P. 156 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 15501-15600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	absexpd 15501	Absolute value of positive integer exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((abs‘𝐴)↑𝑁))
Theorem	abssubd 15502	Swapping order of subtraction doesn't change the absolute value. Example of [Apostol] p. 363. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	absmuld 15503	Absolute value distributes over multiplication. Proposition 10-3.7(f) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 · 𝐵)) = ((abs‘𝐴) · (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	absdivd 15504	Absolute value distributes over division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 / 𝐵)) = ((abs‘𝐴) / (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	abstrid 15505	Triangle inequality for absolute value. Proposition 10-3.7(h) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘𝐴) + (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	abs2difd 15506	Difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	abs2dif2d 15507	Difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘𝐴) + (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	abs2difabsd 15508	Absolute value of difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵))) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	abs3difd 15509	Absolute value of differences around common element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) + (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐵))))
Theorem	abs3lemd 15510	Lemma involving absolute value of differences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) < (𝐷 / 2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐵)) < (𝐷 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) < 𝐷)
Theorem	reusq0 15511*	A complex number is the square of exactly one complex number iff the given complex number is zero. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥↑2) = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 = 0))
Theorem	bhmafibid1cn 15512	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity for complex numbers. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) Generalization for complex numbers proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid2cn 15513	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity for complex numbers. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) Generalization for complex numbers proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid1 15514	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. Remark: The proof uses a different approach than the proof of bhmafibid1cn 15512, and is a little bit shorter. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid2 15515	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
5.10  Elementary limits and convergence
5.10.1  Superior limit (lim sup)
Syntax	clsp 15516	Extend class notation to include the limsup function.
class lim sup
Definition	df-limsup 15517*	Define the superior limit of an infinite sequence of extended real numbers. Definition 12-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 175. See limsupval 15520 for its value. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 11-Sep-2020.)
⊢ lim sup = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑥 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgord 15518	Ordering property of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐵[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) ≤ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐴[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupcl 15519	Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	limsupval 15520*	The superior limit of an infinite sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers, which is the infimum of the set of suprema of all upper infinite subsequences of 𝐹. Definition 12-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 175. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgf 15521*	Closure of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ*
Theorem	limsupgval 15522*	Value of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℝ → (𝐺‘𝑀) = sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑀[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgle 15523*	The defining property of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((𝐺‘𝐶) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)))
Theorem	limsuple 15524*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
Theorem	limsuplt 15525*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴))
Theorem	limsupval2 15526*	The superior limit, relativized to an unbounded set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf((𝐺 “ 𝐴), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgre 15527*	If a sequence of real numbers has upper bounded limit supremum, then all the partial suprema are real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) < +∞) → 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	limsupbnd1 15528*	If a sequence is eventually at most 𝐴, then the limsup is also at most 𝐴. (The converse is only true if the less or equal is replaced by strictly less than; consider the sequence 1 / 𝑛 which is never less or equal to zero even though the limsup is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	limsupbnd2 15529*	If a sequence is eventually greater than 𝐴, then the limsup is also greater than 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
5.10.2  Limits
Syntax	cli 15530	Extend class notation with convergence relation for limits.
class ⇝
Syntax	crli 15531	Extend class notation with real convergence relation for limits.
class ⇝𝑟
Syntax	co1 15532	Extend class notation with the set of all eventually bounded functions.
class 𝑂(1)
Syntax	clo1 15533	Extend class notation with the set of all eventually upper bounded functions.
class ≤𝑂(1)
Definition	df-clim 15534*	Define the limit relation for complex number sequences. See clim 15540 for its relational expression. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.)
⊢ ⇝ = {⟨𝑓, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝑓‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑘) − 𝑦)) < 𝑥))}
Definition	df-rlim 15535*	Define the limit relation for partial functions on the reals. See rlim 15541 for its relational expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ⇝𝑟 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑥⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑧 ≤ 𝑤 → (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑤) − 𝑥)) < 𝑦))}
Definition	df-o1 15536*	Define the set of eventually bounded functions. We don't bother to build the full conception of big-O notation, because we can represent any big-O in terms of 𝑂(1) and division, and any little-O in terms of a limit and division. We could also use limsup for this, but it only works on integer sequences, while this will work for real sequences or integer sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(abs‘(𝑓‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚}
Definition	df-lo1 15537*	Define the set of eventually upper bounded real functions. This fills a gap in 𝑂(1) coverage, to express statements like 𝑓(𝑥) ≤ 𝑔(𝑥) + 𝑂(𝑥) via (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)) / 𝑥) ∈ ≤𝑂(1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ ≤𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚}
Theorem	climrel 15538	The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ Rel ⇝
Theorem	rlimrel 15539	The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ Rel ⇝𝑟
Theorem	clim 15540*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. This means that for any real 𝑥, no matter how small, there always exists an integer 𝑗 such that the absolute difference of any later complex number in the sequence and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	rlim 15541*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number function 𝐹 is 𝐶, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐶, in the real sense. This means that for any real 𝑥, no matter how small, there always exists a number 𝑦 such that the absolute difference of any number in the function beyond 𝑦 and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	rlim2 15542*	Rewrite rlim 15541 for a mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim2lt 15543*	Use strictly less-than in place of less equal in the real limit predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim3 15544*	Restrict the range of the domain bound to reals greater than some 𝐷 ∈ ℝ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐷[,)+∞)∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	climcl 15545	Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	rlimpm 15546	Closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ))
Theorem	rlimf 15547	Closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℂ)
Theorem	rlimss 15548	Domain closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	rlimcl 15549	Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	clim2 15550*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴, with more general quantifier restrictions than clim 15540. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	clim2c 15551*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))
Theorem	clim0 15552*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	clim0c 15553*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥))
Theorem	rlim0 15554*	Express the predicate 𝐵(𝑧) converges to 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim0lt 15555*	Use strictly less-than in place of less equal in the real limit predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑧 → (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	climi 15556*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶))
Theorem	climi2 15557*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶)
Theorem	climi0 15558*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers to zero. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝐶)
Theorem	rlimi 15559*	Convergence at infinity of a function on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑅))
Theorem	rlimi2 15560*	Convergence at infinity of a function on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐷[,)+∞)∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑅))
Theorem	ello1 15561*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	ello12 15562*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello12r 15563*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1f 15564	An eventually upper bounded function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℝ)
Theorem	lo1dm 15565	An eventually upper bounded function's domain is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	lo1bdd 15566*	The defining property of an eventually upper bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	ello1mpt 15567*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello1mpt2 15568*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐶[,)+∞)∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello1d 15569*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1bdd2 15570*	If an eventually bounded function is bounded on every interval 𝐴 ∩ (-∞, 𝑦) by a function 𝑀(𝑦), then the function is bounded on the whole domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	lo1bddrp 15571*	Refine o1bdd2 15587 to give a strictly positive upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	elo1 15572*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	elo12 15573*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	elo12r 15574*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1f 15575	An eventually bounded function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℂ)
Theorem	o1dm 15576	An eventually bounded function's domain is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	o1bdd 15577*	The defining property of an eventually bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	lo1o1 15578	A function is eventually bounded iff its absolute value is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (abs ∘ 𝐹) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)))
Theorem	lo1o12 15579*	A function is eventually bounded iff its absolute value is eventually upper bounded. (This function is useful for converting theorems about ≤𝑂(1) to 𝑂(1).) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (abs‘𝐵)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)))
Theorem	elo1mpt 15580*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	elo1mpt2 15581*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐶[,)+∞)∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	elo1d 15582*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1lo1 15583*	A real function is eventually bounded iff it is eventually lower bounded and eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))))
Theorem	o1lo12 15584*	A lower bounded real function is eventually bounded iff it is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)))
Theorem	o1lo1d 15585*	A real eventually bounded function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	icco1 15586*	Derive eventual boundedness from separate upper and lower eventual bounds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑀[,]𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1bdd2 15587*	If an eventually bounded function is bounded on every interval 𝐴 ∩ (-∞, 𝑦) by a function 𝑀(𝑦), then the function is bounded on the whole domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	o1bddrp 15588*	Refine o1bdd2 15587 to give a strictly positive upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	climconst 15589*	An (eventually) constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	rlimconst 15590*	A constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐵)
Theorem	rlimclim1 15591	Forward direction of rlimclim 15592. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ dom 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	rlimclim 15592	A sequence on an upper integer set converges in the real sense iff it converges in the integer sense. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	climrlim2 15593*	Produce a real limit from an integer limit, where the real function is only dependent on the integer part of 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = (⌊‘𝑥) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)
Theorem	climconst2 15594	A constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⊆ 𝑍    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑍 × {𝐴}) ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	climz 15595	The zero sequence converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (ℤ × {0}) ⇝ 0
Theorem	rlimuni 15596	A real function whose domain is unbounded above converges to at most one limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	rlimdm 15597	Two ways to express that a function has a limit. (The expression ( ⇝𝑟 ‘𝐹) is sometimes useful as a shorthand for "the unique limit of the function 𝐹"). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 ‘𝐹)))
Theorem	climuni 15598	An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	fclim 15599	The limit relation is function-like, and with codomain the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ⇝ :dom ⇝ ⟶ℂ
Theorem	climdm 15600	Two ways to express that a function has a limit. (The expression ( ⇝ ‘𝐹) is sometimes useful as a shorthand for "the unique limit of the function 𝐹"). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ ( ⇝ ‘𝐹))