Theorem noeta 27709

Description: The full-eta axiom for the surreal numbers. This is the single most important property of the surreals. It says that, given two sets of surreals such that one comes completely before the other, there is a surreal lying strictly between the two. Furthermore, if the birthdays of members of 𝐴 and 𝐵 are strictly bounded above by 𝑂, then 𝑂 non-strictly bounds the separator. Axiom FE of [Alling] p. 185. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
noeta	⊢ ((((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ No (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <s 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 <s 𝑦 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑂))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧   𝑦,𝐵,𝑧   𝑧,𝑂   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑂(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem noeta

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 𝑑 𝑒 𝑓 𝑔 𝑗 ℎ 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2734	. . 3 ⊢ if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔), 2o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓)))) = if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔), 2o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓))))
2	1	nosupcbv 27668	. 2 ⊢ if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔), 2o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓)))) = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏), 2o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑒 <s 𝑑 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑏) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑏)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑒 <s 𝑑 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑑‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
3		eqid 2734	. . 3 ⊢ if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓), 1o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓)))) = if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓), 1o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓))))
4	3	noinfcbv 27683	. 2 ⊢ if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓), 1o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓)))) = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎), 1o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑏) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑏)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑑‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
5	2, 4	noetalem2 27708	1 ⊢ ((((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ No (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <s 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 <s 𝑦 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑂))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  {cab 2712  ∀wral 3049  ∃wrex 3058   ∪ cun 3897   ⊆ wss 3899  ifcif 4477  {csn 4578  ⟨cop 4584   class class class wbr 5096   ↦ cmpt 5177  dom cdm 5622   ↾ cres 5624   “ cima 5625  Oncon0 6315  suc csuc 6317  ℩cio 6444  ‘cfv 6490  ℩crio 7312  1_oc1o 8388  2_oc2o 8389   No csur 27605   <s cslt 27606   bday cbday 27607

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2182  ax-ext 2706  ax-rep 5222  ax-sep 5239  ax-nul 5249  ax-pow 5308  ax-pr 5375  ax-un 7678

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2883  df-ne 2931  df-ral 3050  df-rex 3059  df-rmo 3348  df-reu 3349  df-rab 3398  df-v 3440  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-pw 4554  df-sn 4579  df-pr 4581  df-tp 4583  df-op 4585  df-uni 4862  df-int 4901  df-br 5097  df-opab 5159  df-mpt 5178  df-tr 5204  df-id 5517  df-eprel 5522  df-po 5530  df-so 5531  df-fr 5575  df-we 5577  df-xp 5628  df-rel 5629  df-cnv 5630  df-co 5631  df-dm 5632  df-rn 5633  df-res 5634  df-ima 5635  df-ord 6318  df-on 6319  df-suc 6321  df-iota 6446  df-fun 6492  df-fn 6493  df-f 6494  df-f1 6495  df-fo 6496  df-f1o 6497  df-fv 6498  df-riota 7313  df-1o 8395  df-2o 8396  df-no 27608  df-slt 27609  df-bday 27610

This theorem is referenced by:  noeta2  27751  etasslt  27781