P. 90 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8901-9000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	le2subd 8901	Subtracting both sides of two 'less than or equal to' relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐷) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐵))
Theorem	ltleaddd 8902	Adding both sides of two orderings. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐶 + 𝐷))
Theorem	leltaddd 8903	Adding both sides of two orderings. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐶 + 𝐷))
Theorem	lt2addd 8904	Adding both side of two inequalities. Theorem I.25 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐶 + 𝐷))
Theorem	lt2subd 8905	Subtracting both sides of two 'less than' relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐷) < (𝐶 − 𝐵))
Theorem	possumd 8906	Condition for a positive sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 < (𝐴 + 𝐵) ↔ -𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	sublt0d 8907	When a subtraction gives a negative result. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < 0 ↔ 𝐴 < 𝐵))
Theorem	ltaddsublt 8908	Addition and subtraction on one side of 'less than'. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 < 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶) < 𝐴))
Theorem	1le1 8909	1 ≤ 1. Common special case. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 16-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 1 ≤ 1
Theorem	gt0add 8910	A positive sum must have a positive addend. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < (𝐴 + 𝐵)) → (0 < 𝐴 ∨ 0 < 𝐵))
4.3.5  Real Apartness
Syntax	creap 8911	Class of real apartness relation.
class #ℝ
Definition	df-reap 8912*	Define real apartness. Definition in Section 11.2.1 of [HoTT], p. (varies). Although #ℝ is an apartness relation on the reals (see df-ap 8919 for more discussion of apartness relations), for our purposes it is just a stepping stone to defining # which is an apartness relation on complex numbers. On the reals, #ℝ and # agree (apreap 8924). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.)
⊢ #ℝ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥))}
Theorem	reapval 8913	Real apartness in terms of classes. Beyond the development of # itself, proofs should use reaplt 8925 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	reapirr 8914	Real apartness is irreflexive. Part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). Beyond the development of # itself, proofs should use apirr 8942 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐴)
Theorem	recexre 8915*	Existence of reciprocal of real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 #ℝ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Theorem	reapti 8916	Real apartness is tight. Beyond the development of apartness itself, proofs should use apti 8959. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵))
Theorem	recexgt0 8917*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
4.3.6  Complex Apartness
Syntax	cap 8918	Class of complex apartness relation.
class #
Definition	df-ap 8919*	Define complex apartness. Definition 6.1 of [Geuvers], p. 17. Two numbers are considered apart if it is possible to separate them. One common usage is that we can divide by a number if it is apart from zero (see for example recclap 9018 which says that a number apart from zero has a reciprocal). The defining characteristics of an apartness are irreflexivity (apirr 8942), symmetry (apsym 8943), and cotransitivity (apcotr 8944). Apartness implies negated equality, as seen at apne 8960, and the converse would also follow if we assumed excluded middle. In addition, apartness of complex numbers is tight, which means that two numbers which are not apart are equal (apti 8959). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.)
⊢ # = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑢 ∈ ℝ ((𝑥 = (𝑟 + (i · 𝑠)) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑡 + (i · 𝑢))) ∧ (𝑟 #ℝ 𝑡 ∨ 𝑠 #ℝ 𝑢))}
Theorem	ixi 8920	i times itself is minus 1. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (i · i) = -1
Theorem	inelr 8921	The imaginary unit i is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ
Theorem	rimul 8922	A real number times the imaginary unit is real only if the number is 0. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	rereim 8923	Decomposition of a real number into real part (itself) and imaginary part (zero). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = (𝐵 + (i · 𝐶)))) → (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = 0))
Theorem	apreap 8924	Complex apartness and real apartness agree on the real numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵))
Theorem	reaplt 8925	Real apartness in terms of less than. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	reapltxor 8926	Real apartness in terms of less than (exclusive-or version). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ⊻ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	1ap0 8927	One is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 1 # 0
Theorem	ltmul1a 8928	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	ltmul1 8929	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	lemul1 8930	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapmul1lem 8931	Lemma for reapmul1 8932. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapmul1 8932	Multiplication of both sides of real apartness by a real number apart from zero. Special case of apmul1 9127. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 # 0)) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapadd1 8933	Real addition respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐶) # (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapneg 8934	Real negation respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ -𝐴 # -𝐵))
Theorem	reapcotr 8935	Real apartness is cotransitive. Part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐶)))
Theorem	remulext1 8936	Left extensionality for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	remulext2 8937	Right extensionality for real multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) # (𝐶 · 𝐵) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	apsqgt0 8938	The square of a real number apart from zero is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 # 0) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐴))
Theorem	cru 8939	The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	apreim 8940	Complex apartness in terms of real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) # (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷)))
Theorem	mulreim 8941	Complex multiplication in terms of real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) · (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷))) = (((𝐴 · 𝐶) + -(𝐵 · 𝐷)) + (i · ((𝐶 · 𝐵) + (𝐷 · 𝐴)))))
Theorem	apirr 8942	Apartness is irreflexive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ¬ 𝐴 # 𝐴)
Theorem	apsym 8943	Apartness is symmetric. This theorem for real numbers is part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴))
Theorem	apcotr 8944	Apartness is cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐶)))
Theorem	apadd1 8945	Addition respects apartness. Analogue of addcan 8514 for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐶) # (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	apadd2 8946	Addition respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐴) # (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	addext 8947	Strong extensionality for addition. Given excluded middle, apartness would be equivalent to negated equality and this would follow readily (for all operations) from oveq12 6097. For us, it is proved a different way. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷) → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷)))
Theorem	apneg 8948	Negation respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ -𝐴 # -𝐵))
Theorem	mulext1 8949	Left extensionality for complex multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	mulext2 8950	Right extensionality for complex multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) # (𝐶 · 𝐵) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	mulext 8951	Strong extensionality for multiplication. Given excluded middle, apartness would be equivalent to negated equality and this would follow readily (for all operations) from oveq12 6097. For us, it is proved a different way. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) # (𝐶 · 𝐷) → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷)))
Theorem	mulap0r 8952	A product apart from zero. Lemma 2.13 of [Geuvers], p. 6. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0) → (𝐴 # 0 ∧ 𝐵 # 0))
Theorem	msqge0 8953	A square is nonnegative. Lemma 2.35 of [Geuvers], p. 9. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴))
Theorem	msqge0i 8954	A square is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴)
Theorem	msqge0d 8955	A square is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴))
Theorem	mulge0 8956	The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵)) → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	mulge0i 8957	The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	mulge0d 8958	The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	apti 8959	Complex apartness is tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	apne 8960	Apartness implies negated equality. We cannot in general prove the converse (as shown at neapmkv 17337), which is the whole point of having separate notations for apartness and negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	apcon4bid 8961	Contrapositive law deduction for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 # 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	leltap 8962	≤ implies 'less than' is 'apart'. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴))
Theorem	gt0ap0 8963	Positive implies apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	gt0ap0i 8964	Positive means apart from zero (useful for ordering theorems involving division). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 < 𝐴 → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	gt0ap0ii 8965	Positive implies apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 # 0
Theorem	gt0ap0d 8966	Positive implies apart from zero. Because of the way we define #, 𝐴 must be an element of ℝ, not just ℝ*. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	negap0 8967	A number is apart from zero iff its negative is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 # 0 ↔ -𝐴 # 0))
Theorem	negap0d 8968	The negative of a number apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	ltleap 8969	Less than in terms of non-strict order and apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 # 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltap 8970	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝐵 # 𝐴)
Theorem	gtapii 8971	'Greater than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 # 𝐴
Theorem	ltapii 8972	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 # 𝐵
Theorem	ltapi 8973	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 # 𝐴)
Theorem	gtapd 8974	'Greater than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 # 𝐴)
Theorem	ltapd 8975	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 𝐵)
Theorem	leltapd 8976	≤ implies 'less than' is 'apart'. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴))
Theorem	ap0gt0 8977	A nonnegative number is apart from zero if and only if it is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) → (𝐴 # 0 ↔ 0 < 𝐴))
Theorem	ap0gt0d 8978	A nonzero nonnegative number is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)
Theorem	apsub1 8979	Subtraction respects apartness. Analogue of subcan2 8559 for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) # (𝐵 − 𝐶)))
Theorem	subap0 8980	Two numbers being apart is equivalent to their difference being apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) # 0 ↔ 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	subap0d 8981	Two numbers apart from each other have difference apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) # 0)
Theorem	cnstab 8982	Equality of complex numbers is stable. Stability here means ¬ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵 as defined at df-stab 843. This theorem for real numbers is Proposition 5.2 of [BauerHanson], p. 27. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → STAB 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	aprcl 8983	Reverse closure for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ))
Theorem	apsscn 8984*	The points apart from a given point are complex numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2023.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 # 𝐵} ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	lt0ap0 8985	A number which is less than zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 0) → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	lt0ap0d 8986	A real number less than zero is apart from zero. Deduction form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	aptap 8987	Complex apartness (as defined at df-ap 8919) is a tight apartness (as defined at df-tap 7622). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2025.)
⊢ # TAp ℂ
4.3.7  Reciprocals
Theorem	recextlem1 8988	Lemma for recexap 8990. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 23-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) · (𝐴 − (i · 𝐵))) = ((𝐴 · 𝐴) + (𝐵 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	recexaplem2 8989	Lemma for recexap 8990. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) # 0) → ((𝐴 · 𝐴) + (𝐵 · 𝐵)) # 0)
Theorem	recexap 8990*	Existence of reciprocal of nonzero complex number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 # 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Theorem	mulap0 8991	The product of two numbers apart from zero is apart from zero. Lemma 2.15 of [Geuvers], p. 6. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 # 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 # 0)) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0)
Theorem	mulap0b 8992	The product of two numbers apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 # 0 ∧ 𝐵 # 0) ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0))
Theorem	mulap0i 8993	The product of two numbers apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 # 0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 # 0    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0
Theorem	mulap0bd 8994	The product of two numbers apart from zero is apart from zero. Exercise 11.11 of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 # 0 ∧ 𝐵 # 0) ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0))
Theorem	mulap0d 8995	The product of two numbers apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0)
Theorem	mulap0bad 8996	A factor of a complex number apart from zero is apart from zero. Partial converse of mulap0d 8995 and consequence of mulap0bd 8994. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	mulap0bbd 8997	A factor of a complex number apart from zero is apart from zero. Partial converse of mulap0d 8995 and consequence of mulap0bd 8994. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 # 0)
Theorem	mulcanapd 8998	Cancellation law for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) = (𝐶 · 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	mulcanap2d 8999	Cancellation law for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) = (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	mulcanapad 9000	Cancellation of a nonzero factor on the left in an equation. One-way deduction form of mulcanapd 8998. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 # 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 · 𝐴) = (𝐶 · 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)