P. 304 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 30301-30400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	spthdifv 30301	The vertices of a simple path are distinct, so the vertex function is one-to-one. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))–1-1→(Vtx‘𝐺))
Theorem	spthdep 30302	A simple path (at least of length 1) has different start and end points (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 0) → (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))
Theorem	pthdepisspth 30303	A path with different start and end points is a simple path (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkdvdelem 30304*	Lemma for upgrwlkdvde 30305. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))–1-1→𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} → Fun ◡𝐹))
Theorem	upgrwlkdvde 30305	In a pseudograph, all edges of a walk consisting of different vertices are different. Notice that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary hypergraphs, see the counterexample given in the comment of upgrspthswlk 30306. (Contributed by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝑃) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	upgrspthswlk 30306*	The set of simple paths in a pseudograph, expressed as walk. Notice that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary hypergraphs, since a walk with distinct vertices does not need to be a trail: let E = { p0, p1, p2 } be a hyperedge, then ( p0, e, p1, e, p2 ) is walk with distinct vertices, but not with distinct edges. Therefore, E is not a trail and, by definition, also no path. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (SPaths‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ Fun ◡𝑝)})
Theorem	upgrwlkdvspth 30307	A walk consisting of different vertices is a simple path. Notice that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary hypergraphs, see the counterexample given in the comment of upgrspthswlk 30306. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝑃) → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	pthsonfval 30308*	The set of paths between two vertices (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓(Paths‘𝐺)𝑝)})
Theorem	spthson 30309*	The set of simple paths between two vertices (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑝)})
Theorem	ispthson 30310	Properties of a pair of functions to be a path between two given vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	isspthson 30311	Properties of a pair of functions to be a simple path between two given vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	pthsonprop 30312	Properties of a path between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	spthonprop 30313	Properties of a simple path between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	pthonispth 30314	A path between two vertices is a path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	pthontrlon 30315	A path between two vertices is a trail between these vertices. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃)
Theorem	pthonpth 30316	A path is a path between its endpoints. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹((𝑃‘0)(PathsOn‘𝐺)(𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))𝑃)
Theorem	isspthonpth 30317	A pair of functions is a simple path between two given vertices iff it is a simple path starting and ending at the two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	spthonisspth 30318	A simple path between to vertices is a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	spthonpthon 30319	A simple path between two vertices is a path between these vertices. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃)
Theorem	spthonepeq 30320	The endpoints of a simple path between two vertices are equal iff the path is of length 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (♯‘𝐹) = 0))
Theorem	uhgrwkspthlem1 30321	Lemma 1 for uhgrwkspth 30323. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 1) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	uhgrwkspthlem2 30322	Lemma 2 for uhgrwkspth 30323. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ ((♯‘𝐹) = 1 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑃‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)) = 𝐵)) → Fun ◡𝑃)
Theorem	uhgrwkspth 30323	Any walk of length 1 between two different vertices is a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 1 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2wlkneq 30324	The vertices and edges are pairwise different in a walk of length 2 in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) ∧ ((♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))) → (((𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘1) ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘2) ∧ (𝑃‘1) ≠ (𝑃‘2)) ∧ (𝐹‘0) ≠ (𝐹‘1)))
Theorem	usgr2wlkspthlem1 30325	Lemma 1 for usgr2wlkspth 30327. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	usgr2wlkspthlem2 30326	Lemma 2 for usgr2wlkspth 30327. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 27-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))) → Fun ◡𝑃)
Theorem	usgr2wlkspth 30327	In a simple graph, any walk of length 2 between two different vertices is a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 27-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2trlncl 30328	In a simple graph, any trail of length 2 does not start and end at the same vertex. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘2)))
Theorem	usgr2trlspth 30329	In a simple graph, any trail of length 2 is a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2pthspth 30330	In a simple graph, any path of length 2 is a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2pthlem 30331*	Lemma for usgr2pth 30332. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) → ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})∃𝑧 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥, 𝑦})(((𝑃‘0) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑃‘2) = 𝑧) ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {𝑥, 𝑦} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {𝑦, 𝑧}))))
Theorem	usgr2pth 30332*	In a simple graph, there is a path of length 2 iff there are three distinct vertices so that one of them is connected to each of the two others by an edge. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph → ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)–1-1→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)–1-1→𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})∃𝑧 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥, 𝑦})(((𝑃‘0) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑃‘2) = 𝑧) ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {𝑥, 𝑦} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {𝑦, 𝑧})))))
Theorem	usgr2pth0 30333*	In a simply graph, there is a path of length 2 iff there are three distinct vertices so that one of them is connected to each of the two others by an edge. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph → ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)–1-1→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)–1-1→𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})∃𝑧 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥, 𝑦})(((𝑃‘0) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝑧 ∧ (𝑃‘2) = 𝑦) ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {𝑥, 𝑧} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {𝑧, 𝑦})))))
Theorem	pthdlem1 30334*	Lemma 1 for pthd 30337. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ◡(𝑃 ↾ (1..^𝑅)))
Theorem	pthdlem2lem 30335*	Lemma for pthdlem2 30336. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (♯‘𝑃) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐼 = 0 ∨ 𝐼 = 𝑅)) → (𝑃‘𝐼) ∉ (𝑃 “ (1..^𝑅)))
Theorem	pthdlem2 30336*	Lemma 2 for pthd 30337. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑃 “ {0, 𝑅}) ∩ (𝑃 “ (1..^𝑅))) = ∅)
Theorem	pthd 30337*	Two words representing a trail which also represent a path in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    &   ⊢ (♯‘𝐹) = 𝑅    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	subgrpth 30338	If a path exists in a subgraph of a graph 𝐺, then that path also exists in 𝐺. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 → (𝐹(Paths‘𝑆)𝑃 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃))
17.3.5  Closed walks
Syntax	cclwlks 30339	Extend class notation with closed walks (of a graph).
class ClWalks
Definition	df-clwlks 30340*	Define the set of all closed walks (in an undirected graph). According to definition 4 in [Huneke] p. 2: "A walk of length n on (a graph) G is an ordered sequence v0 , v1 , ... v(n) of vertices such that v(i) and v(i+1) are neighbors (i.e are connected by an edge). We say the walk is closed if v(n) = v0". According to the definition of a walk as two mappings f from { 0 , ... , ( n - 1 ) } and p from { 0 , ... , n }, where f enumerates the (indices of the) edges, and p enumerates the vertices, a closed walk is represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(0)) p(1) e(f(1)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n-1)) p(n)=p(0). Notice that by this definition, a single vertex can be considered as a closed walk of length 0, see also 0clwlk 30703. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ClWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))})
Theorem	clwlks 30341*	The set of closed walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (ClWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))}
Theorem	isclwlk 30342	A pair of functions represents a closed walk iff it represents a walk in which the first vertex is equal to the last vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	clwlkiswlk 30343	A closed walk is a walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	clwlkwlk 30344	Closed walks are walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkswks 30345	Closed walks are walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ⊆ (Walks‘𝐺)
Theorem	isclwlke 30346*	Properties of a pair of functions to be a closed walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))))
Theorem	isclwlkupgr 30347*	Properties of a pair of functions to be a closed walk (in a pseudograph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 28-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))))
Theorem	clwlkcomp 30348*	A closed walk expressed by properties of its components. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑇)) → (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))))
Theorem	clwlkcompim 30349*	Implications for the properties of the components of a closed walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))))
Theorem	upgrclwlkcompim 30350*	Implications for the properties of the components of a closed walk in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺)) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	clwlkcompbp 30351	Basic properties of the components of a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	clwlkl1loop 30352	A closed walk of length 1 is a loop. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((Fun (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 1) → ((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘1) ∧ {(𝑃‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)))
17.3.6  Circuits and cycles
Syntax	ccrcts 30353	Extend class notation with circuits (in a graph).
class Circuits
Syntax	ccycls 30354	Extend class notation with cycles (in a graph).
class Cycles
Definition	df-crcts 30355*	Define the set of all circuits (in an undirected graph). According to Wikipedia ("Cycle (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A circuit can be a closed walk allowing repetitions of vertices but not edges"; according to Wikipedia ("Glossary of graph theory terms", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_graph_theory_terms, 3-Oct-2017): "A circuit may refer to ... a trail (a closed tour without repeated edges), ...". Following Bollobas ("A trail whose endvertices coincide (a closed trail) is called a circuit.", see Definition of [Bollobas] p. 5.), a circuit is a closed trail without repeated edges. So the circuit is also represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ Circuits = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))})
Definition	df-cycls 30356*	Define the set of all (simple) cycles (in an undirected graph). According to Wikipedia ("Cycle (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A simple cycle may be defined either as a closed walk with no repetitions of vertices and edges allowed, other than the repetition of the starting and ending vertex." According to Bollobas: "If a walk W = x0 x1 ... x(l) is such that l >= 3, x0=x(l), and the vertices x(i), 0 < i < l, are distinct from each other and x0, then W is said to be a cycle." See Definition of [Bollobas] p. 5. However, since a walk consisting of distinct vertices (except the first and the last vertex) is a path, a cycle can be defined as path whose first and last vertices coincide. So a cycle is represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ Cycles = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Paths‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))})
Theorem	crcts 30357*	The set of circuits (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (Circuits‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))}
Theorem	cycls 30358*	The set of cycles (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (Cycles‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Paths‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))}
Theorem	iscrct 30359	Sufficient and necessary conditions for a pair of functions to be a circuit (in an undirected graph): A pair of function "is" (represents) a circuit iff it is a closed trail. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	iscycl 30360	Sufficient and necessary conditions for a pair of functions to be a cycle (in an undirected graph): A pair of function "is" (represents) a cycle iff it is a closed path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	crctprop 30361	The properties of a circuit: A circuit is a closed trail. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	cyclprop 30362	The properties of a cycle: A cycle is a closed path. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	crctisclwlk 30363	A circuit is a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	crctistrl 30364	A circuit is a trail. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	crctiswlk 30365	A circuit is a walk. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	cyclispth 30366	A cycle is a path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	subgrcycl 30367	If a cycle exists in a subgraph of a graph 𝐺, then that cycle also exists in 𝐺. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝑆)𝑃 → 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	cycliswlk 30368	A cycle is a walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	cycliscrct 30369	A cycle is a circuit. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	cyclnumvtx 30370	The number of vertices of a (non-trivial) cycle is the number of edges in the cycle. (Contributed by AV, 5-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((1 ≤ (♯‘𝐹) ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘ran 𝑃) = (♯‘𝐹))
Theorem	cyclnspth 30371	A (non-trivial) cycle is not a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ≠ ∅ → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → ¬ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	pthisspthorcycl 30372	A path is either a simple path or a cycle (or both). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∨ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	pthspthcyc 30373	A pair ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ represents a path if it represents either a simple path or a cycle. The exclusivity only holds for non-trivial paths (𝐹 ≠ ∅), see cyclnspth 30371. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∨ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	spthcycl 30374	A walk is a trivial path if and only if it is both a simple path and a cycle. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹 = ∅) ↔ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	cyclispthon 30375	A cycle is a path starting and ending at its first vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹((𝑃‘0)(PathsOn‘𝐺)(𝑃‘0))𝑃)
Theorem	lfgrn1cycl 30376*	In a loop-free graph there are no cycles with length 1 (consisting of one edge). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 1))
Theorem	usgr2trlncrct 30377	In a simple graph, any trail of length 2 is not a circuit. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → ¬ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	umgrn1cycl 30378	In a multigraph graph (with no loops!) there are no cycles with length 1 (consisting of one edge). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 1)
Theorem	uspgrn2crct 30379	In a simple pseudograph there are no circuits with length 2 (consisting of two edges). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 3-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 2)
Theorem	usgrn2cycl 30380	In a simple graph there are no cycles with length 2 (consisting of two edges). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 2)
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem1 30381	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30392. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) + 1) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem2 30382*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30392. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑆))) → (𝑄‘𝐽) = (𝑃‘(𝐽 + 𝑆)))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem3 30383*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30392. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ (((𝑁 − 𝑆) + 1)...𝑁)) → (𝑄‘𝐽) = (𝑃‘((𝐽 + 𝑆) − 𝑁)))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem4 30384*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30392. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^(𝑁 − 𝑆))if-((𝑄‘𝑗) = (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗)) = {(𝑄‘𝑗)}, {(𝑄‘𝑗), (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗))))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem5 30385*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30392. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (((𝑁 − 𝑆) + 1)..^𝑁)if-((𝑄‘𝑗) = (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗)) = {(𝑄‘𝑗)}, {(𝑄‘𝑗), (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗))))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem6 30386*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30392. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘0))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 = (𝑁 − 𝑆)) → if-((𝑄‘𝐽) = (𝑄‘(𝐽 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝐽)) = {(𝑄‘𝐽)}, {(𝑄‘𝐽), (𝑄‘(𝐽 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝐽))))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem7 30387*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30392. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑄‘𝑗) = (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗)) = {(𝑄‘𝑗)}, {(𝑄‘𝑗), (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗))))
Theorem	crctcshlem1 30388	Lemma for crctcsh 30395. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	crctcshlem2 30389	Lemma for crctcsh 30395. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐻) = 𝑁)
Theorem	crctcshlem3 30390*	Lemma for crctcsh 30395. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐻 ∈ V ∧ 𝑄 ∈ V))
Theorem	crctcshlem4 30391*	Lemma for crctcsh 30395. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 = 0) → (𝐻 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑄 = 𝑃))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0 30392*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a walk ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 0) → 𝐻(Walks‘𝐺)𝑄)
Theorem	crctcshwlk 30393*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a walk ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(Walks‘𝐺)𝑄)
Theorem	crctcshtrl 30394*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a trail ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(Trails‘𝐺)𝑄)
Theorem	crctcsh 30395*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a circuit ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑄)
17.3.7  Walks as words In general, a walk is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges, as defined in df-wlks 30162: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n). Often, it is sufficient to refer to a walk by the natural sequence of its vertices, i.e omitting its edges in its representation: p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) p(n), see the corresponding remark in [Diestel] p. 6. The concept of a Word, see df-word 14639, is the appropriate way to define such a sequence (being finite and starting at index 0) of vertices. Therefore, it is used in Definitions df-wwlks 30401 and df-wwlksn 30402, and the representation of a walk as sequence of its vertices is called "walk as word". Only for simple pseudographs, however, the edges can be uniquely reconstructed from such a representation. In other cases, there could be more than one edge between two adjacent vertices in the walk (in a multigraph), or two adjacent vertices could be connected by two different hyperedges involving additional vertices (in a hypergraph).
Syntax	cwwlks 30396	Extend class notation with walks (in a graph) as word over the set of vertices.
class WWalks
Syntax	cwwlksn 30397	Extend class notation with walks (in a graph) of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class WWalksN
Syntax	cwwlksnon 30398	Extend class notation with walks between two vertices (in a graph) of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class WWalksNOn
Syntax	cwwspthsn 30399	Extend class notation with simple paths (in a graph) of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class WSPathsN
Syntax	cwwspthsnon 30400	Extend class notation with simple paths between two vertices (in a graph) of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class WSPathsNOn