Theorem bdayimaon 27193

Description: Lemma for full-eta properties. The successor of the union of the image of the birthday function under a set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdayimaon	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)

Proof of Theorem bdayimaon

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdayfo 27177	. . . . . 6 ⊢ bday : No –onto→On
2		fofun 6806	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday : No –onto→On → Fun bday )
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Fun bday
4		funimaexg 6634	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Fun bday ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
5	3, 4	mpan 688	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
6	5	uniexd 7731	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
7		imassrn 6070	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ ran bday
8		forn 6808	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday : No –onto→On → ran bday = On)
9	1, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran bday = On
10	7, 9	sseqtri 4018	. . . 4 ⊢ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ On
11		ssorduni 7765	. . . 4 ⊢ (( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ On → Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴))
12	10, 11	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴)
13	6, 12	jctil 520	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V))
14		elon2 6375	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On ↔ (Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V))
15		onsucb 7804	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
16	14, 15	bitr3i 276	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V) ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
17	13, 16	sylib 217	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  Vcvv 3474   ⊆ wss 3948  ∪ cuni 4908  ran crn 5677   “ cima 5679  Ord word 6363  Oncon0 6364  suc csuc 6366  Fun wfun 6537  –onto→wfo 6541   No csur 27140   bday cbday 27142

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5427  ax-un 7724

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-sbc 3778  df-csb 3894  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-pss 3967  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-pw 4604  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-iun 4999  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-tr 5266  df-id 5574  df-eprel 5580  df-po 5588  df-so 5589  df-fr 5631  df-we 5633  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-rn 5687  df-res 5688  df-ima 5689  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-suc 6370  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-1o 8465  df-no 27143  df-bday 27145

This theorem is referenced by:  noetasuplem1  27233  noetainflem1  27237