Theorem bnj1522 35062

Description: Well-founded recursion, part 3 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1522.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
bnj1522.2	⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj1522.3	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
bnj1522.4	⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1522	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝐵,𝑓   𝐺,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝑥,𝐻   𝑅,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝑌,𝑑

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥,𝑑)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)   𝐻(𝑓,𝑑)   𝑌(𝑥,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem bnj1522

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1522.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
2		bnj1522.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
3		bnj1522.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
4		bnj1522.4	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶
5		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)))
6		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻))
7		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)) ↔ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)))
8		eqid 2729	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}
9		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ (((((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) ↔ ((((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
10	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	bnj1523 35061	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2707   ≠ wne 2925  ∀wral 3044  ∃wrex 3053  {crab 3405   ⊆ wss 3914  ⟨cop 4595  ∪ cuni 4871   class class class wbr 5107   ↾ cres 5640   Fn wfn 6506  ‘cfv 6511   predc-bnj14 34678   FrSe w-bnj15 34682

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5234  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pow 5320  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711  ax-reg 9545  ax-inf2 9594

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-reu 3355  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-pss 3934  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-tr 5215  df-id 5533  df-eprel 5538  df-po 5546  df-so 5547  df-fr 5591  df-we 5593  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-ord 6335  df-on 6336  df-lim 6337  df-suc 6338  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-f1 6516  df-fo 6517  df-f1o 6518  df-fv 6519  df-om 7843  df-1o 8434  df-bnj17 34677  df-bnj14 34679  df-bnj13 34681  df-bnj15 34683  df-bnj18 34685  df-bnj19 34687

This theorem is referenced by: (None)