Theorem dmnnzd 39010

Description: Obsolete theorem, use idomnzd 49443 instead. A domain has no zero-divisors (besides zero). (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dmnnzd.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
dmnnzd.2	⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅)
dmnnzd.3	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
dmnnzd.4	⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmnnzd	⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Dmn ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) = 𝑍)) → (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝑍))

Proof of Theorem dmnnzd

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmnnzd.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
2		dmnnzd.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅)
3		dmnnzd.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4		dmnnzd.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑍 = (GId‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2760	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GId‘𝐻) = (GId‘𝐻)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	isdmn3 39009	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ CRingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑎𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍 → (𝑎 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍))))
7	6	simp3bi 1165	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑎𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍 → (𝑎 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍)))
8		oveq1 7427	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑎𝐻𝑏) = (𝐴𝐻𝑏))
9	8	eqeq1d 2762	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑎𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍 ↔ (𝐴𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍))
10		eqeq1 2764	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑎 = 𝑍 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝑍))
11	10	orbi1d 930	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑎 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍)))
12	9, 11	imbi12d 347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (((𝑎𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍 → (𝑎 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍)) ↔ ((𝐴𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍 → (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍))))
13		oveq2 7428	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐻𝑏) = (𝐴𝐻𝐵))
14	13	eqeq1d 2762	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍 ↔ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) = 𝑍))
15		eqeq1 2764	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → (𝑏 = 𝑍 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝑍))
16	15	orbi2d 929	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝑍)))
17	14, 16	imbi12d 347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍 → (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍)) ↔ ((𝐴𝐻𝐵) = 𝑍 → (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝑍))))
18	12, 17	rspc2v 3586	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑎𝐻𝑏) = 𝑍 → (𝑎 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑍)) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵) = 𝑍 → (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝑍))))
19	7, 18	syl5com 32	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵) = 𝑍 → (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝑍))))
20	19	expd 421	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Dmn → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵) = 𝑍 → (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝑍)))))
21	20	3imp2 1368	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Dmn ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) = 𝑍)) → (𝐴 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝑍))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2955  ∀wral 3076  ran crn 5651  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7420  1^st c1st 7999  2^nd c2nd 8000  GIdcgi 31092  CRingOpsccring 38928  Dmncdmn 38982

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7751

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-int 4907  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-riota 7377  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-1st 8001  df-2nd 8002  df-1o 8476  df-en 8974  df-grpo 31095  df-gid 31096  df-ginv 31097  df-ablo 31147  df-ass 38778  df-exid 38780  df-mgmOLD 38784  df-sgrOLD 38796  df-mndo 38802  df-rngo 38830  df-com2 38925  df-crngo 38929  df-idl 38945  df-pridl 38946  df-prrngo 38983  df-dmn 38984  df-igen 38995

This theorem is used by:  dmncan1  39011