P. 370 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 36901-37000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bj-gabss 36901	Inclusion of generalized class abstractions. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → {𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	bj-gabssd 36902	Inclusion of generalized class abstractions. Deduction form. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	bj-gabeqd 36903	Equality of generalized class abstractions. Deduction form. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	bj-gabeqis 36904*	Equality of generalized class abstractions, with implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐵 ∣ 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	bj-elgab 36905	Elements of a generalized class abstraction. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	bj-gabima 36906	Generalized class abstraction as a direct image. TODO: improve the support lemmas elimag 6093 and fvelima 6987 to nonfreeness hypothesis (and for the latter, biconditional). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ dom 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝐹‘𝑥) ∣ 𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = (𝐹 “ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
21.19.5.9  Restricted nonfreeness In this subsection, we define restricted nonfreeness (or relative nonfreeness).
Syntax	wrnf 36907	Syntax for restricted nonfreeness.
wff Ⅎ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑
Definition	df-bj-rnf 36908	Definition of restricted nonfreeness. Informally, the proposition Ⅎ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 means that 𝜑(𝑥) does not vary on 𝐴. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
21.19.5.10  Russell's paradox A few results around Russell's paradox. For clarity, we prove separately a FOL statement (now in the main part as ru0 2127) and then two versions (bj-ru1 36909 and bj-ru 36910). Special attention is put on minimizing axiom depencencies.
Theorem	bj-ru1 36909*	A version of Russell's paradox ru 3802 not mentioning the universal class. (see also bj-ru 36910). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Oct-2019.) Remove usage of ax-10 2141, ax-11 2158, ax-12 2178 by using eqabbw 2818 following BTernaryTau's similar revision of ru 3802. (Revised by BJ, 28-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥}
Theorem	bj-ru 36910	Remove dependency on ax-13 2380 (and df-v 3490) from Russell's paradox ru 3802 expressed with primitive symbols and with a class variable 𝑉. Note the more economical use of elissetv 2825 instead of isset 3502 to avoid use of df-v 3490. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥} ∈ 𝑉
21.19.5.11  Curry's paradox in set theory
Theorem	currysetlem 36911*	Lemma for currysetlem 36911, where it is used with (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑) substituted for 𝜓. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)} ↔ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} → 𝜑)))
Theorem	curryset 36912*	Curry's paradox in set theory. This can be seen as a generalization of Russell's paradox, which corresponds to the case where 𝜑 is ⊥. See alternate exposal of basically the same proof currysetALT 36916. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)} ∈ 𝑉
Theorem	currysetlem1 36913*	Lemma for currysetALT 36916. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑋 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	currysetlem2 36914*	Lemma for currysetALT 36916. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝜑))
Theorem	currysetlem3 36915*	Lemma for currysetALT 36916. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉
Theorem	currysetALT 36916*	Alternate proof of curryset 36912, or more precisely alternate exposal of the same proof. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝜑)} ∈ 𝑉
21.19.5.12  Some disjointness results A few utility theorems on disjointness of classes.
Theorem	bj-n0i 36917*	Inference associated with n0 4376. Shortens 2ndcdisj 23485 (2888>2878), notzfaus 5381 (264>253). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ ∅    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	bj-disjsn01 36918	Disjointness of the singletons containing 0 and 1. This is a consequence of disjcsn 9673 but the present proof does not use regularity. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Apr-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ({∅} ∩ {1o}) = ∅
Theorem	bj-0nel1 36919	The empty set does not belong to {1o}. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ∅ ∉ {1o}
Theorem	bj-1nel0 36920	1o does not belong to {∅}. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 1o ∉ {∅}
21.19.5.13  Complements on direct products A few utility theorems on direct products.
Theorem	bj-xpimasn 36921	The image of a singleton, general case. [Change and relabel xpimasn 6216 accordingly, maybe to xpima2sn.] (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = if(𝑋 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, ∅)
Theorem	bj-xpima1sn 36922	The image of a singleton by a direct product, empty case. [Change and relabel xpimasn 6216 accordingly, maybe to xpima2sn.] (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = ∅)
Theorem	bj-xpima1snALT 36923	Alternate proof of bj-xpima1sn 36922. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = ∅)
Theorem	bj-xpima2sn 36924	The image of a singleton by a direct product, nonempty case. [To replace xpimasn 6216.] (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-xpnzex 36925	If the first factor of a product is nonempty, and the product is a set, then the second factor is a set. UPDATE: this is actually the curried (exported) form of xpexcnv 7960 (up to commutation in the product). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-xpexg2 36926	Curried (exported) form of xpexg 7785. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-xpnzexb 36927	If the first factor of a product is a nonempty set, then the product is a set if and only if the second factor is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {∅}) → (𝐵 ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-cleq 36928*	Substitution property for certain classes. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ (𝐴 “ 𝐶)} = {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)})
21.19.5.14  "Singletonization" and tagging This subsection introduces the "singletonization" and the "tagging" of a class. The singletonization of a class is the class of singletons of elements of that class. It is useful since all nonsingletons are disjoint from it, so one can easily adjoin to it disjoint elements, which is what the tagging does: it adjoins the empty set. This can be used for instance to define the one-point compactification of a topological space. It will be used in the next section to define tuples which work for proper classes.
Theorem	bj-snsetex 36929*	The class of sets "whose singletons" belong to a set is a set. Nice application of ax-rep 5303. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ 𝐴} ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-clexab 36930*	Sethood of certain classes. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ (𝐴 “ 𝐵)} ∈ V)
Syntax	bj-csngl 36931	Syntax for singletonization. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
class sngl 𝐴
Definition	df-bj-sngl 36932*	Definition of "singletonization". The class sngl 𝐴 is isomorphic to 𝐴 and since it contains only singletons, it can be easily be adjoined disjoint elements, which can be useful in various constructions. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ sngl 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = {𝑦}}
Theorem	bj-sngleq 36933	Substitution property for sngl. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → sngl 𝐴 = sngl 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-elsngl 36934*	Characterization of the elements of the singletonization of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ sngl 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 = {𝑥})
Theorem	bj-snglc 36935	Characterization of the elements of 𝐴 in terms of elements of its singletonization. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ∈ sngl 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-snglss 36936	The singletonization of a class is included in its powerclass. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ sngl 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	bj-0nelsngl 36937	The empty set is not a member of a singletonization (neither is any nonsingleton, in particular any von Neuman ordinal except possibly df-1o 8522). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ∅ ∉ sngl 𝐴
Theorem	bj-snglinv 36938*	Inverse of singletonization. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ sngl 𝐴}
Theorem	bj-snglex 36939	A class is a set if and only if its singletonization is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ sngl 𝐴 ∈ V)
Syntax	bj-ctag 36940	Syntax for the tagged copy of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
class tag 𝐴
Definition	df-bj-tag 36941	Definition of the tagged copy of a class, that is, the adjunction to (an isomorph of) 𝐴 of a disjoint element (here, the empty set). Remark: this could be used for the one-point compactification of a topological space. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ tag 𝐴 = (sngl 𝐴 ∪ {∅})
Theorem	bj-tageq 36942	Substitution property for tag. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → tag 𝐴 = tag 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-eltag 36943*	Characterization of the elements of the tagging of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ tag 𝐵 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 = {𝑥} ∨ 𝐴 = ∅))
Theorem	bj-0eltag 36944	The empty set belongs to the tagging of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ tag 𝐴
Theorem	bj-tagn0 36945	The tagging of a class is nonempty. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ tag 𝐴 ≠ ∅
Theorem	bj-tagss 36946	The tagging of a class is included in its powerclass. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ tag 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	bj-snglsstag 36947	The singletonization is included in the tagging. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ sngl 𝐴 ⊆ tag 𝐴
Theorem	bj-sngltagi 36948	The singletonization is included in the tagging. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ sngl 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ tag 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-sngltag 36949	The singletonization and the tagging of a set contain the same singletons. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝐴} ∈ sngl 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ∈ tag 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-tagci 36950	Characterization of the elements of 𝐵 in terms of elements of its tagged version. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ∈ tag 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-tagcg 36951	Characterization of the elements of 𝐵 in terms of elements of its tagged version. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ∈ tag 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-taginv 36952*	Inverse of tagging. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ tag 𝐴}
Theorem	bj-tagex 36953	A class is a set if and only if its tagging is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ tag 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-xtageq 36954	The products of a given class and the tagging of either of two equal classes are equal. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 × tag 𝐴) = (𝐶 × tag 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-xtagex 36955	The product of a set and the tagging of a set is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 × tag 𝐵) ∈ V))
21.19.5.15  Tuples of classes This subsection gives a definition of an ordered pair, or couple (2-tuple), that "works" for proper classes, as evidenced by Theorems bj-2uplth 36987 and bj-2uplex 36988, and more importantly, bj-pr21val 36979 and bj-pr22val 36985. In particular, one can define well-behaved tuples of classes. Classes in ZF(C) are only virtual, and in particular they cannot be quantified over. Theorem bj-2uplex 36988 has advantages: in view of df-br 5167, several sethood antecedents could be removed from existing theorems. For instance, relsnopg 5827 (resp. relsnop 5829) would hold without antecedents (resp. hypotheses) thanks to relsnb 5826). Also, the antecedent Rel 𝑅 could be removed from brrelex12 5752 and related theorems brrelex*, and, as a consequence, of multiple later theorems. Similarly, df-struct 17194 could be simplified by removing the exception currently made for the empty set. The projections are denoted by pr1 and pr2 and the couple with projections (or coordinates) 𝐴 and 𝐵 is denoted by ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆. Note that this definition uses the Kuratowski definition (df-op 4655) as a preliminary definition, and then "redefines" a couple. It could also use the "short" version of the Kuratowski pair (see opthreg 9687) without needing the axiom of regularity; it could even bypass this definition by "inlining" it. This definition is due to Anthony Morse and is expounded (with idiosyncratic notation) in Anthony P. Morse, A Theory of Sets, Academic Press, 1965 (second edition 1986). Note that this extends in a natural way to tuples. A variation of this definition is justified in opthprc 5764, but here we use "tagged versions" of the factors (see df-bj-tag 36941) so that an m-tuple can equal an n-tuple only when m = n (and the projections are the same). A comparison of the different definitions of tuples (strangely not mentioning Morse's), is given in Dominic McCarty and Dana Scott, Reconsidering ordered pairs, Bull. Symbolic Logic, Volume 14, Issue 3 (Sept. 2008), 379--397. where a recursive definition of tuples is given that avoids the two-step definition of tuples and that can be adapted to various set theories. Finally, another survey is Akihiro Kanamori, The empty set, the singleton, and the ordered pair, Bull. Symbolic Logic, Volume 9, Number 3 (Sept. 2003), 273--298. (available at http://math.bu.edu/people/aki/8.pdf 36941)
Syntax	bj-cproj 36956	Syntax for the class projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
class (𝐴 Proj 𝐵)
Definition	df-bj-proj 36957*	Definition of the class projection corresponding to tagged tuples. The expression (𝐴 Proj 𝐵) denotes the projection on the A^th component. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 Proj 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ {𝑥} ∈ (𝐵 “ {𝐴})}
Theorem	bj-projeq 36958	Substitution property for Proj. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → (𝐵 = 𝐷 → (𝐴 Proj 𝐵) = (𝐶 Proj 𝐷)))
Theorem	bj-projeq2 36959	Substitution property for Proj. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐴 Proj 𝐵) = (𝐴 Proj 𝐶))
Theorem	bj-projun 36960	The class projection on a given component preserves unions. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 Proj (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 Proj 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 Proj 𝐶))
Theorem	bj-projex 36961	Sethood of the class projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 Proj 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-projval 36962	Value of the class projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 Proj ({𝐵} × tag 𝐶)) = if(𝐵 = 𝐴, 𝐶, ∅))
Syntax	bj-c1upl 36963	Syntax for Morse monuple. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
class ⦅𝐴⦆
Definition	df-bj-1upl 36964	Definition of the Morse monuple (1-tuple). This is not useful per se, but is used as a step towards the definition of couples (2-tuples, or ordered pairs). The reason for "tagging" the set is so that an m-tuple and an n-tuple be equal only when m = n. Note that with this definition, the 0-tuple is the empty set. New usage is discouraged because the precise definition is generally unimportant compared to the characteristic properties bj-2upleq 36978, bj-2uplth 36987, bj-2uplex 36988, and the properties of the projections (see df-bj-pr1 36967 and df-bj-pr2 36981). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ⦅𝐴⦆ = ({∅} × tag 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-1upleq 36965	Substitution property for ⦅ − ⦆. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⦅𝐴⦆ = ⦅𝐵⦆)
Syntax	bj-cpr1 36966	Syntax for the first class tuple projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
class pr1 𝐴
Definition	df-bj-pr1 36967	Definition of the first projection of a class tuple. New usage is discouraged because the precise definition is generally unimportant compared to the characteristic properties bj-pr1eq 36968, bj-pr11val 36971, bj-pr21val 36979, bj-pr1ex 36972. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ pr1 𝐴 = (∅ Proj 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-pr1eq 36968	Substitution property for pr1. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → pr1 𝐴 = pr1 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-pr1un 36969	The first projection preserves unions. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ pr1 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (pr1 𝐴 ∪ pr1 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-pr1val 36970	Value of the first projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ pr1 ({𝐴} × tag 𝐵) = if(𝐴 = ∅, 𝐵, ∅)
Theorem	bj-pr11val 36971	Value of the first projection of a monuple. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ pr1 ⦅𝐴⦆ = 𝐴
Theorem	bj-pr1ex 36972	Sethood of the first projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → pr1 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-1uplth 36973	The characteristic property of monuples. Note that this holds without sethood hypotheses. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (⦅𝐴⦆ = ⦅𝐵⦆ ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-1uplex 36974	A monuple is a set if and only if its coordinates are sets. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (⦅𝐴⦆ ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-1upln0 36975	A monuple is nonempty. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ⦅𝐴⦆ ≠ ∅
Syntax	bj-c2uple 36976	Syntax for Morse couple. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
class ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆
Definition	df-bj-2upl 36977	Definition of the Morse couple. See df-bj-1upl 36964. New usage is discouraged because the precise definition is generally unimportant compared to the characteristic properties bj-2upleq 36978, bj-2uplth 36987, bj-2uplex 36988, and the properties of the projections (see df-bj-pr1 36967 and df-bj-pr2 36981). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ = (⦅𝐴⦆ ∪ ({1o} × tag 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-2upleq 36978	Substitution property for ⦅ − , − ⦆. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 = 𝐷 → ⦅𝐴, 𝐶⦆ = ⦅𝐵, 𝐷⦆))
Theorem	bj-pr21val 36979	Value of the first projection of a couple. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ pr1 ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ = 𝐴
Syntax	bj-cpr2 36980	Syntax for the second class tuple projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
class pr2 𝐴
Definition	df-bj-pr2 36981	Definition of the second projection of a class tuple. New usage is discouraged because the precise definition is generally unimportant compared to the characteristic properties bj-pr2eq 36982, bj-pr22val 36985, bj-pr2ex 36986. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ pr2 𝐴 = (1o Proj 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-pr2eq 36982	Substitution property for pr2. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → pr2 𝐴 = pr2 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-pr2un 36983	The second projection preserves unions. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ pr2 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (pr2 𝐴 ∪ pr2 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-pr2val 36984	Value of the second projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ pr2 ({𝐴} × tag 𝐵) = if(𝐴 = 1o, 𝐵, ∅)
Theorem	bj-pr22val 36985	Value of the second projection of a couple. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ pr2 ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ = 𝐵
Theorem	bj-pr2ex 36986	Sethood of the second projection. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → pr2 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-2uplth 36987	The characteristic property of couples. Note that this holds without sethood hypotheses (compare opth 5496). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ = ⦅𝐶, 𝐷⦆ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	bj-2uplex 36988	A couple is a set if and only if its coordinates are sets. For the advantages offered by the reverse closure property, see the section head comment. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-2upln0 36989	A couple is nonempty. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ ≠ ∅
Theorem	bj-2upln1upl 36990	A couple is never equal to a monuple. It is in order to have this "non-clashing" result that tagging was used. Without tagging, we would have ⦅𝐴, ∅⦆ = ⦅𝐴⦆. Note that in the context of Morse tuples, it is natural to define the 0-tuple as the empty set. Therefore, the present theorem together with bj-1upln0 36975 and bj-2upln0 36989 tell us that an m-tuple may equal an n-tuple only when m = n, at least for m, n <= 2, but this result would extend as soon as we define n-tuples for higher values of n. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ⦅𝐴, 𝐵⦆ ≠ ⦅𝐶⦆
21.19.5.16  Set theory: elementary operations relative to a universe Some elementary set-theoretic operations "relative to a universe" (by which is merely meant some given class considered as a universe).
Theorem	bj-rcleqf 36991	Relative version of cleqf 2940. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∩ 𝐴) = (𝑉 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-rcleq 36992*	Relative version of dfcleq 2733. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∩ 𝐴) = (𝑉 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-reabeq 36993*	Relative form of eqabb 2884. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∩ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	bj-disj2r 36994	Relative version of ssdifin0 4509, allowing a biconditional, and of disj2 4481. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Nov-2021.) This proof does not rely, even indirectly, on ssdifin0 4509 nor disj2 4481. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑉) ⊆ (𝑉 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑉) = ∅)
Theorem	bj-sscon 36995	Contraposition law for relative subclasses. Relative and generalized version of ssconb 4165, which it can shorten, as well as conss2 44412. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Nov-2021.) This proof does not rely, even indirectly, on ssconb 4165 nor conss2 44412. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑉) ⊆ (𝑉 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝑉) ⊆ (𝑉 ∖ 𝐴))
21.19.5.17  Axioms for finite unions In this section, we introduce the axiom of singleton ax-bj-sn 36999 and the axiom of binary union ax-bj-bun 37003. Both axioms are implied by the standard axioms of unordered pair ax-pr 5447 and of union ax-un 7770 (see snex 5451 and unex 7779). Conversely, the axiom of unordered pair ax-pr 5447 is implied by the axioms of singleton and of binary union, as proved in bj-prexg 37005 and bj-prex 37006. The axioms of union ax-un 7770 and of powerset ax-pow 5383 are independent of these axioms: consider respectively the class of pseudo-hereditarily sets of cardinality less than a given singular strong limit cardinal, see Greg Oman, On the axiom of union, Arch. Math. Logic (2010) 49:283--289 (that model does have finite unions), and the class of well-founded hereditarily countable sets (or hereditarily less than a given uncountable regular cardinal). See also https://mathoverflow.net/questions/81815 5383 and https://mathoverflow.net/questions/48365 5383. A proof by finite induction shows that the existence of finite unions is equivalent to the existence of binary unions and of nullary unions (the latter being the axiom of the empty set ax-nul 5324). The axiom of binary union is useful in theories without the axioms of union ax-un 7770 and of powerset ax-pow 5383. For instance, the class of well-founded sets hereditarily of cardinality at most 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 with ordinary membership relation is a model of { ax-ext 2711, ax-rep 5303, ax-sep 5317, ax-nul 5324, ax-reg 9661 } and the axioms of existence of unordered 𝑚-tuples for all 𝑚 ≤ 𝑛, and in most cases one would like to rule out such models, hence the need for extra axioms, typically variants of powersets or unions. The axiom of adjunction ax-bj-adj 37008 is more widely used, and is an axiom of General Set Theory. We prove how to retrieve it from binary union and singleton in bj-adjfrombun 37012 and conversely how to prove from adjunction singleton (bj-snfromadj 37010) and unordered pair (bj-prfromadj 37011).
Theorem	bj-abex 36996*	Two ways of stating that the extension of a formula is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	bj-clex 36997*	Two ways of stating that a class is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	bj-axsn 36998*	Two ways of stating the axiom of singleton (which is the universal closure of either side, see ax-bj-sn 36999). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ({𝑥} ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑥))
Axiom	ax-bj-sn 36999*	Axiom of singleton. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑥)
Theorem	bj-snexg 37000	A singleton built on a set is a set. Contrary to bj-snex 37001, this proof is intuitionistically valid and does not require ax-nul 5324. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) Extract it from snex 5451 and prove it from ax-bj-sn 36999. (Revised by BJ, 12-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ∈ V)