Theorem prarloclem 7684

Description: A special case of Lemma 6.16 from [BauerTaylor], p. 32. Given evenly spaced rational numbers from 𝐴 to 𝐴 +_Q (𝑁 ·_Q 𝑃) (which are in the lower and upper cuts, respectively, of a real number), there are a pair of numbers, two positions apart in the even spacing, which straddle the cut. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Oct-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
prarloclem	⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ N ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q ∧ 1o <N 𝑁) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨(𝑗 +o 2o), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑗   𝑗,𝐿   𝑗,𝑁   𝑃,𝑗   𝑈,𝑗

Proof of Theorem prarloclem

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prarloclem5 7683	. 2 ⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ N ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q ∧ 1o <N 𝑁) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +o 2o) +o 𝑥), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈))
2		prarloclem4 7681	. . . 4 ⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q) → (∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +o 2o) +o 𝑥), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨(𝑗 +o 2o), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)))
3	2	3ad2antr2 1187	. . 3 ⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ N ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q ∧ 1o <N 𝑁)) → (∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +o 2o) +o 𝑥), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨(𝑗 +o 2o), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)))
4	3	3adant3 1041	. 2 ⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ N ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q ∧ 1o <N 𝑁) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → (∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑦, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨((𝑦 +o 2o) +o 𝑥), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨(𝑗 +o 2o), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈)))
5	1, 4	mpd 13	1 ⊢ (((⟨𝐿, 𝑈⟩ ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ N ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Q ∧ 1o <N 𝑁) ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ((𝐴 +Q0 ([⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q0 ·Q0 𝑃)) ∈ 𝐿 ∧ (𝐴 +Q ([⟨(𝑗 +o 2o), 1o⟩] ~Q ·Q 𝑃)) ∈ 𝑈))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∧ w3a 1002   ∈ wcel 2200  ∃wrex 2509  ⟨cop 3669   class class class wbr 4082  ωcom 4681  (class class class)co 6000  1_oc1o 6553  2_oc2o 6554   +_o coa 6557  [cec 6676  Ncnpi 7455   <_N clti 7458   ~_Q ceq 7462  Qcnq 7463   +_Q cplq 7465   ·_Q cmq 7466   ~_Q0 ceq0 7469   +_Q0 cplq0 7472   ·_Q0 cmq0 7473  Pcnp 7474

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-coll 4198  ax-sep 4201  ax-nul 4209  ax-pow 4257  ax-pr 4292  ax-un 4523  ax-setind 4628  ax-iinf 4679

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 840  df-3or 1003  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-reu 2515  df-rab 2517  df-v 2801  df-sbc 3029  df-csb 3125  df-dif 3199  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-nul 3492  df-pw 3651  df-sn 3672  df-pr 3673  df-op 3675  df-uni 3888  df-int 3923  df-iun 3966  df-br 4083  df-opab 4145  df-mpt 4146  df-tr 4182  df-eprel 4379  df-id 4383  df-iord 4456  df-on 4458  df-suc 4461  df-iom 4682  df-xp 4724  df-rel 4725  df-cnv 4726  df-co 4727  df-dm 4728  df-rn 4729  df-res 4730  df-ima 4731  df-iota 5277  df-fun 5319  df-fn 5320  df-f 5321  df-f1 5322  df-fo 5323  df-f1o 5324  df-fv 5325  df-ov 6003  df-oprab 6004  df-mpo 6005  df-1st 6284  df-2nd 6285  df-recs 6449  df-irdg 6514  df-1o 6560  df-2o 6561  df-oadd 6564  df-omul 6565  df-er 6678  df-ec 6680  df-qs 6684  df-ni 7487  df-pli 7488  df-mi 7489  df-lti 7490  df-plpq 7527  df-mpq 7528  df-enq 7530  df-nqqs 7531  df-plqqs 7532  df-mqqs 7533  df-ltnqqs 7536  df-enq0 7607  df-nq0 7608  df-0nq0 7609  df-plq0 7610  df-mq0 7611  df-inp 7649

This theorem is referenced by:  prarloc  7686