Theorem infeq5 9638

Description: The statement "there exists a set that is a proper subset of its union" is equivalent to the Axiom of Infinity (shown on the right-hand side in the form of omex 9644.) The left-hand side provides us with a very short way to express the Axiom of Infinity using only elementary symbols. This proof of equivalence does not depend on the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
infeq5	⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 ↔ ω ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem infeq5

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-pss 4014	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥))
2		unieq 4877	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ∪ 𝑥 = ∪ ∅)
3		uni0 4895	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∪ ∅ = ∅
4	2, 3	eqtr2di 2812	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ∅ = ∪ 𝑥)
5		eqtr 2780	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ∅ = ∪ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑥)
6	4, 5	mpdan 700	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑥)
7	6	necon3i 2987	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥 → 𝑥 ≠ ∅)
8	7	anim1i 627	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
9	8	ancoms 464	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
10	1, 9	sylbi 220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
11	10	eximi 1867	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
12		eqid 2760	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})
13		eqid 2760	. . . . 5 ⊢ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}), ∅) ↾ ω) = (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}), ∅) ↾ ω)
14		vex 3454	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
15	12, 13, 14, 14	inf3lem7 9635	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → ω ∈ V)
16	15	exlimiv 1962	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → ω ∈ V)
17	11, 16	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 → ω ∈ V)
18		infeq5i 9637	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∈ V → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥)
19	17, 18	impbii 212	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 ↔ ω ∈ V)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1811   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2955  {crab 3412  Vcvv 3450   ⊆ wss 3895   ⊊ wpss 4013   ∩ cin 4089  ∅c0 4278  ∪ cuni 4866   ↦ cmpt 5185   ↾ cres 5652  ωcom 7877  reccrdg 8417

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7751  ax-reg 9586

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-ss 3896  df-pss 4014  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-tr 5212  df-id 5545  df-eprel 5550  df-po 5558  df-so 5559  df-fr 5603  df-we 5605  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-pred 6304  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-lim 6367  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7423  df-om 7878  df-2nd 8002  df-frecs 8299  df-wrecs 8330  df-recs 8379  df-rdg 8418

This theorem is used by: (None)