ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  addext GIF version

Theorem addext 8880
Description: Strong extensionality for addition. Given excluded middle, apartness would be equivalent to negated equality and this would follow readily (for all operations) from oveq12 6058. For us, it is proved a different way. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2020.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
addext (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷) → (𝐴 # 𝐶𝐵 # 𝐷)))

Proof of Theorem addext
StepHypRef Expression
1 simpll 527 . . . 4 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
2 simplr 529 . . . 4 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
31, 2addcld 8289 . . 3 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
4 simprl 531 . . . 4 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
5 simprr 533 . . . 4 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)
64, 5addcld 8289 . . 3 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (𝐶 + 𝐷) ∈ ℂ)
74, 2addcld 8289 . . 3 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (𝐶 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
8 apcotr 8877 . . 3 (((𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐶 + 𝐷) ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐶 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐵) ∨ (𝐶 + 𝐷) # (𝐶 + 𝐵))))
93, 6, 7, 8syl3anc 1274 . 2 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐵) ∨ (𝐶 + 𝐷) # (𝐶 + 𝐵))))
10 apadd1 8878 . . . 4 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
111, 4, 2, 10syl3anc 1274 . . 3 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
12 apadd2 8879 . . . . 5 ((𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐵 # 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷)))
132, 5, 4, 12syl3anc 1274 . . . 4 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (𝐵 # 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷)))
14 apsym 8876 . . . . 5 (((𝐶 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐶 + 𝐷) ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐶 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐷) # (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
157, 6, 14syl2anc 411 . . . 4 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐶 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐷) # (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
1613, 15bitrd 188 . . 3 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (𝐵 # 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐷) # (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
1711, 16orbi12d 801 . 2 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 # 𝐶𝐵 # 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐵) ∨ (𝐶 + 𝐷) # (𝐶 + 𝐵))))
189, 17sylibrd 169 1 (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷) → (𝐴 # 𝐶𝐵 # 𝐷)))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 104  wb 105  wo 716  wcel 2203   class class class wbr 4108  (class class class)co 6049  cc 8121   + caddc 8126   # cap 8851
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2205  ax-14 2206  ax-ext 2214  ax-sep 4227  ax-pow 4286  ax-pr 4321  ax-un 4553  ax-setind 4658  ax-cnex 8214  ax-resscn 8215  ax-1cn 8216  ax-1re 8217  ax-icn 8218  ax-addcl 8219  ax-addrcl 8220  ax-mulcl 8221  ax-mulrcl 8222  ax-addcom 8223  ax-mulcom 8224  ax-addass 8225  ax-mulass 8226  ax-distr 8227  ax-i2m1 8228  ax-0lt1 8229  ax-1rid 8230  ax-0id 8231  ax-rnegex 8232  ax-precex 8233  ax-cnre 8234  ax-pre-ltirr 8235  ax-pre-ltwlin 8236  ax-pre-lttrn 8237  ax-pre-apti 8238  ax-pre-ltadd 8239  ax-pre-mulgt0 8240
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2083  df-mo 2084  df-clab 2219  df-cleq 2225  df-clel 2228  df-nfc 2373  df-ne 2413  df-nel 2508  df-ral 2525  df-rex 2526  df-reu 2527  df-rab 2529  df-v 2814  df-sbc 3042  df-dif 3212  df-un 3214  df-in 3216  df-ss 3223  df-pw 3670  df-sn 3694  df-pr 3695  df-op 3697  df-uni 3914  df-br 4109  df-opab 4171  df-id 4413  df-xp 4754  df-rel 4755  df-cnv 4756  df-co 4757  df-dm 4758  df-iota 5311  df-fun 5353  df-fv 5359  df-riota 6002  df-ov 6052  df-oprab 6053  df-mpo 6054  df-pnf 8306  df-mnf 8307  df-ltxr 8309  df-sub 8442  df-neg 8443  df-reap 8845  df-ap 8852
This theorem is referenced by:  mulext1  8882  abs00ap  11740  absext  11741
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator