P. 156 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 15501-15600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	nn0absidi 15501	A nonnegative integer is its own absolute value (inference form). (Contributed by AV, 22-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ (abs‘𝑁) = 𝑁
Theorem	absltd 15502	Absolute value and 'less than' relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘𝐴) < 𝐵 ↔ (-𝐵 < 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵)))
Theorem	absled 15503	Absolute value and 'less than or equal to' relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘𝐴) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (-𝐵 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)))
Theorem	abssubge0d 15504	Absolute value of a nonnegative difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) = (𝐵 − 𝐴))
Theorem	abssuble0d 15505	Absolute value of a nonpositive difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) = (𝐵 − 𝐴))
Theorem	absdifltd 15506	The absolute value of a difference and 'less than' relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) < 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐵 − 𝐶) < 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 < (𝐵 + 𝐶))))
Theorem	absdifled 15507	The absolute value of a difference and 'less than or equal to' relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) ≤ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐵 − 𝐶) ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶))))
Theorem	icodiamlt 15508	Two elements in a half-open interval have separation strictly less than the difference between the endpoints. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,)𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴[,)𝐵))) → (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐷)) < (𝐵 − 𝐴))
Theorem	abscld 15509	Real closure of absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	sqrtcld 15510	Closure of the square root function over the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (√‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	sqrtrege0d 15511	The real part of the square root function is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (ℜ‘(√‘𝐴)))
Theorem	sqsqrtd 15512	Square root theorem. Theorem I.35 of [Apostol] p. 29. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((√‘𝐴)↑2) = 𝐴)
Theorem	msqsqrtd 15513	Square root theorem. Theorem I.35 of [Apostol] p. 29. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((√‘𝐴) · (√‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sqr00d 15514	A square root is zero iff its argument is 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (√‘𝐴) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	absvalsqd 15515	Square of value of absolute value function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) = (𝐴 · (∗‘𝐴)))
Theorem	absvalsq2d 15516	Square of value of absolute value function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) = (((ℜ‘𝐴)↑2) + ((ℑ‘𝐴)↑2)))
Theorem	absge0d 15517	Absolute value is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (abs‘𝐴))
Theorem	absval2d 15518	Value of absolute value function. Definition 10.36 of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) = (√‘(((ℜ‘𝐴)↑2) + ((ℑ‘𝐴)↑2))))
Theorem	abs00d 15519	The absolute value of a number is zero iff the number is zero. Proposition 10-3.7(c) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	absne0d 15520	The absolute value of a number is zero iff the number is zero. Proposition 10-3.7(c) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ≠ 0)
Theorem	absrpcld 15521	The absolute value of a nonzero number is a positive real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	absnegd 15522	Absolute value of negative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘-𝐴) = (abs‘𝐴))
Theorem	abscjd 15523	The absolute value of a number and its conjugate are the same. Proposition 10-3.7(b) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(∗‘𝐴)) = (abs‘𝐴))
Theorem	releabsd 15524	The real part of a number is less than or equal to its absolute value. Proposition 10-3.7(d) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℜ‘𝐴) ≤ (abs‘𝐴))
Theorem	absexpd 15525	Absolute value of positive integer exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((abs‘𝐴)↑𝑁))
Theorem	abssubd 15526	Swapping order of subtraction doesn't change the absolute value. Example of [Apostol] p. 363. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	absmuld 15527	Absolute value distributes over multiplication. Proposition 10-3.7(f) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 · 𝐵)) = ((abs‘𝐴) · (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	absdivd 15528	Absolute value distributes over division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 / 𝐵)) = ((abs‘𝐴) / (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	abstrid 15529	Triangle inequality for absolute value. Proposition 10-3.7(h) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘𝐴) + (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	abs2difd 15530	Difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	abs2dif2d 15531	Difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘𝐴) + (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	abs2difabsd 15532	Absolute value of difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵))) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	abs3difd 15533	Absolute value of differences around common element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) + (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐵))))
Theorem	abs3lemd 15534	Lemma involving absolute value of differences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) < (𝐷 / 2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐵)) < (𝐷 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) < 𝐷)
Theorem	reusq0 15535*	A complex number is the square of exactly one complex number iff the given complex number is zero. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥↑2) = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 = 0))
Theorem	bhmafibid1cn 15536	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity for complex numbers. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) Generalization for complex numbers proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid2cn 15537	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity for complex numbers. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) Generalization for complex numbers proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid1 15538	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. Remark: The proof uses a different approach than the proof of bhmafibid1cn 15536, and is a little bit shorter. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid2 15539	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
5.10  Elementary limits and convergence
5.10.1  Superior limit (lim sup)
Syntax	clsp 15540	Extend class notation to include the limsup function.
class lim sup
Definition	df-limsup 15541*	Define the superior limit of an infinite sequence of extended real numbers. Definition 12-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 175. See limsupval 15544 for its value. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 11-Sep-2020.)
⊢ lim sup = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑥 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgord 15542	Ordering property of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐵[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) ≤ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐴[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupcl 15543	Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	limsupval 15544*	The superior limit of an infinite sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers, which is the infimum of the set of suprema of all upper infinite subsequences of 𝐹. Definition 12-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 175. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgf 15545*	Closure of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ*
Theorem	limsupgval 15546*	Value of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℝ → (𝐺‘𝑀) = sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑀[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgle 15547*	The defining property of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((𝐺‘𝐶) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)))
Theorem	limsuple 15548*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
Theorem	limsuplt 15549*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴))
Theorem	limsupval2 15550*	The superior limit, relativized to an unbounded set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf((𝐺 “ 𝐴), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgre 15551*	If a sequence of real numbers has upper bounded limit supremum, then all the partial suprema are real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) < +∞) → 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	limsupbnd1 15552*	If a sequence is eventually at most 𝐴, then the limsup is also at most 𝐴. (The converse is only true if the less or equal is replaced by strictly less than; consider the sequence 1 / 𝑛 which is never less or equal to zero even though the limsup is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	limsupbnd2 15553*	If a sequence is eventually greater than 𝐴, then the limsup is also greater than 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
5.10.2  Limits
Syntax	cli 15554	Extend class notation with convergence relation for limits.
class ⇝
Syntax	crli 15555	Extend class notation with real convergence relation for limits.
class ⇝𝑟
Syntax	co1 15556	Extend class notation with the set of all eventually bounded functions.
class 𝑂(1)
Syntax	clo1 15557	Extend class notation with the set of all eventually upper bounded functions.
class ≤𝑂(1)
Definition	df-clim 15558*	Define the limit relation for complex number sequences. See clim 15564 for its relational expression. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.)
⊢ ⇝ = {⟨𝑓, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝑓‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑘) − 𝑦)) < 𝑥))}
Definition	df-rlim 15559*	Define the limit relation for partial functions on the reals. See rlim 15565 for its relational expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ⇝𝑟 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑥⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑧 ≤ 𝑤 → (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑤) − 𝑥)) < 𝑦))}
Definition	df-o1 15560*	Define the set of eventually bounded functions. We don't bother to build the full conception of big-O notation, because we can represent any big-O in terms of 𝑂(1) and division, and any little-O in terms of a limit and division. We could also use limsup for this, but it only works on integer sequences, while this will work for real sequences or integer sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(abs‘(𝑓‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚}
Definition	df-lo1 15561*	Define the set of eventually upper bounded real functions. This fills a gap in 𝑂(1) coverage, to express statements like 𝑓(𝑥) ≤ 𝑔(𝑥) + 𝑂(𝑥) via (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)) / 𝑥) ∈ ≤𝑂(1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ ≤𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚}
Theorem	climrel 15562	The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ Rel ⇝
Theorem	rlimrel 15563	The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ Rel ⇝𝑟
Theorem	clim 15564*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. This means that for any real 𝑥, no matter how small, there always exists an integer 𝑗 such that the absolute difference of any later complex number in the sequence and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	rlim 15565*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number function 𝐹 is 𝐶, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐶, in the real sense. This means that for any real 𝑥, no matter how small, there always exists a number 𝑦 such that the absolute difference of any number in the function beyond 𝑦 and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	rlim2 15566*	Rewrite rlim 15565 for a mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim2lt 15567*	Use strictly less-than in place of less equal in the real limit predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim3 15568*	Restrict the range of the domain bound to reals greater than some 𝐷 ∈ ℝ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐷[,)+∞)∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	climcl 15569	Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	rlimpm 15570	Closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ))
Theorem	rlimf 15571	Closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℂ)
Theorem	rlimss 15572	Domain closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	rlimcl 15573	Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	clim2 15574*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴, with more general quantifier restrictions than clim 15564. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	clim2c 15575*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))
Theorem	clim0 15576*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	clim0c 15577*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥))
Theorem	rlim0 15578*	Express the predicate 𝐵(𝑧) converges to 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim0lt 15579*	Use strictly less-than in place of less equal in the real limit predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑧 → (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	climi 15580*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶))
Theorem	climi2 15581*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶)
Theorem	climi0 15582*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers to zero. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝐶)
Theorem	rlimi 15583*	Convergence at infinity of a function on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑅))
Theorem	rlimi2 15584*	Convergence at infinity of a function on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐷[,)+∞)∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑅))
Theorem	ello1 15585*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	ello12 15586*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello12r 15587*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1f 15588	An eventually upper bounded function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℝ)
Theorem	lo1dm 15589	An eventually upper bounded function's domain is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	lo1bdd 15590*	The defining property of an eventually upper bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	ello1mpt 15591*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello1mpt2 15592*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐶[,)+∞)∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello1d 15593*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1bdd2 15594*	If an eventually bounded function is bounded on every interval 𝐴 ∩ (-∞, 𝑦) by a function 𝑀(𝑦), then the function is bounded on the whole domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	lo1bddrp 15595*	Refine o1bdd2 15611 to give a strictly positive upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	elo1 15596*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	elo12 15597*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	elo12r 15598*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1f 15599	An eventually bounded function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℂ)
Theorem	o1dm 15600	An eventually bounded function's domain is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)