Theorem 3at 40813

Description: Any three non-colinear atoms in a (lattice) plane determine the plane uniquely. This is the 2-dimensional analogue of ps-1 40800 for lines and 4at 40936 for volumes. I could not find this proof in the literature on projective geometry (where it is either given as an axiom or stated as an unproved fact), but it is similar to Theorem 15 of Veblen, "The Foundations of Geometry" (1911), p. 18, which uses different axioms. This proof was written before I became aware of Veblen's, and it is possible that a shorter proof could be obtained by using Veblen's proof for hints. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
3at.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
3at.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3at.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3at	⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))

Proof of Theorem 3at

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3at.l	. . . 4 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
2		3at.j	. . . 4 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3		3at.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4	1, 2, 3	3atlem7 40812	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
5	4	3expia 1139	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
6		hllat 40686	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
7		simpl 488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
8		simpr1 1213	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
9		eqid 2763	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
10	9, 3	atbase 40612	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
11	8, 10	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
12		simpr2 1214	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)
13	9, 3	atbase 40612	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
14	12, 13	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
15	9, 2	latjcl 18663	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
16	7, 11, 14, 15	syl3anc 1399	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
17		simpr3 1215	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)
18	9, 3	atbase 40612	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
19	17, 18	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
20	9, 2	latjcl 18663	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
21	7, 16, 19, 20	syl3anc 1399	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
22	9, 1	latref 18665	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
23	21, 22	syldan 603	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
24		breq2 5112	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
25	23, 24	syl5ibcom 248	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
26	6, 25	sylan 592	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
27	26	3adant3 1150	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
28	27	adantr 486	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
29	5, 28	impbid 215	1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959   class class class wbr 5108  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451  Basecbs 17431  lecple 17479  joincjn 18535  Latclat 18655  Atomscatm 40586  HLchlt 40673

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-f1 6571  df-fo 6572  df-f1o 6573  df-fv 6574  df-riota 7408  df-ov 7454  df-oprab 7455  df-proset 18518  df-poset 18537  df-plt 18552  df-lub 18568  df-glb 18569  df-join 18570  df-meet 18571  df-p0 18647  df-lat 18656  df-covers 40589  df-ats 40590  df-atl 40621  df-cvlat 40645  df-hlat 40674

This theorem is used by:  llncvrlpln2  40880  2lplnja  40942