| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 165 of 502) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31005) |
(31006-32528) |
(32529-50153) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | sadcl 16401 | The sum of two sequences is a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ⊆ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | sadcom 16402 | The adder sequence function is commutative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) = (𝐵 sadd 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | saddisjlem 16403* | Lemma for sadadd 16406. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) & ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | saddisj 16404 | The sum of disjoint sequences is the union of the sequences. (In this case, there are no carried bits.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | sadaddlem 16405* | Lemma for sadadd 16406. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ (bits‘𝐴), 𝑚 ∈ (bits‘𝐵), ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((bits‘𝐴) sadd (bits‘𝐵)) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (bits‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) mod (2↑𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | sadadd 16406 |
For sequences that correspond to valid integers, the adder sequence
function produces the sequence for the sum. This is effectively a proof
of the correctness of the ripple carry adder, implemented with logic
gates corresponding to df-had 1596 and df-cad 1609.
It is interesting to consider in what sense the sadd function can be said to be "adding" things outside the range of the bits function, that is, when adding sequences that are not eventually constant and so do not denote any integer. The correct interpretation is that the sequences are representations of 2-adic integers, which have a natural ring structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((bits‘𝐴) sadd (bits‘𝐵)) = (bits‘(𝐴 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | sadid1 16407 | The adder sequence function has a left identity, the empty set, which is the representation of the integer zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (𝐴 sadd ∅) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sadid2 16408 | The adder sequence function has a right identity, the empty set, which is the representation of the integer zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (∅ sadd 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sadasslem 16409 | Lemma for sadass 16410. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) sadd 𝐶) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = ((𝐴 sadd (𝐵 sadd 𝐶)) ∩ (0..^𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | sadass 16410 | Sequence addition is associative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) sadd 𝐶) = (𝐴 sadd (𝐵 sadd 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | sadeq 16411 | Any element of a sequence sum only depends on the values of the argument sequences up to and including that point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) sadd (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) ∩ (0..^𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | bitsres 16412 | Restrict the bits of a number to an upper integer set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((bits‘𝐴) ∩ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) = (bits‘((⌊‘(𝐴 / (2↑𝑁))) · (2↑𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | bitsuz 16413 | The bits of a number are all at least 𝑁 iff the number is divisible by 2↑𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((2↑𝑁) ∥ 𝐴 ↔ (bits‘𝐴) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | bitsshft 16414* | Shifting a bit sequence to the left (toward the more significant bits) causes the number to be multiplied by a power of two. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑛 − 𝑁) ∈ (bits‘𝐴)} = (bits‘(𝐴 · (2↑𝑁)))) | ||
| Definition | df-smu 16415* | Define the multiplication of two bit sequences, using repeated sequence addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ smul = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0 ↦ {𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ 𝑘 ∈ (seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝑦)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))‘(𝑘 + 1))}) | ||
| Theorem | smufval 16416* | The multiplication of two bit sequences as repeated sequence addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 smul 𝐵) = {𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) | ||
| Theorem | smupf 16417* | The sequence of partial sums of the sequence multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:ℕ0⟶𝒫 ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | smup0 16418* | The initial element of the partial sum sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘0) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | smupp1 16419* | The initial element of the partial sum sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝑃‘𝑁) sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑁) ∈ 𝐵)})) | ||
| Theorem | smuval 16420* | Define the addition of two bit sequences, using df-had 1596 and df-cad 1609 bit operations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 smul 𝐵) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | smuval2 16421* | The partial sum sequence stabilizes at 𝑁 after the 𝑁 + 1-th element of the sequence; this stable value is the value of the sequence multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 smul 𝐵) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (𝑃‘𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | smupvallem 16422* | If 𝐴 only has elements less than 𝑁, then all elements of the partial sum sequence past 𝑁 already equal the final value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (0..^𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑀) = (𝐴 smul 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | smucl 16423 | The product of two sequences is a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) → (𝐴 smul 𝐵) ⊆ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | smu01lem 16424* | Lemma for smu01 16425 and smu02 16426. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0)) → ¬ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑘) ∈ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 smul 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | smu01 16425 | Multiplication of a sequence by 0 on the right. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (𝐴 smul ∅) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | smu02 16426 | Multiplication of a sequence by 0 on the left. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (∅ smul 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | smupval 16427* | Rewrite the elements of the partial sum sequence in terms of sequence multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑁) = ((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | smup1 16428* | Rewrite smupp1 16419 using only smul instead of the internal recursive function 𝑃. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1))) smul 𝐵) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul 𝐵) sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑁) ∈ 𝐵)})) | ||
| Theorem | smueqlem 16429* | Any element of a sequence multiplication only depends on the values of the argument sequences up to and including that point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝑄 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁)))})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 smul 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) ∩ (0..^𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | smueq 16430 | Any element of a sequence multiplication only depends on the values of the argument sequences up to and including that point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 smul 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) ∩ (0..^𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | smumullem 16431 | Lemma for smumul 16432. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((bits‘𝐴) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul (bits‘𝐵)) = (bits‘((𝐴 mod (2↑𝑁)) · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | smumul 16432 |
For sequences that correspond to valid integers, the sequence
multiplication function produces the sequence for the product. This is
effectively a proof of the correctness of the multiplication process,
implemented in terms of logic gates for df-sad 16390, whose correctness is
verified in sadadd 16406.
Outside this range, the sequences cannot be representing integers, but the smul function still "works". This extended function is best interpreted in terms of the ring structure of the 2-adic integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((bits‘𝐴) smul (bits‘𝐵)) = (bits‘(𝐴 · 𝐵))) | ||
| Syntax | cgcd 16433 | Extend the definition of a class to include the greatest common divisor operator. |
| class gcd | ||
| Definition | df-gcd 16434* | Define the gcd operator. For example, (-6 gcd 9) = 3 (ex-gcd 30544). For an alternate definition, based on the definition in [ApostolNT] p. 15, see dfgcd2 16485. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ gcd = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < ))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdval 16435* | The value of the gcd operator. (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) is the greatest common divisor of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If 𝑀 and 𝑁 are both 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ))) | ||
| Theorem | gcd0val 16436 | The value, by convention, of the gcd operator when both operands are 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ (0 gcd 0) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | gcdn0val 16437* | The value of the gcd operator when at least one operand is nonzero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | gcdcllem1 16438* | Lemma for gcdn0cl 16441, gcddvds 16442 and dvdslegcd 16443. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∥ 𝑛} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑛 ≠ 0) → (𝑆 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | gcdcllem2 16439* | Lemma for gcdn0cl 16441, gcddvds 16442 and dvdslegcd 16443. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ {𝑀, 𝑁}𝑧 ∥ 𝑛} & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁)} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | gcdcllem3 16440* | Lemma for gcdn0cl 16441, gcddvds 16442 and dvdslegcd 16443. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ {𝑀, 𝑁}𝑧 ∥ 𝑛} & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁)} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → (sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℕ ∧ (sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ) ∥ 𝑀 ∧ sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ) ∥ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ≤ sup(𝑅, ℝ, < )))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdn0cl 16441 | Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | gcddvds 16442 | The gcd of two integers divides each of them. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∥ 𝑀 ∧ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∥ 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | dvdslegcd 16443 | An integer which divides both operands of the gcd operator is bounded by it. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ≤ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | nndvdslegcd 16444 | A positive integer which divides both positive operands of the gcd operator is bounded by it. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ≤ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdcl 16445 | Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | gcdnncl 16446 | Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | gcdcld 16447 | Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | gcd2n0cl 16448 | Closure of the gcd operator if the second operand is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 0) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | zeqzmulgcd 16449* | An integer is the product of an integer and the gcd of it and another integer. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (𝑛 · (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | divgcdz 16450 | An integer divided by the gcd of it and a nonzero integer is an integer. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∈ ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | gcdf 16451 | Domain and codomain of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ gcd :(ℤ × ℤ)⟶ℕ0 | ||
| Theorem | gcdcom 16452 | The gcd operator is commutative. Theorem 1.4(a) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | gcdcomd 16453 | The gcd operator is commutative, deduction version. (Contributed by SN, 24-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | divgcdnn 16454 | A positive integer divided by the gcd of it and another integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | divgcdnnr 16455 | A positive integer divided by the gcd of it and another integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 / (𝐵 gcd 𝐴)) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | gcdeq0 16456 | The gcd of two integers is zero iff they are both zero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 0 ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdn0gt0 16457 | The gcd of two integers is positive (nonzero) iff they are not both zero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0) ↔ 0 < (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | gcd0id 16458 | The gcd of 0 and an integer is the integer's absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (0 gcd 𝑁) = (abs‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | gcdid0 16459 | The gcd of an integer and 0 is the integer's absolute value. Theorem 1.4(d)2 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (𝑁 gcd 0) = (abs‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | nn0gcdid0 16460 | The gcd of a nonnegative integer with 0 is itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 gcd 0) = 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | gcdneg 16461 | Negating one operand of the gcd operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd -𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | neggcd 16462 | Negating one operand of the gcd operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (-𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | gcdaddmlem 16463 | Lemma for gcdaddm 16464. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd ((𝐾 · 𝑀) + 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | gcdaddm 16464 | Adding a multiple of one operand of the gcd operator to the other does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 + (𝐾 · 𝑀)))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdadd 16465 | The GCD of two numbers is the same as the GCD of the left and their sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 + 𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdid 16466 | The gcd of a number and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (𝑁 gcd 𝑁) = (abs‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | gcd1 16467 | The gcd of a number with 1 is 1. Theorem 1.4(d)1 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 gcd 1) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | gcdabs1 16468 | gcd of the absolute value of the first operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑁) gcd 𝑀) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | gcdabs2 16469 | gcd of the absolute value of the second operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 gcd (abs‘𝑀)) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | gcdabs 16470 | The gcd of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 15-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑀) gcd (abs‘𝑁)) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | modgcd 16471 | The gcd remains unchanged if one operand is replaced with its remainder modulo the other. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝑀 mod 𝑁) gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 1gcd 16472 | The GCD of one and an integer is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (1 gcd 𝑀) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | gcdmultipled 16473 | The greatest common divisor of a nonnegative integer 𝑀 and a multiple of it is 𝑀 itself. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 · 𝑀)) = 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | gcdmultiplez 16474 | The GCD of a multiple of an integer is the integer itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | gcdmultiple 16475 | The GCD of a multiple of a positive integer is the positive integer itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsgcdidd 16476 | The greatest common divisor of a positive integer and another integer it divides is itself. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | 6gcd4e2 16477 | The greatest common divisor of six and four is two. To calculate this gcd, a simple form of Euclid's algorithm is used: (6 gcd 4) = ((4 + 2) gcd 4) = (2 gcd 4) and (2 gcd 4) = (2 gcd (2 + 2)) = (2 gcd 2) = 2. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (6 gcd 4) = 2 | ||
| Theorem | bezoutlem1 16478* | Lemma for bezout 16482. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑧 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 0 → (abs‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | bezoutlem2 16479* | Lemma for bezout 16482. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2014.) ( Revised by AV, 30-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑧 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = inf(𝑀, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 = 0 ∧ 𝐵 = 0)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | bezoutlem3 16480* | Lemma for bezout 16482. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) ( Revised by AV, 30-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑧 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = inf(𝑀, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 = 0 ∧ 𝐵 = 0)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝑀 → 𝐺 ∥ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | bezoutlem4 16481* | Lemma for bezout 16482. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑧 ∈ ℕ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = inf(𝑀, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 = 0 ∧ 𝐵 = 0)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) ∈ 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | bezout 16482* | Bézout's identity: For any integers 𝐴 and 𝐵, there are integers 𝑥, 𝑦 such that (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 𝐴 · 𝑥 + 𝐵 · 𝑦. This is Metamath 100 proof #60. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsgcd 16483 | An integer which divides each of two others also divides their gcd. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsgcdb 16484 | Biconditional form of dvdsgcd 16483. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) ↔ 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | dfgcd2 16485* | Alternate definition of the gcd operator, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 15. (Contributed by AV, 8-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐷 = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ↔ (0 ≤ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐷 ∥ 𝑁) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ ℤ ((𝑒 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑒 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝑒 ∥ 𝐷)))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdass 16486 | Associative law for gcd operator. Theorem 1.4(b) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑁 gcd 𝑀) gcd 𝑃) = (𝑁 gcd (𝑀 gcd 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | mulgcd 16487 | Distribute multiplication by a nonnegative integer over gcd. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) gcd (𝐾 · 𝑁)) = (𝐾 · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | absmulgcd 16488 | Distribute absolute value of multiplication over gcd. Theorem 1.4(c) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) gcd (𝐾 · 𝑁)) = (abs‘(𝐾 · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | mulgcdr 16489 | Reverse distribution law for the gcd operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) gcd (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) · 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | gcddiv 16490 | Division law for GCD. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐶 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∥ 𝐵)) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) / 𝐶) = ((𝐴 / 𝐶) gcd (𝐵 / 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdzeq 16491 | A positive integer 𝐴 is equal to its gcd with an integer 𝐵 if and only if 𝐴 divides 𝐵. Generalization of gcdeq 16492. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | gcdeq 16492 | 𝐴 is equal to its gcd with 𝐵 if and only if 𝐴 divides 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dvdssqim 16493 | Unidirectional form of dvdssq 16506. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑁↑2))) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsexpim 16494 | If two numbers are divisible, so are their nonnegative exponents. Similar to dvdssqim 16493 for nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 2-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ 𝐵 → (𝐴↑𝑁) ∥ (𝐵↑𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsmulgcd 16495 | A divisibility equivalent for odmulg 19497. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 · (𝐶 gcd 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | rpmulgcd 16496 | If 𝐾 and 𝑀 are relatively prime, then the GCD of 𝐾 and 𝑀 · 𝑁 is the GCD of 𝐾 and 𝑁. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1) → (𝐾 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = (𝐾 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | rplpwr 16497 | If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴↑𝑁 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd 𝐵) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | rprpwr 16498 | If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴 and 𝐵↑𝑁. Originally a subproof of rppwr 16499. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → (𝐴 gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | rppwr 16499 | If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴↑𝑁 and 𝐵↑𝑁. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | nn0rppwr 16500 | If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴↑𝑁 and 𝐵↑𝑁. rppwr 16499 extended to nonnegative integers. Less general than rpexp12i 16663. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)) = 1)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |