Theorem bdayimaon 27654

Description: Lemma for full-eta properties. The successor of the union of the image of the birthday function under a set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdayimaon	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)

Proof of Theorem bdayimaon

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdayfo 27638	. . . . . 6 ⊢ bday : No –onto→On
2		fofun 6817	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday : No –onto→On → Fun bday )
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Fun bday
4		funimaexg 6644	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Fun bday ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
5	3, 4	mpan 688	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
6	5	uniexd 7755	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
7		imassrn 6079	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ ran bday
8		forn 6819	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday : No –onto→On → ran bday = On)
9	1, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran bday = On
10	7, 9	sseqtri 4018	. . . 4 ⊢ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ On
11		ssorduni 7789	. . . 4 ⊢ (( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ On → Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴))
12	10, 11	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴)
13	6, 12	jctil 518	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V))
14		elon2 6385	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On ↔ (Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V))
15		onsucb 7828	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
16	14, 15	bitr3i 276	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V) ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
17	13, 16	sylib 217	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  Vcvv 3473   ⊆ wss 3949  ∪ cuni 4912  ran crn 5683   “ cima 5685  Ord word 6373  Oncon0 6374  suc csuc 6376  Fun wfun 6547  –onto→wfo 6551   No csur 27601   bday cbday 27603

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2699  ax-rep 5289  ax-sep 5303  ax-nul 5310  ax-pr 5433  ax-un 7748

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2529  df-eu 2558  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-reu 3375  df-rab 3431  df-v 3475  df-sbc 3779  df-csb 3895  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-pss 3968  df-nul 4327  df-if 4533  df-pw 4608  df-sn 4633  df-pr 4635  df-op 4639  df-uni 4913  df-iun 5002  df-br 5153  df-opab 5215  df-mpt 5236  df-tr 5270  df-id 5580  df-eprel 5586  df-po 5594  df-so 5595  df-fr 5637  df-we 5639  df-xp 5688  df-rel 5689  df-cnv 5690  df-co 5691  df-dm 5692  df-rn 5693  df-res 5694  df-ima 5695  df-ord 6377  df-on 6378  df-suc 6380  df-iota 6505  df-fun 6555  df-fn 6556  df-f 6557  df-f1 6558  df-fo 6559  df-f1o 6560  df-fv 6561  df-1o 8495  df-no 27604  df-bday 27606

This theorem is referenced by:  noetasuplem1  27694  noetainflem1  27698