Theorem bnj1522 35084

Description: Well-founded recursion, part 3 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1522.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
bnj1522.2	⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj1522.3	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
bnj1522.4	⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1522	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝐵,𝑓   𝐺,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝑥,𝐻   𝑅,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝑌,𝑑

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥,𝑑)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)   𝐻(𝑓,𝑑)   𝑌(𝑥,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem bnj1522

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1522.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
2		bnj1522.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
3		bnj1522.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
4		bnj1522.4	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶
5		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)))
6		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻))
7		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)) ↔ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)))
8		eqid 2731	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}
9		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ (((((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) ↔ ((((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
10	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	bnj1523 35083	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  {cab 2709   ≠ wne 2928  ∀wral 3047  ∃wrex 3056  {crab 3395   ⊆ wss 3897  ⟨cop 4579  ∪ cuni 4856   class class class wbr 5089   ↾ cres 5616   Fn wfn 6476  ‘cfv 6481   predc-bnj14 34700   FrSe w-bnj15 34704

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-rep 5215  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pow 5301  ax-pr 5368  ax-un 7668  ax-reg 9478  ax-inf2 9531

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-reu 3347  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3737  df-csb 3846  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-pss 3917  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-pw 4549  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-uni 4857  df-iun 4941  df-br 5090  df-opab 5152  df-mpt 5171  df-tr 5197  df-id 5509  df-eprel 5514  df-po 5522  df-so 5523  df-fr 5567  df-we 5569  df-xp 5620  df-rel 5621  df-cnv 5622  df-co 5623  df-dm 5624  df-rn 5625  df-res 5626  df-ima 5627  df-ord 6309  df-on 6310  df-lim 6311  df-suc 6312  df-iota 6437  df-fun 6483  df-fn 6484  df-f 6485  df-f1 6486  df-fo 6487  df-f1o 6488  df-fv 6489  df-om 7797  df-1o 8385  df-bnj17 34699  df-bnj14 34701  df-bnj13 34703  df-bnj15 34705  df-bnj18 34707  df-bnj19 34709

This theorem is referenced by: (None)