Theorem 3at 40641

Description: Any three non-colinear atoms in a (lattice) plane determine the plane uniquely. This is the 2-dimensional analogue of ps-1 40628 for lines and 4at 40764 for volumes. I could not find this proof in the literature on projective geometry (where it is either given as an axiom or stated as an unproved fact), but it is similar to Theorem 15 of Veblen, "The Foundations of Geometry" (1911), p. 18, which uses different axioms. This proof was written before I became aware of Veblen's, and it is possible that a shorter proof could be obtained by using Veblen's proof for hints. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
3at.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
3at.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3at.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3at	⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))

Proof of Theorem 3at

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3at.l	. . . 4 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
2		3at.j	. . . 4 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3		3at.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4	1, 2, 3	3atlem7 40640	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
5	4	3expia 1139	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
6		hllat 40514	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
7		simpl 488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
8		simpr1 1213	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
9		eqid 2760	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
10	9, 3	atbase 40440	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
11	8, 10	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
12		simpr2 1214	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)
13	9, 3	atbase 40440	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
14	12, 13	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
15	9, 2	latjcl 18619	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
16	7, 11, 14, 15	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
17		simpr3 1215	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)
18	9, 3	atbase 40440	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
19	17, 18	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
20	9, 2	latjcl 18619	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
21	7, 16, 19, 20	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
22	9, 1	latref 18621	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ (Base‘𝐾)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
23	21, 22	syldan 603	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
24		breq2 5106	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
25	23, 24	syl5ibcom 248	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
26	6, 25	sylan 592	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
27	26	3adant3 1150	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
28	27	adantr 486	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))
29	5, 28	impbid 215	1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2955   class class class wbr 5102  ‘cfv 6539  (class class class)co 7421  Basecbs 17393  lecple 17441  joincjn 18491  Latclat 18611  Atomscatm 40414  HLchlt 40501

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7752

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6541  df-fn 6542  df-f 6543  df-f1 6544  df-fo 6545  df-f1o 6546  df-fv 6547  df-riota 7378  df-ov 7424  df-oprab 7425  df-proset 18474  df-poset 18493  df-plt 18508  df-lub 18524  df-glb 18525  df-join 18526  df-meet 18527  df-p0 18603  df-lat 18612  df-covers 40417  df-ats 40418  df-atl 40449  df-cvlat 40473  df-hlat 40502

This theorem is used by:  llncvrlpln2  40708  2lplnja  40770