Theorem grpomuldivass 31006

Description: Associative-type law for multiplication and division. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpdivf.1	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
grpdivf.3	⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpomuldivass	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐷𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem grpomuldivass

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr1 1213	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
2		simpr2 1214	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)
3		grpdivf.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
4		eqid 2762	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inv‘𝐺) = (inv‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	grpoinvcl 30989	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
6	5	3ad2antr3 1209	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
7	1, 2, 6	3jca 1146	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋))
8	3	grpoass 30968	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))))
9	7, 8	syldan 603	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))))
10		simpl 488	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐺 ∈ GrpOp)
11	3	grpocl 30965	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
12	11	3adant3r3 1203	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
13		simpr3 1215	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
14		grpdivf.3	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
15	3, 4, 14	grpodivval 31000	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
16	10, 12, 13, 15	syl3anc 1398	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
17	3, 4, 14	grpodivval 31000	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐵𝐷𝐶) = (𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
18	17	3adant3r1 1201	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐵𝐷𝐶) = (𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶)))
19	18	oveq2d 7432	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐷𝐶)) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐶))))
20	9, 16, 19	3eqtr4d 2807	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐷𝐶) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐷𝐶)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ran crn 5660  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7416  GrpOpcgr 30954  invcgn 30956   /_𝑔 cgs 30957

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7373  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-1st 7989  df-2nd 7990  df-grpo 30958  df-gid 30959  df-ginv 30960  df-gdiv 30961

This theorem is used by:  ablomuldiv  31017  ablodivdiv  31018  ablo4pnp  38615