Theorem gcdval 16513

Description: The value of the gcd operator. (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) is the greatest common divisor of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If 𝑀 and 𝑁 are both 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Nov-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gcdval	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝑀   𝑛,𝑁

Proof of Theorem gcdval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2739	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 = 0 ↔ 𝑀 = 0))
2	1	anbi1d 631	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0)))
3		breq2 5123	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑀))
4	3	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)))
5	4	rabbidv 3423	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)})
6	5	supeq1d 9456	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ))
7	2, 6	ifbieq2d 4527	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )))
8		eqeq1 2739	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 = 0 ↔ 𝑁 = 0))
9	8	anbi2d 630	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)))
10		breq2 5123	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑛 ∥ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁))
11	10	anbi2d 630	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)))
12	11	rabbidv 3423	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)})
13	12	supeq1d 9456	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ))
14	9, 13	ifbieq2d 4527	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))
15		df-gcd 16512	. 2 ⊢ gcd = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )))
16		c0ex 11227	. . 3 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
17		ltso 11313	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ
18	17	supex 9474	. . 3 ⊢ sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ) ∈ V
19	16, 18	ifex 4551	. 2 ⊢ if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )) ∈ V
20	7, 14, 15, 19	ovmpo 7565	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  {crab 3415  ifcif 4500   class class class wbr 5119  (class class class)co 7403  supcsup 9450  ℝcr 11126  0cc0 11127   < clt 11267  ℤcz 12586   ∥ cdvds 16270   gcd cgcd 16511

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5266  ax-nul 5276  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7727  ax-resscn 11184  ax-1cn 11185  ax-icn 11186  ax-addcl 11187  ax-mulcl 11189  ax-i2m1 11195  ax-pre-lttri 11201  ax-pre-lttrn 11202

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-nel 3037  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3359  df-rab 3416  df-v 3461  df-sbc 3766  df-csb 3875  df-dif 3929  df-un 3931  df-in 3933  df-ss 3943  df-nul 4309  df-if 4501  df-pw 4577  df-sn 4602  df-pr 4604  df-op 4608  df-uni 4884  df-br 5120  df-opab 5182  df-mpt 5202  df-id 5548  df-po 5561  df-so 5562  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-rn 5665  df-res 5666  df-ima 5667  df-iota 6483  df-fun 6532  df-fn 6533  df-f 6534  df-f1 6535  df-fo 6536  df-f1o 6537  df-fv 6538  df-ov 7406  df-oprab 7407  df-mpo 7408  df-er 8717  df-en 8958  df-dom 8959  df-sdom 8960  df-sup 9452  df-pnf 11269  df-mnf 11270  df-ltxr 11272  df-gcd 16512

This theorem is referenced by:  gcd0val  16514  gcdn0val  16515  gcdf  16529  gcdcom  16530  dfgcd2  16563  gcdass  16564