Theorem infeq5 9662

Description: The statement "there exists a set that is a proper subset of its union" is equivalent to the Axiom of Infinity (shown on the right-hand side in the form of omex 9668.) The left-hand side provides us with a very short way to express the Axiom of Infinity using only elementary symbols. This proof of equivalence does not depend on the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
infeq5	⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 ↔ ω ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem infeq5

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-pss 4017	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥))
2		unieq 4881	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ∪ 𝑥 = ∪ ∅)
3		uni0 4899	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∪ ∅ = ∅
4	2, 3	eqtr2di 2815	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ∅ = ∪ 𝑥)
5		eqtr 2783	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ∅ = ∪ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑥)
6	4, 5	mpdan 700	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑥)
7	6	necon3i 2991	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥 → 𝑥 ≠ ∅)
8	7	anim1i 627	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
9	8	ancoms 464	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
10	1, 9	sylbi 220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
11	10	eximi 1868	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
12		eqid 2763	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})
13		eqid 2763	. . . . 5 ⊢ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}), ∅) ↾ ω) = (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}), ∅) ↾ ω)
14		vex 3458	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
15	12, 13, 14, 14	inf3lem7 9659	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → ω ∈ V)
16	15	exlimiv 1965	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → ω ∈ V)
17	11, 16	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 → ω ∈ V)
18		infeq5i 9661	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∈ V → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥)
19	17, 18	impbii 212	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 ↔ ω ∈ V)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900   ⊊ wpss 4016   ∩ cin 4092  ∅c0 4281  ∪ cuni 4870   ↦ cmpt 5189   ↾ cres 5657  ωcom 7898  reccrdg 8442

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772  ax-reg 9610

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-tr 5216  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6319  df-ord 6380  df-on 6381  df-lim 6382  df-suc 6383  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-f 6559  df-f1 6560  df-fo 6561  df-f1o 6562  df-fv 6563  df-ov 7443  df-om 7899  df-2nd 8023  df-frecs 8324  df-wrecs 8355  df-recs 8404  df-rdg 8443

This theorem is used by: (None)