P. 277 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27601-27700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ostth3 27601*	- Lemma for ostth 27602: p-adic case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ¬ 1 < (𝐹‘𝑛))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑃) < 1)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = -((log‘(𝐹‘𝑃)) / (log‘𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = if((𝐹‘𝑃) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑝), (𝐹‘𝑝), (𝐹‘𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ+ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℚ ↦ (((𝐽‘𝑃)‘𝑦)↑𝑐𝑎)))
Theorem	ostth 27602*	Ostrowski's theorem, which classifies all absolute values on ℚ. Any such absolute value must either be the trivial absolute value 𝐾, a constant exponent 0 < 𝑎 ≤ 1 times the regular absolute value, or a positive exponent times the p-adic absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, (𝑞↑-(𝑞 pCnt 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ ℚ ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, 0, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹 = 𝐾 ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ (0(,]1)𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℚ ↦ ((abs‘𝑦)↑𝑐𝑎)) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑔 ∈ ran 𝐽 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℚ ↦ ((𝑔‘𝑦)↑𝑐𝑎))))
PART 15  SURREAL NUMBERS
15.1  Sign sequence representation and Alling's axioms The surreal numbers can be represented in several equivalent ways. In [Alling], Norman Alling made this notion explicit by giving a set of axioms that all representations admit, then proving that there is an order and birthday preserving bijection between any systems that satisfy these axioms. In this section, we start with the definition of surreal numbers given in [Gonshor] and derive Alling's axioms. After deriving them we no longer refer to the explicit definition of surreals. In particular, we never take advantage of the fact that the empty set is a surreal number under our definition.
15.1.1  Definitions and initial properties
Syntax	csur 27603	Declare the class of all surreal numbers (see df-no 27606).
class No
Syntax	clts 27604	Declare the less-than relation over surreal numbers (see df-lts 27607).
class <s
Syntax	cbday 27605	Declare the birthday function for surreal numbers (see df-bday 27608).
class bday
Definition	df-no 27606*	Define the class of surreal numbers. The surreal numbers are a proper class of numbers developed by John H. Conway and introduced by Donald Knuth in 1975. They form a proper class into which all ordered fields can be embedded. The approach we take to defining them was first introduced by Hary Gonshor, and is based on the conception of a "sign expansion" of a surreal number. We define the surreals as ordinal-indexed sequences of 1o and 2o, analogous to Gonshor's ( − ) and ( + ). After introducing this definition, we will abstract away from it using axioms that Norman Alling developed in "Foundations of Analysis over Surreal Number Fields." This is done in an effort to be agnostic towards the exact implementation of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ No = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑎⟶{1o, 2o}}
Definition	df-lts 27607*	Next, we introduce surreal less-than, a comparison relation over the surreals by lexicographically ordering them. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ <s = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ No ∧ 𝑔 ∈ No ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝑔‘𝑥)))}
Definition	df-bday 27608	Finally, we introduce the birthday function. This function maps each surreal to an ordinal. In our implementation, this is the domain of the sign function. The important properties of this function are established later. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.)
⊢ bday = (𝑥 ∈ No ↦ dom 𝑥)
Theorem	elno 27609*	Membership in the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by SF, 14-Apr-2012.) Avoid ax-rep 5213. (Revised by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴:𝑥⟶{1o, 2o})
Theorem	elnoOLD 27610*	Obsolete version of elno 27609 as of 5-Jun-2025. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴:𝑥⟶{1o, 2o})
Theorem	ltsval 27611*	The value of the surreal less-than relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐴‘𝑦) = (𝐵‘𝑦) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑥){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝐵‘𝑥))))
Theorem	bdayval 27612	The value of the birthday function within the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( bday ‘𝐴) = dom 𝐴)
Theorem	nofun 27613	A surreal is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Fun 𝐴)
Theorem	nodmon 27614	The domain of a surreal is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → dom 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	norn 27615	The range of a surreal is a subset of the surreal signs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ran 𝐴 ⊆ {1o, 2o})
Theorem	nofnbday 27616	A surreal is a function over its birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝐴 Fn ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	nodmord 27617	The domain of a surreal has the ordinal property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Ord dom 𝐴)
Theorem	elno2 27618	An alternative condition for membership in No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Mar-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ran 𝐴 ⊆ {1o, 2o}))
Theorem	elno3 27619	Another condition for membership in No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ (𝐴:dom 𝐴⟶{1o, 2o} ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ On))
Theorem	ltsval2 27620*	Alternate expression for surreal less-than. Two surreals obey surreal less-than iff they obey the sign ordering at the first place they differ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝐵‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)})))
Theorem	nofv 27621	The function value of a surreal is either a sign or the empty set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ((𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅ ∨ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o ∨ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o))
Theorem	nosgnn0 27622	∅ is not a surreal sign. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {1o, 2o}
Theorem	nosgnn0i 27623	If 𝑋 is a surreal sign, then it is not null. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ ∅ ≠ 𝑋
Theorem	noreson 27624	The restriction of a surreal to an ordinal is still a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	ltsintdifex 27625*	If 𝐴 <s 𝐵, then the intersection of all the ordinals that have differing signs in 𝐴 and 𝐵 exists. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ V))
Theorem	ltsres 27626	If the restrictions of two surreals to a given ordinal obey surreal less-than, then so do the two surreals themselves. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) <s (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
Theorem	noxp1o 27627	The Cartesian product of an ordinal and {1o} is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 × {1o}) ∈ No )
Theorem	noseponlem 27628*	Lemma for nosepon 27629. Consider a case of proper subset domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐴‘𝑥) = (𝐵‘𝑥))
Theorem	nosepon 27629*	Given two unequal surreals, the minimal ordinal at which they differ is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ On)
Theorem	noextend 27630	Extending a surreal by one sign value results in a new surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 𝑋⟩}) ∈ No )
Theorem	noextendseq 27631	Extend a surreal by a sequence of ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∪ ((𝐵 ∖ dom 𝐴) × {𝑋})) ∈ No )
Theorem	noextenddif 27632*	Calculate the place where a surreal and its extension differ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ ((𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 𝑋⟩})‘𝑥)} = dom 𝐴)
Theorem	noextendlt 27633	Extending a surreal with a negative sign results in a smaller surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 1o⟩}) <s 𝐴)
Theorem	noextendgt 27634	Extending a surreal with a positive sign results in a bigger surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝐴 <s (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 2o⟩}))
Theorem	nolesgn2o 27635	Given 𝐴 less-than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 2o, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o) ∧ ¬ 𝐵 <s 𝐴) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 2o)
Theorem	nolesgn2ores 27636	Given 𝐴 less-than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 2o, then (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o) ∧ ¬ 𝐵 <s 𝐴) → (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋))
Theorem	nogesgn1o 27637	Given 𝐴 greater than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 1o)
Theorem	nogesgn1ores 27638	Given 𝐴 greater than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o, then (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋))
15.1.2  Ordering
Theorem	ltssolem1 27639	Lemma for ltsso 27640. The "sign expansion" binary relation totally orders the surreal signs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ {⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} Or ({1o, 2o} ∪ {∅})
Theorem	ltsso 27640	Less-than totally orders the surreals. Axiom O of [Alling] p. 184. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ <s Or No
15.1.3  Birthday Function
Theorem	bdayfo 27641	The birthday function maps the surreals onto the ordinals. Axiom B of [Alling] p. 184. (Proof shortened on 14-Apr-2012 by SF). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.)
⊢ bday : No –onto→On
15.1.4  Density
Theorem	fvnobday 27642	The value of a surreal at its birthday is ∅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by SF, 14-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴‘( bday ‘𝐴)) = ∅)
Theorem	nosepnelem 27643*	Lemma for nosepne 27644. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) ≠ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	nosepne 27644*	The value of two non-equal surreals at the first place they differ is different. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) ≠ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	nosep1o 27645*	If the value of a surreal at a separator is 1o then the surreal is lesser. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) = 1o) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
Theorem	nosep2o 27646*	If the value of a surreal at a separator is 2o then the surreal is greater. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐵‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐴‘𝑥)}) = 2o) → 𝐵 <s 𝐴)
Theorem	nosepdmlem 27647*	Lemma for nosepdm 27648. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∪ dom 𝐵))
Theorem	nosepdm 27648*	The first place two surreals differ is an element of the larger of their domains. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∪ dom 𝐵))
Theorem	nosepeq 27649*	The values of two surreals at a point less than their separators are equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) → (𝐴‘𝑋) = (𝐵‘𝑋))
Theorem	nosepssdm 27650*	Given two non-equal surreals, their separator is less-than or equal to the domain of one of them. Part of Lemma 2.1.1 of [Lipparini] p. 3. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ⊆ dom 𝐴)
Theorem	nodenselem4 27651*	Lemma for nodense 27656. Show that a particular abstraction is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ On)
Theorem	nodenselem5 27652*	Lemma for nodense 27656. If the birthdays of two distinct surreals are equal, then the ordinal from nodenselem4 27651 is an element of that birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	nodenselem6 27653*	The restriction of a surreal to the abstraction from nodenselem4 27651 is still a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ↾ ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) ∈ No )
Theorem	nodenselem7 27654*	Lemma for nodense 27656. 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equal at all elements of the abstraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → (𝐶 ∈ ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} → (𝐴‘𝐶) = (𝐵‘𝐶)))
Theorem	nodenselem8 27655*	Lemma for nodense 27656. Give a condition for surreal less-than when two surreals have the same birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) = 1o ∧ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) = 2o)))
Theorem	nodense 27656*	Given two distinct surreals with the same birthday, there is an older surreal lying between the two of them. Axiom SD of [Alling] p. 184. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (( bday ‘𝑥) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 <s 𝐵))
15.1.5  Full-Eta Property The theorems in this section are derived from "A clean way to separate sets of surreals" by Paolo Lipparini, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.03500.
Theorem	bdayimaon 27657	Lemma for full-eta properties. The successor of the union of the image of the birthday function under a set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
Theorem	nolt02olem 27658	Lemma for nolt02o 27659. If 𝐴(𝑋) is undefined with 𝐴 surreal and 𝑋 ordinal, then dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅) → dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	nolt02o 27659	Given 𝐴 less-than 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and undefined at 𝑋, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 2o)
Theorem	nogt01o 27660	Given 𝐴 greater than 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐵(𝑋) undefined, then 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) ∧ (𝐵‘𝑋) = ∅) → (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o)
Theorem	noresle 27661*	Restriction law for surreals. Lemma 2.1.4 of [Lipparini] p. 3. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ No ∧ 𝑆 ∈ No ) ∧ (dom 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝑆 ↾ suc 𝑔) <s (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝑔))) → ¬ 𝑆 <s 𝑈)
Theorem	nomaxmo 27662*	A class of surreals has at most one maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦)
Theorem	nominmo 27663*	A class of surreals has at most one minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥)
Theorem	nosupprefixmo 27664*	In any class of surreals, there is at most one value of the prefix property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝐺) = 𝑥))
Theorem	noinfprefixmo 27665*	In any class of surreals, there is at most one value of the prefix property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝐺) = 𝑥))
Theorem	nosupcbv 27666*	Lemma to change bound variables in a surreal supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏), 2o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑑 ∈ dom 𝑒 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑒 → (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑑) = (𝑓 ↾ suc 𝑑)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑒 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑒 → (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑓 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑒‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
Theorem	nosupno 27667*	The next several theorems deal with a surreal "supremum". This surreal will ultimately be shown to bound 𝐴 below and bound the restriction of any surreal above. We begin by showing that the given expression actually defines a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ No )
Theorem	nosupdm 27668*	The domain of the surreal supremum when there is no maximum. The primary point of this theorem is to change bound variable. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 → dom 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑞 <s 𝑝 → (𝑝 ↾ suc 𝑧) = (𝑞 ↾ suc 𝑧)))})
Theorem	nosupbday 27669*	Birthday bounding law for surreal supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ( bday ‘𝑆) ⊆ 𝑂)
Theorem	nosupfv 27670*	The value of surreal supremum when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑈 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑆‘𝐺) = (𝑈‘𝐺))
Theorem	nosupres 27671*	A restriction law for surreal supremum when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑈 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑆 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺))
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem1 27672*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27678. Establish a soft upper bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑆 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆))
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem2 27673*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27678. When there is no maximum, if any member of 𝐴 is a prolongment of 𝑆, then so are all elements of 𝐴 above it. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑊 <s 𝑈))) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem3 27674*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27678. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ 2o)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem4 27675*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27678. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not undefined. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem5 27676*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27678. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ 1o)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem6 27677*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27678. Establish a hard upper bound when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd1 27678*	Bounding law from below for the surreal supremum. Proposition 4.2 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd2lem1 27679*	Bounding law from above when a set of surreals has a maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑦) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑍) → ¬ (𝑍 ↾ suc dom 𝑈) <s (𝑈 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑈, 2o⟩}))
Theorem	nosupbnd2 27680*	Bounding law from above for the surreal supremum. Proposition 4.3 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑍 ↔ ¬ (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆))
Theorem	noinfcbv 27681*	Change bound variables for surreal infimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎), 1o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑏) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑏)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑑‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
Theorem	noinfno 27682*	The next several theorems deal with a surreal "infimum". This surreal will ultimately be shown to bound 𝐵 above and bound the restriction of any surreal below. We begin by showing that the given expression actually defines a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑇 ∈ No )
Theorem	noinfdm 27683*	Next, we calculate the domain of 𝑇. This is mostly to change bound variables. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 → dom 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑝 <s 𝑞 → (𝑝 ↾ suc 𝑧) = (𝑞 ↾ suc 𝑧)))})
Theorem	noinfbday 27684*	Birthday bounding law for surreal infimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ( bday ‘𝑇) ⊆ 𝑂)
Theorem	noinffv 27685*	The value of surreal infimum when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑣 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑇‘𝐺) = (𝑈‘𝐺))
Theorem	noinfres 27686*	The restriction of surreal infimum when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑣 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑇 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺))
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem1 27687*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27693. Establish a soft lower bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) <s 𝑇)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem2 27688*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27693. When there is no minimum, if any member of 𝐵 is a prolongment of 𝑇, then so are all elements below it. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑊))) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem3 27689*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27693. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ 1o)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem4 27690*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27693. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not undefined. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem5 27691*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27693. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ 2o)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem6 27692*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27693. Establish a hard lower bound when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑇 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇))
Theorem	noinfbnd1 27693*	Bounding law from above for the surreal infimum. Analagous to proposition 4.2 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑇 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇))
Theorem	noinfbnd2lem1 27694*	Bounding law from below when a set of surreals has a minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑈) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏) → ¬ (𝑈 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑈, 1o⟩}) <s (𝑍 ↾ suc dom 𝑈))
Theorem	noinfbnd2 27695*	Bounding law from below for the surreal infimum. Analagous to proposition 4.3 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏 ↔ ¬ 𝑇 <s (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑇)))
Theorem	nosupinfsep 27696*	Given two sets of surreals, a surreal 𝑊 separates them iff its restriction to the maximum of dom 𝑆 and dom 𝑇 separates them. Corollary 4.4 of [Lipparini] p. 7. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ No ) → ((∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑊 <s 𝑏) ↔ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s (𝑊 ↾ (dom 𝑆 ∪ dom 𝑇)) ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑊 ↾ (dom 𝑆 ∪ dom 𝑇)) <s 𝑏)))
Theorem	noetasuplem1 27697*	Lemma for noeta 27707. Establish that our final surreal really is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑍 ∈ No )
Theorem	noetasuplem2 27698*	Lemma for noeta 27707. The restriction of 𝑍 to dom 𝑆 is 𝑆. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)
Theorem	noetasuplem3 27699*	Lemma for noeta 27707. 𝑍 is an upper bound for 𝐴. Part of Theorem 5.1 of [Lipparini] p. 7-8. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑋 <s 𝑍)
Theorem	noetasuplem4 27700*	Lemma for noeta 27707. When 𝐴 and 𝐵 are separated, then 𝑍 is a lower bound for 𝐵. Part of Theorem 5.1 of [Lipparini] p. 7-8. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎 <s 𝑏) → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏)