Theorem isfldidl2 39096

Description: Obsolete theorem, use isfieldidl2 21546 instead. Determine if a ring is a field based on its ideals. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isfldidl2.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾)
isfldidl2.2	⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾)
isfldidl2.3	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
isfldidl2.4	⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isfldidl2	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))

Proof of Theorem isfldidl2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isfldidl2.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾)
2		isfldidl2.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾)
3		isfldidl2.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4		isfldidl2.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (GId‘𝐻) = (GId‘𝐻)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	isfldidl 39095	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))
7		crngorngo 39027	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → 𝐾 ∈ RingOps)
8		eqcom 2767	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐻))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	0rngo 39054	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ RingOps → (𝑍 = (GId‘𝐻) ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
10	8, 9	bitrid 286	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ RingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
11	7, 10	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
12	11	necon3bid 2999	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍}))
13	12	anbi1d 643	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → (((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
14	13	pm5.32i 585	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
15		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
16		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
17	14, 15, 16	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))
18	6, 17	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2955  {csn 4584  {cpr 4586  ran crn 5651  ‘cfv 6538  1^st c1st 7999  2^nd c2nd 8000  GIdcgi 31097  RingOpscrngo 38921  Fldcfld 39018  CRingOpsccring 39020  Idlcidl 39034

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7751

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-int 4907  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-riota 7377  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-1st 8001  df-2nd 8002  df-1o 8479  df-en 8977  df-grpo 31100  df-gid 31101  df-ginv 31102  df-ablo 31152  df-ass 38870  df-exid 38872  df-mgmOLD 38876  df-sgrOLD 38888  df-mndo 38894  df-rngo 38922  df-drngo 38976  df-com2 39017  df-fld 39019  df-crngo 39021  df-idl 39037  df-igen 39087

This theorem is used by: (None)