Theorem tfsconcatrnss12 44177

Description: The range of the concatenation of transfinite sequences is a superset of the ranges of both sequences. Theorem 3 in Grzegorz Bancerek, "Epsilon Numbers and Cantor Normal Form", Formalized Mathematics, Vol. 17, No. 4, Pages 249–256, 2009. DOI: 10.2478/v10037-009-0032-8 (Contributed by RP, 2-Mar-2025.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfsconcat.op	⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfsconcatrnss12	⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → (ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∧ ran 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝐶,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝐷,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   + (𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑎, 𝑏)

Proof of Theorem tfsconcatrnss12

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfsconcat.op	. . 3 ⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))
2	1	tfsconcatrn 44170	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵))
3		ssun1 4127	. . . 4 ⊢ ran 𝐴 ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵)
4		id 23	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) → ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵))
5	3, 4	sseqtrrid 3977	. . 3 ⊢ (ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) → ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵))
6		ssun2 4128	. . . 4 ⊢ ran 𝐵 ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵)
7	6, 4	sseqtrrid 3977	. . 3 ⊢ (ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) → ran 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵))
8	5, 7	jca 521	. 2 ⊢ (ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) → (ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∧ ran 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵)))
9	2, 8	syl 18	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → (ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∧ ran 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3088  Vcvv 3453   ∖ cdif 3899   ∪ cun 3900   ⊆ wss 3902  {copab 5171  dom cdm 5659  ran crn 5660  Oncon0 6361   Fn wfn 6532  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7416   ∈ cmpo 7418   +_o coa 8455

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3367  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-om 7866  df-2nd 7990  df-frecs 8283  df-wrecs 8314  df-recs 8363  df-rdg 8402  df-oadd 8462

This theorem is used by: (None)