Theorem isfldidl2 38761

Description: Obsolete theorem, use isfieldidl2 21424 instead. Determine if a ring is a field based on its ideals. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isfldidl2.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾)
isfldidl2.2	⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾)
isfldidl2.3	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
isfldidl2.4	⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isfldidl2	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))

Proof of Theorem isfldidl2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isfldidl2.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝐾)
2		isfldidl2.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝐾)
3		isfldidl2.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4		isfldidl2.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2766	. . 3 ⊢ (GId‘𝐻) = (GId‘𝐻)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	isfldidl 38760	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))
7		crngorngo 38692	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → 𝐾 ∈ RingOps)
8		eqcom 2773	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐻))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	0rngo 38719	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ RingOps → (𝑍 = (GId‘𝐻) ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
10	8, 9	bitrid 286	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ RingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
11	7, 10	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 = {𝑍}))
12	11	necon3bid 3005	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍}))
13	12	anbi1d 643	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps → (((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
14	13	pm5.32i 585	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
15		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ ((GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
16		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋})))
17	14, 15, 16	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))
18	6, 17	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Fld ↔ (𝐾 ∈ CRingOps ∧ 𝑋 ≠ {𝑍} ∧ (Idl‘𝐾) = {{𝑍}, 𝑋}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2961  {csn 4594  {cpr 4596  ran crn 5667  ‘cfv 6543  1^st c1st 7993  2^nd c2nd 7994  GIdcgi 30879  RingOpscrngo 38586  Fldcfld 38683  CRingOpsccring 38685  Idlcidl 38699

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-rep 5243  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rmo 3372  df-reu 3373  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-csb 3857  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-int 4918  df-iun 4963  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-suc 6373  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-riota 7380  df-ov 7426  df-oprab 7427  df-mpo 7428  df-1st 7995  df-2nd 7996  df-1o 8462  df-en 8953  df-grpo 30882  df-gid 30883  df-ginv 30884  df-ablo 30934  df-ass 38535  df-exid 38537  df-mgmOLD 38541  df-sgrOLD 38553  df-mndo 38559  df-rngo 38587  df-drngo 38641  df-com2 38682  df-fld 38684  df-crngo 38686  df-idl 38702  df-igen 38752

This theorem is used by: (None)