P. 370 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 36901-37000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bj-gabeqd 36901	Equality of generalized class abstractions. Deduction form. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	bj-gabeqis 36902*	Equality of generalized class abstractions, with implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐵 ∣ 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	bj-elgab 36903	Elements of a generalized class abstraction. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	bj-gabima 36904	Generalized class abstraction as a direct image. TODO: improve the support lemmas elimag 6051 and fvelima 6943 to nonfreeness hypothesis (and for the latter, biconditional). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ dom 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝐹‘𝑥) ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = (𝐹 “ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
21.19.5.9  Restricted nonfreeness In this subsection, we define restricted nonfreeness (or relative nonfreeness).
Syntax	wrnf 36905	Syntax for restricted nonfreeness.
wff Ⅎ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑
Definition	df-bj-rnf 36906	Definition of restricted nonfreeness. Informally, the proposition Ⅎ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 means that 𝜑(𝑥) does not vary on 𝐴. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
21.19.5.10  Russell's paradox A few results around Russell's paradox. For clarity, we prove separately a FOL statement (now in the main part as ru0 2127) and then two versions (bj-ru1 36907 and bj-ru 36908). Special attention is put on minimizing axiom depencencies.
Theorem	bj-ru1 36907*	A version of Russell's paradox ru 3763 not mentioning the universal class. (see also bj-ru 36908). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Oct-2019.) Remove usage of ax-10 2141, ax-11 2157, ax-12 2177 by using eqabbw 2808 following BTernaryTau's similar revision of ru 3763. (Revised by BJ, 28-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥}
Theorem	bj-ru 36908	Remove dependency on ax-13 2376 (and df-v 3461) from Russell's paradox ru 3763 expressed with primitive symbols and with a class variable 𝑉. Note the more economical use of elissetv 2815 instead of isset 3473 to avoid use of df-v 3461. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥} ∈ 𝑉
21.19.5.11  Curry's paradox in set theory
Theorem	currysetlem 36909*	Lemma for currysetlem 36909, where it is used with (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑) substituted for 𝜓. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)} ↔ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} → 𝜑)))
Theorem	curryset 36910*	Curry's paradox in set theory. This can be seen as a generalization of Russell's paradox, which corresponds to the case where 𝜑 is ⊥. See alternate exposal of basically the same proof currysetALT 36914. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)} ∈ 𝑉
Theorem	currysetlem1 36911*	Lemma for currysetALT 36914. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑋 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	currysetlem2 36912*	Lemma for currysetALT 36914. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝜑))
Theorem	currysetlem3 36913*	Lemma for currysetALT 36914. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉
Theorem	currysetALT 36914*	Alternate proof of curryset 36910, or more precisely alternate exposal of the same proof. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)} ∈ 𝑉
21.19.5.12  Some disjointness results A few utility theorems on disjointness of classes.
Theorem	bj-n0i 36915*	Inference associated with n0 4328. Shortens 2ndcdisj 23392 (2888>2878), notzfaus 5333 (264>253). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ ∅    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	bj-disjsn01 36916	Disjointness of the singletons containing 0 and 1. This is a consequence of disjcsn 9616 but the present proof does not use regularity. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Apr-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ({∅} ∩ {1o}) = ∅
Theorem	bj-0nel1 36917	The empty set does not belong to {1o}. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ∅ ∉ {1o}
Theorem	bj-1nel0 36918	1o does not belong to {∅}. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 1o ∉ {∅}
21.19.5.13  Complements on direct products A few utility theorems on direct products.
Theorem	bj-xpimasn 36919	The image of a singleton, general case. [Change and relabel xpimasn 6174 accordingly, maybe to xpima2sn.] (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = if(𝑋 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, ∅)
Theorem	bj-xpima1sn 36920	The image of a singleton by a direct product, empty case. [Change and relabel xpimasn 6174 accordingly, maybe to xpima2sn.] (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = ∅)
Theorem	bj-xpima1snALT 36921	Alternate proof of bj-xpima1sn 36920. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = ∅)
Theorem	bj-xpima2sn 36922	The image of a singleton by a direct product, nonempty case. [To replace xpimasn 6174.] (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-xpnzex 36923	If the first factor of a product is nonempty, and the product is a set, then the second factor is a set. UPDATE: this is actually the curried (exported) form of xpexcnv 7914 (up to commutation in the product). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-xpexg2 36924	Curried (exported) form of xpexg 7742. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-xpnzexb 36925	If the first factor of a product is a nonempty set, then the product is a set if and only if the second factor is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {∅}) → (𝐵 ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-cleq 36926*	Substitution property for certain classes. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ (𝐴 “ 𝐶)} = {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)})
21.19.5.14  "Singletonization" and tagging This subsection introduces the "singletonization" and the "tagging" of a class. The singletonization of a class is the class of singletons of elements of that class. It is useful since all nonsingletons are disjoint from it, so one can easily adjoin to it disjoint elements, which is what the tagging does: it adjoins the empty set. This can be used for instance to define the one-point compactification of a topological space. It will be used in the next section to define tuples which work for proper classes.
Theorem	bj-snsetex 36927*	The class of sets "whose singletons" belong to a set is a set. Nice application of ax-rep 5249. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ 𝐴} ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-clexab 36928*	Sethood of certain classes. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ (𝐴 “ 𝐵)} ∈ V)
Syntax	bj-csngl 36929	Syntax for singletonization. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
class sngl 𝐴
Definition	df-bj-sngl 36930*	Definition of "singletonization". The class sngl 𝐴 is isomorphic to 𝐴 and since it contains only singletons, it can be easily be adjoined disjoint elements, which can be useful in various constructions. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ sngl 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = {𝑦}}
Theorem	bj-sngleq 36931	Substitution property for sngl. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → sngl 𝐴 = sngl 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-elsngl 36932*	Characterization of the elements of the singletonization of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ sngl 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 = {𝑥})
Theorem	bj-snglc 36933	Characterization of the elements of 𝐴 in terms of elements of its singletonization. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ∈ sngl 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-snglss 36934	The singletonization of a class is included in its powerclass. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ sngl 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	bj-0nelsngl 36935	The empty set is not a member of a singletonization (neither is any nonsingleton, in particular any von Neuman ordinal except possibly df-1o 8478). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ∅ ∉ sngl 𝐴
Theorem	bj-snglinv 36936*	Inverse of singletonization. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ sngl 𝐴}
Theorem	bj-snglex 36937	A class is a set if and only if its singletonization is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ sngl 𝐴 ∈ V)
Syntax	bj-ctag 36938	Syntax for the tagged copy of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
class tag 𝐴
Definition	df-bj-tag 36939	Definition of the tagged copy of a class, that is, the adjunction to (an isomorph of) 𝐴 of a disjoint element (here, the empty set). Remark: this could be used for the one-point compactification of a topological space. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ tag 𝐴 = (sngl 𝐴 ∪ {∅})
Theorem	bj-tageq 36940	Substitution property for tag. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → tag 𝐴 = tag 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-eltag 36941*	Characterization of the elements of the tagging of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ tag 𝐵 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 = {𝑥} ∨ 𝐴 = ∅))
Theorem	bj-0eltag 36942	The empty set belongs to the tagging of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ tag 𝐴
Theorem	bj-tagn0 36943	The tagging of a class is nonempty. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ tag 𝐴 ≠ ∅
Theorem	bj-tagss 36944	The tagging of a class is included in its powerclass. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ tag 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	bj-snglsstag 36945	The singletonization is included in the tagging. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ sngl 𝐴 ⊆ tag 𝐴
Theorem	bj-sngltagi 36946	The singletonization is included in the tagging. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ sngl 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ tag 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-sngltag 36947	The singletonization and the tagging of a set contain the same singletons. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝐴} ∈ sngl 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ∈ tag 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-tagci 36948	Characterization of the elements of 𝐵 in terms of elements of its tagged version. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ∈ tag 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-tagcg 36949	Characterization of the elements of 𝐵 in terms of elements of its tagged version. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ∈ tag 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-taginv 36950*	Inverse of tagging. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ tag 𝐴}
Theorem	bj-tagex 36951	A class is a set if and only if its tagging is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ tag 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-xtageq 36952	The products of a given class and the tagging of either of two equal classes are equal. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 × tag 𝐴) = (𝐶 × tag 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-xtagex 36953	The product of a set and the tagging of a set is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 × tag 𝐵) ∈ V))
21.19.5.15  Tuples of classes This subsection gives a definition of an ordered pair, or couple (2-tuple), that "works" for proper classes, as evidenced by Theorems bj-2uplth 36985 and bj-2uplex 36986, and more importantly, bj-pr21val 36977 and bj-pr22val 36983. In particular, one can define well-behaved tuples of classes. Classes in ZF(C) are only virtual, and in particular they cannot be quantified over. Theorem bj-2uplex 36986 has advantages: in view of df-br 5120, several sethood antecedents could be removed from existing theorems. For instance, relsnopg 5782 (resp. relsnop 5784) would hold without antecedents (resp. hypotheses) thanks to relsnb 5781). Also, the antecedent Rel 𝑅 could be removed from brrelex12 5706 and related theorems brrelex*, and, as a consequence, of multiple later theorems. Similarly, df-struct 17164 could be simplified by removing the exception currently made for the empty set. The projections are denoted by pr1 and pr2 and the couple with projections (or coordinates) 𝐴 and 𝐵 is denoted by ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆. Note that this definition uses the Kuratowski definition (df-op 4608) as a preliminary definition, and then "redefines" a couple. It could also use the "short" version of the Kuratowski pair (see opthreg 9630) without needing the axiom of regularity; it could even bypass this definition by "inlining" it. This definition is due to Anthony Morse and is expounded (with idiosyncratic notation) in Anthony P. Morse, A Theory of Sets, Academic Press, 1965 (second edition 1986). Note that this extends in a natural way to tuples. A variation of this definition is justified in opthprc 5718, but here we use "tagged versions" of the factors (see df-bj-tag 36939) so that an m-tuple can equal an n-tuple only when m = n (and the projections are the same). A comparison of the different definitions of tuples (strangely not mentioning Morse's), is given in Dominic McCarty and Dana Scott, Reconsidering ordered pairs, Bull. Symbolic Logic, Volume 14, Issue 3 (Sept. 2008), 379--397. where a recursive definition of tuples is given that avoids the two-step definition of tuples and that can be adapted to various set theories. Finally, another survey is Akihiro Kanamori, The empty set, the singleton, and the ordered pair, Bull. Symbolic Logic, Volume 9, Number 3 (Sept. 2003), 273--298. (available at http://math.bu.edu/people/aki/8.pdf 36939)
Syntax	bj-cproj 36954	Syntax for the class projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
class (𝐴 Proj 𝐵)
Definition	df-bj-proj 36955*	Definition of the class projection corresponding to tagged tuples. The expression (𝐴 Proj 𝐵) denotes the projection on the A^th component. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 Proj 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ (𝐵 “ {𝐴})}
Theorem	bj-projeq 36956	Substitution property for Proj. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → (𝐵 = 𝐷 → (𝐴 Proj 𝐵) = (𝐶 Proj 𝐷)))
Theorem	bj-projeq2 36957	Substitution property for Proj. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐴 Proj 𝐵) = (𝐴 Proj 𝐶))
Theorem	bj-projun 36958	The class projection on a given component preserves unions. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 Proj (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 Proj 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 Proj 𝐶))
Theorem	bj-projex 36959	Sethood of the class projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 Proj 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-projval 36960	Value of the class projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 Proj ({𝐵} × tag 𝐶)) = if(𝐵 = 𝐴, 𝐶, ∅))
Syntax	bj-c1upl 36961	Syntax for Morse monuple. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
class ⦅𝐴⦆
Definition	df-bj-1upl 36962	Definition of the Morse monuple (1-tuple). This is not useful per se, but is used as a step towards the definition of couples (2-tuples, or ordered pairs). The reason for "tagging" the set is so that an m-tuple and an n-tuple be equal only when m = n. Note that with this definition, the 0-tuple is the empty set. New usage is discouraged because the precise definition is generally unimportant compared to the characteristic properties bj-2upleq 36976, bj-2uplth 36985, bj-2uplex 36986, and the properties of the projections (see df-bj-pr1 36965 and df-bj-pr2 36979). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ⦅𝐴⦆ = ({∅} × tag 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-1upleq 36963	Substitution property for ⦅ − ⦆. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⦅𝐴⦆ = ⦅𝐵⦆)
Syntax	bj-cpr1 36964	Syntax for the first class tuple projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
class pr1 𝐴
Definition	df-bj-pr1 36965	Definition of the first projection of a class tuple. New usage is discouraged because the precise definition is generally unimportant compared to the characteristic properties bj-pr1eq 36966, bj-pr11val 36969, bj-pr21val 36977, bj-pr1ex 36970. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ pr1 𝐴 = (∅ Proj 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-pr1eq 36966	Substitution property for pr1. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → pr1 𝐴 = pr1 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-pr1un 36967	The first projection preserves unions. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ pr1 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (pr1 𝐴 ∪ pr1 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-pr1val 36968	Value of the first projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ pr1 ({𝐴} × tag 𝐵) = if(𝐴 = ∅, 𝐵, ∅)
Theorem	bj-pr11val 36969	Value of the first projection of a monuple. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ pr1 ⦅𝐴⦆ = 𝐴
Theorem	bj-pr1ex 36970	Sethood of the first projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → pr1 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-1uplth 36971	The characteristic property of monuples. Note that this holds without sethood hypotheses. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (⦅𝐴⦆ = ⦅𝐵⦆ ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-1uplex 36972	A monuple is a set if and only if its coordinates are sets. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (⦅𝐴⦆ ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-1upln0 36973	A monuple is nonempty. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ⦅𝐴⦆ ≠ ∅
Syntax	bj-c2uple 36974	Syntax for Morse couple. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
class ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆
Definition	df-bj-2upl 36975	Definition of the Morse couple. See df-bj-1upl 36962. New usage is discouraged because the precise definition is generally unimportant compared to the characteristic properties bj-2upleq 36976, bj-2uplth 36985, bj-2uplex 36986, and the properties of the projections (see df-bj-pr1 36965 and df-bj-pr2 36979). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ = (⦅𝐴⦆ ∪ ({1o} × tag 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-2upleq 36976	Substitution property for ⦅ − , − ⦆. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 = 𝐷 → ⦅𝐴, 𝐶⦆ = ⦅𝐵, 𝐷⦆))
Theorem	bj-pr21val 36977	Value of the first projection of a couple. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ pr1 ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ = 𝐴
Syntax	bj-cpr2 36978	Syntax for the second class tuple projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
class pr2 𝐴
Definition	df-bj-pr2 36979	Definition of the second projection of a class tuple. New usage is discouraged because the precise definition is generally unimportant compared to the characteristic properties bj-pr2eq 36980, bj-pr22val 36983, bj-pr2ex 36984. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ pr2 𝐴 = (1o Proj 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-pr2eq 36980	Substitution property for pr2. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → pr2 𝐴 = pr2 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-pr2un 36981	The second projection preserves unions. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ pr2 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (pr2 𝐴 ∪ pr2 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-pr2val 36982	Value of the second projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ pr2 ({𝐴} × tag 𝐵) = if(𝐴 = 1o, 𝐵, ∅)
Theorem	bj-pr22val 36983	Value of the second projection of a couple. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ pr2 ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ = 𝐵
Theorem	bj-pr2ex 36984	Sethood of the second projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → pr2 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-2uplth 36985	The characteristic property of couples. Note that this holds without sethood hypotheses (compare opth 5451). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ = ⦅𝐶, 𝐷⦆ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	bj-2uplex 36986	A couple is a set if and only if its coordinates are sets. For the advantages offered by the reverse closure property, see the section head comment. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-2upln0 36987	A couple is nonempty. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ ≠ ∅
Theorem	bj-2upln1upl 36988	A couple is never equal to a monuple. It is in order to have this "non-clashing" result that tagging was used. Without tagging, we would have ⦅𝐴, ∅⦆ = ⦅𝐴⦆. Note that in the context of Morse tuples, it is natural to define the 0-tuple as the empty set. Therefore, the present theorem together with bj-1upln0 36973 and bj-2upln0 36987 tell us that an m-tuple may equal an n-tuple only when m = n, at least for m, n <= 2, but this result would extend as soon as we define n-tuples for higher values of n. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ ≠ ⦅𝐶⦆
21.19.5.16  Set theory: elementary operations relative to a universe Some elementary set-theoretic operations "relative to a universe" (by which is merely meant some given class considered as a universe).
Theorem	bj-rcleqf 36989	Relative version of cleqf 2927. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∩ 𝐴) = (𝑉 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-rcleq 36990*	Relative version of dfcleq 2728. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∩ 𝐴) = (𝑉 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-reabeq 36991*	Relative form of eqabb 2874. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∩ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	bj-disj2r 36992	Relative version of ssdifin0 4461, allowing a biconditional, and of disj2 4433. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Nov-2021.) This proof does not rely, even indirectly, on ssdifin0 4461 nor disj2 4433. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑉) ⊆ (𝑉 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑉) = ∅)
Theorem	bj-sscon 36993	Contraposition law for relative subclasses. Relative and generalized version of ssconb 4117, which it can shorten, as well as conss2 44415. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Nov-2021.) This proof does not rely, even indirectly, on ssconb 4117 nor conss2 44415. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑉) ⊆ (𝑉 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝑉) ⊆ (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴))
21.19.5.17  Axioms for finite unions In this section, we introduce the axiom of singleton ax-bj-sn 36997 and the axiom of binary union ax-bj-bun 37001. Both axioms are implied by the standard axioms of unordered pair ax-pr 5402 and of union ax-un 7727 (see snex 5406 and unex 7736). Conversely, the axiom of unordered pair ax-pr 5402 is implied by the axioms of singleton and of binary union, as proved in bj-prexg 37003 and bj-prex 37004. The axioms of union ax-un 7727 and of powerset ax-pow 5335 are independent of these axioms: consider respectively the class of pseudo-hereditarily sets of cardinality less than a given singular strong limit cardinal, see Greg Oman, On the axiom of union, Arch. Math. Logic (2010) 49:283--289 (that model does have finite unions), and the class of well-founded hereditarily countable sets (or hereditarily less than a given uncountable regular cardinal). See also https://mathoverflow.net/questions/81815 5335 and https://mathoverflow.net/questions/48365 5335. A proof by finite induction shows that the existence of finite unions is equivalent to the existence of binary unions and of nullary unions (the latter being the axiom of the empty set ax-nul 5276). The axiom of binary union is useful in theories without the axioms of union ax-un 7727 and of powerset ax-pow 5335. For instance, the class of well-founded sets hereditarily of cardinality at most 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 with ordinary membership relation is a model of { ax-ext 2707, ax-rep 5249, ax-sep 5266, ax-nul 5276, ax-reg 9604 } and the axioms of existence of unordered 𝑚-tuples for all 𝑚 ≤ 𝑛, and in most cases one would like to rule out such models, hence the need for extra axioms, typically variants of powersets or unions. The axiom of adjunction ax-bj-adj 37006 is more widely used, and is an axiom of General Set Theory. We prove how to retrieve it from binary union and singleton in bj-adjfrombun 37010 and conversely how to prove from adjunction singleton (bj-snfromadj 37008) and unordered pair (bj-prfromadj 37009).
Theorem	bj-abex 36994*	Two ways of stating that the extension of a formula is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	bj-clex 36995*	Two ways of stating that a class is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	bj-axsn 36996*	Two ways of stating the axiom of singleton (which is the universal closure of either side, see ax-bj-sn 36997). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ({𝑥} ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑥))
Axiom	ax-bj-sn 36997*	Axiom of singleton. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑥)
Theorem	bj-snexg 36998	A singleton built on a set is a set. Contrary to bj-snex 36999, this proof is intuitionistically valid and does not require ax-nul 5276. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) Extract it from snex 5406 and prove it from ax-bj-sn 36997. (Revised by BJ, 12-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-snex 36999	A singleton is a set. See also snex 5406, snexALT 5353. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) Prove it from ax-bj-sn 36997. (Revised by BJ, 12-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝐴} ∈ V
Theorem	bj-axbun 37000*	Two ways of stating the axiom of binary union (which is the universal closure of either side, see ax-bj-bun 37001). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑦)))