MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ablodivdiv4 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ablodivdiv4 31149
Description: Law for double group division. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
abldiv.1 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
abldiv.3 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ablodivdiv4 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem ablodivdiv4
StepHypRef Expression
1 ablogrpo 31142 . . 3 (𝐺 ∈ AbelOp → 𝐺 ∈ GrpOp)
2 simpl 488 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐺 ∈ GrpOp)
3 abldiv.1 . . . . . 6 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4 abldiv.3 . . . . . 6 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
53, 4grpodivcl 31134 . . . . 5 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
653adant3r3 1203 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
7 simpr3 1215 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
8 eqid 2761 . . . . 5 (inv‘𝐺) = (inv‘𝐺)
93, 8, 4grpodivval 31130 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
102, 6, 7, 9syl3anc 1398 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
111, 10sylan 592 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
12 simpr1 1213 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
13 simpr2 1214 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)
14 simp3 1156 . . . . 5 ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
153, 8grpoinvcl 31119 . . . . 5 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
161, 14, 15syl2an 608 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
1712, 13, 163jca 1146 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋))
183, 4ablodivdiv 31148 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
1917, 18syldan 603 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
203, 8, 4grpodivinv 31131 . . . . 5 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐺𝐶))
211, 20syl3an1 1181 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐺𝐶))
22213adant3r1 1201 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐺𝐶))
2322oveq2d 7434 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))) = (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
2411, 19, 233eqtr2d 2802 1 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ran crn 5652  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7418  GrpOpcgr 31084  invcgn 31086   /𝑔 cgs 31087  AbelOpcablo 31139
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7749
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7375  df-ov 7421  df-oprab 7422  df-mpo 7423  df-1st 7999  df-2nd 8000  df-grpo 31088  df-gid 31089  df-ginv 31090  df-gdiv 31091  df-ablo 31140
This theorem is used by:  ablodiv32  31150  ablo4pnp  38794
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator