Theorem 3at 40297

Description: Any three non-colinear atoms in a (lattice) plane determine the plane uniquely. This is the 2-dimensional analogue of ps-1 40284 for lines and 4at 40420 for volumes. I could not find this proof in the literature on projective geometry (where it is either given as an axiom or stated as an unproved fact), but it is similar to Theorem 15 of Veblen, "The Foundations of Geometry" (1911), p. 18, which uses different axioms. This proof was written before I became aware of Veblen's, and it is possible that a shorter proof could be obtained by using Veblen's proof for hints. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
3at.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
3at.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3at.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3at	⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))

Proof of Theorem 3at

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3at.l	. . . 4 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
2		3at.j	. . . 4 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3		3at.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4	1, 2, 3	3atlem7 40296	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
5	4	3expia 1139	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
6		hllat 40170	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
7		simpl 488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
8		simpr1 1213	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
9		eqid 2765	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
10	9, 3	atbase 40096	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
11	8, 10	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
12		simpr2 1214	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)
13	9, 3	atbase 40096	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
14	12, 13	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
15	9, 2	latjcl 18513	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
16	7, 11, 14, 15	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
17		simpr3 1215	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)
18	9, 3	atbase 40096	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
19	17, 18	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
20	9, 2	latjcl 18513	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
21	7, 16, 19, 20	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
22	9, 1	latref 18515	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
23	21, 22	syldan 603	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
24		breq2 5115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
25	23, 24	syl5ibcom 248	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
26	6, 25	sylan 592	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
27	26	3adant3 1150	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
28	27	adantr 486	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
29	5, 28	impbid 215	1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2960   class class class wbr 5111  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7416  Basecbs 17287  lecple 17335  joincjn 18385  Latclat 18505  Atomscatm 40070  HLchlt 40157

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rmo 3371  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-riota 7373  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-proset 18368  df-poset 18387  df-plt 18402  df-lub 18418  df-glb 18419  df-join 18420  df-meet 18421  df-p0 18497  df-lat 18506  df-covers 40073  df-ats 40074  df-atl 40105  df-cvlat 40129  df-hlat 40158

This theorem is used by:  llncvrlpln2  40364  2lplnja  40426