imaginary part function is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((ℑ‘𝑧) − (ℑ‘𝐴))) < 𝑥))
Theorem	climcn1lem 15507*	The limit of a continuous function, theorem form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐻:ℂ⟶ℂ    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((𝐻‘𝑧) − (𝐻‘𝐴))) < 𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐻‘𝐴))
Theorem	climabs 15508*	Limit of the absolute value of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (abs‘𝐴))
Theorem	climcj 15509*	Limit of the complex conjugate of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (∗‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (∗‘𝐴))
Theorem	climre 15510*	Limit of the real part of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (ℜ‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (ℜ‘𝐴))
Theorem	climim 15511*	Limit of the imaginary part of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (ℑ‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (ℑ‘𝐴))
Theorem	rlimmptrcl 15512*	Reverse closure for a real limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	rlimabs 15513*	Limit of the absolute value of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (abs‘𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 (abs‘𝐶))
Theorem	rlimcj 15514*	Limit of the complex conjugate of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (∗‘𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 (∗‘𝐶))
Theorem	rlimre 15515*	Limit of the real part of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (ℜ‘𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 (ℜ‘𝐶))
Theorem	rlimim 15516*	Limit of the imaginary part of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (ℑ‘𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 (ℑ‘𝐶))
Theorem	o1of2 15517*	Show that a binary operation preserves eventual boundedness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (((𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ)) → (((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑚 ∧ (abs‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑛) → (abs‘(𝑥𝑅𝑦)) ≤ 𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑂(1)) → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1add 15518	The sum of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑂(1)) → (𝐹 ∘f + 𝐺) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1mul 15519	The product of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑂(1)) → (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1sub 15520	The difference of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑂(1)) → (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	rlimo1 15521	Any function with a finite limit is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	rlimdmo1 15522	A convergent function is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1rlimmul 15523	The product of an eventually bounded function and a function of limit zero has limit zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐺 ⇝𝑟 0) → (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ⇝𝑟 0)
Theorem	o1const 15524*	A constant function is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1const 15525*	A constant function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1mptrcl 15526*	Reverse closure for an eventually upper bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	o1mptrcl 15527*	Reverse closure for an eventually bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	o1add2 15528*	The sum of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1mul2 15529*	The product of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 · 𝐶)) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1sub2 15530*	The product of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1add 15531*	The sum of two eventually upper bounded functions is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1mul 15532*	The product of an eventually upper bounded function and a positive eventually upper bounded function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 · 𝐶)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1mul2 15533*	The product of an eventually upper bounded function and a positive eventually upper bounded function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐶 · 𝐵)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1dif 15534*	If the difference of two functions is eventually bounded, eventual boundedness of either one implies the other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1)))
Theorem	lo1sub 15535*	The difference of an eventually upper bounded function and an eventually bounded function is eventually upper bounded. The "correct" sharp result here takes the second function to be eventually lower bounded instead of just bounded, but our notation for this is simply (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1), so it is just a special case of lo1add 15531. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	climadd 15536*	Limit of the sum of two converging sequences. Proposition 12-2.1(a) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐴 + 𝐵))
Theorem	climmul 15537*	Limit of the product of two converging sequences. Proposition 12-2.1(c) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	climsub 15538*	Limit of the difference of two converging sequences. Proposition 12-2.1(b) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	climaddc1 15539*	Limit of a constant 𝐶 added to each term of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐴 + 𝐶))
Theorem	climaddc2 15540*	Limit of a constant 𝐶 added to each term of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 + (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐶 + 𝐴))
Theorem	climmulc2 15541*	Limit of a sequence multiplied by a constant 𝐶. Corollary 12-2.2 of [Gleason] p. 171. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 · (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐶 · 𝐴))
Theorem	climsubc1 15542*	Limit of a constant 𝐶 subtracted from each term of a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐴 − 𝐶))
Theorem	climsubc2 15543*	Limit of a constant 𝐶 minus each term of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 − (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐶 − 𝐴))
Theorem	climle 15544*	Comparison of the limits of two sequences. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	climsqz 15545*	Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	climsqz2 15546*	Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	rlimadd 15547*	Limit of the sum of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(a) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 + 𝐸))
Theorem	rlimsub 15548*	Limit of the difference of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(b) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 − 𝐸))
Theorem	rlimmul 15549*	Limit of the product of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(c) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 · 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 · 𝐸))
Theorem	rlimdiv 15550*	Limit of the quotient of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(a) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 / 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 / 𝐸))
Theorem	rlimneg 15551*	Limit of the negative of a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵) ⇝𝑟 -𝐶)
Theorem	rlimle 15552*	Comparison of the limits of two sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≤ 𝐸)
Theorem	rlimsqzlem 15553*	Lemma for rlimsqz 15554 and rlimsqz2 15555. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐸)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)
Theorem	rlimsqz 15554*	Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)
Theorem	rlimsqz2 15555*	Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐷 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)
Theorem	lo1le 15556*	Transfer eventual upper boundedness from a larger function to a smaller function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1le 15557*	Transfer eventual boundedness from a larger function to a smaller function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → (abs‘𝐶) ≤ (abs‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	rlimno1 15558*	A function whose inverse converges to zero is unbounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (1 / 𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	clim2ser 15559*	The limit of an infinite series with an initial segment removed. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 − (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	clim2ser2 15560*	The limit of an infinite series with an initial segment added. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 + (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	iserex 15561*	An infinite series converges, if and only if the series does with initial terms removed. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ seq𝑁( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	isermulc2 15562*	Multiplication of an infinite series by a constant. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 14-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 · (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ⇝ (𝐶 · 𝐴))
Theorem	climlec2 15563*	Comparison of a constant to the limit of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	iserle 15564*	Comparison of the limits of two infinite series. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	iserge0 15565*	The limit of an infinite series of nonnegative reals is nonnegative. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	climub 15566*	The limit of a monotonic sequence is an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑁) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	climserle 15567*	The partial sums of a converging infinite series with nonnegative terms are bounded by its limit. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	isershft 15568	Index shift of the limit of an infinite series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ seq(𝑀 + 𝑁)( + , (𝐹 shift 𝑁)) ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	isercolllem1 15569*	Lemma for isercoll 15572. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ) → (𝐺 ↾ 𝑆) Isom < , < (𝑆, (𝐺 “ 𝑆)))
Theorem	isercolllem2 15570*	Lemma for isercoll 15572. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐺‘1))) → (1...(♯‘(𝐺 “ (◡𝐺 “ (𝑀...𝑁))))) = (◡𝐺 “ (𝑀...𝑁)))
Theorem	isercolllem3 15571*	Lemma for isercoll 15572. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑍 ∖ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐺‘1))) → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) = (seq1( + , 𝐻)‘(♯‘(𝐺 “ (◡𝐺 “ (𝑀...𝑁))))))
Theorem	isercoll 15572*	Rearrange an infinite series by spacing out the terms using an order isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑍 ∖ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( + , 𝐻) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	isercoll2 15573*	Generalize isercoll 15572 so that both sequences have arbitrary starting point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑊 ∖ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐻) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ seq𝑁( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	climsup 15574*	A bounded monotonic sequence converges to the supremum of its range. Theorem 12-5.1 of [Gleason] p. 180. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ sup(ran 𝐹, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	climcau 15575*	A converging sequence of complex numbers is a Cauchy sequence. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180 (necessity part). (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)
Theorem	climbdd 15576*	A converging sequence of complex numbers is bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	caucvgrlem 15577*	Lemma for caurcvgr 15578. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (lim sup‘𝐹))) < (3 · 𝑅))))
Theorem	caurcvgr 15578*	A Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges to its limit supremum. The third hypothesis specifies that 𝐹 is a Cauchy sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	caucvgrlem2 15579*	Lemma for caucvgr 15580. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐻:ℂ⟶ℝ    &   ⊢ (((𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐹‘𝑗) ∈ ℂ) → (abs‘((𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) − (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑗)))) ≤ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑛))) ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 ‘(𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)))
Theorem	caucvgr 15580*	A Cauchy sequence of complex numbers converges to a complex number. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180 (sufficiency part). (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 )
Theorem	caurcvg 15581*	A Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges to its limit supremum. The fourth hypothesis specifies that 𝐹 is a Cauchy sequence. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑚))) < 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	caurcvg2 15582*	A Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges, existence version. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ ∧ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	caucvg 15583*	A Cauchy sequence of complex numbers converges to a complex number. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180 (sufficiency part). (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	caucvgb 15584*	A function is convergent if and only if it is Cauchy. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	serf0 15585*	If an infinite series converges, its underlying sequence converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0)
Theorem	iseraltlem1 15586*	Lemma for iseralt 15589. A decreasing sequence with limit zero consists of positive terms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑁))
Theorem	iseraltlem2 15587*	Lemma for iseralt 15589. The terms of an alternating series form a chain of inequalities in alternate terms, so that for example 𝑆(1) ≤ 𝑆(3) ≤ 𝑆(5) ≤ ... and ... ≤ 𝑆(4) ≤ 𝑆(2) ≤ 𝑆(0) (assuming 𝑀 = 0 so that these terms are defined). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((-1↑𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → ((-1↑𝑁) · (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘(𝑁 + (2 · 𝐾)))) ≤ ((-1↑𝑁) · (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	iseraltlem3 15588*	Lemma for iseralt 15589. From iseraltlem2 15587, we have (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) and (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 1) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1), and we also have (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 1) = (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) − 𝐺(𝑛 + 1) for each 𝑛 by the definition of the partial sum 𝑆, so combining the inequalities we get (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) − 𝐺(𝑛 + 1) = (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 1) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) = (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) − 𝐺(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) + 𝐺(𝑛 + 1), so ∣ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) − (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ = ∣ 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) − 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ ≤ 𝐺(𝑛 + 1) and ∣ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) − (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ = ∣ 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) − 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ ≤ 𝐺(𝑛 + 1). Thus, both even and odd partial sums are Cauchy if 𝐺 converges to 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((-1↑𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → ((abs‘((seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘(𝑁 + (2 · 𝐾))) − (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) ≤ (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∧ (abs‘((seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘((𝑁 + (2 · 𝐾)) + 1)) − (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) ≤ (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	iseralt 15589*	The alternating series test. If 𝐺(𝑘) is a decreasing sequence that converges to 0, then Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍(-1↑𝑘) · 𝐺(𝑘) is a convergent series. (Note that the first term is positive if 𝑀 is even, and negative if 𝑀 is odd. If the parity of your series does not match up with this, you will need to post-compose the series with multiplication by -1 using isermulc2 15562.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jul-2022.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((-1↑𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
5.10.3  Finite and infinite sums
Syntax	csu 15590	Extend class notation to include finite and infinite summations. (An underscore was added to the ASCII token in order to facilitate set.mm text searches, since "sum" is a commonly used word in comments.)
class Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Definition	df-sum 15591*	Define the sum of a series with an index set of integers 𝐴. The variable 𝑘 is normally a free variable in 𝐵, i.e., 𝐵 can be thought of as 𝐵(𝑘). This definition is the result of a collection of discussions over the most general definition for a sum that does not need the index set to have a specified ordering. This definition is in two parts, one for finite sums and one for subsets of the upper integers. When summing over a subset of the upper integers, we extend the index set to the upper integers by adding zero outside the domain, and then sum the set in order, setting the result to the limit of the partial sums, if it exists. This means that conditionally convergent sums can be evaluated meaningfully. For finite sums, we are explicitly order-independent, by picking any bijection to a 1-based finite sequence and summing in the induced order. These two methods of summation produce the same result on their common region of definition (i.e., finite sets of integers) by summo 15621. Examples: Σ𝑘 ∈ {1, 2, 4}𝑘 means 1 + 2 + 4 = 7, and Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ(1 / (2↑𝑘)) = 1 means 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 1 (geoihalfsum 15786). (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚))))
Theorem	sumex 15592	A sum is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V
Theorem	sumeq1 15593	Equality theorem for a sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	nfsum1 15594	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	nfsum 15595*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for sum: if 𝑥 is (effectively) not free in 𝐴 and 𝐵, it is not free in Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴𝐵. Version of nfsum 15595 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by GG, 24-Feb-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	sumeq2w 15596	Equality theorem for sum, when the class expressions 𝐵 and 𝐶 are equal everywhere. Proved using only Extensionality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	sumeq2ii 15597*	Equality theorem for sum, with the class expressions 𝐵 and 𝐶 guarded by I to be always sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ( I ‘𝐵) = ( I ‘𝐶) → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	sumeq2 15598*	Equality theorem for sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	cbvsum 15599*	Change bound variable in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	cbvsumv 15600*	Change bound variable in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶