P. 275 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27401-27500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cofcutr1d 27401*	If 𝑋 is the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵, then 𝐴 is cofinal with ( L ‘𝑋). First half of theorem 2.9 of [Gonshor] p. 12. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤s 𝑦)
Theorem	cofcutr2d 27402*	If 𝑋 is the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵, then 𝐵 is coinitial with ( R ‘𝑋). Second half of theorem 2.9 of [Gonshor] p. 12. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑤 ≤s 𝑧)
Theorem	cofcutrtime 27403*	If 𝑋 is the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵 and all of 𝐴 and 𝐵 are older than 𝑋, then ( L ‘𝑋) is cofinal with 𝐴 and ( R ‘𝑋) is coinitial with 𝐵. Note: we will call a cut where all of the elements of the cut are older than the cut itself a "timely" cut. Part of Theorem 4.02(12) of [Alling] p. 125. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝑋)) ∧ 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑥 ≤s 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 ≤s 𝑧))
Theorem	cofcutrtime1d 27404*	If 𝑋 is a timely cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵, then ( L ‘𝑋) is cofinal with 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑥 ≤s 𝑦)
Theorem	cofcutrtime2d 27405*	If 𝑋 is a timely cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵, then ( R ‘𝑋) is coinitial with 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 ≤s 𝑧)
Theorem	cofss 27406*	Cofinality for a subset. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤s 𝑦)
Theorem	coiniss 27407*	Coinitiality for a subset. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤s 𝑥)
Theorem	cutlt 27408*	Eliminating all elements below a given element of a cut does not affect the cut. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (({𝑋} ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐿 ∣ 𝑋 <s 𝑦}) |s 𝑅))
Theorem	cutpos 27409*	Reduce the elements of a cut for a positive number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s <s 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (({ 0s } ∪ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}) |s ( R ‘𝐴)))
15.4  Induction and recursion
15.4.1  Induction and recursion on one variable
Syntax	cnorec 27410	Declare the syntax for surreal recursion of one variable.
class norec (𝐹)
Definition	df-norec 27411*	Define the recursion generator for surreal functions of one variable. This generator creates a recursive function of surreals from their value on their left and right sets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ norec (𝐹) = frecs({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))}, No , 𝐹)
Theorem	lrrecval 27412*	The next step in the development of the surreals is to establish induction and recursion across left and right sets. To that end, we are going to develop a relationship 𝑅 that is founded, partial, and set-like across the surreals. This first theorem just establishes the value of 𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	lrrecval2 27413*	Next, we establish an alternate expression for 𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	lrrecpo 27414*	Now, we establish that 𝑅 is a partial ordering on No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 Po No
Theorem	lrrecse 27415*	Next, we show that 𝑅 is set-like over No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 Se No
Theorem	lrrecfr 27416*	Now we show that 𝑅 is founded over No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 Fr No
Theorem	lrrecpred 27417*	Finally, we calculate the value of the predecessor class over 𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) = (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	noinds 27418*	Induction principle for a single surreal. If a property passes from a surreal's left and right sets to the surreal itself, then it holds for all surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ No → (∀𝑦 ∈ (( L ‘𝑥) ∪ ( R ‘𝑥))𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝜒)
Theorem	norecfn 27419	Surreal recursion over one variable is a function over the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn No
Theorem	norecov 27420	Calculate the value of the surreal recursion operation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐹 ↾ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))))
15.4.2  Induction and recursion on two variables
Syntax	cnorec2 27421	Declare the syntax for surreal recursion on two arguments.
class norec2 (𝐹)
Definition	df-norec2 27422*	Define surreal recursion on two variables. This function is key to the development of most of surreal numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ norec2 (𝐹) = frecs({⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑎){⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∣ 𝑐 ∈ (( L ‘𝑑) ∪ ( R ‘𝑑))} (1st ‘𝑏) ∨ (1st ‘𝑎) = (1st ‘𝑏)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑎){⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∣ 𝑐 ∈ (( L ‘𝑑) ∪ ( R ‘𝑑))} (2nd ‘𝑏) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑎) = (2nd ‘𝑏)) ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑏))}, ( No × No ), 𝐹)
Theorem	noxpordpo 27423*	To get through most of the textbook defintions in surreal numbers we will need recursion on two variables. This set of theorems sets up the preconditions for double recursion. This theorem establishes the partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Po ( No × No )
Theorem	noxpordfr 27424*	Next we establish the foundedness of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Fr ( No × No )
Theorem	noxpordse 27425*	Next we establish the set-like nature of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Se ( No × No )
Theorem	noxpordpred 27426*	Next we calculate the predecessor class of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
Theorem	no2indslem 27427*	Double induction on surreals with explicit notation for the relationships. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ No ∧ 𝑦 ∈ No ) → ((∀𝑧 ∈ (( L ‘𝑥) ∪ ( R ‘𝑥))∀𝑤 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (( L ‘𝑥) ∪ ( R ‘𝑥))𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))𝜃) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → 𝜂)
Theorem	no2inds 27428*	Double induction on surreals. The many substitution instances are to cover all possible cases. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ No ∧ 𝑦 ∈ No ) → ((∀𝑧 ∈ (( L ‘𝑥) ∪ ( R ‘𝑥))∀𝑤 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (( L ‘𝑥) ∪ ( R ‘𝑥))𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))𝜃) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → 𝜂)
Theorem	norec2fn 27429	The double-recursion operator on surreals yields a function on pairs of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec2 (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn ( No × No )
Theorem	norec2ov 27430	The value of the double-recursion surreal function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec2 (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐺(𝐹 ↾ ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))))
Theorem	no3inds 27431*	Triple induction over surreal numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆))    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ No ∧ 𝑐 ∈ No ) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ (( L ‘𝑎) ∪ ( R ‘𝑎))∀𝑒 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))∀𝑓 ∈ (( L ‘𝑐) ∪ ( R ‘𝑐))𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (( L ‘𝑎) ∪ ( R ‘𝑎))∀𝑒 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (( L ‘𝑎) ∪ ( R ‘𝑎))∀𝑓 ∈ (( L ‘𝑐) ∪ ( R ‘𝑐))𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ (( L ‘𝑎) ∪ ( R ‘𝑎))𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))∀𝑓 ∈ (( L ‘𝑐) ∪ ( R ‘𝑐))𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (( L ‘𝑐) ∪ ( R ‘𝑐))𝜂) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ No ∧ 𝑌 ∈ No ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) → 𝜆)
15.5  Surreal arithmetic
15.5.1  Addition
Syntax	cadds 27432	Declare the syntax for surreal addition.
class +s
Definition	df-adds 27433*	Define surreal addition. This is the first of the field operations on the surreals. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. Definition from [Gonshor] p. 13. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ +s = norec2 ((𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑦 = (𝑙𝑎(2nd ‘𝑥))} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))𝑧 = ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑎𝑙)}) |s ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑦 = (𝑟𝑎(2nd ‘𝑥))} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))𝑧 = ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑎𝑟)}))))
Theorem	addsfn 27434	Surreal addition is a function over pairs of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ +s Fn ( No × No )
Theorem	addsval 27435*	The value of surreal addition. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑙)}) |s ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑟)})))
Theorem	addsval2 27436*	The value of surreal addition with different choices for each bound variable. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑚)}) |s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑡 = (𝐴 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsrid 27437	Surreal addition to zero is identity. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 +s 0s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addsridd 27438	Surreal addition to zero is identity. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 0s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addscom 27439	Surreal addition commutes. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (𝐵 +s 𝐴))
Theorem	addscomd 27440	Surreal addition commutes. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (𝐵 +s 𝐴))
Theorem	addslid 27441	Surreal addition to zero is identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( 0s +s 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addsproplem1 27442*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. To prove closure on surreal addition we need to prove that addition is compatible with order at the same time. We do this by inducting over the maximum of two natural sums of the birthdays of surreals numbers. In the final step we will loop around and use tfr3 8395 to prove this of all surreals. This first lemma just instantiates the inductive hypothesis so we do not need to do it continuously throughout the proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐶))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐵 <s 𝐶 → (𝐵 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐴))))
Theorem	addsproplem2 27443*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. When proving closure for operations defined using norec and norec2, it is a strictly stronger statement to say that the cut defined is actually a cut than it is to say that the operation is closed. We will often prove this stronger statement. Here, we do so for the cut involved in surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)}))
Theorem	addsproplem3 27444*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Show the cut properties of surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsproplem4 27445*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝑌 is older than 𝑍. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝑌) ∈ ( bday ‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsproplem5 27446*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝑍 is older than 𝑌. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝑍) ∈ ( bday ‘𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsproplem6 27447*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Finally, we show the second half of the induction hypothesis when 𝑌 and 𝑍 are the same age. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝑌) = ( bday ‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsproplem7 27448*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Putting together the three previous lemmas, we now show the second half of the inductive hypothesis unconditionally. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsprop 27449	Inductively show that surreal addition is closed and compatible with less-than. This proof follows from induction on the birthdays of the surreal numbers involved. This pattern occurs throughout surreal development. Theorem 3.1 of [Gonshor] p. 14. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ No ∧ 𝑌 ∈ No ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ (𝑌 <s 𝑍 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))))
Theorem	addscutlem 27450*	Lemma for addscut 27451. Show the statement with some additional distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addscut 27451*	Demonstrate the cut properties of surreal addition. This gives us closure together with a pair of set-less-than relationships for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addscut2 27452*	Show that the cut involved in surreal addition is legitimate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)}))
Theorem	addscld 27453	Surreal numbers are closed under addition. Theorem 6(iii) of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No )
Theorem	addscl 27454	Surreal numbers are closed under addition. Theorem 6(iii) of [Conway[ p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	addsf 27455	Function statement for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ +s :( No × No )⟶ No
Theorem	addsfo 27456	Surreal addition is onto. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ +s :( No × No )–onto→ No
Theorem	sltadd1im 27457	Surreal less-than is preserved under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → (𝐴 +s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sltadd2im 27458	Surreal less-than is preserved under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → (𝐶 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sleadd1im 27459	Surreal less-than or equal cancels under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 +s 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤s 𝐵))
Theorem	sleadd2im 27460	Surreal less-than or equal cancels under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐶 +s 𝐴) ≤s (𝐶 +s 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≤s 𝐵))
Theorem	sleadd1 27461	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. Theorem 5 of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sleadd2 27462	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) ≤s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltadd2 27463	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltadd1 27464	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addscan2 27465	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) = (𝐵 +s 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addscan1 27466	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐶 +s 𝐴) = (𝐶 +s 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	sleadd1d 27467	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. Theorem 5 of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sleadd2d 27468	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) ≤s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltadd2d 27469	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltadd1d 27470	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addscan2d 27471	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) = (𝐵 +s 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addscan1d 27472	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 +s 𝐴) = (𝐶 +s 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addsuniflem 27473*	Lemma for addsunif 27474. State the whole theorem with extra distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐿 𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑀 𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑚)}) |s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 𝑡 = (𝐴 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsunif 27474*	Uniformity theorem for surreal addition. This theorem states that we can use any cuts that define 𝐴 and 𝐵 in the definition of surreal addition. Theorem 3.2 of [Gonshor] p. 15. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐿 𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑀 𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑚)}) |s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 𝑡 = (𝐴 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsasslem1 27475*	Lemma for addition associativity. Expand one form of the triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = ((({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)𝑦 = ((𝑙 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑧 = ((𝐴 +s 𝑚) +s 𝐶)}) ∪ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑤 = ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝑛)}) |s (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)𝑎 = ((𝑝 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶)} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = ((𝐴 +s 𝑞) +s 𝐶)}) ∪ {𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑐 = ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝑟)})))
Theorem	addsasslem2 27476*	Lemma for addition associativity. Expand the other form of the triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) = ((({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑙 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶))} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s (𝑚 +s 𝐶))}) ∪ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑤 = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝑛))}) |s (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)𝑎 = (𝑝 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (𝐴 +s (𝑞 +s 𝐶))}) ∪ {𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑐 = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝑟))})))
Theorem	addsass 27477	Surreal addition is associative. Part of theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addsassd 27478	Surreal addition is associative. Part of theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	adds32d 27479	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) +s 𝐵))
Theorem	adds12d 27480	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) = (𝐵 +s (𝐴 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	adds4d 27481	Rearrangement of four terms in a surreal sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s (𝐶 +s 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 +s 𝐷)))
Theorem	adds42d 27482	Rearrangement of four terms in a surreal sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s (𝐶 +s 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) +s (𝐷 +s 𝐵)))
15.5.2  Negation and Subtraction
Syntax	cnegs 27483	Declare the syntax for surreal negation.
class -us
Syntax	csubs 27484	Declare the syntax for surreal subtraction.
class -s
Definition	df-negs 27485*	Define surreal negation. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ -us = norec ((𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑛 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑛 “ ( R ‘𝑥)) |s (𝑛 “ ( L ‘𝑥)))))
Definition	df-subs 27486*	Define surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ -s = (𝑥 ∈ No , 𝑦 ∈ No ↦ (𝑥 +s ( -us ‘𝑦)))
Theorem	negsfn 27487	Surreal negation is a function over surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ -us Fn No
Theorem	subsfn 27488	Surreal subtraction is a function over pairs of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ -s Fn ( No × No )
Theorem	negsval 27489	The value of the surreal negation function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	negs0s 27490	Negative surreal zero is surreal zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ( -us ‘ 0s ) = 0s
Theorem	negsproplem1 27491*	Lemma for surreal negation. We prove a pair of properties of surreal negation simultaneously. First, we instantiate some quantifiers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝑋) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝑋) ∈ No ∧ (𝑋 <s 𝑌 → ( -us ‘𝑌) <s ( -us ‘𝑋))))
Theorem	negsproplem2 27492*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show that the cut that defines negation is legitimate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	negsproplem3 27493*	Lemma for surreal negation. Give the cut properties of surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	negsproplem4 27494*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐴 is simpler than 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsproplem5 27495*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐵 is simpler than 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsproplem6 27496*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐴 is the same age as 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsproplem7 27497*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis unconditionally. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsprop 27498	Show closure and ordering properties of negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	negscl 27499	The surreals are closed under negation. Theorem 6(ii) of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No )
Theorem	negscld 27500	The surreals are closed under negation. Theorem 6(ii) of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No )