![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nnind | GIF version |
Description: Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. See nnaddcl 8650 for an example of its use. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nnind.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
nnind.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
nnind.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
nnind.4 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) |
nnind.5 | ⊢ 𝜓 |
nnind.6 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nnind | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1nn 8641 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ | |
2 | nnind.5 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝜓 | |
3 | nnind.1 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
4 | 3 | elrab 2809 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (1 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (1 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜓)) |
5 | 1, 2, 4 | mpbir2an 909 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 1 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} |
6 | elrabi 2806 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) | |
7 | peano2nn 8642 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ) | |
8 | 7 | a1d 22 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ)) |
9 | nnind.6 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) | |
10 | 8, 9 | anim12d 331 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜃))) |
11 | nnind.2 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
12 | 11 | elrab 2809 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜒)) |
13 | nnind.3 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
14 | 13 | elrab 2809 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ((𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜃)) |
15 | 10, 12, 14 | 3imtr4g 204 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑})) |
16 | 6, 15 | mpcom 36 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) |
17 | 16 | rgen 2459 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} |
18 | peano5nni 8633 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((1 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) → ℕ ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) | |
19 | 5, 17, 18 | mp2an 420 | . . . 4 ⊢ ℕ ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} |
20 | 19 | sseli 3059 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) |
21 | nnind.4 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
22 | 21 | elrab 2809 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜏)) |
23 | 20, 22 | sylib 121 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜏)) |
24 | 23 | simprd 113 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 = wceq 1314 ∈ wcel 1463 ∀wral 2390 {crab 2394 ⊆ wss 3037 (class class class)co 5728 1c1 7548 + caddc 7550 ℕcn 8630 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 681 ax-5 1406 ax-7 1407 ax-gen 1408 ax-ie1 1452 ax-ie2 1453 ax-8 1465 ax-10 1466 ax-11 1467 ax-i12 1468 ax-bndl 1469 ax-4 1470 ax-17 1489 ax-i9 1493 ax-ial 1497 ax-i5r 1498 ax-ext 2097 ax-sep 4006 ax-cnex 7636 ax-resscn 7637 ax-1re 7639 ax-addrcl 7642 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 947 df-tru 1317 df-nf 1420 df-sb 1719 df-clab 2102 df-cleq 2108 df-clel 2111 df-nfc 2244 df-ral 2395 df-rex 2396 df-rab 2399 df-v 2659 df-un 3041 df-in 3043 df-ss 3050 df-sn 3499 df-pr 3500 df-op 3502 df-uni 3703 df-int 3738 df-br 3896 df-iota 5046 df-fv 5089 df-ov 5731 df-inn 8631 |
This theorem is referenced by: nnindALT 8647 nn1m1nn 8648 nnaddcl 8650 nnmulcl 8651 nnge1 8653 nn1gt1 8664 nnsub 8669 zaddcllempos 8995 zaddcllemneg 8997 nneoor 9057 peano5uzti 9063 nn0ind-raph 9072 indstr 9290 exbtwnzlemshrink 9919 exp3vallem 10187 expcllem 10197 expap0 10216 seq3coll 10478 resqrexlemover 10674 resqrexlemlo 10677 resqrexlemcalc3 10680 gcdmultiple 11554 rplpwr 11561 prmind2 11647 prmdvdsexp 11672 sqrt2irr 11686 pw2dvdslemn 11688 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |