ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  eqglact GIF version

Theorem eqglact 14028
Description: A left coset can be expressed as the image of a left action. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2015.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
eqger.x 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺)
eqger.r = (𝐺 ~QG 𝑌)
eqglact.3 + = (+g𝐺)
Assertion
Ref Expression
eqglact ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋𝐴𝑋) → [𝐴] = ((𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)) “ 𝑌))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥, +   𝑥,   𝑥,𝐺   𝑥,𝑋   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑌

Proof of Theorem eqglact
Dummy variable 𝑔 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eqger.x . . . . . . 7 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺)
2 eqid 2238 . . . . . . 7 (invg𝐺) = (invg𝐺)
3 eqglact.3 . . . . . . 7 + = (+g𝐺)
4 eqger.r . . . . . . 7 = (𝐺 ~QG 𝑌)
51, 2, 3, 4eqgval 14026 . . . . . 6 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋) → (𝐴 𝑥 ↔ (𝐴𝑋𝑥𝑋 ∧ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌)))
6 3anass 1013 . . . . . 6 ((𝐴𝑋𝑥𝑋 ∧ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌) ↔ (𝐴𝑋 ∧ (𝑥𝑋 ∧ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌)))
75, 6bitrdi 196 . . . . 5 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋) → (𝐴 𝑥 ↔ (𝐴𝑋 ∧ (𝑥𝑋 ∧ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌))))
87baibd 935 . . . 4 (((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋) ∧ 𝐴𝑋) → (𝐴 𝑥 ↔ (𝑥𝑋 ∧ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌)))
983impa 1225 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋𝐴𝑋) → (𝐴 𝑥 ↔ (𝑥𝑋 ∧ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌)))
109abbidv 2358 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋𝐴𝑋) → {𝑥𝐴 𝑥} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝑋 ∧ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌)})
11 dfec2 6810 . . 3 (𝐴𝑋 → [𝐴] = {𝑥𝐴 𝑥})
12113ad2ant3 1051 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋𝐴𝑋) → [𝐴] = {𝑥𝐴 𝑥})
13 eqid 2238 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥))) = (𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))
1413, 1, 3, 2grplactcnv 13907 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐴𝑋) → (((𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))‘𝐴):𝑋1-1-onto𝑋((𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))‘𝐴) = ((𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))‘((invg𝐺)‘𝐴))))
1514simprd 114 . . . . . . 7 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐴𝑋) → ((𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))‘𝐴) = ((𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))‘((invg𝐺)‘𝐴)))
1613, 1grplactfval 13906 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝐴𝑋 → ((𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))‘𝐴) = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)))
1716adantl 277 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐴𝑋) → ((𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))‘𝐴) = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)))
1817cnveqd 4956 . . . . . . 7 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐴𝑋) → ((𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))‘𝐴) = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)))
191, 2grpinvcl 13853 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐴𝑋) → ((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑋)
2013, 1grplactfval 13906 . . . . . . . 8 (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))‘((invg𝐺)‘𝐴)) = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥)))
2119, 20syl 14 . . . . . . 7 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐴𝑋) → ((𝑔𝑋 ↦ (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝑔 + 𝑥)))‘((invg𝐺)‘𝐴)) = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥)))
2215, 18, 213eqtr3d 2279 . . . . . 6 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐴𝑋) → (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)) = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥)))
2322cnveqd 4956 . . . . 5 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐴𝑋) → (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)) = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥)))
24233adant2 1047 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋𝐴𝑋) → (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)) = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥)))
2524imaeq1d 5125 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋𝐴𝑋) → ((𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)) “ 𝑌) = ((𝑥𝑋 ↦ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥)) “ 𝑌))
26 imacnvcnv 5252 . . 3 ((𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)) “ 𝑌) = ((𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)) “ 𝑌)
27 eqid 2238 . . . . 5 (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥)) = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥))
2827mptpreima 5281 . . . 4 ((𝑥𝑋 ↦ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥)) “ 𝑌) = {𝑥𝑋 ∣ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌}
29 df-rab 2537 . . . 4 {𝑥𝑋 ∣ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝑋 ∧ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌)}
3028, 29eqtri 2259 . . 3 ((𝑥𝑋 ↦ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥)) “ 𝑌) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝑋 ∧ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌)}
3125, 26, 303eqtr3g 2294 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋𝐴𝑋) → ((𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)) “ 𝑌) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝑋 ∧ (((invg𝐺)‘𝐴) + 𝑥) ∈ 𝑌)})
3210, 12, 313eqtr4d 2281 1 ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑌𝑋𝐴𝑋) → [𝐴] = ((𝑥𝑋 ↦ (𝐴 + 𝑥)) “ 𝑌))
Colors of variables:    wff set class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 104  wb 105  w3a 1009   = wceq 1402  wcel 2209  {cab 2224  {crab 2532  wss 3220   class class class wbr 4130  cmpt 4192  ccnv 4773  cima 4777  1-1-ontowf1o 5376  cfv 5377  (class class class)co 6085  [cec 6805  Basecbs 13352  +gcplusg 13431  Grpcgrp 13805  invgcminusg 13806   ~QG cqg 13972
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-coll 4246  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1re 8273  ax-addrcl 8276
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rmo 2536  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-iun 4014  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-f1o 5384  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-ec 6809  df-inn 9305  df-2 9363  df-ndx 13355  df-slot 13356  df-base 13358  df-plusg 13444  df-0g 13612  df-mgm 13676  df-sgrp 13717  df-mnd 13730  df-grp 13808  df-minusg 13809  df-eqg 13975
This theorem is used by:  eqgen  14030
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator