Theorem grpomuldivass 30902

Description: Associative-type law for multiplication and division. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpdivf.1	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
grpdivf.3	⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpomuldivass	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐷𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem grpomuldivass

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr1 1213	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
2		simpr2 1214	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)
3		grpdivf.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inv‘𝐺) = (inv‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	grpoinvcl 30885	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
6	5	3ad2antr3 1209	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
7	1, 2, 6	3jca 1146	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋))
8	3	grpoass 30864	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))))
9	7, 8	syldan 602	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))))
10		simpl 487	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐺 ∈ GrpOp)
11	3	grpocl 30861	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
12	11	3adant3r3 1203	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
13		simpr3 1215	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
14		grpdivf.3	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
15	3, 4, 14	grpodivval 30896	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
16	10, 12, 13, 15	syl3anc 1398	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
17	3, 4, 14	grpodivval 30896	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐵𝐷𝐶) = (𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
18	17	3adant3r1 1201	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐵𝐷𝐶) = (𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
19	18	oveq2d 7426	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐷𝐶)) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))))
20	9, 16, 19	3eqtr4d 2808	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐷𝐶)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ran crn 5662  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  GrpOpcgr 30850  invcgn 30852   /_𝑔 cgs 30853

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-riota 7367  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-grpo 30854  df-gid 30855  df-ginv 30856  df-gdiv 30857

This theorem is used by:  ablomuldiv  30913  ablodivdiv  30914  ablo4pnp  38559