Theorem gcdval 16542

Description: The value of the gcd operator. (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) is the greatest common divisor of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If 𝑀 and 𝑁 are both 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Nov-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gcdval	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝑀   𝑛,𝑁

Proof of Theorem gcdval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2744	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 = 0 ↔ 𝑀 = 0))
2	1	anbi1d 630	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0)))
3		breq2 5170	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑀))
4	3	anbi1d 630	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)))
5	4	rabbidv 3451	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)})
6	5	supeq1d 9515	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ))
7	2, 6	ifbieq2d 4574	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )))
8		eqeq1 2744	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 = 0 ↔ 𝑁 = 0))
9	8	anbi2d 629	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)))
10		breq2 5170	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑛 ∥ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁))
11	10	anbi2d 629	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)))
12	11	rabbidv 3451	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)})
13	12	supeq1d 9515	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ))
14	9, 13	ifbieq2d 4574	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))
15		df-gcd 16541	. 2 ⊢ gcd = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )))
16		c0ex 11284	. . 3 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
17		ltso 11370	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ
18	17	supex 9532	. . 3 ⊢ sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ) ∈ V
19	16, 18	ifex 4598	. 2 ⊢ if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )) ∈ V
20	7, 14, 15, 19	ovmpo 7610	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  {crab 3443  ifcif 4548   class class class wbr 5166  (class class class)co 7448  supcsup 9509  ℝcr 11183  0cc0 11184   < clt 11324  ℤcz 12639   ∥ cdvds 16302   gcd cgcd 16540

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pow 5383  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770  ax-resscn 11241  ax-1cn 11242  ax-icn 11243  ax-addcl 11244  ax-mulcl 11246  ax-i2m1 11252  ax-pre-lttri 11258  ax-pre-lttrn 11259

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-nel 3053  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rmo 3388  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-po 5607  df-so 5608  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fo 6579  df-f1o 6580  df-fv 6581  df-ov 7451  df-oprab 7452  df-mpo 7453  df-er 8763  df-en 9004  df-dom 9005  df-sdom 9006  df-sup 9511  df-pnf 11326  df-mnf 11327  df-ltxr 11329  df-gcd 16541

This theorem is referenced by:  gcd0val  16543  gcdn0val  16544  gcdf  16558  gcdcom  16559  dfgcd2  16593  gcdass  16594