![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nnind | GIF version |
Description: Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. See nnaddcl 9002 for an example of its use. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nnind.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
nnind.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
nnind.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
nnind.4 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) |
nnind.5 | ⊢ 𝜓 |
nnind.6 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nnind | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1nn 8993 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ | |
2 | nnind.5 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝜓 | |
3 | nnind.1 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
4 | 3 | elrab 2916 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (1 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (1 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜓)) |
5 | 1, 2, 4 | mpbir2an 944 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 1 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} |
6 | elrabi 2913 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) | |
7 | peano2nn 8994 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ) | |
8 | 7 | a1d 22 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ)) |
9 | nnind.6 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) | |
10 | 8, 9 | anim12d 335 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜃))) |
11 | nnind.2 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
12 | 11 | elrab 2916 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜒)) |
13 | nnind.3 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
14 | 13 | elrab 2916 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ((𝑦 + 1) ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜃)) |
15 | 10, 12, 14 | 3imtr4g 205 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑})) |
16 | 6, 15 | mpcom 36 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) |
17 | 16 | rgen 2547 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} |
18 | peano5nni 8985 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((1 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} (𝑦 + 1) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) → ℕ ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) | |
19 | 5, 17, 18 | mp2an 426 | . . . 4 ⊢ ℕ ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} |
20 | 19 | sseli 3175 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑}) |
21 | nnind.4 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
22 | 21 | elrab 2916 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜏)) |
23 | 20, 22 | sylib 122 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝜏)) |
24 | 23 | simprd 114 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1364 ∈ wcel 2164 ∀wral 2472 {crab 2476 ⊆ wss 3153 (class class class)co 5918 1c1 7873 + caddc 7875 ℕcn 8982 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-ext 2175 ax-sep 4147 ax-cnex 7963 ax-resscn 7964 ax-1re 7966 ax-addrcl 7969 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 982 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-clab 2180 df-cleq 2186 df-clel 2189 df-nfc 2325 df-ral 2477 df-rex 2478 df-rab 2481 df-v 2762 df-un 3157 df-in 3159 df-ss 3166 df-sn 3624 df-pr 3625 df-op 3627 df-uni 3836 df-int 3871 df-br 4030 df-iota 5215 df-fv 5262 df-ov 5921 df-inn 8983 |
This theorem is referenced by: nnindALT 8999 nn1m1nn 9000 nnaddcl 9002 nnmulcl 9003 nnge1 9005 nn1gt1 9016 nnsub 9021 zaddcllempos 9354 zaddcllemneg 9356 nneoor 9419 peano5uzti 9425 nn0ind-raph 9434 indstr 9658 exbtwnzlemshrink 10317 exp3vallem 10611 expcllem 10621 expap0 10640 apexp1 10789 seq3coll 10913 resqrexlemover 11154 resqrexlemlo 11157 resqrexlemcalc3 11160 gcdmultiple 12157 rplpwr 12164 prmind2 12258 prmdvdsexp 12286 sqrt2irr 12300 pw2dvdslemn 12303 pcmpt 12481 prmpwdvds 12493 mulgnnass 13227 dvexp 14860 2sqlem10 15212 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |