P. 277 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27601-27700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
PART 15  SURREAL NUMBERS
15.1  Sign sequence representation and Alling's axioms The surreal numbers can be represented in several equivalent ways. In [Alling], Norman Alling made this notion explicit by giving a set of axioms that all representations admit, then proving that there is an order and birthday preserving bijection between any systems that satisfy these axioms. In this section, we start with the definition of surreal numbers given in [Gonshor] and derive Alling's axioms. After deriving them we no longer refer to the explicit definition of surreals. In particular, we never take advantage of the fact that the empty set is a surreal number under our definition.
15.1.1  Definitions and initial properties
Syntax	csur 27601	Declare the class of all surreal numbers (see df-no 27604).
class No
Syntax	cslt 27602	Declare the less-than relation over surreal numbers (see df-slt 27605).
class <s
Syntax	cbday 27603	Declare the birthday function for surreal numbers (see df-bday 27606).
class bday
Definition	df-no 27604*	Define the class of surreal numbers. The surreal numbers are a proper class of numbers developed by John H. Conway and introduced by Donald Knuth in 1975. They form a proper class into which all ordered fields can be embedded. The approach we take to defining them was first introduced by Hary Gonshor, and is based on the conception of a "sign expansion" of a surreal number. We define the surreals as ordinal-indexed sequences of 1o and 2o, analogous to Gonshor's ( − ) and ( + ). After introducing this definition, we will abstract away from it using axioms that Norman Alling developed in "Foundations of Analysis over Surreal Number Fields." This is done in an effort to be agnostic towards the exact implementation of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ No = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑎⟶{1o, 2o}}
Definition	df-slt 27605*	Next, we introduce surreal less-than, a comparison relation over the surreals by lexicographically ordering them. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ <s = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ No ∧ 𝑔 ∈ No ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝑔‘𝑥)))}
Definition	df-bday 27606	Finally, we introduce the birthday function. This function maps each surreal to an ordinal. In our implementation, this is the domain of the sign function. The important properties of this function are established later. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.)
⊢ bday = (𝑥 ∈ No ↦ dom 𝑥)
Theorem	elno 27607*	Membership in the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by SF, 14-Apr-2012.) Avoid ax-rep 5249. (Revised by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴:𝑥⟶{1o, 2o})
Theorem	elnoOLD 27608*	Obsolete version of elno 27607 as of 5-Jun-2025. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴:𝑥⟶{1o, 2o})
Theorem	sltval 27609*	The value of the surreal less-than relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐴‘𝑦) = (𝐵‘𝑦) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑥){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝐵‘𝑥))))
Theorem	bdayval 27610	The value of the birthday function within the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( bday ‘𝐴) = dom 𝐴)
Theorem	nofun 27611	A surreal is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Fun 𝐴)
Theorem	nodmon 27612	The domain of a surreal is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → dom 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	norn 27613	The range of a surreal is a subset of the surreal signs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ran 𝐴 ⊆ {1o, 2o})
Theorem	nofnbday 27614	A surreal is a function over its birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝐴 Fn ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	nodmord 27615	The domain of a surreal has the ordinal property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Ord dom 𝐴)
Theorem	elno2 27616	An alternative condition for membership in No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Mar-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ran 𝐴 ⊆ {1o, 2o}))
Theorem	elno3 27617	Another condition for membership in No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ (𝐴:dom 𝐴⟶{1o, 2o} ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ On))
Theorem	sltval2 27618*	Alternate expression for surreal less-than. Two surreals obey surreal less-than iff they obey the sign ordering at the first place they differ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝐵‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)})))
Theorem	nofv 27619	The function value of a surreal is either a sign or the empty set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ((𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅ ∨ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o ∨ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o))
Theorem	nosgnn0 27620	∅ is not a surreal sign. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {1o, 2o}
Theorem	nosgnn0i 27621	If 𝑋 is a surreal sign, then it is not null. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ ∅ ≠ 𝑋
Theorem	noreson 27622	The restriction of a surreal to an ordinal is still a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	sltintdifex 27623*	If 𝐴 <s 𝐵, then the intersection of all the ordinals that have differing signs in 𝐴 and 𝐵 exists. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ V))
Theorem	sltres 27624	If the restrictions of two surreals to a given ordinal obey surreal less-than, then so do the two surreals themselves. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) <s (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
Theorem	noxp1o 27625	The Cartesian product of an ordinal and {1o} is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 × {1o}) ∈ No )
Theorem	noseponlem 27626*	Lemma for nosepon 27627. Consider a case of proper subset domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐴‘𝑥) = (𝐵‘𝑥))
Theorem	nosepon 27627*	Given two unequal surreals, the minimal ordinal at which they differ is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ On)
Theorem	noextend 27628	Extending a surreal by one sign value results in a new surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 𝑋⟩}) ∈ No )
Theorem	noextendseq 27629	Extend a surreal by a sequence of ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∪ ((𝐵 ∖ dom 𝐴) × {𝑋})) ∈ No )
Theorem	noextenddif 27630*	Calculate the place where a surreal and its extension differ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ ((𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 𝑋⟩})‘𝑥)} = dom 𝐴)
Theorem	noextendlt 27631	Extending a surreal with a negative sign results in a smaller surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 1o⟩}) <s 𝐴)
Theorem	noextendgt 27632	Extending a surreal with a positive sign results in a bigger surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝐴 <s (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 2o⟩}))
Theorem	nolesgn2o 27633	Given 𝐴 less-than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 2o, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o) ∧ ¬ 𝐵 <s 𝐴) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 2o)
Theorem	nolesgn2ores 27634	Given 𝐴 less-than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 2o, then (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o) ∧ ¬ 𝐵 <s 𝐴) → (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋))
Theorem	nogesgn1o 27635	Given 𝐴 greater than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 1o)
Theorem	nogesgn1ores 27636	Given 𝐴 greater than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o, then (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋))
15.1.2  Ordering
Theorem	sltsolem1 27637	Lemma for sltso 27638. The "sign expansion" binary relation totally orders the surreal signs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ {⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} Or ({1o, 2o} ∪ {∅})
Theorem	sltso 27638	Less-than totally orders the surreals. Axiom O of [Alling] p. 184. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ <s Or No
15.1.3  Birthday Function
Theorem	bdayfo 27639	The birthday function maps the surreals onto the ordinals. Axiom B of [Alling] p. 184. (Proof shortened on 14-Apr-2012 by SF). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.)
⊢ bday : No –onto→On
15.1.4  Density
Theorem	fvnobday 27640	The value of a surreal at its birthday is ∅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by SF, 14-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴‘( bday ‘𝐴)) = ∅)
Theorem	nosepnelem 27641*	Lemma for nosepne 27642. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) ≠ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	nosepne 27642*	The value of two non-equal surreals at the first place they differ is different. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) ≠ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	nosep1o 27643*	If the value of a surreal at a separator is 1o then the surreal is lesser. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) = 1o) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
Theorem	nosep2o 27644*	If the value of a surreal at a separator is 2o then the surreal is greater. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐵‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐴‘𝑥)}) = 2o) → 𝐵 <s 𝐴)
Theorem	nosepdmlem 27645*	Lemma for nosepdm 27646. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∪ dom 𝐵))
Theorem	nosepdm 27646*	The first place two surreals differ is an element of the larger of their domains. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∪ dom 𝐵))
Theorem	nosepeq 27647*	The values of two surreals at a point less than their separators are equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) → (𝐴‘𝑋) = (𝐵‘𝑋))
Theorem	nosepssdm 27648*	Given two non-equal surreals, their separator is less-than or equal to the domain of one of them. Part of Lemma 2.1.1 of [Lipparini] p. 3. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ⊆ dom 𝐴)
Theorem	nodenselem4 27649*	Lemma for nodense 27654. Show that a particular abstraction is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ On)
Theorem	nodenselem5 27650*	Lemma for nodense 27654. If the birthdays of two distinct surreals are equal, then the ordinal from nodenselem4 27649 is an element of that birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	nodenselem6 27651*	The restriction of a surreal to the abstraction from nodenselem4 27649 is still a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ↾ ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) ∈ No )
Theorem	nodenselem7 27652*	Lemma for nodense 27654. 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equal at all elements of the abstraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → (𝐶 ∈ ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} → (𝐴‘𝐶) = (𝐵‘𝐶)))
Theorem	nodenselem8 27653*	Lemma for nodense 27654. Give a condition for surreal less-than when two surreals have the same birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) = 1o ∧ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) = 2o)))
Theorem	nodense 27654*	Given two distinct surreals with the same birthday, there is an older surreal lying between the two of them. Axiom SD of [Alling] p. 184. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (( bday ‘𝑥) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 <s 𝐵))
15.1.5  Full-Eta Property The theorems in this section are derived from "A clean way to separate sets of surreals" by Paolo Lipparini, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.03500.
Theorem	bdayimaon 27655	Lemma for full-eta properties. The successor of the union of the image of the birthday function under a set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
Theorem	nolt02olem 27656	Lemma for nolt02o 27657. If 𝐴(𝑋) is undefined with 𝐴 surreal and 𝑋 ordinal, then dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅) → dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	nolt02o 27657	Given 𝐴 less-than 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and undefined at 𝑋, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 2o)
Theorem	nogt01o 27658	Given 𝐴 greater than 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐵(𝑋) undefined, then 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) ∧ (𝐵‘𝑋) = ∅) → (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o)
Theorem	noresle 27659*	Restriction law for surreals. Lemma 2.1.4 of [Lipparini] p. 3. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ No ∧ 𝑆 ∈ No ) ∧ (dom 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝑆 ↾ suc 𝑔) <s (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝑔))) → ¬ 𝑆 <s 𝑈)
Theorem	nomaxmo 27660*	A class of surreals has at most one maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦)
Theorem	nominmo 27661*	A class of surreals has at most one minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥)
Theorem	nosupprefixmo 27662*	In any class of surreals, there is at most one value of the prefix property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝐺) = 𝑥))
Theorem	noinfprefixmo 27663*	In any class of surreals, there is at most one value of the prefix property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝐺) = 𝑥))
Theorem	nosupcbv 27664*	Lemma to change bound variables in a surreal supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏), 2o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑑 ∈ dom 𝑒 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑒 → (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑑) = (𝑓 ↾ suc 𝑑)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑒 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑒 → (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑓 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑒‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
Theorem	nosupno 27665*	The next several theorems deal with a surreal "supremum". This surreal will ultimately be shown to bound 𝐴 below and bound the restriction of any surreal above. We begin by showing that the given expression actually defines a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ No )
Theorem	nosupdm 27666*	The domain of the surreal supremum when there is no maximum. The primary point of this theorem is to change bound variable. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 → dom 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑞 <s 𝑝 → (𝑝 ↾ suc 𝑧) = (𝑞 ↾ suc 𝑧)))})
Theorem	nosupbday 27667*	Birthday bounding law for surreal supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ( bday ‘𝑆) ⊆ 𝑂)
Theorem	nosupfv 27668*	The value of surreal supremum when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑈 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑆‘𝐺) = (𝑈‘𝐺))
Theorem	nosupres 27669*	A restriction law for surreal supremum when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑈 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑆 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺))
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem1 27670*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27676. Establish a soft upper bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑆 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆))
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem2 27671*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27676. When there is no maximum, if any member of 𝐴 is a prolongment of 𝑆, then so are all elements of 𝐴 above it. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑊 <s 𝑈))) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem3 27672*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27676. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ 2o)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem4 27673*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27676. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not undefined. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem5 27674*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27676. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ 1o)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem6 27675*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27676. Establish a hard upper bound when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd1 27676*	Bounding law from below for the surreal supremum. Proposition 4.2 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd2lem1 27677*	Bounding law from above when a set of surreals has a maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑦) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑍) → ¬ (𝑍 ↾ suc dom 𝑈) <s (𝑈 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑈, 2o⟩}))
Theorem	nosupbnd2 27678*	Bounding law from above for the surreal supremum. Proposition 4.3 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑍 ↔ ¬ (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆))
Theorem	noinfcbv 27679*	Change bound variables for surreal infimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎), 1o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑏) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑏)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑑‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
Theorem	noinfno 27680*	The next several theorems deal with a surreal "infimum". This surreal will ultimately be shown to bound 𝐵 above and bound the restriction of any surreal below. We begin by showing that the given expression actually defines a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑇 ∈ No )
Theorem	noinfdm 27681*	Next, we calculate the domain of 𝑇. This is mostly to change bound variables. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 → dom 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑝 <s 𝑞 → (𝑝 ↾ suc 𝑧) = (𝑞 ↾ suc 𝑧)))})
Theorem	noinfbday 27682*	Birthday bounding law for surreal infimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ( bday ‘𝑇) ⊆ 𝑂)
Theorem	noinffv 27683*	The value of surreal infimum when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑣 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑇‘𝐺) = (𝑈‘𝐺))
Theorem	noinfres 27684*	The restriction of surreal infimum when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑣 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑇 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺))
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem1 27685*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27691. Establish a soft lower bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) <s 𝑇)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem2 27686*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27691. When there is no minimum, if any member of 𝐵 is a prolongment of 𝑇, then so are all elements below it. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑊))) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem3 27687*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27691. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ 1o)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem4 27688*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27691. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not undefined. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem5 27689*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27691. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ 2o)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem6 27690*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27691. Establish a hard lower bound when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑇 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇))
Theorem	noinfbnd1 27691*	Bounding law from above for the surreal infimum. Analagous to proposition 4.2 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑇 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇))
Theorem	noinfbnd2lem1 27692*	Bounding law from below when a set of surreals has a minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑈) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏) → ¬ (𝑈 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑈, 1o⟩}) <s (𝑍 ↾ suc dom 𝑈))
Theorem	noinfbnd2 27693*	Bounding law from below for the surreal infimum. Analagous to proposition 4.3 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏 ↔ ¬ 𝑇 <s (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑇)))
Theorem	nosupinfsep 27694*	Given two sets of surreals, a surreal 𝑊 separates them iff its restriction to the maximum of dom 𝑆 and dom 𝑇 separates them. Corollary 4.4 of [Lipparini] p. 7. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ No ) → ((∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑊 <s 𝑏) ↔ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s (𝑊 ↾ (dom 𝑆 ∪ dom 𝑇)) ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑊 ↾ (dom 𝑆 ∪ dom 𝑇)) <s 𝑏)))
Theorem	noetasuplem1 27695*	Lemma for noeta 27705. Establish that our final surreal really is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑍 ∈ No )
Theorem	noetasuplem2 27696*	Lemma for noeta 27705. The restriction of 𝑍 to dom 𝑆 is 𝑆. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)
Theorem	noetasuplem3 27697*	Lemma for noeta 27705. 𝑍 is an upper bound for 𝐴. Part of Theorem 5.1 of [Lipparini] p. 7-8. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑋 <s 𝑍)
Theorem	noetasuplem4 27698*	Lemma for noeta 27705. When 𝐴 and 𝐵 are separated, then 𝑍 is a lower bound for 𝐵. Part of Theorem 5.1 of [Lipparini] p. 7-8. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎 <s 𝑏) → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏)
Theorem	noetainflem1 27699*	Lemma for noeta 27705. Establish that this particular construction gives a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑇 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∖ dom 𝑇) × {2o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑊 ∈ No )
Theorem	noetainflem2 27700*	Lemma for noeta 27705. The restriction of 𝑊 to the domain of 𝑇 is 𝑇. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑇 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∖ dom 𝑇) × {2o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)