P. 275 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27401-27500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem3d 27401	Lemma 4 for 2lgsoddprmlem3 27402. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (((7↑2) − 1) / 8) = (2 · 3)
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem3 27402	Lemma 3 for 2lgsoddprm 27404. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑅 = (𝑁 mod 8)) → (2 ∥ (((𝑅↑2) − 1) / 8) ↔ 𝑅 ∈ {1, 7}))
Theorem	2lgsoddprmlem4 27403	Lemma 4 for 2lgsoddprm 27404. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁) → (2 ∥ (((𝑁↑2) − 1) / 8) ↔ (𝑁 mod 8) ∈ {1, 7}))
Theorem	2lgsoddprm 27404	The second supplement to the law of quadratic reciprocity for odd primes (common representation, see theorem 9.5 in [ApostolNT] p. 181): The Legendre symbol for 2 at an odd prime is minus one to the power of the square of the odd prime minus one divided by eight ((2 /L 𝑃) = -1^(((P^2)-1)/8) ). (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) → (2 /L 𝑃) = (-1↑(((𝑃↑2) − 1) / 8)))
14.4.11  All primes 4n+1 are the sum of two squares
Theorem	2sqlem1 27405*	Lemma for 2sq 27418. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ[i] 𝐴 = ((abs‘𝑥)↑2))
Theorem	2sqlem2 27406*	Lemma for 2sq 27418. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	mul2sq 27407	Fibonacci's identity (actually due to Diophantus). The product of two sums of two squares is also a sum of two squares. We can take advantage of Gaussian integers here to trivialize the proof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem3 27408	Lemma for 2sqlem5 27410. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 · 𝑃) = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ ((𝐶 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem4 27409	Lemma for 2sqlem5 27410. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 · 𝑃) = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem5 27410	Lemma for 2sq 27418. If a number that is a sum of two squares is divisible by a prime that is a sum of two squares, then the quotient is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem6 27411*	Lemma for 2sq 27418. If a number that is a sum of two squares is divisible by a number whose prime divisors are all sums of two squares, then the quotient is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∥ 𝐵 → 𝑝 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem7 27412*	Lemma for 2sq 27418. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑌 ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ ℕ)
Theorem	2sqlem8a 27413*	Lemma for 2sqlem8 27414. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2016.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑌 (𝑏 ∥ 𝑎 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 gcd 𝐷) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	2sqlem8 27414*	Lemma for 2sq 27418. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑌 (𝑏 ∥ 𝑎 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 / (𝐶 gcd 𝐷))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐷 / (𝐶 gcd 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem9 27415*	Lemma for 2sq 27418. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑌 (𝑏 ∥ 𝑎 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem10 27416*	Lemma for 2sq 27418. Every factor of a "proper" sum of two squares (where the summands are coprime) is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∥ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem11 27417*	Lemma for 2sq 27418. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sq 27418*	All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of two squares. This is Metamath 100 proof #20. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	2sqblem 27419	Lemma for 2sqb 27420. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 gcd 𝑌) = ((𝑃 · 𝐴) + (𝑌 · 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 mod 4) = 1)
Theorem	2sqb 27420*	The converse to 2sq 27418. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ↔ (𝑃 = 2 ∨ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1)))
Theorem	2sq2 27421	2 is the sum of squares of two nonnegative integers iff the two integers are 1. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 2 ↔ (𝐴 = 1 ∧ 𝐵 = 1)))
Theorem	2sqn0 27422	If the sum of two squares is prime, none of the original number is zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	2sqcoprm 27423	If the sum of two squares is prime, the two original numbers are coprime. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)
Theorem	2sqmod 27424	Given two decompositions of a prime as a sum of two squares, show that they are equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	2sqmo 27425*	There exists at most one decomposition of a prime as a sum of two squares. See 2sqb 27420 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃*𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqnn0 27426*	All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of squares of two nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	2sqnn 27427*	All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of squares of two positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	addsq2reu 27428*	For each complex number 𝐶, there exists a unique complex number 𝑎 added to the square of a unique another complex number 𝑏 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. The unique complex number 𝑎 is 𝐶, and the unique another complex number 𝑏 is 0. Remark: This, together with addsqnreup 27431, is an example showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑). See also comments for df-eu 2573 and 2eu4 2659. For more details see comment for addsqnreup 27431. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqn2reu 27429*	For each complex number 𝐶, there does not exist a unique complex number 𝑏, squared and added to a unique another complex number 𝑎 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. Actually, for each complex number 𝑏, 𝑎 = (𝐶 − (𝑏↑2)) is unique. Remark: This, together with addsq2reu 27428, shows that commutation of two unique quantifications need not be equivalent, and provides an evident justification of the fact that considering the pair of variables is necessary to obtain what we intuitively understand as "double unique existence". (Proposed by GL, 23-Jun-2023.). (Contributed by AV, 23-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqrexnreu 27430*	For each complex number, there exists a complex number to which the square of more than one (or no) other complex numbers can be added to result in the given complex number. Remark: This theorem, together with addsq2reu 27428, shows that there are cases in which there is a set together with a not unique other set fulfilling a wff, although there is a unique set fulfilling the wff together with another unique set (see addsq2reu 27428). For more details see comment for addsqnreup 27431. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℂ ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqnreup 27431*	There is no unique decomposition of a complex number as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number. Remark: This theorem, together with addsq2reu 27428, is a real life example (about a numerical property) showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑"). See also comments for df-eu 2573 and 2eu4 2659. In the case of decompositions of complex numbers as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number, the only/unique complex number to which the square of a unique complex number is added yields in the given complex number is the given number itself, and the unique complex number to be squared is 0 (see comment for addsq2reu 27428). There are, however, complex numbers to which the square of more than one other complex numbers can be added to yield the given complex number (see addsqrexnreu 27430). For example, ⟨1, (√‘(𝐶 − 1))⟩ and ⟨1, -(√‘(𝐶 − 1))⟩ are two different decompositions of 𝐶 (if 𝐶 ≠ 1). Therefore, there is no unique decomposition of any complex number as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number, as generally proved by this theorem. As a consequence, a theorem must claim the existence of a unique pair of sets to express "There are unique 𝑎 and 𝑏 so that .." (more formally ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 with 𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩), or by showing (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑) (see 2reu4 4459 resp. 2eu4 2659). These two representations are equivalent (see opreu2reurex 6252). An analogon of this theorem using the latter variant is given in addsqn2reurex2 27433. In some cases, however, the variant with (ordered!) pairs may be possible only for ordered sets (like ℝ or ℙ) and claiming that the first component is less than or equal to the second component (see, for example, 2sqreunnltb 27449 and 2sqreuopb 27456). Alternatively, (proper) unordered pairs can be used: ∃!𝑝𝑒𝒫 𝐴((♯‘𝑝) = 2 ∧ 𝜑), or, using the definition of proper pairs: ∃!𝑝 ∈ (Pairsproper‘𝐴)𝜑 (see, for example, inlinecirc02preu 49286). (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ)((1st ‘𝑝) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsq2nreurex 27432*	For each complex number 𝐶, there is no unique complex number 𝑎 added to the square of another complex number 𝑏 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqn2reurex2 27433*	For each complex number 𝐶, there does not uniquely exist two complex numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏, with 𝑏 squared and added to 𝑎 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. Remark: This, together with addsq2reu 27428, is an example showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑), as it is the case with the pattern (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. See also comments for df-eu 2573 and 2eu4 2659. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶))
Theorem	2sqreulem1 27434*	Lemma 1 for 2sqreu 27444. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreultlem 27435*	Lemma for 2sqreult 27446. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jun-2023.) (Proposed by GL, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreultblem 27436*	Lemma for 2sqreultb 27447. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 18-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreunnlem1 27437*	Lemma 1 for 2sqreunn 27445. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreunnltlem 27438*	Lemma for 2sqreunnlt 27448. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) Specialization to different integers, proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 11-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreunnltblem 27439*	Lemma for 2sqreunnltb 27449. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 18-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreulem2 27440	Lemma 2 for 2sqreu 27444 etc. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐶↑2)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	2sqreulem3 27441	Lemma 3 for 2sqreu 27444 etc. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0)) → (((𝜑 ∧ ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐶↑2)) = 𝑃)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	2sqreulem4 27442*	Lemma 4 for 2sqreu 27444 et. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃*𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑
Theorem	2sqreunnlem2 27443*	Lemma 2 for 2sqreunn 27445. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃*𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑
Theorem	2sqreu 27444*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two nonnegative integers. See 2sqnn0 27426 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreunn 27445*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two positive integers. See 2sqnn 27427 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreult 27446*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jun-2023.) (Proposed by GL, 8-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreultb 27447*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers iff 𝑃≡1 (mod 4). (Contributed by AV, 10-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑)))
Theorem	2sqreunnlt 27448*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two different positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) Specialization to different integers, proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreunnltb 27449*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑)))
Theorem	2sqreuop 27450*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two nonnegative integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreu 27444. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) ≤ (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuopnn 27451*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two positive integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunn 27445. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) ≤ (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuoplt 27452*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreult 27446. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuopltb 27453*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers iff 𝑃≡1 (mod 4). Ordered pair variant of 2sqreultb 27447. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreuopnnlt 27454*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two different positive integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnlt 27448. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuopnnltb 27455*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnltb 27449. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreuopb 27456*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. Alternate ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnltb 27449. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)∃𝑎∃𝑏(𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))))
14.4.12  Chebyshev's Weak Prime Number Theorem, Dirichlet's Theorem
Theorem	chebbnd1lem1 27457	Lemma for chebbnd1 27460: show a lower bound on π(𝑥) at even integers using similar techniques to those used to prove bpos 27281. (Note that the expression 𝐾 is actually equal to 2 · 𝑁, but proving that is not necessary for the proof, and it's too much work.) The key to the proof is bposlem1 27272, which shows that each term in the expansion ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁) = ∏𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝↑(𝑝 pCnt ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))) is at most 2 · 𝑁, so that the sum really only has nonzero elements up to 2 · 𝑁, and since each term is at most 2 · 𝑁, after taking logs we get the inequality π(2 · 𝑁) · log(2 · 𝑁) ≤ log((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁), and bclbnd 27268 finishes the proof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Apr-2016.)
⊢ 𝐾 = if((2 · 𝑁) ≤ ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁), (2 · 𝑁), ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → (log‘((4↑𝑁) / 𝑁)) < ((π‘(2 · 𝑁)) · (log‘(2 · 𝑁))))
Theorem	chebbnd1lem2 27458	Lemma for chebbnd1 27460: Show that log(𝑁) / 𝑁 does not change too much between 𝑁 and 𝑀 = ⌊(𝑁 / 2). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (⌊‘(𝑁 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 8 ≤ 𝑁) → ((log‘(2 · 𝑀)) / (2 · 𝑀)) < (2 · ((log‘𝑁) / 𝑁)))
Theorem	chebbnd1lem3 27459	Lemma for chebbnd1 27460: get a lower bound on π(𝑁) / (𝑁 / log(𝑁)) that is independent of 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (⌊‘(𝑁 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 8 ≤ 𝑁) → (((log‘2) − (1 / (2 · e))) / 2) < ((π‘𝑁) · ((log‘𝑁) / 𝑁)))
Theorem	chebbnd1 27460	The Chebyshev bound: The function π(𝑥) is eventually lower bounded by a positive constant times 𝑥 / log(𝑥). Alternatively stated, the function (𝑥 / log(𝑥)) / π(𝑥) is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((𝑥 / (log‘𝑥)) / (π‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chtppilimlem1 27461	Lemma for chtppilim 27463. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (2[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁↑𝑐𝐴) / (π‘𝑁)) < (1 − 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) · ((π‘𝑁) · (log‘𝑁))) < (θ‘𝑁))
Theorem	chtppilimlem2 27462*	Lemma for chtppilim 27463. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞)(𝑧 ≤ 𝑥 → ((𝐴↑2) · ((π‘𝑥) · (log‘𝑥))) < (θ‘𝑥)))
Theorem	chtppilim 27463	The θ function is asymptotic to π(𝑥)log(𝑥), so it is sufficient to prove θ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 to establish the PNT. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((θ‘𝑥) / ((π‘𝑥) · (log‘𝑥)))) ⇝𝑟 1
Theorem	chto1ub 27464	The θ function is upper bounded by a linear term. Corollary of chtub 27200. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ ((θ‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chebbnd2 27465	The Chebyshev bound, part 2: The function π(𝑥) is eventually upper bounded by a positive constant times 𝑥 / log(𝑥). Alternatively stated, the function π(𝑥) / (𝑥 / log(𝑥)) is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((π‘𝑥) / (𝑥 / (log‘𝑥)))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chto1lb 27466	The θ function is lower bounded by a linear term. Corollary of chebbnd1 27460. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ (𝑥 / (θ‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chpchtlim 27467	The ψ and θ functions are asymptotic to each other, so is sufficient to prove either θ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 or ψ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 to establish the PNT. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((ψ‘𝑥) / (θ‘𝑥))) ⇝𝑟 1
Theorem	chpo1ub 27468	The ψ function is upper bounded by a linear term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ ((ψ‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chpo1ubb 27469*	The ψ function is upper bounded by a linear term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2016.)
⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ (ψ‘𝑥) ≤ (𝑐 · 𝑥)
Theorem	vmadivsum 27470*	The sum of the von Mangoldt function over 𝑛 is asymptotic to log𝑥 + 𝑂(1). Equation 9.2.13 of [Shapiro], p. 331. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛) − (log‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	vmadivsumb 27471*	Give a total bound on the von Mangoldt sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘(Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛) − (log‘𝑥))) ≤ 𝑐
Theorem	rplogsumlem1 27472*	Lemma for rplogsum 27515. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑛 ∈ (2...𝐴)((log‘𝑛) / (𝑛 · (𝑛 − 1))) ≤ 2)
Theorem	rplogsumlem2 27473*	Lemma for rplogsum 27515. Equation 9.2.14 of [Shapiro], p. 331. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...𝐴)(((Λ‘𝑛) − if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (log‘𝑛), 0)) / 𝑛) ≤ 2)
Theorem	dchrisum0lem1a 27474	Lemma for dchrisum0lem1 27504. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑋))) → (𝑋 ≤ ((𝑋↑2) / 𝐷) ∧ (⌊‘((𝑋↑2) / 𝐷)) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(⌊‘𝑋))))
Theorem	rpvmasumlem 27475*	Lemma for rpvmasum 27514. Calculate the "trivial case" estimate Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥( 1 (𝑛)Λ(𝑛) / 𝑛) = log𝑥 + 𝑂(1), where 1 (𝑥) is the principal Dirichlet character. Equation 9.4.7 of [Shapiro], p. 376. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(( 1 ‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) − (log‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrisumlema 27476*	Lemma for dchrisum 27480. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼 ∈ ℝ+ → ⦋𝐼 / 𝑛⦌𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ (𝑀[,)+∞) → 0 ≤ ⦋𝐼 / 𝑛⦌𝐴)))
Theorem	dchrisumlem1 27477*	Lemma for dchrisum 27480. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑢)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℕ0) → (abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑈)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅)
Theorem	dchrisumlem2 27478*	Lemma for dchrisum 27480. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑢)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≤ (𝐼 + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝐽) − (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝐼))) ≤ ((2 · 𝑅) · ⦋𝑈 / 𝑛⦌𝐴))
Theorem	dchrisumlem3 27479*	Lemma for dchrisum 27480. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑢)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑀[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑥)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	dchrisum 27480*	If 𝑛 ∈ [𝑀, +∞) ↦ 𝐴(𝑛) is a positive decreasing function approaching zero, then the infinite sum Σ𝑛, 𝑋(𝑛)𝐴(𝑛) is convergent, with the partial sum Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥, 𝑋(𝑛)𝐴(𝑛) within 𝑂(𝐴(𝑀)) of the limit 𝑇. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑀[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑥)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	dchrmusumlema 27481*	Lemma for dchrmusum 27512 and dchrisumn0 27509. Apply dchrisum 27480 for the function 1 / 𝑦. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 / 𝑦)))
Theorem	dchrmusum2 27482*	The sum of the Möbius function multiplied by a non-principal Dirichlet character, divided by 𝑛, is bounded, provided that 𝑇 ≠ 0. Lemma 9.4.2 of [Shapiro], p. 380. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · 𝑇)) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmasumlem1 27483*	An alternative expression for a Dirichlet-weighted von Mangoldt sum in terms of the Möbius function. Equation 9.4.11 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) = Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝐴 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) · ((log‘𝑚) / 𝑚))))
Theorem	dchrvmasum2lem 27484*	Give an expression for log𝑥 remarkably similar to Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥(𝑋(𝑛)Λ(𝑛) / 𝑛) given in dchrvmasumlem1 27483. Part of Lemma 9.4.3 of [Shapiro], p. 380. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (log‘𝐴) = Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝐴 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) · ((log‘((𝐴 / 𝑑) / 𝑚)) / 𝑚))))
Theorem	dchrvmasum2if 27485*	Combine the results of dchrvmasumlem1 27483 and dchrvmasum2lem 27484 inside a conditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) + if(𝜓, (log‘𝐴), 0)) = Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝐴 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) · ((log‘if(𝜓, (𝐴 / 𝑑), 𝑚)) / 𝑚))))
Theorem	dchrvmasumlem2 27486*	Lemma for dchrvmasum 27513. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑚 = (𝑥 / 𝑑) → 𝐹 = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (3[,)+∞)) → (abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 · ((log‘𝑚) / 𝑚)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ (1[,)3)(abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((abs‘(𝐾 − 𝑇)) / 𝑑)) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmasumlem3 27487*	Lemma for dchrvmasum 27513. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑚 = (𝑥 / 𝑑) → 𝐹 = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (3[,)+∞)) → (abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 · ((log‘𝑚) / 𝑚)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ (1[,)3)(abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · (𝐾 − 𝑇))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmasumlema 27488*	Lemma for dchrvmasum 27513 and dchrvmasumif 27491. Apply dchrisum 27480 for the function log(𝑦) / 𝑦, which is decreasing above e (or above 3, the nearest integer bound). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) · ((log‘𝑎) / 𝑎)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (3[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 · ((log‘𝑦) / 𝑦))))
Theorem	dchrvmasumiflem1 27489*	Lemma for dchrvmasumif 27491. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) · ((log‘𝑎) / 𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐾) ⇝ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (3[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐾)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐸 · ((log‘𝑦) / 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · (Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝑥 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑘)) · ((log‘if(𝑆 = 0, (𝑥 / 𝑑), 𝑘)) / 𝑘)) − if(𝑆 = 0, 0, 𝑇)))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmasumiflem2 27490*	Lemma for dchrvmasum 27513. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) · ((log‘𝑎) / 𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐾) ⇝ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (3[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐾)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐸 · ((log‘𝑦) / 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) + if(𝑆 = 0, (log‘𝑥), 0))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmasumif 27491*	An asymptotic approximation for the sum of 𝑋(𝑛)Λ(𝑛) / 𝑛 conditional on the value of the infinite sum 𝑆. (We will later show that the case 𝑆 = 0 is impossible, and hence establish dchrvmasum 27513.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) + if(𝑆 = 0, (log‘𝑥), 0))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmaeq0 27492*	The set 𝑊 is the collection of all non-principal Dirichlet characters such that the sum Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 is equal to zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ↔ 𝑆 = 0))
Theorem	dchrisum0fval 27493*	Value of the function 𝐹, the divisor sum of a Dirichlet character. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝐴) = Σ𝑡 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝐴} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑡)))
Theorem	dchrisum0fmul 27494*	The function 𝐹, the divisor sum of a Dirichlet character, is a multiplicative function (but not completely multiplicative). Equation 9.4.27 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘(𝐴 · 𝐵)) = ((𝐹‘𝐴) · (𝐹‘𝐵)))
Theorem	dchrisum0ff 27495*	The function 𝐹 is a real function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	dchrisum0flblem1 27496*	Lemma for dchrisum0flb 27498. Base case, prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if((√‘(𝑃↑𝐴)) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑃↑𝐴)))
Theorem	dchrisum0flblem2 27497*	Lemma for dchrisum0flb 27498. Induction over relatively prime factors, with the prime power case handled in dchrisum0flblem1 . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) Replace reference to OLD theorem. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1..^𝐴)if((√‘𝑦) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if((√‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	dchrisum0flb 27498*	The divisor sum of a real Dirichlet character, is lower bounded by zero everywhere and one at the squares. Equation 9.4.29 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if((√‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	dchrisum0fno1 27499*	The sum Σ𝑘 ≤ 𝑥, 𝐹(𝑥) / √𝑘 is divergent (i.e. not eventually bounded). Equation 9.4.30 of [Shapiro], p. 383. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝐹‘𝑘) / (√‘𝑘))) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	rpvmasum2 27500*	A partial result along the lines of rpvmasum 27514. The sum of the von Mangoldt function over those integers 𝑛≡𝐴 (mod 𝑁) is asymptotic to (1 − 𝑀)(log𝑥 / ϕ(𝑥)) + 𝑂(1), where 𝑀 is the number of non-principal Dirichlet characters with Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 = 0. Our goal is to show this set is empty. Equation 9.4.3 of [Shapiro], p. 375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡𝐿 “ {𝐴})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 = (1r‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (((ϕ‘𝑁) · Σ𝑛 ∈ ((1...(⌊‘𝑥)) ∩ 𝑇)((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) − ((log‘𝑥) · (1 − (♯‘𝑊))))) ∈ 𝑂(1))