Theorem isfldidl2 38698

Description: Obsolete theorem, use isfieldidl2 21368 instead. Determine if a ring is a field based on its ideals. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isfldidl2.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾)
isfldidl2.2	⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾)
isfldidl2.3	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
isfldidl2.4	⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isfldidl2	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))

Proof of Theorem isfldidl2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isfldidl2.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾)
2		isfldidl2.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾)
3		isfldidl2.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4		isfldidl2.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (GId‘𝐻) = (GId‘𝐻)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	isfldidl 38697	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))
7		crngorngo 38629	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → 𝐾 ∈ RingOps)
8		eqcom 2770	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐻))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	0rngo 38656	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ RingOps → (𝑍 = (GId‘𝐻) ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
10	8, 9	bitrid 286	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ RingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
11	7, 10	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
12	11	necon3bid 3002	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍}))
13	12	anbi1d 642	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → (((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
14	13	pm5.32i 584	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
15		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
16		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
17	14, 15, 16	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))
18	6, 17	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143   ≠ wne 2958  {csn 4590  {cpr 4592  ran crn 5664  ‘cfv 6538  1^st c1st 7985  2^nd c2nd 7986  GIdcgi 30820  RingOpscrngo 38523  Fldcfld 38620  CRingOpsccring 38622  Idlcidl 38636

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5239  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-int 4914  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7987  df-2nd 7988  df-1o 8454  df-en 8945  df-grpo 30823  df-gid 30824  df-ginv 30825  df-ablo 30875  df-ass 38472  df-exid 38474  df-mgmOLD 38478  df-sgrOLD 38490  df-mndo 38496  df-rngo 38524  df-drngo 38578  df-com2 38619  df-fld 38621  df-crngo 38623  df-idl 38639  df-igen 38689

This theorem is referenced by: (None)