![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nnind | GIF version |
Description: Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. See nnaddcl 8941 for an example of its use. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nnind.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
nnind.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
nnind.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
nnind.4 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) |
nnind.5 | ⊢ 𝜓 |
nnind.6 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nnind | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1nn 8932 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ | |
2 | nnind.5 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝜓 | |
3 | nnind.1 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
4 | 3 | elrab 2895 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (1 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (1 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜓)) |
5 | 1, 2, 4 | mpbir2an 942 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 1 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} |
6 | elrabi 2892 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) | |
7 | peano2nn 8933 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ) | |
8 | 7 | a1d 22 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ)) |
9 | nnind.6 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) | |
10 | 8, 9 | anim12d 335 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜃))) |
11 | nnind.2 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
12 | 11 | elrab 2895 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜒)) |
13 | nnind.3 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
14 | 13 | elrab 2895 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ((𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜃)) |
15 | 10, 12, 14 | 3imtr4g 205 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑})) |
16 | 6, 15 | mpcom 36 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) |
17 | 16 | rgen 2530 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} |
18 | peano5nni 8924 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((1 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) → ℕ ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) | |
19 | 5, 17, 18 | mp2an 426 | . . . 4 ⊢ ℕ ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} |
20 | 19 | sseli 3153 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) |
21 | nnind.4 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
22 | 21 | elrab 2895 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜏)) |
23 | 20, 22 | sylib 122 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜏)) |
24 | 23 | simprd 114 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1353 ∈ wcel 2148 ∀wral 2455 {crab 2459 ⊆ wss 3131 (class class class)co 5877 1c1 7814 + caddc 7816 ℕcn 8921 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 709 ax-5 1447 ax-7 1448 ax-gen 1449 ax-ie1 1493 ax-ie2 1494 ax-8 1504 ax-10 1505 ax-11 1506 ax-i12 1507 ax-bndl 1509 ax-4 1510 ax-17 1526 ax-i9 1530 ax-ial 1534 ax-i5r 1535 ax-ext 2159 ax-sep 4123 ax-cnex 7904 ax-resscn 7905 ax-1re 7907 ax-addrcl 7910 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 980 df-tru 1356 df-nf 1461 df-sb 1763 df-clab 2164 df-cleq 2170 df-clel 2173 df-nfc 2308 df-ral 2460 df-rex 2461 df-rab 2464 df-v 2741 df-un 3135 df-in 3137 df-ss 3144 df-sn 3600 df-pr 3601 df-op 3603 df-uni 3812 df-int 3847 df-br 4006 df-iota 5180 df-fv 5226 df-ov 5880 df-inn 8922 |
This theorem is referenced by: nnindALT 8938 nn1m1nn 8939 nnaddcl 8941 nnmulcl 8942 nnge1 8944 nn1gt1 8955 nnsub 8960 zaddcllempos 9292 zaddcllemneg 9294 nneoor 9357 peano5uzti 9363 nn0ind-raph 9372 indstr 9595 exbtwnzlemshrink 10251 exp3vallem 10523 expcllem 10533 expap0 10552 apexp1 10700 seq3coll 10824 resqrexlemover 11021 resqrexlemlo 11024 resqrexlemcalc3 11027 gcdmultiple 12023 rplpwr 12030 prmind2 12122 prmdvdsexp 12150 sqrt2irr 12164 pw2dvdslemn 12167 pcmpt 12343 prmpwdvds 12355 mulgnnass 13023 dvexp 14260 2sqlem10 14557 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |