Theorem perpln2 29073

Description: Derive a line from perpendicularity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
perpln.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
perpln.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
perpln.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
perpln2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)

Proof of Theorem perpln2

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑔 𝑢 𝑣 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-perpg 29058	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ⟂G = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝑔))})
2		simpr 490	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → 𝑔 = 𝐺)
3	2	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (LineG‘𝑔) = (LineG‘𝐺))
4		perpln.l	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2815	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (LineG‘𝑔) = 𝐿)
6	5	rneqd 5926	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → ran (LineG‘𝑔) = ran 𝐿)
7	6	eleq2d 2848	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑎 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↔ 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿))
8	6	eleq2d 2848	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑏 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↔ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿))
9	7, 8	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → ((𝑎 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔)) ↔ (𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿)))
10	2	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (∟G‘𝑔) = (∟G‘𝐺))
11	10	eleq2d 2848	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝑔) ↔ ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)))
12	11	ralbidv 3187	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝑔) ↔ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)))
13	12	rexralbidv 3230	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)))
14	9, 13	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (((𝑎 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝑔)) ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))))
15	14	opabbidv 5175	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝑔))} = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))})
16		perpln.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
17	16	elexd 3476	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
18	4	fvexi 6896	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐿 ∈ V
19		rnexg 7903	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐿 ∈ V → ran 𝐿 ∈ V)
20	18, 19	mp1i 14	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐿 ∈ V)
21	20, 20	xpexd 7754	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran 𝐿 × ran 𝐿) ∈ V)
22		opabssxp 5751	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))} ⊆ (ran 𝐿 × ran 𝐿)
23	22	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))} ⊆ (ran 𝐿 × ran 𝐿))
24	21, 23	ssexd 5293	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))} ∈ V)
25	1, 15, 17, 24	fvmptd2 6999	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟂G‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))})
26	25	rneqd 5926	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (⟂G‘𝐺) = ran {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))})
27	22	rnssi 5928	. . . 4 ⊢ ran {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))} ⊆ ran (ran 𝐿 × ran 𝐿)
28	26, 27	eqsstrdi 3978	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (⟂G‘𝐺) ⊆ ran (ran 𝐿 × ran 𝐿))
29		rnxpss 6169	. . 3 ⊢ ran (ran 𝐿 × ran 𝐿) ⊆ ran 𝐿
30	28, 29	sstrdi 3946	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (⟂G‘𝐺) ⊆ ran 𝐿)
31		relopabv 5806	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))}
32	25	releqd 5763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Rel (⟂G‘𝐺) ↔ Rel {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))}))
33	31, 32	mpbiri 261	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel (⟂G‘𝐺))
34		perpln.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)
35		brrelex12 5711	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Rel (⟂G‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
36	33, 34, 35	syl2anc 596	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
37	36	simpld 500	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
38	36	simprd 501	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
39		brelrng 5929	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ ran (⟂G‘𝐺))
40	37, 38, 34, 39	syl3anc 1398	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran (⟂G‘𝐺))
41	30, 40	sseldd 3935	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088  Vcvv 3453   ∩ cin 3901   ⊆ wss 3902   class class class wbr 5107  {copab 5171   × cxp 5657  ran crn 5660  Rel wrel 5664  ‘cfv 6537  ⟨“cs3 14917  TarskiGcstrkg 28776  LineGclng 28783  ∟Gcrag 29055  ⟂Gcperpg 29057

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fv 6545  df-perpg 29058

This theorem is used by:  perpin  29087  hlperpnel  29088  mideulem2  29097  opphllem  29098  opphllem3  29112  opphllem5  29114  opphllem6  29115  trgcopy  29198  perpprlng  29315  prlngex  29316