ioojoin - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ioojoin		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ioojoin 13540

Description: Join two open intervals to create a third. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2014.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ioojoin	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → (((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ {𝐵}) ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐴(,)𝐶))

Proof of Theorem ioojoin Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑤 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		unass 4121	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ {𝐵}) ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)))
2		snunioo 13535	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐵[,)𝐶))
3	2	3expa 1136	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐵[,)𝐶))
4	3	3adantl1 1185	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐵[,)𝐶))
5	4	adantrl 729	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐵[,)𝐶))
6	5	uneq2d 4118	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶))) = ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ (𝐵[,)𝐶)))
7		df-ioo 13406	. . . 4 ⊢ (,) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦)})
8		df-ico 13408	. . . 4 ⊢ [,) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦)})
9		xrlenlt 11302	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐵 ≤ 𝑤 ↔ ¬ 𝑤 < 𝐵))
10		xrlttr 13195	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝑤 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝑤 < 𝐶))
11		xrltletr 13212	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑤) → 𝐴 < 𝑤))
12	7, 8, 9, 7, 10, 11	ixxun 13418	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ (𝐵[,)𝐶)) = (𝐴(,)𝐶))
13	6, 12	eqtrd 2797	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ ({𝐵} ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶))) = (𝐴(,)𝐶))
14	1, 13	eqtrid 2809	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → (((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ {𝐵}) ∪ (𝐵(,)𝐶)) = (𝐴(,)𝐶))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 ∪ cun 3900 {csn 4587 class class class wbr 5107 (class class class)co 7417 ℝ^*cxr 11270 < clt 11271 ≤ cle 11272 (,)cioo 13402 [,)cico 13404

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2215 ax-ext 2734 ax-sep 5255 ax-nul 5267 ax-pow 5334 ax-pr 5402 ax-un 7740 ax-cnex 11184 ax-resscn 11185 ax-pre-lttri 11202 ax-pre-lttrn 11203

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2566 df-eu 2596 df-clab 2741 df-cleq 2754 df-clel 2837 df-nfc 2911 df-ne 2958 df-nel 3064 df-ral 3079 df-rex 3089 df-rab 3415 df-v 3455 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3851 df-dif 3905 df-un 3907 df-in 3909 df-ss 3919 df-nul 4283 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4588 df-pr 4590 df-op 4594 df-uni 4871 df-br 5108 df-opab 5172 df-mpt 5191 df-id 5554 df-po 5567 df-so 5568 df-xp 5665 df-rel 5666 df-cnv 5667 df-co 5668 df-dm 5669 df-rn 5670 df-res 5671 df-ima 5672 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6539 df-fn 6540 df-f 6541 df-f1 6542 df-fo 6543 df-f1o 6544 df-fv 6545 df-ov 7420 df-oprab 7421 df-mpo 7422 df-er 8700 df-en 8957 df-dom 8958 df-sdom 8959 df-pnf 11273 df-mnf 11274 df-xr 11275 df-ltxr 11276 df-le 11277 df-ioo 13406 df-ico 13408 df-icc 13409

This theorem is used by: reconnlem1 25059 itgsplitioo 26072 lhop 26250 iocunico 44060

W3C validator