Theorem gcdval 16466

Description: The value of the gcd operator. (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) is the greatest common divisor of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If 𝑀 and 𝑁 are both 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Nov-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gcdval	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝑀   𝑛,𝑁

Proof of Theorem gcdval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2733	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 = 0 ↔ 𝑀 = 0))
2	1	anbi1d 631	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0)))
3		breq2 5111	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑀))
4	3	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)))
5	4	rabbidv 3413	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)})
6	5	supeq1d 9397	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ))
7	2, 6	ifbieq2d 4515	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )))
8		eqeq1 2733	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 = 0 ↔ 𝑁 = 0))
9	8	anbi2d 630	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)))
10		breq2 5111	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑛 ∥ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁))
11	10	anbi2d 630	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)))
12	11	rabbidv 3413	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)})
13	12	supeq1d 9397	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ))
14	9, 13	ifbieq2d 4515	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))
15		df-gcd 16465	. 2 ⊢ gcd = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )))
16		c0ex 11168	. . 3 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
17		ltso 11254	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ
18	17	supex 9415	. . 3 ⊢ sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ) ∈ V
19	16, 18	ifex 4539	. 2 ⊢ if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )) ∈ V
20	7, 14, 15, 19	ovmpo 7549	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  {crab 3405  ifcif 4488   class class class wbr 5107  (class class class)co 7387  supcsup 9391  ℝcr 11067  0cc0 11068   < clt 11208  ℤcz 12529   ∥ cdvds 16222   gcd cgcd 16464

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pow 5320  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711  ax-resscn 11125  ax-1cn 11126  ax-icn 11127  ax-addcl 11128  ax-mulcl 11130  ax-i2m1 11136  ax-pre-lttri 11142  ax-pre-lttrn 11143

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-nel 3030  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rmo 3354  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-po 5546  df-so 5547  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-f1 6516  df-fo 6517  df-f1o 6518  df-fv 6519  df-ov 7390  df-oprab 7391  df-mpo 7392  df-er 8671  df-en 8919  df-dom 8920  df-sdom 8921  df-sup 9393  df-pnf 11210  df-mnf 11211  df-ltxr 11213  df-gcd 16465

This theorem is referenced by:  gcd0val  16467  gcdn0val  16468  gcdf  16482  gcdcom  16483  dfgcd2  16516  gcdass  16517