Theorem noeta 27653

Description: The full-eta axiom for the surreal numbers. This is the single most important property of the surreals. It says that, given two sets of surreals such that one comes completely before the other, there is a surreal lying strictly between the two. Furthermore, if the birthdays of members of 𝐴 and 𝐵 are strictly bounded above by 𝑂, then 𝑂 non-strictly bounds the separator. Axiom FE of [Alling] p. 185. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
noeta	⊢ ((((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ No (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <s 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 <s 𝑦 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑂))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧   𝑦,𝐵,𝑧   𝑧,𝑂   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑂(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem noeta

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 𝑑 𝑒 𝑓 𝑔 𝑗 ℎ 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2729	. . 3 ⊢ if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔), 2o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓)))) = if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔), 2o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓))))
2	1	nosupcbv 27612	. 2 ⊢ if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑔), 2o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑘 <s 𝑗 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓)))) = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏), 2o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑒 <s 𝑑 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑏) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑏)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑒 <s 𝑑 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑑‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
3		eqid 2729	. . 3 ⊢ if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓), 1o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓)))) = if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓), 1o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓))))
4	3	noinfcbv 27627	. 2 ⊢ if(∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓, ((℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑔 <s 𝑓), 1o⟩}), (ℎ ∈ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑘 ↾ suc 𝑔)))} ↦ (℩𝑓∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (ℎ ∈ dom 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑗 <s 𝑘 → (𝑗 ↾ suc ℎ) = (𝑘 ↾ suc ℎ)) ∧ (𝑗‘ℎ) = 𝑓)))) = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎), 1o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑏) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑏)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑑‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
5	2, 4	noetalem2 27652	1 ⊢ ((((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ No (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <s 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 <s 𝑦 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑂))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2707  ∀wral 3044  ∃wrex 3053   ∪ cun 3901   ⊆ wss 3903  ifcif 4476  {csn 4577  ⟨cop 4583   class class class wbr 5092   ↦ cmpt 5173  dom cdm 5619   ↾ cres 5621   “ cima 5622  Oncon0 6307  suc csuc 6309  ℩cio 6436  ‘cfv 6482  ℩crio 7305  1_oc1o 8381  2_oc2o 8382   No csur 27549   <s cslt 27550   bday cbday 27551

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5218  ax-sep 5235  ax-nul 5245  ax-pow 5304  ax-pr 5371  ax-un 7671

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rmo 3343  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3395  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-pss 3923  df-nul 4285  df-if 4477  df-pw 4553  df-sn 4578  df-pr 4580  df-tp 4582  df-op 4584  df-uni 4859  df-int 4897  df-br 5093  df-opab 5155  df-mpt 5174  df-tr 5200  df-id 5514  df-eprel 5519  df-po 5527  df-so 5528  df-fr 5572  df-we 5574  df-xp 5625  df-rel 5626  df-cnv 5627  df-co 5628  df-dm 5629  df-rn 5630  df-res 5631  df-ima 5632  df-ord 6310  df-on 6311  df-suc 6313  df-iota 6438  df-fun 6484  df-fn 6485  df-f 6486  df-f1 6487  df-fo 6488  df-f1o 6489  df-fv 6490  df-riota 7306  df-1o 8388  df-2o 8389  df-no 27552  df-slt 27553  df-bday 27554

This theorem is referenced by:  noeta2  27695  etasslt  27724