Theorem bdayimaon 27581

Description: Lemma for full-eta properties. The successor of the union of the image of the birthday function under a set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdayimaon	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)

Proof of Theorem bdayimaon

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdayfo 27565	. . . . . 6 ⊢ bday : No –onto→On
2		fofun 6800	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday : No –onto→On → Fun bday )
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Fun bday
4		funimaexg 6628	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Fun bday ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
5	3, 4	mpan 687	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
6	5	uniexd 7729	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
7		imassrn 6064	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ ran bday
8		forn 6802	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday : No –onto→On → ran bday = On)
9	1, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran bday = On
10	7, 9	sseqtri 4013	. . . 4 ⊢ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ On
11		ssorduni 7763	. . . 4 ⊢ (( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ On → Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴))
12	10, 11	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴)
13	6, 12	jctil 519	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V))
14		elon2 6369	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On ↔ (Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V))
15		onsucb 7802	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
16	14, 15	bitr3i 277	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ V) ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
17	13, 16	sylib 217	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  Vcvv 3468   ⊆ wss 3943  ∪ cuni 4902  ran crn 5670   “ cima 5672  Ord word 6357  Oncon0 6358  suc csuc 6360  Fun wfun 6531  –onto→wfo 6535   No csur 27528   bday cbday 27530

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2697  ax-rep 5278  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pr 5420  ax-un 7722

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065  df-reu 3371  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-sbc 3773  df-csb 3889  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-pss 3962  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-pw 4599  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-uni 4903  df-iun 4992  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-mpt 5225  df-tr 5259  df-id 5567  df-eprel 5573  df-po 5581  df-so 5582  df-fr 5624  df-we 5626  df-xp 5675  df-rel 5676  df-cnv 5677  df-co 5678  df-dm 5679  df-rn 5680  df-res 5681  df-ima 5682  df-ord 6361  df-on 6362  df-suc 6364  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-1o 8467  df-no 27531  df-bday 27533

This theorem is referenced by:  noetasuplem1  27621  noetainflem1  27625