Theorem bnj1522 35079

Description: Well-founded recursion, part 3 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1522.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
bnj1522.2	⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj1522.3	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
bnj1522.4	⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1522	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝐵,𝑓   𝐺,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝑥,𝐻   𝑅,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝑌,𝑑

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥,𝑑)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)   𝐻(𝑓,𝑑)   𝑌(𝑥,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem bnj1522

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1522.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
2		bnj1522.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
3		bnj1522.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
4		bnj1522.4	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶
5		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)))
6		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻))
7		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)) ↔ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)))
8		eqid 2737	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}
9		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ (((((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) ↔ ((((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
10	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	bnj1523 35078	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  {cab 2714   ≠ wne 2940  ∀wral 3061  ∃wrex 3070  {crab 3436   ⊆ wss 3966  ⟨cop 4640  ∪ cuni 4915   class class class wbr 5151   ↾ cres 5695   Fn wfn 6564  ‘cfv 6569   predc-bnj14 34695   FrSe w-bnj15 34699

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2708  ax-rep 5288  ax-sep 5305  ax-nul 5315  ax-pow 5374  ax-pr 5441  ax-un 7761  ax-reg 9639  ax-inf2 9688

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-nf 1783  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2892  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-reu 3381  df-rab 3437  df-v 3483  df-sbc 3795  df-csb 3912  df-dif 3969  df-un 3971  df-in 3973  df-ss 3983  df-pss 3986  df-nul 4343  df-if 4535  df-pw 4610  df-sn 4635  df-pr 4637  df-op 4641  df-uni 4916  df-iun 5001  df-br 5152  df-opab 5214  df-mpt 5235  df-tr 5269  df-id 5587  df-eprel 5593  df-po 5601  df-so 5602  df-fr 5645  df-we 5647  df-xp 5699  df-rel 5700  df-cnv 5701  df-co 5702  df-dm 5703  df-rn 5704  df-res 5705  df-ima 5706  df-ord 6395  df-on 6396  df-lim 6397  df-suc 6398  df-iota 6522  df-fun 6571  df-fn 6572  df-f 6573  df-f1 6574  df-fo 6575  df-f1o 6576  df-fv 6577  df-om 7895  df-1o 8514  df-bnj17 34694  df-bnj14 34696  df-bnj13 34698  df-bnj15 34700  df-bnj18 34702  df-bnj19 34704

This theorem is referenced by: (None)