Theorem isfldidl2 39195

Description: Obsolete theorem, use isfieldidl2 21571 instead. Determine if a ring is a field based on its ideals. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isfldidl2.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾)
isfldidl2.2	⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾)
isfldidl2.3	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
isfldidl2.4	⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isfldidl2	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))

Proof of Theorem isfldidl2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isfldidl2.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾)
2		isfldidl2.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾)
3		isfldidl2.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4		isfldidl2.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (GId‘𝐻) = (GId‘𝐻)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	isfldidl 39194	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))
7		crngorngo 39126	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → 𝐾 ∈ RingOps)
8		eqcom 2770	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐻))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	0rngo 39153	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ RingOps → (𝑍 = (GId‘𝐻) ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
10	8, 9	bitrid 286	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ RingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
11	7, 10	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
12	11	necon3bid 3003	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍}))
13	12	anbi1d 643	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → (((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
14	13	pm5.32i 585	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
15		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
16		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
17	14, 15, 16	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))
18	6, 17	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  {csn 4588  {cpr 4590  ran crn 5656  ‘cfv 6558  1^st c1st 8023  2^nd c2nd 8024  GIdcgi 31122  RingOpscrngo 39020  Fldcfld 39117  CRingOpsccring 39119  Idlcidl 39133

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-suc 6386  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-riota 7400  df-ov 7446  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-1st 8025  df-2nd 8026  df-1o 8504  df-en 9002  df-grpo 31125  df-gid 31126  df-ginv 31127  df-ablo 31177  df-ass 38969  df-exid 38971  df-mgmOLD 38975  df-sgrOLD 38987  df-mndo 38993  df-rngo 39021  df-drngo 39075  df-com2 39116  df-fld 39118  df-crngo 39120  df-idl 39136  df-igen 39186

This theorem is used by: (None)