P. 304 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 30301-30400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	1pthon2v 30301*	For each pair of adjacent vertices there is a path of length 1 from one vertex to the other in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ 𝑒) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝)
Theorem	1pthon2ve 30302*	For each pair of adjacent vertices there is a path of length 1 from one vertex to the other in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝)
Theorem	wlk2v2elem1 30303	Lemma 1 for wlk2v2e 30305: 𝐹 is a length 2 word of over {0}, the domain of the singleton word 𝐼. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ⟨“{𝑋, 𝑌}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“00”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼
Theorem	wlk2v2elem2 30304*	Lemma 2 for wlk2v2e 30305: The values of 𝐼 after 𝐹 are edges between two vertices enumerated by 𝑃. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ⟨“{𝑋, 𝑌}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“00”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑋”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}
Theorem	wlk2v2e 30305	In a graph with two vertices and one edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other and back to the first vertex via the same/only edge is a walk. Notice that 𝐺 is a simple graph (without loops) only if 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ⟨“{𝑋, 𝑌}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“00”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑋”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨{𝑋, 𝑌}, 𝐼⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃
Theorem	ntrl2v2e 30306	A walk which is not a trail: In a graph with two vertices and one edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other and back to the first vertex via the same/only edge is a walk, see wlk2v2e 30305, but not a trail. Notice that 𝐺 is a simple graph (without loops) only if 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ⟨“{𝑋, 𝑌}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“00”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑋”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨{𝑋, 𝑌}, 𝐼⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃
Theorem	3wlkdlem1 30307	Lemma 1 for 3wlkd 30318. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1)
Theorem	3wlkdlem2 30308	Lemma 2 for 3wlkd 30318. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)) = {0, 1, 2}
Theorem	3wlkdlem3 30309	Lemma 3 for 3wlkd 30318. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑃‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑃‘2) = 𝐶 ∧ (𝑃‘3) = 𝐷)))
Theorem	3wlkdlem4 30310*	Lemma 4 for 3wlkd 30318. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	3wlkdlem5 30311*	Lemma 5 for 3wlkd 30318. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
Theorem	3pthdlem1 30312*	Lemma 1 for 3pthd 30322. (Contributed by AV, 9-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑘 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))
Theorem	3wlkdlem6 30313	Lemma 6 for 3wlkd 30318. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐿)))
Theorem	3wlkdlem7 30314	Lemma 7 for 3wlkd 30318. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ V ∧ 𝐾 ∈ V ∧ 𝐿 ∈ V))
Theorem	3wlkdlem8 30315	Lemma 8 for 3wlkd 30318. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘0) = 𝐽 ∧ (𝐹‘1) = 𝐾 ∧ (𝐹‘2) = 𝐿))
Theorem	3wlkdlem9 30316	Lemma 9 for 3wlkd 30318. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘2))))
Theorem	3wlkdlem10 30317*	Lemma 10 for 3wlkd 30318. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
Theorem	3wlkd 30318	Construction of a walk from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3wlkond 30319	A walk of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3trld 30320	Construction of a trail from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3trlond 30321	A trail of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 8-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3pthd 30322	A path of length 3 from one vertex to another vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3pthond 30323	A path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3spthd 30324	A simple path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3spthond 30325	A simple path of length 3 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐷)𝑃)
Theorem	3cycld 30326	Construction of a 3-cycle from three given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	3cyclpd 30327	Construction of a 3-cycle from three given edges in a graph, containing an endpoint of one of these edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾𝐿”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾) ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐿)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 3 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝐴))
Theorem	upgr3v3e3cycl 30328*	If there is a cycle of length 3 in a pseudograph, there are three distinct vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 3) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑎)))
Theorem	uhgr3cyclexlem 30329	Lemma for uhgr3cyclex 30330. (Contributed by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐽 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} = (𝐼‘𝐽)) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} = (𝐼‘𝐾)))) → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)
Theorem	uhgr3cyclex 30330*	If there are three different vertices in a hypergraph which are mutually connected by edges, there is a 3-cycle in the graph containing one of these vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = 𝐴))
Theorem	umgr3cyclex 30331*	If there are three (different) vertices in a multigraph which are mutually connected by edges, there is a 3-cycle in the graph containing one of these vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐶, 𝐴} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = 𝐴))
Theorem	umgr3v3e3cycl 30332*	If and only if there is a 3-cycle in a multigraph, there are three (different) vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 14-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UMGraph → (∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 3) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑐, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	upgr4cycl4dv4e 30333*	If there is a cycle of length 4 in a pseudograph, there are four (different) vertices in the graph which are mutually connected by edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 13-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 4) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ((({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝑐} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ({𝑐, 𝑑} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑑, 𝑎} ∈ 𝐸)) ∧ ((𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑑) ∧ (𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑑))))
17.3.12  Connected graphs
Syntax	cconngr 30334	Extend class notation with connected graphs.
class ConnGraph
Definition	df-conngr 30335*	Define the class of all connected graphs. A graph is called connected if there is a path between every pair of (distinct) vertices. The distinctness of the vertices is not necessary for the definition, because there is always a path (of length 0) from a vertex to itself, see 0pthonv 30277 and dfconngr1 30336. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ConnGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣]∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝑔)𝑛)𝑝}
Theorem	dfconngr1 30336*	Alternative definition of the class of all connected graphs, requiring paths between distinct vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ConnGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣]∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑣 ∖ {𝑘})∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝑔)𝑛)𝑝}
Theorem	isconngr 30337*	The property of being a connected graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑛)𝑝))
Theorem	isconngr1 30338*	The property of being a connected graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑘})∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑘(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑛)𝑝))
Theorem	cusconngr 30339	A complete hypergraph is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ComplGraph) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph)
Theorem	0conngr 30340	A graph without vertices is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ ConnGraph
Theorem	0vconngr 30341	A graph without vertices is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph)
Theorem	1conngr 30342	A graph with (at most) one vertex is connected. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (Vtx‘𝐺) = {𝑁}) → 𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph)
Theorem	conngrv2edg 30343*	A vertex in a connected graph with more than one vertex is incident with at least one edge. Formerly part of proof for vdgn0frgrv2 30443. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉)) → ∃𝑒 ∈ ran 𝐼 𝑁 ∈ 𝑒)
Theorem	vdn0conngrumgrv2 30344	A vertex in a connected multigraph with more than one vertex cannot have degree 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ ConnGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝑉))) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑁) ≠ 0)
17.4  Eulerian paths and the Konigsberg Bridge problem
17.4.1  Eulerian paths According to Wikipedia ("Eulerian path", 9-Mar-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eulerian_path): "In graph theory, an Eulerian trail (or Eulerian path) is a trail in a finite graph that visits every edge exactly once (allowing for revisiting vertices). Similarly, an Eulerian circuit or Eulerian cycle is an Eulerian trail that starts and ends on the same vertex. ... The term Eulerian graph has two common meanings in graph theory. One meaning is a graph with an Eulerian circuit, and the other is a graph with every vertex of even degree. These definitions coincide for connected graphs. ... A graph that has an Eulerian trail but not an Eulerian circuit is called semi-Eulerian." Correspondingly, an Eulerian path is defined as "a trail containing all edges" (see definition in [Bollobas] p. 16) in df-eupth 30346 resp. iseupth 30349. (EulerPaths‘𝐺) is the set of all Eulerian paths in graph 𝐺, see eupths 30348. An Eulerian circuit (called Euler tour in the definition in [Diestel] p. 22) is "a circuit in a graph containing all the edges" (see definition in [Bollobas] p. 16), or, with other words, a circuit which is an Eulerian path. The function mapping a graph to the set of its Eulerian paths is defined as EulerPaths in df-eupth 30346, whereas there is no explicit definition for Eulerian circuits (yet): The statement "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian circuit" is formally expressed by (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃). Each Eulerian path can be made an Eulerian circuit by adding an edge which connects the endpoints of the Eulerian path (see eupth2eucrct 30365). Vice versa, removing one edge from a graph with an Eulerian circuit results in a graph with an Eulerian path, see eucrct2eupth 30393. An Eulerian path does not have to be a path in the meaning of definition df-pths 29860, because it may traverse some vertices more than once. Therefore, "Eulerian trail" would be a more appropriate name. The main result of this section is (one direction of) Euler's Theorem: "A non-trivial connected graph has an Euler[ian] circuit iff each vertex has even degree." (see part 1 of theorem 12 in [Bollobas] p. 16 and theorem 1.8.1 in [Diestel] p. 22) or, expressed with Eulerian paths: "A connected graph has an Euler[ian] trail from a vertex x to a vertex y (not equal with x) iff x and y are the only vertices of odd degree." (see part 2 of theorem 12 in [Bollobas] p. 17). In eulerpath 30389, it is shown that a pseudograph with an Eulerian path has either zero or two vertices of odd degree, and eulercrct 30390 shows that a pseudograph with an Eulerian circuit has only vertices of even degree.
Syntax	ceupth 30345	Extend class notation with Eulerian paths.
class EulerPaths
Definition	df-eupth 30346*	Define the set of all Eulerian paths on an arbitrary graph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ EulerPaths = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓:(0..^(♯‘𝑓))–onto→dom (iEdg‘𝑔))})
Theorem	releupth 30347	The set (EulerPaths‘𝐺) of all Eulerian paths on 𝐺 is a set of pairs by our definition of an Eulerian path, and so is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ Rel (EulerPaths‘𝐺)
Theorem	eupths 30348*	The Eulerian paths on the graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (EulerPaths‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓:(0..^(♯‘𝑓))–onto→dom 𝐼)}
Theorem	iseupth 30349	The property "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian path on the graph 𝐺". An Eulerian path is defined as bijection 𝐹 from the edges to a set 0...(𝑁 − 1) and a function 𝑃:(0...𝑁)⟶𝑉 into the vertices such that for each 0 ≤ 𝑘 < 𝑁, 𝐹(𝑘) is an edge from 𝑃(𝑘) to 𝑃(𝑘 + 1). (Since the edges are undirected and there are possibly many edges between any two given vertices, we need to list both the edges and the vertices of the path separately.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–onto→dom 𝐼))
Theorem	iseupthf1o 30350	The property "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian path on the graph 𝐺". An Eulerian path is defined as bijection 𝐹 from the edges to a set 0...(𝑁 − 1) and a function 𝑃:(0...𝑁)⟶𝑉 into the vertices such that for each 0 ≤ 𝑘 < 𝑁, 𝐹(𝑘) is an edge from 𝑃(𝑘) to 𝑃(𝑘 + 1). (Since the edges are undirected and there are possibly many edges between any two given vertices, we need to list both the edges and the vertices of the path separately.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼))
Theorem	eupthi 30351	Properties of an Eulerian path. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼))
Theorem	eupthf1o 30352	The 𝐹 function in an Eulerian path is a bijection from a half-open range of nonnegative integers to the set of edges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼)
Theorem	eupthfi 30353	Any graph with an Eulerian path is of finite size, i.e. with a finite number of edges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → dom 𝐼 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	eupthseg 30354	The 𝑁-th edge in an eulerian path is the edge having 𝑃(𝑁) and 𝑃(𝑁 + 1) as endpoints . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) → {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)))
Theorem	upgriseupth 30355*	The property "⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ is an Eulerian path on the pseudograph 𝐺". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
Theorem	upgreupthi 30356*	Properties of an Eulerian path in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) → (𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1-onto→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}))
Theorem	upgreupthseg 30357	The 𝑁-th edge in an eulerian path is the edge from 𝑃(𝑁) to 𝑃(𝑁 + 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})
Theorem	eupthcl 30358	An Eulerian path has length ♯(𝐹), which is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → (♯‘𝐹) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eupthistrl 30359	An Eulerian path is a trail. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	eupthiswlk 30360	An Eulerian path is a walk. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	eupthpf 30361	The 𝑃 function in an Eulerian path is a function from a finite sequence of nonnegative integers to the vertices. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶(Vtx‘𝐺))
Theorem	eupth0 30362	There is an Eulerian path on an empty graph, i.e. a graph with at least one vertex, but without an edge. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 5-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ∅(EulerPaths‘𝐺){⟨0, 𝐴⟩})
Theorem	eupthres 30363	The restriction ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩ of an Eulerian path ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ to an initial segment of the path (of length 𝑁) forms an Eulerian path on the subgraph 𝑆 consisting of the edges in the initial segment. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 6-Mar-2021.) Hypothesis revised using the prefix operation. (Revised by AV, 30-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 prefix 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ↾ (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄)
Theorem	eupthp1 30364	Append one path segment to an Eulerian path ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ to become an Eulerian path ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩ of the supergraph 𝑆 obtained by adding the new edge to the graph 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝑃‘𝑁), 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ∪ {⟨𝐵, 𝐸⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ∪ {⟨𝑁, 𝐵⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨(𝑁 + 1), 𝐶⟩})    &   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑃‘𝑁)) → 𝐸 = {𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄)
Theorem	eupth2eucrct 30365	Append one path segment to an Eulerian path ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ which may not be an (Eulerian) circuit to become an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩ of the supergraph 𝑆 obtained by adding the new edge to the graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝑃‘𝑁), 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ∪ {⟨𝐵, 𝐸⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ∪ {⟨𝑁, 𝐵⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨(𝑁 + 1), 𝐶⟩})    &   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑃‘𝑁)) → 𝐸 = {𝐶})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝑃‘0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄 ∧ 𝐻(Circuits‘𝑆)𝑄))
Theorem	eupth2lem1 30366	Lemma for eupth2 30387. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑈 ∈ if(𝐴 = 𝐵, ∅, {𝐴, 𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑈 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	eupth2lem2 30367	Lemma for eupth2 30387. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝑈) → (¬ 𝑈 ∈ if(𝐴 = 𝐵, ∅, {𝐴, 𝐵}) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if(𝐴 = 𝐶, ∅, {𝐴, 𝐶})))
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem1 30368	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30375. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑃‘𝑁) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem2 30369	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30375. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (iEdg‘𝑋))
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem3 30370	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30375. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (iEdg‘𝑌))
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem4 30371	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30375. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)) ∩ dom 𝐼))
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem5 30372	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30375. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑌) = {(𝐹‘𝑁)})
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem6 30373	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30375. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑋) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	trlsegvdeglem7 30374	Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30375. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑌) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	trlsegvdeg 30375	The effect on vertex degree of adding one edge to a trail.. In the following, a subgraph induced by a segment of a trail is called a "subtrail": For any subtrail 𝑍 of a trail ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ in a pseudograph 𝐺 which is composed of subtrails 𝑋 and 𝑌, where 𝑌 consists of a single edge, the vertex degree of any vertex 𝑈 within 𝑍 is the sum of the vertex degree of 𝑈 within 𝑋 and the vertex degree of 𝑈 within 𝑌. Note that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary walks (if the last edge was identical with a previous edge, the degree of the vertices incident with this edge would not be increased because of this edge). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) Formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 30384. (Revised by AV, 20-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((VtxDeg‘𝑍)‘𝑈) = (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)))
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem1 30376	Lemma for eupth2lem3 30384. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem2 30377	Lemma for eupth2lem3 30384. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem3 30378*	Lemma for eupth2lem3 30384, formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 30384: If a loop {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} is added to a trail, the degree of the vertices with odd degree remains odd (regarding the subgraphs induced by the involved trails). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → if-((𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁)}, {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))) → (¬ 2 ∥ (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})))
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem4 30379*	Lemma for eupth2lem3 30384, formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 30384: If an edge (not a loop) is added to a trail, the degree of the end vertices of this edge remains odd if it was odd before (regarding the subgraphs induced by the involved trails). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → if-((𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁)}, {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) ∈ 𝒫 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑃‘𝑁) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∧ (𝑈 = (𝑃‘𝑁) ∨ 𝑈 = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)))) → (¬ 2 ∥ (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})))
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem5 30380*	Lemma for eupth2 30387. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) ∈ 𝒫 𝑉)
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem6 30381*	Formerly part of proof of eupth2lem3 30384: If an edge (not a loop) is added to a trail, the degree of vertices not being end vertices of this edge remains odd if it was odd before (regarding the subgraphs induced by the involved trails). Remark: This seems to be not valid for hyperedges joining more vertices than (𝑃‘0) and (𝑃‘𝑁): if there is a third vertex in the edge, and this vertex is already contained in the trail, then the degree of this vertex could be affected by this edge! (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑃‘𝑁) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∧ (𝑈 ≠ (𝑃‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑈 ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)))) → (¬ 2 ∥ (((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) + ((VtxDeg‘𝑌)‘𝑈)) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})))
Theorem	eupth2lem3lem7 30382*	Lemma for eupth2lem3 30384: Combining trlsegvdeg 30375, eupth2lem3lem3 30378, eupth2lem3lem4 30379 and eupth2lem3lem6 30381. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 27-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) = {(𝑃‘𝑁), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑍)‘𝑈) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})))
Theorem	eupthvdres 30383	Formerly part of proof of eupth2 30387: The vertex degree remains the same for all vertices if the edges are restricted to the edges of an Eulerian path. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (VtxDeg‘𝐻) = (VtxDeg‘𝐺))
Theorem	eupth2lem3 30384*	Lemma for eupth2 30387. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^(𝑁 + 1))))⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 + 1) ≤ (♯‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐻)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑁), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑁)}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝑋)‘𝑈) ↔ 𝑈 ∈ if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))})))
Theorem	eupth2lemb 30385*	Lemma for eupth2 30387 (induction basis): There are no vertices of odd degree in an Eulerian path of length 0, having no edge and identical endpoints (the single vertex of the Eulerian path). Formerly part of proof for eupth2 30387. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^0)))⟩)‘𝑥)} = ∅)
Theorem	eupth2lems 30386*	Lemma for eupth2 30387 (induction step): The only vertices of odd degree in a graph with an Eulerian path are the endpoints, and then only if the endpoints are distinct, if the Eulerian path shortened by one edge has this property. Formerly part of proof for eupth2 30387. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝐹) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑛)))⟩)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘𝑛), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘𝑛)})) → ((𝑛 + 1) ≤ (♯‘𝐹) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^(𝑛 + 1))))⟩)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1))}))))
Theorem	eupth2 30387*	The only vertices of odd degree in a graph with an Eulerian path are the endpoints, and then only if the endpoints are distinct. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)} = if((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)), ∅, {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))}))
Theorem	eulerpathpr 30388*	A graph with an Eulerian path has either zero or two vertices of odd degree. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) ∈ {0, 2})
Theorem	eulerpath 30389*	A pseudograph with an Eulerian path has either zero or two vertices of odd degree. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 26-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ (EulerPaths‘𝐺) ≠ ∅) → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) ∈ {0, 2})
Theorem	eulercrct 30390*	A pseudograph with an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ (an "Eulerian pseudograph") has only vertices of even degree. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 2 ∥ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑥))
Theorem	eucrctshift 30391*	Cyclically shifting the indices of an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 15-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑄 ∧ 𝐻(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑄))
Theorem	eucrct2eupth1 30392	Removing one edge (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) from a nonempty graph 𝐺 with an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a graph 𝑆 with an Eulerian path ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. This is the special case of eucrct2eupth 30393 (with 𝐽 = (𝑁 − 1)) where the last segment/edge of the circuit is removed. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2021.) Hypothesis revised using the prefix operation. (Revised by AV, 30-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((♯‘𝐹) − 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 prefix 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ↾ (0...𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄)
Theorem	eucrct2eupth 30393*	Removing one edge (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐽)) from a graph 𝐺 with an Eulerian circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a graph 𝑆 with an Eulerian path ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 17-Mar-2021.) Hypothesis revised using the prefix operation. (Revised by AV, 30-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(EulerPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = 𝑉    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑆) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ ((0..^𝑁) ∖ {𝐽}))))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝐹 cyclShift 𝐾) prefix (𝑁 − 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝐾), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝐾)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝐾) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(EulerPaths‘𝑆)𝑄)
17.4.2  The Königsberg Bridge problem According to Wikipedia ("Seven Bridges of Königsberg", 9-Mar-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Bridges_of_Koenigsberg): "The Seven Bridges of Königsberg is a historically notable problem in mathematics. Its negative resolution by Leonhard Euler in 1736 laid the foundations of graph theory and prefigured the idea of topology. The city of Königsberg in [East] Prussia (now Kaliningrad, Russia) was set on both sides of the Pregel River, and included two large islands - Kneiphof and Lomse - which were connected to each other, or to the two mainland portions of the city, by seven bridges. The problem was to devise a walk through the city that would cross each of those bridges once and only once.". Euler proved that the problem has no solution by applying Euler's theorem to the Königsberg graph, which is obtained by replacing each land mass with an abstract "vertex" or node, and each bridge with an abstract connection, an "edge", which connects two land masses/vertices. The Königsberg graph 𝐺 is a multigraph consisting of 4 vertices and 7 edges, represented by the following ordered pair: 𝐺 = ⟨(0...3), ⟨“{0, 1}{0, 2} {0, 3}{1, 2}{1, 2}{2, 3}{2, 3}”⟩⟩, see konigsbergumgr 30399. konigsberg 30405 shows that the Königsberg graph has no Eulerian path, thus the Königsberg Bridge problem has no solution.
Theorem	konigsbergvtx 30394	The set of vertices of the Königsberg graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (0...3)
Theorem	konigsbergiedg 30395	The indexed edges of the Königsberg graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩
Theorem	konigsbergiedgw 30396*	The indexed edges of the Königsberg graph 𝐺 is a word over the pairs of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ Word {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ (♯‘𝑥) = 2}
Theorem	konigsbergssiedgwpr 30397*	Each subset of the indexed edges of the Königsberg graph 𝐺 is a word over the pairs of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝐸 = (𝐴 ++ 𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ Word {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ (♯‘𝑥) = 2})
Theorem	konigsbergssiedgw 30398*	Each subset of the indexed edges of the Königsberg graph 𝐺 is a word over the pairs of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝐸 = (𝐴 ++ 𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ Word {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝑉 ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
Theorem	konigsbergumgr 30399	The Königsberg graph 𝐺 is a multigraph. (Contributed by AV, 28-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 9-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph
Theorem	konigsberglem1 30400	Lemma 1 for konigsberg 30405: Vertex 0 has degree three. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2016.) (Revised by AV, 4-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (0...3)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ⟨“{0, 1} {0, 2} {0, 3} {1, 2} {1, 2} {2, 3} {2, 3}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘0) = 3