Theorem ablodivdiv4 31035

Description: Law for double group division. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
abldiv.1	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
abldiv.3	⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ablodivdiv4	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem ablodivdiv4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ablogrpo 31028	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ AbelOp → 𝐺 ∈ GrpOp)
2		simpl 488	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐺 ∈ GrpOp)
3		abldiv.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4		abldiv.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	grpodivcl 31020	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
6	5	3adant3r3 1203	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
7		simpr3 1215	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
8		eqid 2760	. . . . 5 ⊢ (inv‘𝐺) = (inv‘𝐺)
9	3, 8, 4	grpodivval 31016	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
10	2, 6, 7, 9	syl3anc 1398	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
11	1, 10	sylan 592	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
12		simpr1 1213	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
13		simpr2 1214	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)
14		simp3 1156	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
15	3, 8	grpoinvcl 31005	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
16	1, 14, 15	syl2an 608	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
17	12, 13, 16	3jca 1146	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋))
18	3, 4	ablodivdiv 31034	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
19	17, 18	syldan 603	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))) = ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
20	3, 8, 4	grpodivinv 31017	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐺𝐶))
21	1, 20	syl3an1 1181	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐺𝐶))
22	21	3adant3r1 1201	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐺𝐶))
23	22	oveq2d 7429	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐷((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))) = (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
24	11, 19, 23	3eqtr2d 2801	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ AbelOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐷𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐷(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ran crn 5656  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7413  GrpOpcgr 30970  invcgn 30972   /_𝑔 cgs 30973  AbelOpcablo 31025

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7736

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-riota 7370  df-ov 7416  df-oprab 7417  df-mpo 7418  df-1st 7986  df-2nd 7987  df-grpo 30974  df-gid 30975  df-ginv 30976  df-gdiv 30977  df-ablo 31026

This theorem is used by:  ablodiv32  31036  ablo4pnp  38630