Theorem tfsconcatrnss12 44543

Description: The range of the concatenation of transfinite sequences is a superset of the ranges of both sequences. Theorem 3 in Grzegorz Bancerek, "Epsilon Numbers and Cantor Normal Form", Formalized Mathematics, Vol. 17, No. 4, Pages 249–256, 2009. DOI: 10.2478/v10037-009-0032-8 (Contributed by RP, 2-Mar-2025.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfsconcat.op	⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfsconcatrnss12	⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → (ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∧ ran 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝐶,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝐷,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   + (𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑎, 𝑏)

Proof of Theorem tfsconcatrnss12

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfsconcat.op	. . 3 ⊢ + = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∪ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝑎 +o dom 𝑏) ∖ dom 𝑎) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑏(𝑥 = (dom 𝑎 +o 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑏‘𝑧)))}))
2	1	tfsconcatrn 44536	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵))
3		ssun1 4179	. . . 4 ⊢ ran 𝐴 ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵)
4		id 23	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) → ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵))
5	3, 4	sseqtrrid 3956	. . 3 ⊢ (ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) → ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵))
6		ssun2 4180	. . . 4 ⊢ ran 𝐵 ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵)
7	6, 4	sseqtrrid 3956	. . 3 ⊢ (ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) → ran 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵))
8	5, 7	jca 521	. 2 ⊢ (ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) → (ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∧ ran 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵)))
9	2, 8	syl 18	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 Fn 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 Fn 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ On)) → (ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∧ ran 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐴 + 𝐵)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∃wrex 3090  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900   ∖ cdif 4048   ∪ cun 4152  {copab 5170  dom cdm 5655  ran crn 5656  Oncon0 6380   Fn wfn 6553  ‘cfv 6558  (class class class)co 7443   ∈ cmpo 7445   +_o coa 8501

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-tr 5216  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6322  df-ord 6383  df-on 6384  df-lim 6385  df-suc 6386  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-ov 7446  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-om 7902  df-2nd 8026  df-frecs 8327  df-wrecs 8358  df-recs 8407  df-rdg 8446  df-oadd 8508

This theorem is used by: (None)