P. 280 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Type

Label

Description

Statement

Syntax

cbtwn 27901

Declare the syntax for the Euclidean betweenness predicate.

class Btwn

Syntax

ccgr 27902

Declare the syntax for the Euclidean congruence predicate.

class Cgr

Definition

df-ee 27903

Define the Euclidean space generator. For details, see elee 27906. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝔼 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (ℝ ↑_m (1...𝑛)))

Definition

df-btwn 27904*

Define the Euclidean betweenness predicate. For details, see brbtwn 27911. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ Btwn = ^◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑧‘𝑖))))}

Definition

df-cgr 27905*

Define the Euclidean congruence predicate. For details, see brcgr 27912. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ Cgr = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛))) ∧ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1^st ‘𝑥)‘𝑖) − ((2^nd ‘𝑥)‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1^st ‘𝑦)‘𝑖) − ((2^nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑖))↑2))}

Theorem

elee 27906

Membership in a Euclidean space. We define Euclidean space here using Cartesian coordinates over 𝑁 space. We later abstract away from this using Tarski's geometry axioms, so this exact definition is unimportant. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ))

Theorem

mptelee 27907*

A condition for a mapping to be an element of a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ ℝ))

Theorem

eleenn 27908

If 𝐴 is in (𝔼‘𝑁), then 𝑁 is a natural. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

eleei 27909

The forward direction of elee 27906. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ)

Theorem

eedimeq 27910

A point belongs to at most one Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀)) → 𝑁 = 𝑀)

Theorem

brbtwn 27911*

The binary relation form of the betweenness predicate. The statement 𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ should be informally read as "𝐴 lies on a line segment between 𝐵 and 𝐶. This exact definition is abstracted away by Tarski's geometry axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐵‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝐶‘𝑖)))))

Theorem

brcgr 27912*

The binary relation form of the congruence predicate. The statement ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ should be read informally as "the 𝑁 dimensional point 𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐶 is from 𝐷, or "the line segment 𝐴𝐵 is congruent to the line segment 𝐶𝐷. This particular definition is encapsulated by Tarski's axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2)))

Theorem

fveere 27913

The function value of a point is a real. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℝ)

Theorem

fveecn 27914

The function value of a point is a complex. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℂ)

Theorem

eqeefv 27915*

Two points are equal iff they agree in all dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (𝐵‘𝑖)))

Theorem

eqeelen 27916*

Two points are equal iff the square of the distance between them is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = 0))

Theorem

brbtwn2 27917*

Alternate characterization of betweenness, with no existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))))))

Theorem

colinearalglem1 27918

Lemma for colinearalg 27922. Expand out a multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐵 − 𝐴) · (𝐹 − 𝐷)) = ((𝐸 − 𝐷) · (𝐶 − 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝐵 · 𝐹) − ((𝐴 · 𝐹) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))) = ((𝐶 · 𝐸) − ((𝐴 · 𝐸) + (𝐶 · 𝐷)))))

Theorem

colinearalglem2 27919*

Lemma for colinearalg 27922. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)) · ((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗))) = (((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗)) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)))))

Theorem

colinearalglem3 27920*

Lemma for colinearalg 27922. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · ((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))) = (((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗)) · ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)))))

Theorem

colinearalglem4 27921*

Lemma for colinearalg 27922. Prove a disjunction that will be needed in the final proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)((((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖))) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · (((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐶‘𝑖))) ≤ 0))

Theorem

colinearalg 27922*

An algebraic characterization of colinearity. Note the similarity to brbtwn2 27917. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ((𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∨ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ ∨ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)))))

Theorem

eleesub 27923*

Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.)

⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))

Theorem

eleesubd 27924*

Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. Deduction form of eleesub 27923. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))

16.4.2.2  Tarski's axioms for geometry for the Euclidean space

Theorem

axdimuniq 27925

The unique dimension axiom. If a point is in 𝑁 dimensional space and in 𝑀 dimensional space, then 𝑁 = 𝑀. This axiom is not traditionally presented with Tarski's axioms, but we require it here as we are considering spaces in arbitrary dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.)

⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀))) → 𝑁 = 𝑀)

Theorem

axcgrrflx 27926

𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐵 is from 𝐴. Axiom A1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩)

Theorem

axcgrtr 27927

Congruence is transitive. Axiom A2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩) → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩))

Theorem

axcgrid 27928

If there is no distance between 𝐴 and 𝐵, then 𝐴 = 𝐵. Axiom A3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐶⟩ → 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Theorem

axsegconlem1 27929*

Lemma for axsegcon 27939. Handle the degenerate case. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)(∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑥‘𝑖))) ∧ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝑥‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2)))

Theorem

axsegconlem2 27930*

Lemma for axsegcon 27939. Show that the square of the distance between two points is a real number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)

⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ)

Theorem

axsegconlem3 27931*

Lemma for axsegcon 27939. Show that the square of the distance between two points is nonnegative. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)

⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 0 ≤ 𝑆)

Theorem

axsegconlem4 27932*

Lemma for axsegcon 27939. Show that the distance between two points is a real number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)

⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (√‘𝑆) ∈ ℝ)

Theorem

axsegconlem5 27933*

Lemma for axsegcon 27939. Show that the distance between two points is nonnegative. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)

⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 0 ≤ (√‘𝑆))

Theorem

axsegconlem6 27934*

Lemma for axsegcon 27939. Show that the distance between two distinct points is positive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)

⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 0 < (√‘𝑆))

Theorem

axsegconlem7 27935*

Lemma for axsegcon 27939. Show that a particular ratio of distances is in the closed unit interval. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Sep-2013.)

⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((√‘𝑆) / ((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇))) ∈ (0[,]1))

Theorem

axsegconlem8 27936*

Lemma for axsegcon 27939. Show that a particular mapping generates a point. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Sep-2013.)

⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)) · (𝐵‘𝑘)) − ((√‘𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑘))) / (√‘𝑆)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))

Theorem

axsegconlem9 27937*

Lemma for axsegcon 27939. Show that 𝐵𝐹 is congruent to 𝐶𝐷. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Sep-2013.)

⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)) · (𝐵‘𝑘)) − ((√‘𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑘))) / (√‘𝑆)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐹‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2))

Theorem

axsegconlem10 27938*

Lemma for axsegcon 27939. Show that the scaling constant from axsegconlem7 27935 produces the betweenness condition for 𝐴, 𝐵 and 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.)

⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)) · (𝐵‘𝑘)) − ((√‘𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑘))) / (√‘𝑆)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − ((√‘𝑆) / ((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)))) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (((√‘𝑆) / ((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇))) · (𝐹‘𝑖))))

Theorem

axsegcon 27939*

Any segment 𝐴𝐵 can be extended to a point 𝑥 such that 𝐵𝑥 is congruent to 𝐶𝐷. Axiom A4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝑥⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩))

Theorem

ax5seglem1 27940*

Lemma for ax5seg 27950. Rexpress a one congruence sum given betweenness. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))))) → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗))↑2) = ((𝑇↑2) · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2)))

Theorem

ax5seglem2 27941*

Lemma for ax5seg 27950. Rexpress another congruence sum given betweenness. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))))) → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2) = (((1 − 𝑇)↑2) · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2)))

Theorem

ax5seglem3a 27942

Lemma for ax5seg 27950. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-May-2015.)

⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗)) ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝐷‘𝑗) − (𝐹‘𝑗)) ∈ ℝ))

Theorem

ax5seglem3 27943*

Lemma for ax5seg 27950. Combine congruences for points on a line. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (0[,]1)) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐸‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑆) · (𝐷‘𝑖)) + (𝑆 · (𝐹‘𝑖))))) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩)) → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐷‘𝑗) − (𝐹‘𝑗))↑2))

Theorem

ax5seglem4 27944*

Lemma for ax5seg 27950. Given two distinct points, the scaling constant in a betweenness statement is nonzero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 𝑇 ≠ 0)

Theorem

ax5seglem5 27945*

Lemma for ax5seg 27950. If 𝐵 is between 𝐴 and 𝐶, and 𝐴 is distinct from 𝐵, then 𝐴 is distinct from 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))))) → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2) ≠ 0)

Theorem

ax5seglem6 27946*

Lemma for ax5seg 27950. Given two line segments that are divided into pieces, if the pieces are congruent, then the scaling constant is the same. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (0[,]1)) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐸‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑆) · (𝐷‘𝑖)) + (𝑆 · (𝐹‘𝑖))))) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩)) → 𝑇 = 𝑆)

Theorem

ax5seglem7 27947

Lemma for ax5seg 27950. An algebraic calculation needed further down the line. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 · ((𝐶 − 𝐷)↑2)) = ((((((1 − 𝑇) · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐶)) − 𝐷)↑2) + ((1 − 𝑇) · ((𝑇 · ((𝐴 − 𝐶)↑2)) − ((𝐴 − 𝐷)↑2))))

Theorem

ax5seglem8 27948

Lemma for ax5seg 27950. Use the weak deduction theorem to eliminate the hypotheses from ax5seglem7 27947. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (𝑇 · ((𝐶 − 𝐷)↑2)) = ((((((1 − 𝑇) · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐶)) − 𝐷)↑2) + ((1 − 𝑇) · ((𝑇 · ((𝐴 − 𝐶)↑2)) − ((𝐴 − 𝐷)↑2)))))

Theorem

ax5seglem9 27949*

Lemma for ax5seg 27950. Take the calculation in ax5seglem8 27948 and turn it into a series of measurements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)

⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))))) → (𝑇 · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐷‘𝑗))↑2)) = (Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐷‘𝑗))↑2) + ((1 − 𝑇) · ((𝑇 · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2)) − Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐷‘𝑗))↑2)))))

Theorem

ax5seg 27950

The five segment axiom. Take two triangles 𝐴𝐷𝐶 and 𝐸𝐻𝐺, a point 𝐵 on 𝐴𝐶, and a point 𝐹 on 𝐸𝐺. If all corresponding line segments except for 𝐶𝐷 and 𝐺𝐻 are congruent, then so are 𝐶𝐷 and 𝐺𝐻. Axiom A5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐹 Btwn ⟨𝐸, 𝐺⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐻⟩)) → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩))

Theorem

axbtwnid 27951

Points are indivisible. That is, if 𝐴 lies between 𝐵 and 𝐵, then 𝐴 = 𝐵. Axiom A6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Theorem

axpaschlem 27952*

Lemma for axpasch 27953. Set up coefficents used in the proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (0[,]1)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ (0[,]1)∃𝑝 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑝 = ((1 − 𝑟) · (1 − 𝑇)) ∧ 𝑟 = ((1 − 𝑝) · (1 − 𝑆)) ∧ ((1 − 𝑟) · 𝑇) = ((1 − 𝑝) · 𝑆)))

Theorem

axpasch 27953*

The inner Pasch axiom. Take a triangle 𝐴𝐶𝐸, a point 𝐷 on 𝐴𝐶, and a point 𝐵 extending 𝐶𝐸. Then 𝐴𝐸 and 𝐷𝐵 intersect at some point 𝑥. Axiom A7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩ ∧ 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝐸, 𝐴⟩)))

Theorem

axlowdimlem1 27954

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Establish a particular constant function as a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((3...𝑁) × {0}):(3...𝑁)⟶ℝ

Theorem

axlowdimlem2 27955

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Show that two sets are disjoint. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((1...2) ∩ (3...𝑁)) = ∅

Theorem

axlowdimlem3 27956

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Set up a union property for an interval of integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2) → (1...𝑁) = ((1...2) ∪ (3...𝑁)))

Theorem

axlowdimlem4 27957

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Set up a particular constant function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2013.)

⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩}:(1...2)⟶ℝ

Theorem

axlowdimlem5 27958

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Show that a particular union is a point in Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2) → ({⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩} ∪ ((3...𝑁) × {0})) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))

Theorem

axlowdimlem6 27959

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Show that three points are non-colinear. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐴 = ({⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨2, 0⟩} ∪ ((3...𝑁) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ({⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨2, 0⟩} ∪ ((3...𝑁) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨2, 1⟩} ∪ ((3...𝑁) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2) → ¬ (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∨ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ ∨ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))

Theorem

axlowdimlem7 27960

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Set up a point in Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) → 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))

Theorem

axlowdimlem8 27961

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Calculate the value of 𝑃 at three. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃‘3) = -1

Theorem

axlowdimlem9 27962

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Calculate the value of 𝑃 away from three. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 3) → (𝑃‘𝐾) = 0)

Theorem

axlowdimlem10 27963

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Set up a family of points in Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)

⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) → 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))

Theorem

axlowdimlem11 27964

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Calculate the value of 𝑄 at its distinguished point. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)

⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑄‘(𝐼 + 1)) = 1

Theorem

axlowdimlem12 27965

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Calculate the value of 𝑄 away from its distinguished point. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)

⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∧ 𝐾 ≠ (𝐼 + 1)) → (𝑄‘𝐾) = 0)

Theorem

axlowdimlem13 27966

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Establish that 𝑃 and 𝑄 are different points. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)

Theorem

axlowdimlem14 27967

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Take two possible 𝑄 from axlowdimlem10 27963. They are the same iff their distinguished values are the same. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)

⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ({⟨(𝐽 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐽 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1)) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) → (𝑄 = 𝑅 → 𝐼 = 𝐽))

Theorem

axlowdimlem15 27968*

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Set up a one-to-one function of points. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)

⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ if(𝑖 = 1, ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0})), ({⟨(𝑖 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝑖 + 1)}) × {0}))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) → 𝐹:(1...(𝑁 − 1))–1-1→(𝔼‘𝑁))

Theorem

axlowdimlem16 27969*

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Set up a summation that will help establish distance. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (2...(𝑁 − 1))) → Σ𝑖 ∈ (3...𝑁)((𝑃‘𝑖)↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (3...𝑁)((𝑄‘𝑖)↑2))

Theorem

axlowdimlem17 27970

Lemma for axlowdim 27973. Establish a congruence result. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ({⟨1, 𝑋⟩, ⟨2, 𝑌⟩} ∪ ((3...𝑁) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (2...(𝑁 − 1))) → ⟨𝑃, 𝐴⟩Cgr⟨𝑄, 𝐴⟩)

Theorem

axlowdim1 27971*

The lower dimension axiom for one dimension. In any dimension, there are at least two distinct points. Theorem 3.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 32, where it is derived from axlowdim2 27972. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2013.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)

Theorem

axlowdim2 27972*

The lower two-dimensional axiom. In any space where the dimension is greater than one, there are three non-colinear points. Axiom A8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2013.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ¬ (𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∨ 𝑦 Btwn ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∨ 𝑧 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))

Theorem

axlowdim 27973*

The general lower dimension axiom. Take a dimension 𝑁 greater than or equal to three. Then, there are three non-colinear points in 𝑁 dimensional space that are equidistant from 𝑁 − 1 distinct points. Derived from remarks in Tarski's System of Geometry, Alfred Tarski and Steven Givant, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, Volume 5, Number 2 (1999), 175-214. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2013.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) → ∃𝑝∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑝:(1...(𝑁 − 1))–1-1→(𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (2...(𝑁 − 1))(⟨(𝑝‘1), 𝑥⟩Cgr⟨(𝑝‘𝑖), 𝑥⟩ ∧ ⟨(𝑝‘1), 𝑦⟩Cgr⟨(𝑝‘𝑖), 𝑦⟩ ∧ ⟨(𝑝‘1), 𝑧⟩Cgr⟨(𝑝‘𝑖), 𝑧⟩) ∧ ¬ (𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∨ 𝑦 Btwn ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∨ 𝑧 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)))

Theorem

axeuclidlem 27974*

Lemma for axeuclid 27975. Handle the algebraic aspects of the theorem. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Sep-2013.)

⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 0) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((1 − 𝑃) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑃 · (𝑇‘𝑖))) = (((1 − 𝑄) · (𝐵‘𝑖)) + (𝑄 · (𝐶‘𝑖)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑟 ∈ (0[,]1)∃𝑠 ∈ (0[,]1)∃𝑢 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)((𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑟) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑟 · (𝑥‘𝑖))) ∧ (𝐶‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑠) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑠 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∧ (𝑇‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑢) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑢 · (𝑦‘𝑖)))))

Theorem

axeuclid 27975*

Euclid's axiom. Take an angle 𝐵𝐴𝐶 and a point 𝐷 between 𝐵 and 𝐶. Now, if you extend the segment 𝐴𝐷 to a point 𝑇, then 𝑇 lies between two points 𝑥 and 𝑦 that lie on the angle. Axiom A10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Sep-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑇⟩ ∧ 𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑇 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)))

Theorem

axcontlem1 27976*

Lemma for axcont 27988. Change bound variables for later use. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑍‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑈‘𝑖)))))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑠 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑦‘𝑗) = (((1 − 𝑠) · (𝑍‘𝑗)) + (𝑠 · (𝑈‘𝑗)))))}

Theorem

axcontlem2 27977*

Lemma for axcont 27988. The idea here is to set up a mapping 𝐹 that will allow to transfer dedekind 11327 to two sets of points. Here, we set up 𝐹 and show its domain and codomain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ (𝑈 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑝⟩ ∨ 𝑝 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑈⟩)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑍‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑈‘𝑖)))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑈) → 𝐹:𝐷–1-1-onto→(0[,)+∞))

Theorem

axcontlem3 27978*

Lemma for axcont 27988. Given the separation assumption, 𝐵 is a subset of 𝐷. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ (𝑈 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑝⟩ ∨ 𝑝 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑈⟩)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑦⟩)) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑈)) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷)

Theorem

axcontlem4 27979*

Lemma for axcont 27988. Given the separation assumption, 𝐴 is a subset of 𝐷. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ (𝑈 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑝⟩ ∨ 𝑝 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑈⟩)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑦⟩)) ∧ ((𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑈)) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷)

Theorem

axcontlem5 27980*

Lemma for axcont 27988. Compute the value of 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ (𝑈 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑝⟩ ∨ 𝑝 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑈⟩)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑍‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑈‘𝑖)))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑇 ↔ (𝑇 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑃‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝑍‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝑈‘𝑖))))))

Theorem

axcontlem6 27981*

Lemma for axcont 27988. State the defining properties of the value of 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ (𝑈 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑝⟩ ∨ 𝑝 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑈⟩)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑍‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑈‘𝑖)))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑃‘𝑖) = (((1 − (𝐹‘𝑃)) · (𝑍‘𝑖)) + ((𝐹‘𝑃) · (𝑈‘𝑖)))))

Theorem

axcontlem7 27982*

Lemma for axcont 27988. Given two points in 𝐷, one preceeds the other iff its scaling constant is less than the other point's. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ (𝑈 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑝⟩ ∨ 𝑝 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑈⟩)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑍‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑈‘𝑖)))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑄⟩ ↔ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑄)))

Theorem

axcontlem8 27983*

Lemma for axcont 27988. A point in 𝐷 is between two others if its function value falls in the middle. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ (𝑈 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑝⟩ ∨ 𝑝 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑈⟩)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑍‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑈‘𝑖)))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)) → (((𝐹‘𝑃) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑄) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑄) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑅)) → 𝑄 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑅⟩))

Theorem

axcontlem9 27984*

Lemma for axcont 27988. Given the separation assumption, all values of 𝐹 over 𝐴 are less than or equal to all values of 𝐹 over 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ (𝑈 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑝⟩ ∨ 𝑝 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑈⟩)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑍‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑈‘𝑖)))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑦⟩)) ∧ ((𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑈)) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐴)∀𝑚 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)𝑛 ≤ 𝑚)

Theorem

axcontlem10 27985*

Lemma for axcont 27988. Given a handful of assumptions, derive the conclusion of the final theorem. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Jun-2013.)

⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ (𝑈 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑝⟩ ∨ 𝑝 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑈⟩)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑡⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑍‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑈‘𝑖)))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑦⟩)) ∧ ((𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑈)) → ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑏 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)

Theorem

axcontlem11 27986*

Lemma for axcont 27988. Eliminate the hypotheses from axcontlem10 27985. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑦⟩)) ∧ ((𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑈)) → ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑏 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)

Theorem

axcontlem12 27987*

Lemma for axcont 27988. Eliminate the trivial cases from the previous lemmas. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Jun-2013.)

⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑍, 𝑦⟩)) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑏 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)

Theorem

axcont 27988*

The axiom of continuity. Take two sets of points 𝐴 and 𝐵. If all the points in 𝐴 come before the points of 𝐵 on a line, then there is a point separating the two. Axiom A11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Jun-2013.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩)) → ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑏 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)

16.4.2.3  EE^n fulfills Tarski's Axioms

Syntax

ceeng 27989

Extends class notation with the Tarski geometry structure for 𝔼↑𝑁.

class EEG

Definition

df-eeng 27990*

Define the geometry structure for 𝔼↑𝑁. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)

⊢ EEG = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ({⟨(Base‘ndx), (𝔼‘𝑛)⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛), 𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)(((𝑥‘𝑖) − (𝑦‘𝑖))↑2))⟩} ∪ {⟨(Itv‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛), 𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∣ 𝑧 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩})⟩, ⟨(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛), 𝑦 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∣ (𝑧 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∨ 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∨ 𝑦 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩)})⟩}))

Theorem

eengv 27991*

The value of the Euclidean geometry for dimension 𝑁. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (EEG‘𝑁) = ({⟨(Base‘ndx), (𝔼‘𝑁)⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁), 𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝑥‘𝑖) − (𝑦‘𝑖))↑2))⟩} ∪ {⟨(Itv‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁), 𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ 𝑧 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩})⟩, ⟨(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁), 𝑦 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑁) ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ (𝑧 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∨ 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∨ 𝑦 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩)})⟩}))

Theorem

eengstr 27992

The Euclidean geometry as a structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (EEG‘𝑁) Struct ⟨1, ;17⟩)

Theorem

eengbas 27993

The Base of the Euclidean geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝔼‘𝑁) = (Base‘(EEG‘𝑁)))

Theorem

ebtwntg 27994

The betweenness relation used in the Tarski structure for the Euclidean geometry is the same as Btwn. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘(EEG‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘(EEG‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 Btwn ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)))

Theorem

ecgrtg 27995

The congruence relation used in the Tarski structure for the Euclidean geometry is the same as Cgr. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘(EEG‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘(EEG‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)))

Theorem

elntg 27996*

The line definition in the Tarski structure for the Euclidean geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Apr-2019.)

⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘(EEG‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘(EEG‘𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (LineG‘(EEG‘𝑁)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))

Theorem

elntg2 27997*

The line definition in the Tarski structure for the Euclidean geometry. In contrast to elntg 27996, the betweenness can be strengthened by excluding 1 resp. 0 from the related intervals (because of 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦). (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2023.)

⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘(EEG‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (1...𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (LineG‘(EEG‘𝑁)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑘) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑘 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑙 ∈ (0[,)1)∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑙) · (𝑝‘𝑖)) + (𝑙 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0(,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑚) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑚 · (𝑝‘𝑖))))}))

Theorem

eengtrkg 27998

The geometry structure for 𝔼↑𝑁 is a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (EEG‘𝑁) ∈ TarskiG)

Theorem

eengtrkge 27999

The geometry structure for 𝔼↑𝑁 is a Euclidean geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (EEG‘𝑁) ∈ TarskiG_E)

PART 17  GRAPH THEORY

To give an overview of the definitions and terms used in the context of graph theory, a glossary is provided in the following, mainly according to definitions in [Bollobas] p. 1-8 or in [Diestel] p. 2-28. Although this glossary concentrates on undirected graphs, many of the concepts are also useful for directed graphs.

Basic concepts:

Term	Reference	Definition	Remarks
Vertex	df-vtx 28012	A vertex of a graph 𝐺 is an element of the set of vertices (Vtx‘𝐺) of the graph 𝐺.	The set of vertices (Vtx‘𝐺) (corresponding to V(G) in [Bollobas] p. 1) is usually the first component 𝑉 of the graph 𝐺 if it is represented by an ordered pair ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩ (see opvtxfv 28018), or the base set (Base‘𝐺) of the graph 𝐺 if it is represented as extensible structure (see basvtxval 28030).
Edge	df-edg 28062	An edge of a graph 𝐺 is a nonempty set of vertices of the graph. It is said that these vertices are "joined" or "connected" by the edge, see [Bollobas] p. 1.	The set of edges (Edg‘𝐺) (corresponding to E(G) in [Bollobas] p. 1) is usually the range ran 𝐸 of the second component 𝐸 of the graph 𝐺 if it is represented by an ordered pair ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩, or the range of the component (.ef‘𝐺) of the graph 𝐺 if it is represented as extensible structure.
Loop		A loop in a graph 𝐺 is an edge which connects a single vertex with itself (or, according to [Bollobas] p. 7 "joins a vertex to itself").	In other words, a loop is an edge 𝑒 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) which is a singleton consisting of a vertex 𝑣 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺): 𝑒 = {𝑣}
Edge function resp. indexed edges	df-iedg 28013	An edge function (or indexed set of edges) of a graph 𝐺 is a mapping of an arbitrary index set to nonempty sets of vertices of the graph.	The edge function (iEdg‘𝐺) is usually the second component 𝐸 of the graph 𝐺 if it is represented by an ordered pair ⟨𝑉, 𝐸 > (see opiedgfv 28021), or the component (.ef‘𝐺) of the graph 𝐺 if it is represented as extensible structure (see edgfiedgval 28031). The set of edges of a graph 𝐺 is the range of its edge function: (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺), see edgval 28063. Whereas the concept of plain edges is sufficient for simple hypergraphs, indexed edges are required for e.g., multigraphs in which the same vertices may be connected by more than one edge.

Basic kinds of graphs:

Term	Reference	Definition	Remarks
Undirected hypergraph	df-uhgr 28072	a class 𝐺 with an edge function 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) which is a function into the power set of the vertices 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺): ran 𝐸 ⊆ (𝒫 𝑉 ∖ {∅}).	In this most general definition of a graph, an "edge" may connect three or more vertices with each other, see [Berge] p. 1. In Wikipedia "Hypergraph", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergraph 28072 (18-Jan-2020) such a hypergraph is called a "non-simple hypergraph", "multiple hypergraph" or "multi-hypergraphs". According to Wikipedia "Incidence structure", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incidence_structure 28072 (18-Jan-2020) "Each hypergraph [...] can be regarded as an incidence structure in which the [vertices] play the role of "points", the corresponding family of [edges] plays the role of "lines" and the incidence relation is set membership". Notice that by using (Edg‘𝐺) the (possibly more than one) edges connecting the same vertices could not be distinguished anymore. Therefore, this representation will only be used for undirected simple hypergraphs.
Undirected simple hypergraph	df-ushgr 28073	a class 𝐺 with an edge function 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) which is a one-to-one function into the power set of the vertices 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺): ran 𝐸 ⊆ (𝒫 𝑉 ∖ {∅}).	See also Wikipedia "Hypergraph", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergraph 28073 (18-Jan-2020). This is how a "hypergraph" is defined in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 7 or the definition in section 1.10 in [Diestel] p. 27. A simple hypergraph has at most one edge between the same vertices, hence a pseudograph needs not be a simple hypergraph. According to [Berge] p. 1, "A simple hypergraph (or "Sperner family") is a hypergraph H = { E_1, E_2, ..., E_m } such that E_i C_ E_j => i = j". By this definition, a simple hypergraph cannot contain the edges E_1 = { v_1 , v_2 } and E_2 = { v_1, v_2, v_3 }, because E_1 C_ E_2, but 1 =/= 2.
Undirected loop-free hypergraph	---	an undirected hypergraph without a loop, i.e. all edges connect at least two vertices.
Undirected pseudograph	df-upgr 28096	a class 𝐺 with an edge function 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) which is a function into the set of (proper or not proper) unordered pairs of vertices 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺).	A proper unordered pair contains two different elements, a not proper unordered pair contains two times the same element, so it is a singleton (see preqsn 4824). This means a pseudograph may contain loops. This definition corresponds to the definition of a "multigraph" in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 7, "In a multigraph both multiple edges [joining two vertices] and multiple loops [joining a vertex to itself] are allowed", or in [Diestel] p. 28, "A multigraph is a pair (V,E) of disjoint sets (of vertices and edges) together with a map E -> V u. [V]^2 assigning to every edge either one or two vertices, its end(s).".
Undirected multigraph	df-umgr 28097	a class 𝐺 with an edge function 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) which is a function into the set of (proper!) unordered pairs of vertices 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺).	This definition is according to Chartrand, Gary and Zhang, Ping (2012): "A First Course in Graph Theory.", Dover, ISBN 978-0-486-48368-9, section 1.4, p. 26: "A multigraph M consists of a finite nonempty set V of vertices and a set E of edges, where every two vertices of M are joined by a finite number of edges (possibly zero). If two or more edges join the same pair of (distinct) vertices, then these edges are called parallel edges." A proper unordered pair contains two different elements, therefore a multigraph does not have loops.
Undirected simple pseudograph	df-uspgr 28164	a class 𝐺 with an edge function 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) which is a one-to-one function into the set of (proper or not proper) unordered pairs of vertices 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺).	This means that there is at most one edge between two vertices, and at most one loop from a vertex to itself.
Undirected simple graph	df-usgr 28165	a class 𝐺 with an edge function 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) which is a one-to-one function into the set of (proper!) unordered pairs of vertices 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺).	An ordered pair ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩ of two distinct sets 𝑉 (the vertices) and 𝐸 (the edges), the "usual" definition of a "graph", see, for example, the definition in section I.1 of [Bollobas] p. 1 or in section 1.1 of [Diestel] p. 2, can be identified with an undirected simple graph without loops by "indexing" the edges with themselves, see usgrausgrb 28183.
Finite graph	df-fusgr 28328	a graph 𝐺 with a finite set of vertices 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺).	See definitions in [Bollobas] p. 1 or [Diestel] p. 2. In simple graphs, the set of (indexed) edges (iEdg‘𝐺) (and therefore also the set of edges (Edg‘𝐺)) is finite if 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) is finite, see fusgrfis 28341. The number of edges is limited by (𝑛C2) (or "𝑛 choose 2") with 𝑛 = (♯‘𝑉), see fusgrmaxsize 28475. Analogously, the number of edges 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) of an undirected simple pseudograph (which may have loops) is limited by ((𝑛 + 1)C2). In pseudographs or multigraphs, however, 𝐸 can be infinite although 𝑉 is finite.
Graph of finite size	---	a graph 𝐺 with a finite set 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺), i.e. with a finite number of edges.	A graph can be of finite size although its set of vertices is infinite (most of the vertices would not be connected by an edge).

Terms and properties of graphs:

Term	Reference	Definition	Remarks
Edge joining resp. connecting (two) vertices	---	An edge 𝑒 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) joins resp. connects the vertices v_1, v_2, ... v_n (𝑛 ∈ ℕ) if 𝑒 = { v_1, v_2, ... v_n }.	If 𝑛 = 1, 𝑒 = { v_1 } is a loop, if 𝑛 = 2, 𝑒 = { v_1 , v_2 } is an edge as it is usually defined, see definition in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 1.
(Two) Endvertices of an edge	see definition in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 1.	If an edge 𝑒 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) joins the vertices v_1, v_2, ... v_n (𝑛 ∈ ℕ), then the vertices v_1, v_2, ... v_n are called the endvertices of the edge 𝑒.
(Two) Adjacent vertices	see definition in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 1/2.	The vertices v_1, v_2, ... v_n (𝑛 ∈ ℕ) are adjacent if there is an edge e = { v_1, v_2, ... v_n } joining these vertices. In this case, the vertices are incident with the edge e (see definition in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 2) or connected by the edge e.
Edge ending at a vertex		An edge 𝑒 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) is ending at a vertex 𝑣 if the vertex is an endvertex of the edge: 𝑣 ∈ 𝑒. In other words, the vertex 𝑣 is incident with the edge 𝑒.
(Two) Adjacent edges		The edges e_0, e_1, ... e_n (𝑛 ∈ ℕ) are adjacent if they have exactly one common endvertex.	Generalization of definition in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 2.
Order of a graph	see definition in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 3	The order of a graph 𝐺 is the number of vertices in the graph: (♯‘(Vtx‘𝐺)).
Size of a graph	see definition in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 3	The size of a graph 𝐺 is the number of edges in the graph: (♯‘(iEdg‘𝐺)). Or, for a simple graph 𝐺: (♯‘(Edg‘𝐺))).
Neighborhood of a vertex	df-nbgr 28344 resp. definition in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 3	A vertex connected with a vertex 𝑣 by an edge is called a neighbor of the vertex 𝑣. The set of neighbors of a vertex 𝑣 is called the neighborhood (or open neighborhood) of the vertex 𝑣. The closed neighborhood is the union of the (open) neighborhood of the vertex 𝑣 with {𝑣}.
Degree of a vertex	df-vtxdg 28477	The degree of a vertex is the number of the edges ending at this vertex.	In a simple graph, the degree of a vertex is the number of neighbors of this vertex, see definition in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 3
Isolated vertex	usgrvd0nedg 28544	A vertex is called isolated if it is not an endvertex of any edge, thus having degree 0.
Universal vertex	df-uvtx 28397	A vertex is called universal if it is connected with every other vertex of the graph by an edge, thus having degree ((♯‘(Vtx‘𝐺)) − ).

Special kinds of graphs:

Term	Reference	Definition	Remarks
Complete graph	df-cplgr 28422	A graph is called complete if each pair of vertices is connected by an edge.	The size of a complete undirected simple graph of order 𝑛 is (𝑛C2) (or "𝑛 choose 2"), see cusgrsize 28465.
Empty graph	uhgr0e 28085	A graph is called empty if it has no edges.
Null graph	uhgr0 28087 and uhgr0vb 28086	A graph is called a null graph if it has no vertices (and therefore also no edges).
Trivial graph	usgr1v 28267	A graph is called the "trivial graph" if it has only one vertex and no edges.
Connected graph	df-conngr 29194 resp. definition in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 6	A graph is called connected if for each pair of vertices there is a path between these vertices.

For the terms "Path", "Walk", "Trail", "Circuit", "Cycle" see the remarks below and the definitions in Section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 4-5.

17.1  Vertices and edges

In the following, the vertices and (indexed) edges for an arbitrary class 𝐺 (called "graph" in the following) are defined and examined. The main result of this section is to show that the set of vertices (Vtx‘𝐺) of a graph 𝐺 is the first component 𝑉 of the graph 𝐺 if it is represented by an ordered pair ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩ (see opvtxfv 28018), or the base set (Base‘𝐺) of the graph 𝐺 if it is represented as extensible structure (see basvtxval 28030), and that the set of indexed edges resp. the edge function (iEdg‘𝐺) is the second component 𝐸 of the graph 𝐺 if it is represented by an ordered pair ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩ (see opiedgfv 28021), or the component (.ef‘𝐺) of the graph 𝐺 if it is represented as extensible structure (see edgfiedgval 28031). Finally, it is shown that the set of edges of a graph 𝐺 is the range of its edge function: (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺), see edgval 28063.

Usually, a graph 𝐺 is a set. If 𝐺 is a proper class, however, it represents the null graph (without vertices and edges), because (Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ and (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ holds, see vtxvalprc 28059 and iedgvalprc 28060.

Up to the end of this section, the edges need not be related to the vertices. Once undirected hypergraphs are defined (see df-uhgr 28072), the edges become nonempty sets of vertices, and by this obtain their meaning as "connectors" of vertices.

17.1.1  The edge function extractor for extensible structures

Syntax

cedgf 28000

Extend class notation with an edge function.

class .ef