P. 275 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27401-27500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	2sqlem5 27401	Lemma for 2sq 27409. If a number that is a sum of two squares is divisible by a prime that is a sum of two squares, then the quotient is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem6 27402*	Lemma for 2sq 27409. If a number that is a sum of two squares is divisible by a number whose prime divisors are all sums of two squares, then the quotient is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∥ 𝐵 → 𝑝 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem7 27403*	Lemma for 2sq 27409. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑌 ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ ℕ)
Theorem	2sqlem8a 27404*	Lemma for 2sqlem8 27405. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2016.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑌 (𝑏 ∥ 𝑎 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 gcd 𝐷) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	2sqlem8 27405*	Lemma for 2sq 27409. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑌 (𝑏 ∥ 𝑎 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 / (𝐶 gcd 𝐷))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐷 / (𝐶 gcd 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem9 27406*	Lemma for 2sq 27409. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑌 (𝑏 ∥ 𝑎 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem10 27407*	Lemma for 2sq 27409. Every factor of a "proper" sum of two squares (where the summands are coprime) is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∥ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sqlem11 27408*	Lemma for 2sq 27409. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ran (𝑤 ∈ ℤ[i] ↦ ((abs‘𝑤)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥 gcd 𝑦) = 1 ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2sq 27409*	All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of two squares. This is Metamath 100 proof #20. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	2sqblem 27410	Lemma for 2sqb 27411. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 gcd 𝑌) = ((𝑃 · 𝐴) + (𝑌 · 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 mod 4) = 1)
Theorem	2sqb 27411*	The converse to 2sq 27409. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ↔ (𝑃 = 2 ∨ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1)))
Theorem	2sq2 27412	2 is the sum of squares of two nonnegative integers iff the two integers are 1. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 2 ↔ (𝐴 = 1 ∧ 𝐵 = 1)))
Theorem	2sqn0 27413	If the sum of two squares is prime, none of the original number is zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	2sqcoprm 27414	If the sum of two squares is prime, the two original numbers are coprime. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)
Theorem	2sqmod 27415	Given two decompositions of a prime as a sum of two squares, show that they are equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)) = 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	2sqmo 27416*	There exists at most one decomposition of a prime as a sum of two squares. See 2sqb 27411 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃*𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqnn0 27417*	All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of squares of two nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	2sqnn 27418*	All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of squares of two positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)))
Theorem	addsq2reu 27419*	For each complex number 𝐶, there exists a unique complex number 𝑎 added to the square of a unique another complex number 𝑏 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. The unique complex number 𝑎 is 𝐶, and the unique another complex number 𝑏 is 0. Remark: This, together with addsqnreup 27422, is an example showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑). See also comments for df-eu 2570 and 2eu4 2656. For more details see comment for addsqnreup 27422. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqn2reu 27420*	For each complex number 𝐶, there does not exist a unique complex number 𝑏, squared and added to a unique another complex number 𝑎 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. Actually, for each complex number 𝑏, 𝑎 = (𝐶 − (𝑏↑2)) is unique. Remark: This, together with addsq2reu 27419, shows that commutation of two unique quantifications need not be equivalent, and provides an evident justification of the fact that considering the pair of variables is necessary to obtain what we intuitively understand as "double unique existence". (Proposed by GL, 23-Jun-2023.). (Contributed by AV, 23-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqrexnreu 27421*	For each complex number, there exists a complex number to which the square of more than one (or no) other complex numbers can be added to result in the given complex number. Remark: This theorem, together with addsq2reu 27419, shows that there are cases in which there is a set together with a not unique other set fulfilling a wff, although there is a unique set fulfilling the wff together with another unique set (see addsq2reu 27419). For more details see comment for addsqnreup 27422. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℂ ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqnreup 27422*	There is no unique decomposition of a complex number as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number. Remark: This theorem, together with addsq2reu 27419, is a real life example (about a numerical property) showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑"). See also comments for df-eu 2570 and 2eu4 2656. In the case of decompositions of complex numbers as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number, the only/unique complex number to which the square of a unique complex number is added yields in the given complex number is the given number itself, and the unique complex number to be squared is 0 (see comment for addsq2reu 27419). There are, however, complex numbers to which the square of more than one other complex numbers can be added to yield the given complex number (see addsqrexnreu 27421). For example, ⟨1, (√‘(𝐶 − 1))⟩ and ⟨1, -(√‘(𝐶 − 1))⟩ are two different decompositions of 𝐶 (if 𝐶 ≠ 1). Therefore, there is no unique decomposition of any complex number as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number, as generally proved by this theorem. As a consequence, a theorem must claim the existence of a unique pair of sets to express "There are unique 𝑎 and 𝑏 so that .." (more formally ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 with 𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩), or by showing (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑) (see 2reu4 4479 resp. 2eu4 2656). These two representations are equivalent (see opreu2reurex 6260). An analogon of this theorem using the latter variant is given in addsqn2reurex2 27424. In some cases, however, the variant with (ordered!) pairs may be possible only for ordered sets (like ℝ or ℙ) and claiming that the first component is less than or equal to the second component (see, for example, 2sqreunnltb 27440 and 2sqreuopb 27447). Alternatively, (proper) unordered pairs can be used: ∃!𝑝𝑒𝒫 𝐴((♯‘𝑝) = 2 ∧ 𝜑), or, using the definition of proper pairs: ∃!𝑝 ∈ (Pairsproper‘𝐴)𝜑 (see, for example, inlinecirc02preu 49145). (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ)((1st ‘𝑝) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsq2nreurex 27423*	For each complex number 𝐶, there is no unique complex number 𝑎 added to the square of another complex number 𝑏 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	addsqn2reurex2 27424*	For each complex number 𝐶, there does not uniquely exist two complex numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏, with 𝑏 squared and added to 𝑎 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. Remark: This, together with addsq2reu 27419, is an example showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑), as it is the case with the pattern (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. See also comments for df-eu 2570 and 2eu4 2656. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶))
Theorem	2sqreulem1 27425*	Lemma 1 for 2sqreu 27435. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreultlem 27426*	Lemma for 2sqreult 27437. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jun-2023.) (Proposed by GL, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreultblem 27427*	Lemma for 2sqreultb 27438. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 18-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreunnlem1 27428*	Lemma 1 for 2sqreunn 27436. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreunnltlem 27429*	Lemma for 2sqreunnlt 27439. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) Specialization to different integers, proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 11-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreunnltblem 27430*	Lemma for 2sqreunnltb 27440. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 18-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreulem2 27431	Lemma 2 for 2sqreu 27435 etc. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐶↑2)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	2sqreulem3 27432	Lemma 3 for 2sqreu 27435 etc. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0)) → (((𝜑 ∧ ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐶↑2)) = 𝑃)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	2sqreulem4 27433*	Lemma 4 for 2sqreu 27435 et. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃*𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑
Theorem	2sqreunnlem2 27434*	Lemma 2 for 2sqreunn 27436. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃*𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑
Theorem	2sqreu 27435*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two nonnegative integers. See 2sqnn0 27417 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreunn 27436*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two positive integers. See 2sqnn 27418 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreult 27437*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jun-2023.) (Proposed by GL, 8-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreultb 27438*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers iff 𝑃≡1 (mod 4). (Contributed by AV, 10-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑)))
Theorem	2sqreunnlt 27439*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two different positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) Specialization to different integers, proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑))
Theorem	2sqreunnltb 27440*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑)))
Theorem	2sqreuop 27441*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two nonnegative integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreu 27435. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) ≤ (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuopnn 27442*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two positive integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunn 27436. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) ≤ (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuoplt 27443*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreult 27437. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuopltb 27444*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers iff 𝑃≡1 (mod 4). Ordered pair variant of 2sqreultb 27438. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreuopnnlt 27445*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two different positive integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnlt 27439. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))
Theorem	2sqreuopnnltb 27446*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnltb 27440. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	2sqreuopb 27447*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. Alternate ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnltb 27440. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)∃𝑎∃𝑏(𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))))
14.4.12  Chebyshev's Weak Prime Number Theorem, Dirichlet's Theorem
Theorem	chebbnd1lem1 27448	Lemma for chebbnd1 27451: show a lower bound on π(𝑥) at even integers using similar techniques to those used to prove bpos 27272. (Note that the expression 𝐾 is actually equal to 2 · 𝑁, but proving that is not necessary for the proof, and it's too much work.) The key to the proof is bposlem1 27263, which shows that each term in the expansion ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁) = ∏𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝↑(𝑝 pCnt ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))) is at most 2 · 𝑁, so that the sum really only has nonzero elements up to 2 · 𝑁, and since each term is at most 2 · 𝑁, after taking logs we get the inequality π(2 · 𝑁) · log(2 · 𝑁) ≤ log((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁), and bclbnd 27259 finishes the proof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Apr-2016.)
⊢ 𝐾 = if((2 · 𝑁) ≤ ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁), (2 · 𝑁), ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → (log‘((4↑𝑁) / 𝑁)) < ((π‘(2 · 𝑁)) · (log‘(2 · 𝑁))))
Theorem	chebbnd1lem2 27449	Lemma for chebbnd1 27451: Show that log(𝑁) / 𝑁 does not change too much between 𝑁 and 𝑀 = ⌊(𝑁 / 2). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (⌊‘(𝑁 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 8 ≤ 𝑁) → ((log‘(2 · 𝑀)) / (2 · 𝑀)) < (2 · ((log‘𝑁) / 𝑁)))
Theorem	chebbnd1lem3 27450	Lemma for chebbnd1 27451: get a lower bound on π(𝑁) / (𝑁 / log(𝑁)) that is independent of 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (⌊‘(𝑁 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 8 ≤ 𝑁) → (((log‘2) − (1 / (2 · e))) / 2) < ((π‘𝑁) · ((log‘𝑁) / 𝑁)))
Theorem	chebbnd1 27451	The Chebyshev bound: The function π(𝑥) is eventually lower bounded by a positive constant times 𝑥 / log(𝑥). Alternatively stated, the function (𝑥 / log(𝑥)) / π(𝑥) is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((𝑥 / (log‘𝑥)) / (π‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chtppilimlem1 27452	Lemma for chtppilim 27454. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (2[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁↑𝑐𝐴) / (π‘𝑁)) < (1 − 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) · ((π‘𝑁) · (log‘𝑁))) < (θ‘𝑁))
Theorem	chtppilimlem2 27453*	Lemma for chtppilim 27454. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞)(𝑧 ≤ 𝑥 → ((𝐴↑2) · ((π‘𝑥) · (log‘𝑥))) < (θ‘𝑥)))
Theorem	chtppilim 27454	The θ function is asymptotic to π(𝑥)log(𝑥), so it is sufficient to prove θ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 to establish the PNT. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((θ‘𝑥) / ((π‘𝑥) · (log‘𝑥)))) ⇝𝑟 1
Theorem	chto1ub 27455	The θ function is upper bounded by a linear term. Corollary of chtub 27191. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ ((θ‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chebbnd2 27456	The Chebyshev bound, part 2: The function π(𝑥) is eventually upper bounded by a positive constant times 𝑥 / log(𝑥). Alternatively stated, the function π(𝑥) / (𝑥 / log(𝑥)) is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((π‘𝑥) / (𝑥 / (log‘𝑥)))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chto1lb 27457	The θ function is lower bounded by a linear term. Corollary of chebbnd1 27451. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ (𝑥 / (θ‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chpchtlim 27458	The ψ and θ functions are asymptotic to each other, so is sufficient to prove either θ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 or ψ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 to establish the PNT. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((ψ‘𝑥) / (θ‘𝑥))) ⇝𝑟 1
Theorem	chpo1ub 27459	The ψ function is upper bounded by a linear term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ ((ψ‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	chpo1ubb 27460*	The ψ function is upper bounded by a linear term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2016.)
⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ (ψ‘𝑥) ≤ (𝑐 · 𝑥)
Theorem	vmadivsum 27461*	The sum of the von Mangoldt function over 𝑛 is asymptotic to log𝑥 + 𝑂(1). Equation 9.2.13 of [Shapiro], p. 331. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛) − (log‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)
Theorem	vmadivsumb 27462*	Give a total bound on the von Mangoldt sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘(Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛) − (log‘𝑥))) ≤ 𝑐
Theorem	rplogsumlem1 27463*	Lemma for rplogsum 27506. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑛 ∈ (2...𝐴)((log‘𝑛) / (𝑛 · (𝑛 − 1))) ≤ 2)
Theorem	rplogsumlem2 27464*	Lemma for rplogsum 27506. Equation 9.2.14 of [Shapiro], p. 331. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...𝐴)(((Λ‘𝑛) − if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (log‘𝑛), 0)) / 𝑛) ≤ 2)
Theorem	dchrisum0lem1a 27465	Lemma for dchrisum0lem1 27495. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑋))) → (𝑋 ≤ ((𝑋↑2) / 𝐷) ∧ (⌊‘((𝑋↑2) / 𝐷)) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(⌊‘𝑋))))
Theorem	rpvmasumlem 27466*	Lemma for rpvmasum 27505. Calculate the "trivial case" estimate Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥( 1 (𝑛)Λ(𝑛) / 𝑛) = log𝑥 + 𝑂(1), where 1 (𝑥) is the principal Dirichlet character. Equation 9.4.7 of [Shapiro], p. 376. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(( 1 ‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) − (log‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrisumlema 27467*	Lemma for dchrisum 27471. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼 ∈ ℝ+ → ⦋𝐼 / 𝑛⦌𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ (𝑀[,)+∞) → 0 ≤ ⦋𝐼 / 𝑛⦌𝐴)))
Theorem	dchrisumlem1 27468*	Lemma for dchrisum 27471. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑢)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℕ0) → (abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑈)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅)
Theorem	dchrisumlem2 27469*	Lemma for dchrisum 27471. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑢)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≤ (𝐼 + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝐽) − (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝐼))) ≤ ((2 · 𝑅) · ⦋𝑈 / 𝑛⦌𝐴))
Theorem	dchrisumlem3 27470*	Lemma for dchrisum 27471. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑢)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑀[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑥)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	dchrisum 27471*	If 𝑛 ∈ [𝑀, +∞) ↦ 𝐴(𝑛) is a positive decreasing function approaching zero, then the infinite sum Σ𝑛, 𝑋(𝑛)𝐴(𝑛) is convergent, with the partial sum Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥, 𝑋(𝑛)𝐴(𝑛) within 𝑂(𝐴(𝑀)) of the limit 𝑇. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑀[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑥)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	dchrmusumlema 27472*	Lemma for dchrmusum 27503 and dchrisumn0 27500. Apply dchrisum 27471 for the function 1 / 𝑦. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 / 𝑦)))
Theorem	dchrmusum2 27473*	The sum of the Möbius function multiplied by a non-principal Dirichlet character, divided by 𝑛, is bounded, provided that 𝑇 ≠ 0. Lemma 9.4.2 of [Shapiro], p. 380. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · 𝑇)) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmasumlem1 27474*	An alternative expression for a Dirichlet-weighted von Mangoldt sum in terms of the Möbius function. Equation 9.4.11 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) = Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝐴 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) · ((log‘𝑚) / 𝑚))))
Theorem	dchrvmasum2lem 27475*	Give an expression for log𝑥 remarkably similar to Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥(𝑋(𝑛)Λ(𝑛) / 𝑛) given in dchrvmasumlem1 27474. Part of Lemma 9.4.3 of [Shapiro], p. 380. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (log‘𝐴) = Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝐴 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) · ((log‘((𝐴 / 𝑑) / 𝑚)) / 𝑚))))
Theorem	dchrvmasum2if 27476*	Combine the results of dchrvmasumlem1 27474 and dchrvmasum2lem 27475 inside a conditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) + if(𝜓, (log‘𝐴), 0)) = Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝐴 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) · ((log‘if(𝜓, (𝐴 / 𝑑), 𝑚)) / 𝑚))))
Theorem	dchrvmasumlem2 27477*	Lemma for dchrvmasum 27504. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑚 = (𝑥 / 𝑑) → 𝐹 = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (3[,)+∞)) → (abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 · ((log‘𝑚) / 𝑚)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ (1[,)3)(abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((abs‘(𝐾 − 𝑇)) / 𝑑)) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmasumlem3 27478*	Lemma for dchrvmasum 27504. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑚 = (𝑥 / 𝑑) → 𝐹 = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (3[,)+∞)) → (abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 · ((log‘𝑚) / 𝑚)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ (1[,)3)(abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · (𝐾 − 𝑇))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmasumlema 27479*	Lemma for dchrvmasum 27504 and dchrvmasumif 27482. Apply dchrisum 27471 for the function log(𝑦) / 𝑦, which is decreasing above e (or above 3, the nearest integer bound). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) · ((log‘𝑎) / 𝑎)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (3[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 · ((log‘𝑦) / 𝑦))))
Theorem	dchrvmasumiflem1 27480*	Lemma for dchrvmasumif 27482. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) · ((log‘𝑎) / 𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐾) ⇝ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (3[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐾)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐸 · ((log‘𝑦) / 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · (Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝑥 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑘)) · ((log‘if(𝑆 = 0, (𝑥 / 𝑑), 𝑘)) / 𝑘)) − if(𝑆 = 0, 0, 𝑇)))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmasumiflem2 27481*	Lemma for dchrvmasum 27504. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) · ((log‘𝑎) / 𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐾) ⇝ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (3[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐾)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐸 · ((log‘𝑦) / 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) + if(𝑆 = 0, (log‘𝑥), 0))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmasumif 27482*	An asymptotic approximation for the sum of 𝑋(𝑛)Λ(𝑛) / 𝑛 conditional on the value of the infinite sum 𝑆. (We will later show that the case 𝑆 = 0 is impossible, and hence establish dchrvmasum 27504.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) + if(𝑆 = 0, (log‘𝑥), 0))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrvmaeq0 27483*	The set 𝑊 is the collection of all non-principal Dirichlet characters such that the sum Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 is equal to zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ↔ 𝑆 = 0))
Theorem	dchrisum0fval 27484*	Value of the function 𝐹, the divisor sum of a Dirichlet character. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝐴) = Σ𝑡 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝐴} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑡)))
Theorem	dchrisum0fmul 27485*	The function 𝐹, the divisor sum of a Dirichlet character, is a multiplicative function (but not completely multiplicative). Equation 9.4.27 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘(𝐴 · 𝐵)) = ((𝐹‘𝐴) · (𝐹‘𝐵)))
Theorem	dchrisum0ff 27486*	The function 𝐹 is a real function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	dchrisum0flblem1 27487*	Lemma for dchrisum0flb 27489. Base case, prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if((√‘(𝑃↑𝐴)) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑃↑𝐴)))
Theorem	dchrisum0flblem2 27488*	Lemma for dchrisum0flb 27489. Induction over relatively prime factors, with the prime power case handled in dchrisum0flblem1 . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) Replace reference to OLD theorem. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1..^𝐴)if((√‘𝑦) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if((√‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	dchrisum0flb 27489*	The divisor sum of a real Dirichlet character, is lower bounded by zero everywhere and one at the squares. Equation 9.4.29 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if((√‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	dchrisum0fno1 27490*	The sum Σ𝑘 ≤ 𝑥, 𝐹(𝑥) / √𝑘 is divergent (i.e. not eventually bounded). Equation 9.4.30 of [Shapiro], p. 383. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝐹‘𝑘) / (√‘𝑘))) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	rpvmasum2 27491*	A partial result along the lines of rpvmasum 27505. The sum of the von Mangoldt function over those integers 𝑛≡𝐴 (mod 𝑁) is asymptotic to (1 − 𝑀)(log𝑥 / ϕ(𝑥)) + 𝑂(1), where 𝑀 is the number of non-principal Dirichlet characters with Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 = 0. Our goal is to show this set is empty. Equation 9.4.3 of [Shapiro], p. 375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡𝐿 “ {𝐴})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 = (1r‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (((ϕ‘𝑁) · Σ𝑛 ∈ ((1...(⌊‘𝑥)) ∩ 𝑇)((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) − ((log‘𝑥) · (1 − (♯‘𝑊))))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrisum0re 27492*	Suppose 𝑋 is a non-principal Dirichlet character with Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 = 0. Then 𝑋 is a real character. Part of Lemma 9.4.4 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ)
Theorem	dchrisum0lema 27493*	Lemma for dchrisum0 27499. Apply dchrisum 27471 for the function 1 / √𝑦. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 / (√‘𝑦))))
Theorem	dchrisum0lem1b 27494*	Lemma for dchrisum0lem1 27495. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / (√‘𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ 𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))) → (abs‘Σ𝑚 ∈ (((⌊‘𝑥) + 1)...(⌊‘((𝑥↑2) / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑚))) ≤ ((2 · 𝐶) / (√‘𝑥)))
Theorem	dchrisum0lem1 27495*	Lemma for dchrisum0 27499. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / (√‘𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑚 ∈ (((⌊‘𝑥) + 1)...(⌊‘(𝑥↑2)))Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘((𝑥↑2) / 𝑚)))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑑))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrisum0lem2a 27496*	Lemma for dchrisum0 27499. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / (√‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑦))(1 / (√‘𝑑)) − (2 · (√‘𝑦))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑟 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑚)) · (𝐻‘((𝑥↑2) / 𝑚)))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrisum0lem2 27497*	Lemma for dchrisum0 27499. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / (√‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑦))(1 / (√‘𝑑)) − (2 · (√‘𝑦))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑟 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐾) ⇝ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐾)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐸 / 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘((𝑥↑2) / 𝑚)))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑑))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrisum0lem3 27498*	Lemma for dchrisum0 27499. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / (√‘𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝑥↑2)))Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘((𝑥↑2) / 𝑚)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / (√‘(𝑚 · 𝑑)))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	dchrisum0 27499*	The sum Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 is nonzero for all non-principal Dirichlet characters (i.e. the assumption 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 is contradictory). This is the key result that allows to eliminate the conditionals from dchrmusum2 27473 and dchrvmasumif 27482. Lemma 9.4.4 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	dchrisumn0 27500*	The sum Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 is nonzero for all non-principal Dirichlet characters (i.e. the assumption 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 is contradictory). This is the key result that allows to eliminate the conditionals from dchrmusum2 27473 and dchrvmasumif 27482. Lemma 9.4.4 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 )    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ≠ 0)