P. 165 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 16401-16500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
5.11.2  _e is irrational
Theorem	eirrlem 16401*	Lemma for eirr 16402. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (1 / (!‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → e = (𝑃 / 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	eirr 16402	e is irrational. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ e ∉ ℚ
Theorem	egt2lt3 16403	Euler's constant e = 2.71828... is strictly bounded below by 2 and above by 3. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (2 < e ∧ e < 3)
Theorem	epos 16404	Euler's constant e is greater than 0. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Nov-2008.)
⊢ 0 < e
Theorem	epr 16405	Euler's constant e is a positive real. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Nov-2008.)
⊢ e ∈ ℝ+
Theorem	ene0 16406	e is not 0. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ e ≠ 0
Theorem	ene1 16407	e is not 1. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ e ≠ 1
5.12  Cardinality of real and complex number subsets
5.12.1  Countability of integers and rationals
Theorem	xpnnen 16408	The Cartesian product of the set of positive integers with itself is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (ℕ × ℕ) ≈ ℕ
Theorem	znnen 16409	The set of integers and the set of positive integers are equinumerous. Exercise 1 of [Gleason] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ℤ ≈ ℕ
Theorem	qnnen 16410	The rational numbers are countable. This proof does not use the Axiom of Choice, even though it uses an onto function, because the base set (ℤ × ℕ) is numerable. Exercise 2 of [Enderton] p. 133. For purposes of the Metamath 100 list, we are considering Mario Carneiro's revision as the date this proof was completed. This is Metamath 100 proof #3. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ℚ ≈ ℕ
5.12.2  The reals are uncountable
Theorem	rpnnen2lem1 16411*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑁) = if(𝑁 ∈ 𝐴, ((1 / 3)↑𝑁), 0))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem2 16412*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝐴):ℕ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem3 16413*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ seq1( + , (𝐹‘ℕ)) ⇝ (1 / 2)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem4 16414*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (0 ≤ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem5 16415*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → seq𝑀( + , (𝐹‘𝐴)) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	rpnnen2lem6 16416*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem7 16417*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem8 16418*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) + Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem9 16419*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑀}))‘𝑘) = (0 + (((1 / 3)↑(𝑀 + 1)) / (1 − (1 / 3)))))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem10 16420*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑛 < 𝑚 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem11 16421*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑛 < 𝑚 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem12 16422*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝒫 ℕ ≼ (0[,]1)
Theorem	rpnnen2 16423	The other half of rpnnen 16424, where we show an injection from sets of positive integers to real numbers. The obvious choice for this is binary expansion, but it has the unfortunate property that it does not produce an injection on numbers which end with all 0's or all 1's (the more well-known decimal version of this is 0.999... 16079). Instead, we opt for a ternary expansion, which produces (a scaled version of) the Cantor set. Since the Cantor set is riddled with gaps, we can show that any two sequences that are not equal must differ somewhere, and when they do, they are placed a finite distance apart, thus ensuring that the map is injective. Our map assigns to each subset 𝐴 of the positive integers the number Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴(3↑ -𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘), where ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, (3↑ -𝑘), 0)) (rpnnen2lem1 16411). This is an infinite sum of real numbers (rpnnen2lem2 16412), and since 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 implies (𝐹‘𝐴) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐵) (rpnnen2lem4 16414) and (𝐹‘ℕ) converges to 1 / 2 (rpnnen2lem3 16413) by geoisum1 16077, the sum is convergent to some real (rpnnen2lem5 16415 and rpnnen2lem6 16416) by the comparison test for convergence cvgcmp 16012. The comparison test also tells us that 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 implies Σ(𝐹‘𝐴) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘𝐵) (rpnnen2lem7 16417). Putting it all together, if we have two sets 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦, there must differ somewhere, and so there must be an 𝑚 such that ∀𝑛 < 𝑚(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑦) but 𝑚 ∈ (𝑥 ∖ 𝑦) or vice versa. In this case, we split off the first 𝑚 − 1 terms (rpnnen2lem8 16418) and cancel them (rpnnen2lem10 16420), since these are the same for both sets. For the remaining terms, we use the subset property to establish that Σ(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑚})) and Σ(𝐹‘{𝑚}) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘𝑥) (where these sums are only over (ℤ≥‘𝑚)), and since Σ(𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑚})) = (3↑ -𝑚) / 2 (rpnnen2lem9 16419) and Σ(𝐹‘{𝑚}) = (3↑ -𝑚), we establish that Σ(𝐹‘𝑦) < Σ(𝐹‘𝑥) (rpnnen2lem11 16421) so that they must be different. By contraposition (rpnnen2lem12 16422), we find that this map is an injection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) (Revised by NM, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝒫 ℕ ≼ (0[,]1)
Theorem	rpnnen 16424	The cardinality of the continuum is the same as the powerset of ω. This is a stronger statement than ruc 16440, which only asserts that ℝ is uncountable, i.e. has a cardinality larger than ω. The main proof is in two parts, rpnnen1 13138 and rpnnen2 16423, each showing an injection in one direction, and this last part uses sbth 9144 to prove that the sets are equinumerous. By constructing explicit injections, we avoid the use of AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ℝ ≈ 𝒫 ℕ
Theorem	rexpen 16425	The real numbers are equinumerous to their own Cartesian product, even though it is not necessarily true that ℝ is well-orderable (so we cannot use infxpidm2 10123 directly). (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (ℝ × ℝ) ≈ ℝ
Theorem	cpnnen 16426	The complex numbers are equinumerous to the powerset of the positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ℂ ≈ 𝒫 ℕ
Theorem	rucALT 16427	Alternate proof of ruc 16440. This proof is a simple corollary of rpnnen 16424, which determines the exact cardinality of the reals. For an alternate proof discussed at mmcomplex.html#uncountable 16424, see ruc 16440. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℕ ≺ ℝ
Theorem	ruclem1 16428*	Lemma for ruc 16440 (the reals are uncountable). Substitutions for the function 𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Fan Zheng, 6-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑋 = if(((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) < 𝑀, 𝐴, ((((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) + 𝐵) / 2)) ∧ 𝑌 = if(((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) < 𝑀, ((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2), 𝐵)))
Theorem	ruclem2 16429*	Lemma for ruc 16440. Ordering property for the input to 𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	ruclem3 16430*	Lemma for ruc 16440. The constructed interval [𝑋, 𝑌] always excludes 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 < 𝑋 ∨ 𝑌 < 𝑀))
Theorem	ruclem4 16431*	Lemma for ruc 16440. Initial value of the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘0) = ⟨0, 1⟩)
Theorem	ruclem6 16432*	Lemma for ruc 16440. Domain and codomain of the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ0⟶(ℝ × ℝ))
Theorem	ruclem7 16433*	Lemma for ruc 16440. Successor value for the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝐺‘𝑁)𝐷(𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	ruclem8 16434*	Lemma for ruc 16440. The intervals of the 𝐺 sequence are all nonempty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) < (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ruclem9 16435*	Lemma for ruc 16440. The first components of the 𝐺 sequence are increasing, and the second components are decreasing. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑀)) ≤ (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) ≤ (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑀))))
Theorem	ruclem10 16436*	Lemma for ruc 16440. Every first component of the 𝐺 sequence is less than every second component. That is, the sequences form a chain a1 < a2 <... < b2 < b1, where ai are the first components and bi are the second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑀)) < (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ruclem11 16437*	Lemma for ruc 16440. Closure lemmas for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))
Theorem	ruclem12 16438*	Lemma for ruc 16440. The supremum of the increasing sequence 1st ∘ 𝐺 is a real number that is not in the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = sup(ran (1st ∘ 𝐺), ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ran 𝐹))
Theorem	ruclem13 16439	Lemma for ruc 16440. There is no function that maps ℕ onto ℝ. (Use nex 1833 if you want this in the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:ℕ⟶ontoℝ.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 6-Jun-2016.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐹:ℕ⟶ontoℝ
Theorem	ruc 16440	The set of positive integers is strictly dominated by the set of real numbers, i.e. the real numbers are uncountable. The proof consists of lemmas ruclem1 16428 through ruclem13 16439 and this final piece. Our proof is based on the proof of Theorem 5.18 of [Truss] p. 114. See ruclem13 16439 for the function existence version of this theorem. For an informal discussion of this proof, see mmcomplex.html#uncountable 16439. For an alternate proof see rucALT 16427. This is Metamath 100 proof #22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ℕ ≺ ℝ
Theorem	resdomq 16441	The set of rationals is strictly less equinumerous than the set of reals (ℝ strictly dominates ℚ). (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.)
⊢ ℚ ≺ ℝ
Theorem	aleph1re 16442	There are at least aleph-one real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (ℵ‘1o) ≼ ℝ
Theorem	aleph1irr 16443	There are at least aleph-one irrationals. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (ℵ‘1o) ≼ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	cnso 16444	The complex numbers can be linearly ordered. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 Or ℂ
PART 6  ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY Here we introduce elementary number theory, in particular the elementary properties of divisibility and elementary prime number theory.
6.1  Elementary properties of divisibility
6.1.1  Irrationality of square root of 2
Theorem	sqrt2irrlem 16445	Lemma for sqrt2irr 16446. This is the core of the proof: if 𝐴 / 𝐵 = √(2), then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are even, so 𝐴 / 2 and 𝐵 / 2 are smaller representatives, which is absurd by the method of infinite descent (here implemented by strong induction). This is Metamath 100 proof #1. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by JV, 4-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (√‘2) = (𝐴 / 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 2) ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐵 / 2) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	sqrt2irr 16446	The square root of 2 is irrational. See zsqrtelqelz 16963 for a generalization to all non-square integers. The proof's core is proven in sqrt2irrlem 16445, which shows that if 𝐴 / 𝐵 = √(2), then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are even, so 𝐴 / 2 and 𝐵 / 2 are smaller representatives, which is absurd. An older version of this proof was included in The Seventeen Provers of the World compiled by Freek Wiedijk. It is also the first of the "top 100" mathematical theorems whose formalization is tracked by Freek Wiedijk on his Formalizing 100 Theorems page at http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/ 16445. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (√‘2) ∉ ℚ
Theorem	sqrt2re 16447	The square root of 2 exists and is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (√‘2) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	sqrt2irr0 16448	The square root of 2 is an irrational number. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (√‘2) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
6.1.2  Some Number sets are chains of proper subsets
Theorem	nthruc 16449	The sequence ℕ, ℤ, ℚ, ℝ, and ℂ forms a chain of proper subsets. In each case the proper subset relationship is shown by demonstrating a number that belongs to one set but not the other. We show that zero belongs to ℤ but not ℕ, one-half belongs to ℚ but not ℤ, the square root of 2 belongs to ℝ but not ℚ, and finally that the imaginary number i belongs to ℂ but not ℝ. See nthruz 16450 for a further refinement. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((ℕ ⊊ ℤ ∧ ℤ ⊊ ℚ) ∧ (ℚ ⊊ ℝ ∧ ℝ ⊊ ℂ))
Theorem	nthruz 16450	The sequence ℕ, ℕ0, and ℤ forms a chain of proper subsets. In each case the proper subset relationship is shown by demonstrating a number that belongs to one set but not the other. We show that zero belongs to ℕ0 but not ℕ and minus one belongs to ℤ but not ℕ0. This theorem refines the chain of proper subsets nthruc 16449. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2004.)
⊢ (ℕ ⊊ ℕ0 ∧ ℕ0 ⊊ ℤ)
6.1.3  The divides relation
Syntax	cdvds 16451	Extend the definition of a class to include the divides relation. See df-dvds 16452.
class ∥
Definition	df-dvds 16452*	Define the divides relation, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 14. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ∥ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑛 · 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
Theorem	divides 16453*	Define the divides relation. 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 means 𝑀 divides into 𝑁 with no remainder. For example, 3 ∥ 6 (ex-dvds 31087). As proven in dvdsval3 16455, 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 mod 𝑀) = 0. See divides 16453 and dvdsval2 16454 for other equivalent expressions. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑛 · 𝑀) = 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsval2 16454	One nonzero integer divides another integer if and only if their quotient is an integer. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	dvdsval3 16455	One nonzero integer divides another integer if and only if the remainder upon division is zero, see remark in [ApostolNT] p. 106. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 mod 𝑀) = 0))
Theorem	dvdszrcl 16456	Reverse closure for the divisibility relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∥ 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	dvdsmod0 16457	If a positive integer divides another integer, then the remainder upon division is zero. (Contributed by AV, 3-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁) → (𝑁 mod 𝑀) = 0)
Theorem	p1modz1 16458	If a number greater than 1 divides another number, the second number increased by 1 is 1 modulo the first number. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝑀) → ((𝐴 + 1) mod 𝑀) = 1)
Theorem	dvdsmodexp 16459	If a positive integer divides another integer, this other integer is equal to its positive powers modulo the positive integer. (Formerly part of the proof for fermltl 16990). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2014.) (Revised by AV, 19-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐴) → ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐴 mod 𝑁))
Theorem	nndivdvds 16460	Strong form of dvdsval2 16454 for positive integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐵 ∥ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	nndivides 16461*	Definition of the divides relation for positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑛 · 𝑀) = 𝑁))
Theorem	moddvds 16462	Two ways to say 𝐴≡𝐵 (mod 𝑁), see also definition in [ApostolNT] p. 106. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 mod 𝑁) = (𝐵 mod 𝑁) ↔ 𝑁 ∥ (𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	modm1div 16463	An integer greater than one divides another integer minus one iff the second integer modulo the first integer is one. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 mod 𝑁) = 1 ↔ 𝑁 ∥ (𝐴 − 1)))
Theorem	addmulmodb 16464	An integer plus a product is itself modulo a positive integer iff the product is divisible by the positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)) → (𝑁 ∥ (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ ((𝐴 + (𝐵 · 𝐶)) mod 𝑁) = (𝐴 mod 𝑁)))
Theorem	dvds0lem 16465	A lemma to assist theorems of ∥ with no antecedents. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 · 𝑀) = 𝑁) → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)
Theorem	dvds1lem 16466*	A lemma to assist theorems of ∥ with one antecedent. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℤ) → 𝑍 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 · 𝐽) = 𝐾 → (𝑍 · 𝑀) = 𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∥ 𝐾 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvds2lem 16467*	A lemma to assist theorems of ∥ with two antecedents. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ)) → 𝑍 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝑥 · 𝐼) = 𝐽 ∧ (𝑦 · 𝐾) = 𝐿) → (𝑍 · 𝑀) = 𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼 ∥ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝐿) → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	iddvds 16468	An integer divides itself. Theorem 1.1(a) in [ApostolNT] p. 14 (reflexive property of the divides relation). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → 𝑁 ∥ 𝑁)
Theorem	1dvds 16469	1 divides any integer. Theorem 1.1(f) in [ApostolNT] p. 14. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → 1 ∥ 𝑁)
Theorem	dvds0 16470	Any integer divides 0. Theorem 1.1(g) in [ApostolNT] p. 14. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → 𝑁 ∥ 0)
Theorem	negdvdsb 16471	An integer divides another iff its negation does. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ -𝑀 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsnegb 16472	An integer divides another iff it divides its negation. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝑀 ∥ -𝑁))
Theorem	absdvdsb 16473	An integer divides another iff its absolute value does. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (abs‘𝑀) ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsabsb 16474	An integer divides another iff it divides its absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝑀 ∥ (abs‘𝑁)))
Theorem	0dvds 16475	Only 0 is divisible by 0. Theorem 1.1(h) in [ApostolNT] p. 14. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (0 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝑁 = 0))
Theorem	dvdsmul1 16476	An integer divides a multiple of itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → 𝑀 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsmul2 16477	An integer divides a multiple of itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → 𝑁 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁))
Theorem	iddvdsexp 16478	An integer divides a positive integer power of itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → 𝑀 ∥ (𝑀↑𝑁))
Theorem	muldvds1 16479	If a product divides an integer, so does one of its factors. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	muldvds2 16480	If a product divides an integer, so does one of its factors. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdscmul 16481	Multiplication by a constant maintains the divides relation. Theorem 1.1(d) in [ApostolNT] p. 14 (multiplication property of the divides relation). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 → (𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ (𝐾 · 𝑁)))
Theorem	dvdsmulc 16482	Multiplication by a constant maintains the divides relation. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 → (𝑀 · 𝐾) ∥ (𝑁 · 𝐾)))
Theorem	dvdscmulr 16483	Cancellation law for the divides relation. Theorem 1.1(e) in [ApostolNT] p. 14. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 0)) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ (𝐾 · 𝑁) ↔ 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsmulcr 16484	Cancellation law for the divides relation. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 0)) → ((𝑀 · 𝐾) ∥ (𝑁 · 𝐾) ↔ 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	summodnegmod 16485	The sum of two integers modulo a positive integer equals zero iff the first of the two integers equals the negative of the other integer modulo the positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝐴 + 𝐵) mod 𝑁) = 0 ↔ (𝐴 mod 𝑁) = ( -𝐵 mod 𝑁)))
Theorem	difmod0 16486	The difference of two integers modulo a positive integer equals zero iff the two integers are equal modulo the positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) mod 𝑁) = 0 ↔ (𝐴 mod 𝑁) = (𝐵 mod 𝑁)))
Theorem	modmulconst 16487	Constant multiplication in a modulo operation, see theorem 5.3 in [ApostolNT] p. 108. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 mod 𝑀) = (𝐵 mod 𝑀) ↔ ((𝐶 · 𝐴) mod (𝐶 · 𝑀)) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) mod (𝐶 · 𝑀))))
Theorem	dvds2ln 16488	If an integer divides each of two other integers, it divides any linear combination of them. Theorem 1.1(c) in [ApostolNT] p. 14 (linearity property of the divides relation). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐼 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ∥ ((𝐼 · 𝑀) + (𝐽 · 𝑁))))
Theorem	dvds2add 16489	If an integer divides each of two other integers, it divides their sum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 + 𝑁)))
Theorem	dvds2sub 16490	If an integer divides each of two other integers, it divides their difference. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 − 𝑁)))
Theorem	dvds2addd 16491	Deduction form of dvds2add 16489. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 + 𝑁))
Theorem	dvds2subd 16492	Deduction form of dvds2sub 16490. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 − 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdstr 16493	The divides relation is transitive. Theorem 1.1(b) in [ApostolNT] p. 14 (transitive property of the divides relation). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdstrd 16494	The divides relation is transitive, a deduction version of dvdstr 16493. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁)
Theorem	dvdsmultr1 16495	If an integer divides another, it divides a multiple of it. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁)))
Theorem	dvdsmultr1d 16496	Deduction form of dvdsmultr1 16495. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsmultr2 16497	If an integer divides another, it divides a multiple of it. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐾 ∥ 𝑁 → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁)))
Theorem	dvdsmultr2d 16498	Deduction form of dvdsmultr2 16497. (Contributed by SN, 23-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁))
Theorem	ordvdsmul 16499	If an integer divides either of two others, it divides their product. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∨ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁)))
Theorem	dvdssub2 16500	If an integer divides a difference, then it divides one term iff it divides the other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 − 𝑁)) → (𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ↔ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁))