P. 165 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 16401-16500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bitsp1o 16401	The 𝑀 + 1-th bit of 2𝑁 + 1 is the 𝑀-th bit of 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝑀 + 1) ∈ (bits‘((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) ↔ 𝑀 ∈ (bits‘𝑁)))
Theorem	bitsfzolem 16402*	Lemma for bitsfzo 16403. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (bits‘𝑁) ⊆ (0..^𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ 𝑁 < (2↑𝑛)}, ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(2↑𝑀)))
Theorem	bitsfzo 16403	The bits of a number are all less than 𝑀 iff the number is nonnegative and less than 2↑𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑁 ∈ (0..^(2↑𝑀)) ↔ (bits‘𝑁) ⊆ (0..^𝑀)))
Theorem	bitsmod 16404	Truncating the bit sequence after some 𝑀 is equivalent to reducing the argument mod 2↑𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → (bits‘(𝑁 mod (2↑𝑀))) = ((bits‘𝑁) ∩ (0..^𝑀)))
Theorem	bitsfi 16405	Every number is associated with a finite set of bits. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (bits‘𝑁) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	bitscmp 16406	The bit complement of 𝑁 is -𝑁 − 1. (Thus, by bitsfi 16405, all negative numbers have cofinite bits representations.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (ℕ0 ∖ (bits‘𝑁)) = (bits‘(-𝑁 − 1)))
Theorem	0bits 16407	The bits of zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (bits‘0) = ∅
Theorem	m1bits 16408	The bits of negative one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (bits‘-1) = ℕ0
Theorem	bitsinv1lem 16409	Lemma for bitsinv1 16410. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑁 mod (2↑(𝑀 + 1))) = ((𝑁 mod (2↑𝑀)) + if(𝑀 ∈ (bits‘𝑁), (2↑𝑀), 0)))
Theorem	bitsinv1 16410*	There is an explicit inverse to the bits function for nonnegative integers (which can be extended to negative integers using bitscmp 16406), part 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → Σ𝑛 ∈ (bits‘𝑁)(2↑𝑛) = 𝑁)
Theorem	bitsinv2 16411*	There is an explicit inverse to the bits function for nonnegative integers, part 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) → (bits‘Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 (2↑𝑛)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bitsf1ocnv 16412*	The bits function restricted to nonnegative integers is a bijection from the integers to the finite sets of integers. It is in fact the inverse of the Ackermann bijection ackbijnn 15800. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((bits ↾ ℕ0):ℕ0–1-1-onto→(𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) ∧ ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0) = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) ↦ Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝑥 (2↑𝑛)))
Theorem	bitsf1o 16413	The bits function restricted to nonnegative integers is a bijection from the integers to the finite sets of integers. It is in fact the inverse of the Ackermann bijection ackbijnn 15800. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (bits ↾ ℕ0):ℕ0–1-1-onto→(𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin)
Theorem	bitsf1 16414	The bits function is an injection from ℤ to 𝒫 ℕ0. It is obviously not a bijection (by Cantor's theorem canth2 9148), and in fact its range is the set of finite and cofinite subsets of ℕ0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.)
⊢ bits:ℤ–1-1→𝒫 ℕ0
Theorem	2ebits 16415	The bits of a power of two. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (bits‘(2↑𝑁)) = {𝑁})
Theorem	bitsinv 16416*	The inverse of the bits function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) → (𝐾‘𝐴) = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (2↑𝑘))
Theorem	bitsinvp1 16417	Recursive definition of the inverse of the bits function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1)))) = ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + if(𝑁 ∈ 𝐴, (2↑𝑁), 0)))
Theorem	sadadd2lem2 16418	The core of the proof of sadadd2 16428. The intuitive justification for this is that cadd is true if at least two arguments are true, and hadd is true if an odd number of arguments are true, so altogether the result is 𝑛 · 𝐴 where 𝑛 is the number of true arguments, which is equivalently obtained by adding together one 𝐴 for each true argument, on the right side. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (if(hadd(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒), 𝐴, 0) + if(cadd(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒), (2 · 𝐴), 0)) = ((if(𝜑, 𝐴, 0) + if(𝜓, 𝐴, 0)) + if(𝜒, 𝐴, 0)))
Definition	df-sad 16419*	Define the addition of two bit sequences, using df-had 1588 and df-cad 1601 bit operations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ sadd = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0 ↦ {𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ hadd(𝑘 ∈ 𝑥, 𝑘 ∈ 𝑦, ∅ ∈ (seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝑥, 𝑚 ∈ 𝑦, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))‘𝑘))})
Theorem	sadfval 16420*	Define the addition of two bit sequences, using df-had 1588 and df-cad 1601 bit operations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) = {𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ hadd(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑘))})
Theorem	sadcf 16421*	The carry sequence is a sequence of elements of 2o encoding a "sequence of wffs". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶:ℕ0⟶2o)
Theorem	sadc0 16422*	The initial element of the carry sequence is ⊥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐶‘0))
Theorem	sadcp1 16423*	The carry sequence (which is a sequence of wffs, encoded as 1o and ∅) is defined recursively as the carry operation applied to the previous carry and the two current inputs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∅ ∈ (𝐶‘(𝑁 + 1)) ↔ cadd(𝑁 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁))))
Theorem	sadval 16424*	The full adder sequence is the half adder function applied to the inputs and the carry sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ↔ hadd(𝑁 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁))))
Theorem	sadcaddlem 16425*	Lemma for sadcadd 16426. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁) ↔ (2↑𝑁) ≤ ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∅ ∈ (𝐶‘(𝑁 + 1)) ↔ (2↑(𝑁 + 1)) ≤ ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1)))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1)))))))
Theorem	sadcadd 16426*	Non-recursive definition of the carry sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁) ↔ (2↑𝑁) ≤ ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))))))
Theorem	sadadd2lem 16427*	Lemma for sadadd2 16428. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + if(∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁), (2↑𝑁), 0)) = ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1)))) + if(∅ ∈ (𝐶‘(𝑁 + 1)), (2↑(𝑁 + 1)), 0)) = ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1)))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1))))))
Theorem	sadadd2 16428*	Sum of initial segments of the sadd sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + if(∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁), (2↑𝑁), 0)) = ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁)))))
Theorem	sadadd3 16429*	Sum of initial segments of the sadd sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁))) mod (2↑𝑁)) = (((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁)))) mod (2↑𝑁)))
Theorem	sadcl 16430	The sum of two sequences is a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ⊆ ℕ0)
Theorem	sadcom 16431	The adder sequence function is commutative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) = (𝐵 sadd 𝐴))
Theorem	saddisjlem 16432*	Lemma for sadadd 16435. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
Theorem	saddisj 16433	The sum of disjoint sequences is the union of the sequences. (In this case, there are no carried bits.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	sadaddlem 16434*	Lemma for sadadd 16435. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ (bits‘𝐴), 𝑚 ∈ (bits‘𝐵), ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((bits‘𝐴) sadd (bits‘𝐵)) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (bits‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) mod (2↑𝑁))))
Theorem	sadadd 16435	For sequences that correspond to valid integers, the adder sequence function produces the sequence for the sum. This is effectively a proof of the correctness of the ripple carry adder, implemented with logic gates corresponding to df-had 1588 and df-cad 1601. It is interesting to consider in what sense the sadd function can be said to be "adding" things outside the range of the bits function, that is, when adding sequences that are not eventually constant and so do not denote any integer. The correct interpretation is that the sequences are representations of 2-adic integers, which have a natural ring structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((bits‘𝐴) sadd (bits‘𝐵)) = (bits‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	sadid1 16436	The adder sequence function has a left identity, the empty set, which is the representation of the integer zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (𝐴 sadd ∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sadid2 16437	The adder sequence function has a right identity, the empty set, which is the representation of the integer zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (∅ sadd 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sadasslem 16438	Lemma for sadass 16439. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) sadd 𝐶) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = ((𝐴 sadd (𝐵 sadd 𝐶)) ∩ (0..^𝑁)))
Theorem	sadass 16439	Sequence addition is associative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) sadd 𝐶) = (𝐴 sadd (𝐵 sadd 𝐶)))
Theorem	sadeq 16440	Any element of a sequence sum only depends on the values of the argument sequences up to and including that point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) sadd (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) ∩ (0..^𝑁)))
Theorem	bitsres 16441	Restrict the bits of a number to an upper integer set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((bits‘𝐴) ∩ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) = (bits‘((⌊‘(𝐴 / (2↑𝑁))) · (2↑𝑁))))
Theorem	bitsuz 16442	The bits of a number are all at least 𝑁 iff the number is divisible by 2↑𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((2↑𝑁) ∥ 𝐴 ↔ (bits‘𝐴) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)))
Theorem	bitsshft 16443*	Shifting a bit sequence to the left (toward the more significant bits) causes the number to be multiplied by a power of two. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑛 − 𝑁) ∈ (bits‘𝐴)} = (bits‘(𝐴 · (2↑𝑁))))
Definition	df-smu 16444*	Define the multiplication of two bit sequences, using repeated sequence addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ smul = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0 ↦ {𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ 𝑘 ∈ (seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝑦)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))‘(𝑘 + 1))})
Theorem	smufval 16445*	The multiplication of two bit sequences as repeated sequence addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 smul 𝐵) = {𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})
Theorem	smupf 16446*	The sequence of partial sums of the sequence multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:ℕ0⟶𝒫 ℕ0)
Theorem	smup0 16447*	The initial element of the partial sum sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘0) = ∅)
Theorem	smupp1 16448*	The initial element of the partial sum sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝑃‘𝑁) sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑁) ∈ 𝐵)}))
Theorem	smuval 16449*	Define the addition of two bit sequences, using df-had 1588 and df-cad 1601 bit operations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 smul 𝐵) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	smuval2 16450*	The partial sum sequence stabilizes at 𝑁 after the 𝑁 + 1-th element of the sequence; this stable value is the value of the sequence multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 smul 𝐵) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (𝑃‘𝑀)))
Theorem	smupvallem 16451*	If 𝐴 only has elements less than 𝑁, then all elements of the partial sum sequence past 𝑁 already equal the final value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑀) = (𝐴 smul 𝐵))
Theorem	smucl 16452	The product of two sequences is a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) → (𝐴 smul 𝐵) ⊆ ℕ0)
Theorem	smu01lem 16453*	Lemma for smu01 16454 and smu02 16455. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0)) → ¬ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑘) ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 smul 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	smu01 16454	Multiplication of a sequence by 0 on the right. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (𝐴 smul ∅) = ∅)
Theorem	smu02 16455	Multiplication of a sequence by 0 on the left. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (∅ smul 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	smupval 16456*	Rewrite the elements of the partial sum sequence in terms of sequence multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑁) = ((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul 𝐵))
Theorem	smup1 16457*	Rewrite smupp1 16448 using only smul instead of the internal recursive function 𝑃. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1))) smul 𝐵) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul 𝐵) sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑁) ∈ 𝐵)}))
Theorem	smueqlem 16458*	Any element of a sequence multiplication only depends on the values of the argument sequences up to and including that point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁)))})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 smul 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) ∩ (0..^𝑁)))
Theorem	smueq 16459	Any element of a sequence multiplication only depends on the values of the argument sequences up to and including that point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 smul 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) ∩ (0..^𝑁)))
Theorem	smumullem 16460	Lemma for smumul 16461. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((bits‘𝐴) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul (bits‘𝐵)) = (bits‘((𝐴 mod (2↑𝑁)) · 𝐵)))
Theorem	smumul 16461	For sequences that correspond to valid integers, the sequence multiplication function produces the sequence for the product. This is effectively a proof of the correctness of the multiplication process, implemented in terms of logic gates for df-sad 16419, whose correctness is verified in sadadd 16435. Outside this range, the sequences cannot be representing integers, but the smul function still "works". This extended function is best interpreted in terms of the ring structure of the 2-adic integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((bits‘𝐴) smul (bits‘𝐵)) = (bits‘(𝐴 · 𝐵)))
6.1.7  The greatest common divisor operator
Syntax	cgcd 16462	Extend the definition of a class to include the greatest common divisor operator.
class gcd
Definition	df-gcd 16463*	Define the gcd operator. For example, (-6 gcd 9) = 3 (ex-gcd 30260). For an alternate definition, based on the definition in [ApostolNT] p. 15, see dfgcd2 16515. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ gcd = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	gcdval 16464*	The value of the gcd operator. (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) is the greatest common divisor of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If 𝑀 and 𝑁 are both 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	gcd0val 16465	The value, by convention, of the gcd operator when both operands are 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (0 gcd 0) = 0
Theorem	gcdn0val 16466*	The value of the gcd operator when at least one operand is nonzero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	gcdcllem1 16467*	Lemma for gcdn0cl 16470, gcddvds 16471 and dvdslegcd 16472. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∥ 𝑛}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑛 ≠ 0) → (𝑆 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	gcdcllem2 16468*	Lemma for gcdn0cl 16470, gcddvds 16471 and dvdslegcd 16472. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ {𝑀, 𝑁}𝑧 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	gcdcllem3 16469*	Lemma for gcdn0cl 16470, gcddvds 16471 and dvdslegcd 16472. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ {𝑀, 𝑁}𝑧 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → (sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℕ ∧ (sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ) ∥ 𝑀 ∧ sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ) ∥ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ≤ sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ))))
Theorem	gcdn0cl 16470	Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	gcddvds 16471	The gcd of two integers divides each of them. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∥ 𝑀 ∧ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdslegcd 16472	An integer which divides both operands of the gcd operator is bounded by it. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ≤ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))
Theorem	nndvdslegcd 16473	A positive integer which divides both positive operands of the gcd operator is bounded by it. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ≤ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))
Theorem	gcdcl 16474	Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	gcdnncl 16475	Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	gcdcld 16476	Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	gcd2n0cl 16477	Closure of the gcd operator if the second operand is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 0) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	zeqzmulgcd 16478*	An integer is the product of an integer and the gcd of it and another integer. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (𝑛 · (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)))
Theorem	divgcdz 16479	An integer divided by the gcd of it and a nonzero integer is an integer. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	gcdf 16480	Domain and codomain of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.)
⊢ gcd :(ℤ × ℤ)⟶ℕ0
Theorem	gcdcom 16481	The gcd operator is commutative. Theorem 1.4(a) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀))
Theorem	gcdcomd 16482	The gcd operator is commutative, deduction version. (Contributed by SN, 24-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀))
Theorem	divgcdnn 16483	A positive integer divided by the gcd of it and another integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	divgcdnnr 16484	A positive integer divided by the gcd of it and another integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 / (𝐵 gcd 𝐴)) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	gcdeq0 16485	The gcd of two integers is zero iff they are both zero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 0 ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)))
Theorem	gcdn0gt0 16486	The gcd of two integers is positive (nonzero) iff they are not both zero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0) ↔ 0 < (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))
Theorem	gcd0id 16487	The gcd of 0 and an integer is the integer's absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (0 gcd 𝑁) = (abs‘𝑁))
Theorem	gcdid0 16488	The gcd of an integer and 0 is the integer's absolute value. Theorem 1.4(d)2 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (𝑁 gcd 0) = (abs‘𝑁))
Theorem	nn0gcdid0 16489	The gcd of a nonnegative integer with 0 is itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 gcd 0) = 𝑁)
Theorem	gcdneg 16490	Negating one operand of the gcd operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd -𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))
Theorem	neggcd 16491	Negating one operand of the gcd operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (-𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))
Theorem	gcdaddmlem 16492	Lemma for gcdaddm 16493. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd ((𝐾 · 𝑀) + 𝑁))
Theorem	gcdaddm 16493	Adding a multiple of one operand of the gcd operator to the other does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 + (𝐾 · 𝑀))))
Theorem	gcdadd 16494	The GCD of two numbers is the same as the GCD of the left and their sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 + 𝑀)))
Theorem	gcdid 16495	The gcd of a number and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (𝑁 gcd 𝑁) = (abs‘𝑁))
Theorem	gcd1 16496	The gcd of a number with 1 is 1. Theorem 1.4(d)1 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 gcd 1) = 1)
Theorem	gcdabs1 16497	gcd of the absolute value of the first operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑁) gcd 𝑀) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀))
Theorem	gcdabs2 16498	gcd of the absolute value of the second operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 gcd (abs‘𝑀)) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀))
Theorem	gcdabs 16499	The gcd of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 15-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑀) gcd (abs‘𝑁)) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))
Theorem	gcdabsOLD 16500	Obsolete version of gcdabs 16499 as of 15-Sep-2024. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑀) gcd (abs‘𝑁)) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))