Theorem 3at 40527

Description: Any three non-colinear atoms in a (lattice) plane determine the plane uniquely. This is the 2-dimensional analogue of ps-1 40514 for lines and 4at 40650 for volumes. I could not find this proof in the literature on projective geometry (where it is either given as an axiom or stated as an unproved fact), but it is similar to Theorem 15 of Veblen, "The Foundations of Geometry" (1911), p. 18, which uses different axioms. This proof was written before I became aware of Veblen's, and it is possible that a shorter proof could be obtained by using Veblen's proof for hints. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
3at.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
3at.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3at.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3at	⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))

Proof of Theorem 3at

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3at.l	. . . 4 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
2		3at.j	. . . 4 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3		3at.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4	1, 2, 3	3atlem7 40526	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
5	4	3expia 1139	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
6		hllat 40400	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
7		simpl 488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
8		simpr1 1213	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
9		eqid 2761	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
10	9, 3	atbase 40326	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
11	8, 10	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
12		simpr2 1214	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)
13	9, 3	atbase 40326	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
14	12, 13	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
15	9, 2	latjcl 18606	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
16	7, 11, 14, 15	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
17		simpr3 1215	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)
18	9, 3	atbase 40326	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
19	17, 18	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
20	9, 2	latjcl 18606	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
21	7, 16, 19, 20	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
22	9, 1	latref 18608	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
23	21, 22	syldan 603	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
24		breq2 5107	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
25	23, 24	syl5ibcom 248	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
26	6, 25	sylan 592	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
27	26	3adant3 1150	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
28	27	adantr 486	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
29	5, 28	impbid 215	1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2956   class class class wbr 5103  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7418  Basecbs 17380  lecple 17428  joincjn 18478  Latclat 18598  Atomscatm 40300  HLchlt 40387

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7749

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7375  df-ov 7421  df-oprab 7422  df-proset 18461  df-poset 18480  df-plt 18495  df-lub 18511  df-glb 18512  df-join 18513  df-meet 18514  df-p0 18590  df-lat 18599  df-covers 40303  df-ats 40304  df-atl 40335  df-cvlat 40359  df-hlat 40388

This theorem is used by:  llncvrlpln2  40594  2lplnja  40656