P. 86 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8501-8600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lesubadd2d 8501	'Less than or equal to' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	ltaddsubd 8502	'Less than' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 < (𝐶 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltaddsub2d 8503	'Less than' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 < (𝐶 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	leaddsub2d 8504	'Less than or equal to' relationship between and addition and subtraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) ≤ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	subled 8505	Swap subtrahends in an inequality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	lesubd 8506	Swap subtrahends in an inequality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ (𝐵 − 𝐴))
Theorem	ltsub23d 8507	'Less than' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) < 𝐵)
Theorem	ltsub13d 8508	'Less than' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < (𝐵 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 < (𝐵 − 𝐴))
Theorem	lesub1d 8509	Subtraction from both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 − 𝐶)))
Theorem	lesub2d 8510	Subtraction of both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	ltsub1d 8511	Subtraction from both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) < (𝐵 − 𝐶)))
Theorem	ltsub2d 8512	Subtraction of both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	ltadd1dd 8513	Addition to both sides of 'less than'. Theorem I.18 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) < (𝐵 + 𝐶))
Theorem	ltsub1dd 8514	Subtraction from both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) < (𝐵 − 𝐶))
Theorem	ltsub2dd 8515	Subtraction of both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐴))
Theorem	leadd1dd 8516	Addition to both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶))
Theorem	leadd2dd 8517	Addition to both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 + 𝐵))
Theorem	lesub1dd 8518	Subtraction from both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 − 𝐶))
Theorem	lesub2dd 8519	Subtraction of both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐴))
Theorem	le2addd 8520	Adding both side of two inequalities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 + 𝐷))
Theorem	le2subd 8521	Subtracting both sides of two 'less than or equal to' relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐷) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐵))
Theorem	ltleaddd 8522	Adding both sides of two orderings. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐶 + 𝐷))
Theorem	leltaddd 8523	Adding both sides of two orderings. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐶 + 𝐷))
Theorem	lt2addd 8524	Adding both side of two inequalities. Theorem I.25 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐶 + 𝐷))
Theorem	lt2subd 8525	Subtracting both sides of two 'less than' relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐷) < (𝐶 − 𝐵))
Theorem	possumd 8526	Condition for a positive sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 < (𝐴 + 𝐵) ↔ -𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	sublt0d 8527	When a subtraction gives a negative result. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < 0 ↔ 𝐴 < 𝐵))
Theorem	ltaddsublt 8528	Addition and subtraction on one side of 'less than'. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 < 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶) < 𝐴))
Theorem	1le1 8529	1 ≤ 1. Common special case. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 16-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 1 ≤ 1
Theorem	gt0add 8530	A positive sum must have a positive addend. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < (𝐴 + 𝐵)) → (0 < 𝐴 ∨ 0 < 𝐵))
4.3.5  Real Apartness
Syntax	creap 8531	Class of real apartness relation.
class #ℝ
Definition	df-reap 8532*	Define real apartness. Definition in Section 11.2.1 of [HoTT], p. (varies). Although #ℝ is an apartness relation on the reals (see df-ap 8539 for more discussion of apartness relations), for our purposes it is just a stepping stone to defining # which is an apartness relation on complex numbers. On the reals, #ℝ and # agree (apreap 8544). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.)
⊢ #ℝ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥))}
Theorem	reapval 8533	Real apartness in terms of classes. Beyond the development of # itself, proofs should use reaplt 8545 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	reapirr 8534	Real apartness is irreflexive. Part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). Beyond the development of # itself, proofs should use apirr 8562 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐴)
Theorem	recexre 8535*	Existence of reciprocal of real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 #ℝ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Theorem	reapti 8536	Real apartness is tight. Beyond the development of apartness itself, proofs should use apti 8579. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵))
Theorem	recexgt0 8537*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
4.3.6  Complex Apartness
Syntax	cap 8538	Class of complex apartness relation.
class #
Definition	df-ap 8539*	Define complex apartness. Definition 6.1 of [Geuvers], p. 17. Two numbers are considered apart if it is possible to separate them. One common usage is that we can divide by a number if it is apart from zero (see for example recclap 8636 which says that a number apart from zero has a reciprocal). The defining characteristics of an apartness are irreflexivity (apirr 8562), symmetry (apsym 8563), and cotransitivity (apcotr 8564). Apartness implies negated equality, as seen at apne 8580, and the converse would also follow if we assumed excluded middle. In addition, apartness of complex numbers is tight, which means that two numbers which are not apart are equal (apti 8579). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.)
⊢ # = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑢 ∈ ℝ ((𝑥 = (𝑟 + (i · 𝑠)) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑡 + (i · 𝑢))) ∧ (𝑟 #ℝ 𝑡 ∨ 𝑠 #ℝ 𝑢))}
Theorem	ixi 8540	i times itself is minus 1. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (i · i) = -1
Theorem	inelr 8541	The imaginary unit i is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ
Theorem	rimul 8542	A real number times the imaginary unit is real only if the number is 0. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	rereim 8543	Decomposition of a real number into real part (itself) and imaginary part (zero). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = (𝐵 + (i · 𝐶)))) → (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = 0))
Theorem	apreap 8544	Complex apartness and real apartness agree on the real numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵))
Theorem	reaplt 8545	Real apartness in terms of less than. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	reapltxor 8546	Real apartness in terms of less than (exclusive-or version). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ⊻ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	1ap0 8547	One is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 1 # 0
Theorem	ltmul1a 8548	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	ltmul1 8549	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	lemul1 8550	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapmul1lem 8551	Lemma for reapmul1 8552. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapmul1 8552	Multiplication of both sides of real apartness by a real number apart from zero. Special case of apmul1 8745. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 # 0)) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapadd1 8553	Real addition respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐶) # (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapneg 8554	Real negation respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ -𝐴 # -𝐵))
Theorem	reapcotr 8555	Real apartness is cotransitive. Part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐶)))
Theorem	remulext1 8556	Left extensionality for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	remulext2 8557	Right extensionality for real multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) # (𝐶 · 𝐵) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	apsqgt0 8558	The square of a real number apart from zero is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 # 0) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐴))
Theorem	cru 8559	The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	apreim 8560	Complex apartness in terms of real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) # (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷)))
Theorem	mulreim 8561	Complex multiplication in terms of real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) · (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷))) = (((𝐴 · 𝐶) + -(𝐵 · 𝐷)) + (i · ((𝐶 · 𝐵) + (𝐷 · 𝐴)))))
Theorem	apirr 8562	Apartness is irreflexive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ¬ 𝐴 # 𝐴)
Theorem	apsym 8563	Apartness is symmetric. This theorem for real numbers is part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴))
Theorem	apcotr 8564	Apartness is cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐶)))
Theorem	apadd1 8565	Addition respects apartness. Analogue of addcan 8137 for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐶) # (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	apadd2 8566	Addition respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐴) # (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	addext 8567	Strong extensionality for addition. Given excluded middle, apartness would be equivalent to negated equality and this would follow readily (for all operations) from oveq12 5884. For us, it is proved a different way. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷) → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷)))
Theorem	apneg 8568	Negation respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ -𝐴 # -𝐵))
Theorem	mulext1 8569	Left extensionality for complex multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	mulext2 8570	Right extensionality for complex multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) # (𝐶 · 𝐵) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	mulext 8571	Strong extensionality for multiplication. Given excluded middle, apartness would be equivalent to negated equality and this would follow readily (for all operations) from oveq12 5884. For us, it is proved a different way. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) # (𝐶 · 𝐷) → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷)))
Theorem	mulap0r 8572	A product apart from zero. Lemma 2.13 of [Geuvers], p. 6. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0) → (𝐴 # 0 ∧ 𝐵 # 0))
Theorem	msqge0 8573	A square is nonnegative. Lemma 2.35 of [Geuvers], p. 9. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴))
Theorem	msqge0i 8574	A square is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴)
Theorem	msqge0d 8575	A square is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴))
Theorem	mulge0 8576	The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵)) → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	mulge0i 8577	The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	mulge0d 8578	The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	apti 8579	Complex apartness is tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	apne 8580	Apartness implies negated equality. We cannot in general prove the converse (as shown at neapmkv 14818), which is the whole point of having separate notations for apartness and negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	apcon4bid 8581	Contrapositive law deduction for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 # 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	leltap 8582	≤ implies 'less than' is 'apart'. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴))
Theorem	gt0ap0 8583	Positive implies apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	gt0ap0i 8584	Positive means apart from zero (useful for ordering theorems involving division). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 < 𝐴 → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	gt0ap0ii 8585	Positive implies apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 # 0
Theorem	gt0ap0d 8586	Positive implies apart from zero. Because of the way we define #, 𝐴 must be an element of ℝ, not just ℝ*. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	negap0 8587	A number is apart from zero iff its negative is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 # 0 ↔ -𝐴 # 0))
Theorem	negap0d 8588	The negative of a number apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	ltleap 8589	Less than in terms of non-strict order and apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 # 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltap 8590	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝐵 # 𝐴)
Theorem	gtapii 8591	'Greater than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 # 𝐴
Theorem	ltapii 8592	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 # 𝐵
Theorem	ltapi 8593	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 # 𝐴)
Theorem	gtapd 8594	'Greater than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 # 𝐴)
Theorem	ltapd 8595	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 𝐵)
Theorem	leltapd 8596	≤ implies 'less than' is 'apart'. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴))
Theorem	ap0gt0 8597	A nonnegative number is apart from zero if and only if it is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) → (𝐴 # 0 ↔ 0 < 𝐴))
Theorem	ap0gt0d 8598	A nonzero nonnegative number is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)
Theorem	apsub1 8599	Subtraction respects apartness. Analogue of subcan2 8182 for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) # (𝐵 − 𝐶)))
Theorem	subap0 8600	Two numbers being apart is equivalent to their difference being apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) # 0 ↔ 𝐴 # 𝐵))