Theorem 3at 40363

Description: Any three non-colinear atoms in a (lattice) plane determine the plane uniquely. This is the 2-dimensional analogue of ps-1 40350 for lines and 4at 40486 for volumes. I could not find this proof in the literature on projective geometry (where it is either given as an axiom or stated as an unproved fact), but it is similar to Theorem 15 of Veblen, "The Foundations of Geometry" (1911), p. 18, which uses different axioms. This proof was written before I became aware of Veblen's, and it is possible that a shorter proof could be obtained by using Veblen's proof for hints. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
3at.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
3at.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3at.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3at	⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))

Proof of Theorem 3at

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3at.l	. . . 4 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
2		3at.j	. . . 4 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3		3at.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4	1, 2, 3	3atlem7 40362	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
5	4	3expia 1139	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
6		hllat 40236	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
7		simpl 488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
8		simpr1 1213	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
9		eqid 2760	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
10	9, 3	atbase 40162	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
11	8, 10	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
12		simpr2 1214	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)
13	9, 3	atbase 40162	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
14	12, 13	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
15	9, 2	latjcl 18527	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
16	7, 11, 14, 15	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
17		simpr3 1215	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)
18	9, 3	atbase 40162	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
19	17, 18	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
20	9, 2	latjcl 18527	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
21	7, 16, 19, 20	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
22	9, 1	latref 18529	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
23	21, 22	syldan 603	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
24		breq2 5107	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
25	23, 24	syl5ibcom 248	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
26	6, 25	sylan 592	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
27	26	3adant3 1150	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
28	27	adantr 486	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
29	5, 28	impbid 215	1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2955   class class class wbr 5103  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7413  Basecbs 17301  lecple 17349  joincjn 18399  Latclat 18519  Atomscatm 40136  HLchlt 40223

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7736

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-riota 7370  df-ov 7416  df-oprab 7417  df-proset 18382  df-poset 18401  df-plt 18416  df-lub 18432  df-glb 18433  df-join 18434  df-meet 18435  df-p0 18511  df-lat 18520  df-covers 40139  df-ats 40140  df-atl 40171  df-cvlat 40195  df-hlat 40224

This theorem is used by:  llncvrlpln2  40430  2lplnja  40492