Theorem idsubc 49857

Description: The source category of an inclusion functor is a subcategory of the target category. See also Remark 4.4 in [Adamek] p. 49. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
idfth.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶)
idsubc.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idsubc	⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))

Proof of Theorem idsubc

Dummy variables 𝑝 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idfth.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶)
2		id 23	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))
3		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐷) = (Hom ‘𝐷)
4		idsubc.h	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷)
5		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝))) = (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝)))
6	1, 2	imaidfu2lem 49806	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) = (Base‘𝐷))
7	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6	imaidfu2 49808	. 2 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝))))
8		eqid 2769	. . 3 ⊢ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) = ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷))
9	2	func1st2nd 49773	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (1st ‘𝐼)(𝐷 Func 𝐸)(2nd ‘𝐼))
10		f1oi 6860	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝐷)
11		dff1o3 6828	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝐷) ↔ (( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–onto→(Base‘𝐷) ∧ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷))))
12	10, 11	mpbi 233	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)):(Base‘𝐷)–onto→(Base‘𝐷) ∧ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)))
13	12	simpri 490	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷))
14		eqidd 2770	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (Base‘𝐷) = (Base‘𝐷))
15	1, 2, 14	idfu1sta 49798	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (1st ‘𝐼) = ( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)))
16	15	cnveqd 5862	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → ◡(1st ‘𝐼) = ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷)))
17	16	funeqd 6559	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (Fun ◡(1st ‘𝐼) ↔ Fun ◡( I ↾ (Base‘𝐷))))
18	13, 17	mpbiri 261	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → Fun ◡(1st ‘𝐼))
19	8, 3, 5, 9, 18	imasubc3 49853	. 2 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (𝑥 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)), 𝑦 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐼) “ (Base‘𝐷)) ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑥}) × (◡(1st ‘𝐼) “ {𝑦}))(((2nd ‘𝐼)‘𝑝) “ ((Hom ‘𝐷)‘𝑝))) ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))
20	7, 19	eqeltrd 2869	1 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  {csn 4594  ∪ ciun 4960   I cid 5556   × cxp 5660  ^◡ccnv 5661   ↾ cres 5664   “ cima 5665  Fun wfun 6531  –onto→wfo 6535  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6536  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7411   ∈ cmpo 7413  1^st c1st 7984  2^nd c2nd 7985  Basecbs 17269  Hom chom 17321  Hom_f chomf 17722  Subcatcsubc 17866   Func cfunc 17911  id_funccidfu 17912

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 5242  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5337  ax-pr 5405  ax-un 7733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4877  df-iun 4962  df-br 5114  df-opab 5178  df-mpt 5197  df-id 5557  df-xp 5668  df-rel 5669  df-cnv 5670  df-co 5671  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674  df-ima 5675  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7368  df-ov 7414  df-oprab 7415  df-mpo 7416  df-1st 7986  df-2nd 7987  df-map 8826  df-pm 8827  df-ixp 8896  df-cat 17724  df-cid 17725  df-homf 17726  df-ssc 17867  df-subc 17869  df-func 17915  df-idfu 17916

This theorem is referenced by: (None)