Theorem isfldidl2 38827

Description: Obsolete theorem, use isfieldidl2 21456 instead. Determine if a ring is a field based on its ideals. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isfldidl2.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾)
isfldidl2.2	⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾)
isfldidl2.3	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
isfldidl2.4	⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isfldidl2	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))

Proof of Theorem isfldidl2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isfldidl2.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾)
2		isfldidl2.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾)
3		isfldidl2.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4		isfldidl2.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2762	. . 3 ⊢ (GId‘𝐻) = (GId‘𝐻)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	isfldidl 38826	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))
7		crngorngo 38758	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → 𝐾 ∈ RingOps)
8		eqcom 2769	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐻))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	0rngo 38785	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ RingOps → (𝑍 = (GId‘𝐻) ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
10	8, 9	bitrid 286	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ RingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
11	7, 10	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
12	11	necon3bid 3001	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍}))
13	12	anbi1d 643	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → (((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
14	13	pm5.32i 585	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
15		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
16		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
17	14, 15, 16	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))
18	6, 17	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2957  {csn 4587  {cpr 4589  ran crn 5660  ‘cfv 6537  1^st c1st 7988  2^nd c2nd 7989  GIdcgi 30979  RingOpscrngo 38652  Fldcfld 38749  CRingOpsccring 38751  Idlcidl 38765

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3367  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7374  df-ov 7420  df-oprab 7421  df-mpo 7422  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-1o 8459  df-en 8957  df-grpo 30982  df-gid 30983  df-ginv 30984  df-ablo 31034  df-ass 38601  df-exid 38603  df-mgmOLD 38607  df-sgrOLD 38619  df-mndo 38625  df-rngo 38653  df-drngo 38707  df-com2 38748  df-fld 38750  df-crngo 38752  df-idl 38768  df-igen 38818

This theorem is used by: (None)