ioojoin - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ioojoin		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ioojoin 13641

Description: Join two open intervals to create a third. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2014.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ioojoin	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → (((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ {𝐵}) ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐴(,)𝐶))

Proof of Theorem ioojoin Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑤 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		unass 4173	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ {𝐵}) ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)))
2		snunioo 13636	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐵[,)𝐶))
3	2	3expa 1136	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐵[,)𝐶))
4	3	3adantl1 1185	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐵[,)𝐶))
5	4	adantrl 729	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐵[,)𝐶))
6	5	uneq2d 4170	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶))) = ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ (𝐵[,)𝐶)))
7		df-ioo 13507	. . . 4 ⊢ (,) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦)})
8		df-ico 13509	. . . 4 ⊢ [,) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦)})
9		xrlenlt 11401	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐵 ≤ 𝑤 ↔ ¬ 𝑤 < 𝐵))
10		xrlttr 13296	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝑤 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝑤 < 𝐶))
11		xrltletr 13313	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑤) → 𝐴 < 𝑤))
12	7, 8, 9, 7, 10, 11	ixxun 13519	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ (𝐵[,)𝐶)) = (𝐴(,)𝐶))
13	6, 12	eqtrd 2798	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶))) = (𝐴(,)𝐶))
14	1, 13	eqtrid 2810	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → (((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ {𝐵}) ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐴(,)𝐶))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2147 ∪ cun 4152 {csn 4588 class class class wbr 5106 (class class class)co 7443 ℝ^*cxr 11369 < clt 11370 ≤ cle 11371 (,)cioo 13503 [,)cico 13505

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1945 ax-6 2002 ax-7 2043 ax-8 2149 ax-9 2157 ax-10 2180 ax-11 2197 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5252 ax-nul 5263 ax-pow 5331 ax-pr 5395 ax-un 7775 ax-cnex 11283 ax-resscn 11284 ax-pre-lttri 11301 ax-pre-lttrn 11302

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2102 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-nel 3066 df-ral 3081 df-rex 3091 df-rab 3417 df-v 3456 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3852 df-ss 3901 df-dif 4050 df-in 4094 df-un 4154 df-nul 4282 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4839 df-uni 4871 df-br 5107 df-opab 5171 df-mpt 5190 df-id 5550 df-po 5563 df-so 5564 df-xp 5661 df-rel 5662 df-cnv 5663 df-co 5664 df-dm 5665 df-rn 5666 df-res 5667 df-ima 5668 df-iota 6512 df-fun 6560 df-fn 6561 df-f 6562 df-f1 6563 df-fo 6564 df-f1o 6565 df-fv 6566 df-ov 7446 df-oprab 7447 df-mpo 7448 df-er 8745 df-en 9002 df-dom 9003 df-sdom 9004 df-pnf 11372 df-mnf 11373 df-xr 11374 df-ltxr 11375 df-le 11376 df-ioo 13507 df-ico 13509 df-icc 13510

This theorem is used by: reconnlem1 25176 itgsplitioo 26188 lhop 26366 iocunico 44405

W3C validator