Theorem prarloclem 7832

Description: A special case of Lemma 6.16 from [BauerTaylor], p. 32. Given evenly spaced rational numbers from 𝐴 to 𝐴 +_Q (𝑁 ·_Q 𝑃) (which are in the lower and upper cuts, respectively, of a real number), there are a pair of numbers, two positions apart in the even spacing, which straddle the cut. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Oct-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
prarloclem	⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ N ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q ∧ 1o <N 𝑁) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨(𝑗 +o 2o), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑗   𝑗,𝐿   𝑗,𝑁   𝑃,𝑗   𝑈,𝑗

Proof of Theorem prarloclem

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prarloclem5 7831	. 2 ⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ N ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q ∧ 1o <N 𝑁) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +o 2o) +o 𝑥), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈))
2		prarloclem4 7829	. . . 4 ⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q) → (∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +o 2o) +o 𝑥), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨(𝑗 +o 2o), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)))
3	2	3ad2antr2 1190	. . 3 ⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ N ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q ∧ 1o <N 𝑁)) → (∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +o 2o) +o 𝑥), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨(𝑗 +o 2o), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)))
4	3	3adant3 1044	. 2 ⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ N ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q ∧ 1o <N 𝑁) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → (∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +o 2o) +o 𝑥), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨(𝑗 +o 2o), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)))
5	1, 4	mpd 13	1 ⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ N ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q ∧ 1o <N 𝑁) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨(𝑗 +o 2o), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∧ w3a 1005   ∈ wcel 2205  ∃wrex 2523  ⟨cop 3697   class class class wbr 4114  ωcom 4717  (class class class)co 6058  1_oc1o 6653  2_oc2o 6654   +_o coa 6657  [cec 6778  Ncnpi 7603   <_N clti 7606   ~_Q ceq 7610  Qcnq 7611   +_Q cplq 7613   ·_Q cmq 7614   ~_Q0 ceq0 7617   +_Q0 cplq0 7620   ·_Q0 cmq0 7621  Pcnp 7622

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2207  ax-14 2208  ax-ext 2216  ax-coll 4230  ax-sep 4233  ax-nul 4241  ax-pow 4292  ax-pr 4327  ax-un 4559  ax-setind 4664  ax-iinf 4715

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 843  df-3or 1006  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2085  df-mo 2086  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-ne 2415  df-ral 2527  df-rex 2528  df-reu 2529  df-rab 2531  df-v 2817  df-sbc 3046  df-csb 3142  df-dif 3216  df-un 3218  df-in 3220  df-ss 3227  df-nul 3513  df-pw 3676  df-sn 3700  df-pr 3701  df-op 3703  df-uni 3920  df-int 3955  df-iun 3998  df-br 4115  df-opab 4177  df-mpt 4178  df-tr 4214  df-eprel 4415  df-id 4419  df-iord 4492  df-on 4494  df-suc 4497  df-iom 4718  df-xp 4760  df-rel 4761  df-cnv 4762  df-co 4763  df-dm 4764  df-rn 4765  df-res 4766  df-ima 4767  df-iota 5317  df-fun 5359  df-fn 5360  df-f 5361  df-f1 5362  df-fo 5363  df-f1o 5364  df-fv 5365  df-ov 6061  df-oprab 6062  df-mpo 6063  df-1st 6347  df-2nd 6348  df-recs 6549  df-irdg 6614  df-1o 6660  df-2o 6661  df-oadd 6664  df-omul 6665  df-er 6780  df-ec 6782  df-qs 6786  df-ni 7635  df-pli 7636  df-mi 7637  df-lti 7638  df-plpq 7675  df-mpq 7676  df-enq 7678  df-nqqs 7679  df-plqqs 7680  df-mqqs 7681  df-ltnqqs 7684  df-enq0 7755  df-nq0 7756  df-0nq0 7757  df-plq0 7758  df-mq0 7759  df-inp 7797

This theorem is referenced by:  prarloc  7834