Theorem infeq5 9706

Description: The statement "there exists a set that is a proper subset of its union" is equivalent to the Axiom of Infinity (shown on the right-hand side in the form of omex 9712.) The left-hand side provides us with a very short way to express the Axiom of Infinity using only elementary symbols. This proof of equivalence does not depend on the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
infeq5	⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 ↔ ω ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem infeq5

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-pss 3996	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥))
2		unieq 4942	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ∪ 𝑥 = ∪ ∅)
3		uni0 4959	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∪ ∅ = ∅
4	2, 3	eqtr2di 2797	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ∅ = ∪ 𝑥)
5		eqtr 2763	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ∅ = ∪ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑥)
6	4, 5	mpdan 686	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑥)
7	6	necon3i 2979	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥 → 𝑥 ≠ ∅)
8	7	anim1i 614	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
9	8	ancoms 458	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∪ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
10	1, 9	sylbi 217	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
11	10	eximi 1833	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥))
12		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})
13		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}), ∅) ↾ ω) = (rec((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}), ∅) ↾ ω)
14		vex 3492	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
15	12, 13, 14, 14	inf3lem7 9703	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → ω ∈ V)
16	15	exlimiv 1929	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → ω ∈ V)
17	11, 16	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 → ω ∈ V)
18		infeq5i 9705	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∈ V → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥)
19	17, 18	impbii 209	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 ↔ ω ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1777   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2946  {crab 3443  Vcvv 3488   ∩ cin 3975   ⊆ wss 3976   ⊊ wpss 3977  ∅c0 4352  ∪ cuni 4931   ↦ cmpt 5249   ↾ cres 5702  ωcom 7903  reccrdg 8465

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5303  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pow 5383  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770  ax-reg 9661

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-pss 3996  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-iun 5017  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-tr 5284  df-id 5593  df-eprel 5599  df-po 5607  df-so 5608  df-fr 5652  df-we 5654  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-pred 6332  df-ord 6398  df-on 6399  df-lim 6400  df-suc 6401  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fo 6579  df-f1o 6580  df-fv 6581  df-ov 7451  df-om 7904  df-2nd 8031  df-frecs 8322  df-wrecs 8353  df-recs 8427  df-rdg 8466

This theorem is referenced by: (None)