Theorem gcdval 16464

Description: The value of the gcd operator. (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) is the greatest common divisor of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If 𝑀 and 𝑁 are both 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Nov-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gcdval	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝑀   𝑛,𝑁

Proof of Theorem gcdval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2732	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 = 0 ↔ 𝑀 = 0))
2	1	anbi1d 630	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0)))
3		breq2 5146	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑀))
4	3	anbi1d 630	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)))
5	4	rabbidv 3436	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)})
6	5	supeq1d 9463	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ))
7	2, 6	ifbieq2d 4550	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )))
8		eqeq1 2732	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 = 0 ↔ 𝑁 = 0))
9	8	anbi2d 629	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)))
10		breq2 5146	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑛 ∥ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁))
11	10	anbi2d 629	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)))
12	11	rabbidv 3436	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)})
13	12	supeq1d 9463	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ))
14	9, 13	ifbieq2d 4550	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))
15		df-gcd 16463	. 2 ⊢ gcd = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )))
16		c0ex 11232	. . 3 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
17		ltso 11318	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ
18	17	supex 9480	. . 3 ⊢ sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ) ∈ V
19	16, 18	ifex 4574	. 2 ⊢ if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )) ∈ V
20	7, 14, 15, 19	ovmpo 7575	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1534   ∈ wcel 2099  {crab 3428  ifcif 4524   class class class wbr 5142  (class class class)co 7414  supcsup 9457  ℝcr 11131  0cc0 11132   < clt 11272  ℤcz 12582   ∥ cdvds 16224   gcd cgcd 16462

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2699  ax-sep 5293  ax-nul 5300  ax-pow 5359  ax-pr 5423  ax-un 7734  ax-resscn 11189  ax-1cn 11190  ax-icn 11191  ax-addcl 11192  ax-mulcl 11194  ax-i2m1 11200  ax-pre-lttri 11206  ax-pre-lttrn 11207

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3or 1086  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-mo 2530  df-eu 2559  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2937  df-nel 3043  df-ral 3058  df-rex 3067  df-rmo 3372  df-rab 3429  df-v 3472  df-sbc 3776  df-csb 3891  df-dif 3948  df-un 3950  df-in 3952  df-ss 3962  df-nul 4319  df-if 4525  df-pw 4600  df-sn 4625  df-pr 4627  df-op 4631  df-uni 4904  df-br 5143  df-opab 5205  df-mpt 5226  df-id 5570  df-po 5584  df-so 5585  df-xp 5678  df-rel 5679  df-cnv 5680  df-co 5681  df-dm 5682  df-rn 5683  df-res 5684  df-ima 5685  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6544  df-fn 6545  df-f 6546  df-f1 6547  df-fo 6548  df-f1o 6549  df-fv 6550  df-ov 7417  df-oprab 7418  df-mpo 7419  df-er 8718  df-en 8958  df-dom 8959  df-sdom 8960  df-sup 9459  df-pnf 11274  df-mnf 11275  df-ltxr 11277  df-gcd 16463

This theorem is referenced by:  gcd0val  16465  gcdn0val  16466  gcdf  16480  gcdcom  16481  dfgcd2  16515  gcdass  16516