Theorem bdayimaon 27125

Description: Lemma for full-eta properties. The successor of the union of the image of the birthday function under a set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdayimaon	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)

Proof of Theorem bdayimaon

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdayfo 27109	. . . . . 6 ⊢ bday : No –onto→On
2		fofun 6794	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday : No –onto→On → Fun bday )
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Fun bday
4		funimaexg 6624	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Fun bday ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
5	3, 4	mpan 688	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
6	5	uniexd 7716	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
7		imassrn 6061	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ ran bday
8		forn 6796	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday : No –onto→On → ran bday = On)
9	1, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran bday = On
10	7, 9	sseqtri 4015	. . . 4 ⊢ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ On
11		ssorduni 7750	. . . 4 ⊢ (( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ On → Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴))
12	10, 11	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴)
13	6, 12	jctil 520	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V))
14		elon2 6365	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On ↔ (Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V))
15		onsucb 7789	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
16	14, 15	bitr3i 276	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V) ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
17	13, 16	sylib 217	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  Vcvv 3474   ⊆ wss 3945  ∪ cuni 4902  ran crn 5671   “ cima 5673  Ord word 6353  Oncon0 6354  suc csuc 6356  Fun wfun 6527  –onto→wfo 6531   No csur 27072   bday cbday 27074

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703  ax-rep 5279  ax-sep 5293  ax-nul 5300  ax-pr 5421  ax-un 7709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-sbc 3775  df-csb 3891  df-dif 3948  df-un 3950  df-in 3952  df-ss 3962  df-pss 3964  df-nul 4320  df-if 4524  df-pw 4599  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-uni 4903  df-iun 4993  df-br 5143  df-opab 5205  df-mpt 5226  df-tr 5260  df-id 5568  df-eprel 5574  df-po 5582  df-so 5583  df-fr 5625  df-we 5627  df-xp 5676  df-rel 5677  df-cnv 5678  df-co 5679  df-dm 5680  df-rn 5681  df-res 5682  df-ima 5683  df-ord 6357  df-on 6358  df-suc 6360  df-iota 6485  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-1o 8450  df-no 27075  df-bday 27077

This theorem is referenced by:  noetasuplem1  27165  noetainflem1  27169