MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ablodivdiv4 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ablodivdiv4 31202
Description: Law for double group division. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
abldiv.1 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
abldiv.3 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ablodivdiv4 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem ablodivdiv4
StepHypRef Expression
1 ablogrpo 31195 . . 3 (𝐺 ∈ AbelOp → 𝐺 ∈ GrpOp)
2 simpl 488 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐺 ∈ GrpOp)
3 abldiv.1 . . . . . 6 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4 abldiv.3 . . . . . 6 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
53, 4grpodivcl 31187 . . . . 5 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
653adant3r3 1203 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
7 simpr3 1215 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
8 eqid 2763 . . . . 5 (inv‘𝐺) = (inv‘𝐺)
93, 8, 4grpodivval 31183 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
102, 6, 7, 9syl3anc 1399 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
111, 10sylan 592 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
12 simpr1 1213 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
13 simpr2 1214 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)
14 simp3 1156 . . . . 5 ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
153, 8grpoinvcl 31172 . . . . 5 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
161, 14, 15syl2an 608 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
1712, 13, 163jca 1146 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋))
183, 4ablodivdiv 31201 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
1917, 18syldan 603 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
203, 8, 4grpodivinv 31184 . . . . 5 ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐺𝐶))
211, 20syl3an1 1181 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐺𝐶))
22213adant3r1 1201 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐺𝐶))
2322oveq2d 7465 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))) = (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
2411, 19, 233eqtr2d 2804 1 ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ran crn 5657  ‘cfv 6564  (class class class)co 7449  GrpOpcgr 31137  invcgn 31139   /𝑔 cgs 31140  AbelOpcablo 31192
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5332  ax-pr 5396  ax-un 7781
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5551  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-res 5668  df-ima 5669  df-iota 6518  df-fun 6566  df-fn 6567  df-f 6568  df-f1 6569  df-fo 6570  df-f1o 6571  df-fv 6572  df-riota 7406  df-ov 7452  df-oprab 7453  df-mpo 7454  df-1st 8033  df-2nd 8034  df-grpo 31141  df-gid 31142  df-ginv 31143  df-gdiv 31144  df-ablo 31193
This theorem is used by:  ablodiv32  31203  ablo4pnp  39073
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator