Theorem grpomuldivass 30573

Description: Associative-type law for multiplication and division. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpdivf.1	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
grpdivf.3	⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpomuldivass	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐷𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem grpomuldivass

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr1 1194	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
2		simpr2 1195	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)
3		grpdivf.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4		eqid 2740	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inv‘𝐺) = (inv‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	grpoinvcl 30556	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
6	5	3ad2antr3 1190	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
7	1, 2, 6	3jca 1128	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋))
8	3	grpoass 30535	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))))
9	7, 8	syldan 590	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))))
10		simpl 482	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐺 ∈ GrpOp)
11	3	grpocl 30532	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
12	11	3adant3r3 1184	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
13		simpr3 1196	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
14		grpdivf.3	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
15	3, 4, 14	grpodivval 30567	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
16	10, 12, 13, 15	syl3anc 1371	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
17	3, 4, 14	grpodivval 30567	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐵𝐷𝐶) = (𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
18	17	3adant3r1 1182	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐵𝐷𝐶) = (𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
19	18	oveq2d 7464	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐷𝐶)) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))))
20	9, 16, 19	3eqtr4d 2790	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐷𝐶)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  ran crn 5701  ‘cfv 6573  (class class class)co 7448  GrpOpcgr 30521  invcgn 30523   /_𝑔 cgs 30524

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5303  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pow 5383  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-iun 5017  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fo 6579  df-f1o 6580  df-fv 6581  df-riota 7404  df-ov 7451  df-oprab 7452  df-mpo 7453  df-1st 8030  df-2nd 8031  df-grpo 30525  df-gid 30526  df-ginv 30527  df-gdiv 30528

This theorem is referenced by:  ablomuldiv  30584  ablodivdiv  30585  ablo4pnp  37840