Theorem idsubc 49664

Description: The source category of an inclusion functor is a subcategory of the target category. See also Remark 4.4 in [Adamek] p. 49. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
idfth.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶)
idsubc.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idsubc	⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))

Proof of Theorem idsubc

Dummy variables 𝑝 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idfth.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶)
2		id 22	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))
3		eqid 2741	. . 3 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐷) = (Hom ‘𝐷)
4		idsubc.h	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷)
5		eqid 2741	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝))) = (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝)))
6	1, 2	imaidfu2lem 49613	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) = (Base‘𝐷))
7	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6	imaidfu2 49615	. 2 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝))))
8		eqid 2741	. . 3 ⊢ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) = ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷))
9	2	func1st2nd 49580	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (1st ‘𝐼)(𝐷 Func 𝐸)(2nd ‘𝐼))
10		f1oi 6809	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝐷)
11		dff1o3 6777	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝐷) ↔ (( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–onto→(Base‘𝐷) ∧ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷))))
12	10, 11	mpbi 232	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–onto→(Base‘𝐷) ∧ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)))
13	12	simpri 487	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷))
14		eqidd 2742	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (Base‘𝐷) = (Base‘𝐷))
15	1, 2, 14	idfu1sta 49605	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (1st ‘𝐼) = ( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)))
16	15	cnveqd 5820	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → ◡(1st ‘𝐼) = ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)))
17	16	funeqd 6511	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (Fun ◡(1st ‘𝐼) ↔ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷))))
18	13, 17	mpbiri 260	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → Fun ◡(1st ‘𝐼))
19	8, 3, 5, 9, 18	imasubc3 49660	. 2 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝))) ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))
20	7, 19	eqeltrd 2841	1 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121  {csn 4558  ∪ ciun 4924   I cid 5515   × cxp 5619  ^◡ccnv 5620   ↾ cres 5623   “ cima 5624  Fun wfun 6483  –onto→wfo 6487  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6488  ‘cfv 6489  (class class class)co 7360   ∈ cmpo 7362  1^st c1st 7933  2^nd c2nd 7934  Basecbs 17174  Hom chom 17226  Hom_f chomf 17627  Subcatcsubc 17771   Func cfunc 17816  id_funccidfu 17817

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-10 2154  ax-11 2170  ax-12 2191  ax-ext 2713  ax-rep 5202  ax-sep 5221  ax-nul 5231  ax-pow 5297  ax-pr 5365  ax-un 7682

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-3an 1095  df-tru 1551  df-fal 1561  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2075  df-mo 2545  df-eu 2575  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2937  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3066  df-rmo 3346  df-reu 3347  df-rab 3394  df-v 3435  df-sbc 3726  df-csb 3834  df-dif 3888  df-un 3890  df-in 3892  df-ss 3902  df-nul 4265  df-if 4458  df-pw 4534  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4842  df-iun 4926  df-br 5076  df-opab 5138  df-mpt 5157  df-id 5516  df-xp 5627  df-rel 5628  df-cnv 5629  df-co 5630  df-dm 5631  df-rn 5632  df-res 5633  df-ima 5634  df-iota 6445  df-fun 6491  df-fn 6492  df-f 6493  df-f1 6494  df-fo 6495  df-f1o 6496  df-fv 6497  df-riota 7317  df-ov 7363  df-oprab 7364  df-mpo 7365  df-1st 7935  df-2nd 7936  df-map 8769  df-pm 8770  df-ixp 8840  df-cat 17629  df-cid 17630  df-homf 17631  df-ssc 17772  df-subc 17774  df-func 17820  df-idfu 17821

This theorem is referenced by: (None)