Theorem idsubc 49818

Description: The source category of an inclusion functor is a subcategory of the target category. See also Remark 4.4 in [Adamek] p. 49. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
idfth.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶)
idsubc.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idsubc	⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))

Proof of Theorem idsubc

Dummy variables 𝑝 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idfth.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶)
2		id 23	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))
3		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐷) = (Hom ‘𝐷)
4		idsubc.h	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷)
5		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝))) = (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝)))
6	1, 2	imaidfu2lem 49767	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) = (Base‘𝐷))
7	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6	imaidfu2 49769	. 2 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝))))
8		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) = ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷))
9	2	func1st2nd 49734	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (1st ‘𝐼)(𝐷 Func 𝐸)(2nd ‘𝐼))
10		f1oi 6857	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝐷)
11		dff1o3 6825	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝐷) ↔ (( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–onto→(Base‘𝐷) ∧ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷))))
12	10, 11	mpbi 233	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–onto→(Base‘𝐷) ∧ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)))
13	12	simpri 490	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷))
14		eqidd 2770	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (Base‘𝐷) = (Base‘𝐷))
15	1, 2, 14	idfu1sta 49759	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (1st ‘𝐼) = ( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)))
16	15	cnveqd 5859	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → ◡(1st ‘𝐼) = ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)))
17	16	funeqd 6556	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (Fun ◡(1st ‘𝐼) ↔ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷))))
18	13, 17	mpbiri 261	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → Fun ◡(1st ‘𝐼))
19	8, 3, 5, 9, 18	imasubc3 49814	. 2 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝))) ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))
20	7, 19	eqeltrd 2869	1 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  {csn 4591  ∪ ciun 4957   I cid 5553   × cxp 5657  ^◡ccnv 5658   ↾ cres 5661   “ cima 5662  Fun wfun 6528  –onto→wfo 6532  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6533  ‘cfv 6534  (class class class)co 7408   ∈ cmpo 7410  1^st c1st 7980  2^nd c2nd 7981  Basecbs 17265  Hom chom 17317  Hom_f chomf 17718  Subcatcsubc 17862   Func cfunc 17907  id_funccidfu 17908

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 5239  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7730

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6490  df-fun 6536  df-fn 6537  df-f 6538  df-f1 6539  df-fo 6540  df-f1o 6541  df-fv 6542  df-riota 7365  df-ov 7411  df-oprab 7412  df-mpo 7413  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-map 8822  df-pm 8823  df-ixp 8892  df-cat 17720  df-cid 17721  df-homf 17722  df-ssc 17863  df-subc 17865  df-func 17911  df-idfu 17912

This theorem is referenced by: (None)