P. 90 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8901-9000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	reapti 8901	Real apartness is tight. Beyond the development of apartness itself, proofs should use apti 8944. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵))
Theorem	recexgt0 8902*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
4.3.6  Complex Apartness
Syntax	cap 8903	Class of complex apartness relation.
class #
Definition	df-ap 8904*	Define complex apartness. Definition 6.1 of [Geuvers], p. 17. Two numbers are considered apart if it is possible to separate them. One common usage is that we can divide by a number if it is apart from zero (see for example recclap 9003 which says that a number apart from zero has a reciprocal). The defining characteristics of an apartness are irreflexivity (apirr 8927), symmetry (apsym 8928), and cotransitivity (apcotr 8929). Apartness implies negated equality, as seen at apne 8945, and the converse would also follow if we assumed excluded middle. In addition, apartness of complex numbers is tight, which means that two numbers which are not apart are equal (apti 8944). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.)
⊢ # = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑢 ∈ ℝ ((𝑥 = (𝑟 + (i · 𝑠)) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑡 + (i · 𝑢))) ∧ (𝑟 #ℝ 𝑡 ∨ 𝑠 #ℝ 𝑢))}
Theorem	ixi 8905	i times itself is minus 1. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (i · i) = -1
Theorem	inelr 8906	The imaginary unit i is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ
Theorem	rimul 8907	A real number times the imaginary unit is real only if the number is 0. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	rereim 8908	Decomposition of a real number into real part (itself) and imaginary part (zero). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = (𝐵 + (i · 𝐶)))) → (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = 0))
Theorem	apreap 8909	Complex apartness and real apartness agree on the real numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵))
Theorem	reaplt 8910	Real apartness in terms of less than. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	reapltxor 8911	Real apartness in terms of less than (exclusive-or version). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ⊻ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	1ap0 8912	One is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 1 # 0
Theorem	ltmul1a 8913	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	ltmul1 8914	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	lemul1 8915	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapmul1lem 8916	Lemma for reapmul1 8917. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapmul1 8917	Multiplication of both sides of real apartness by a real number apart from zero. Special case of apmul1 9112. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 # 0)) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapadd1 8918	Real addition respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐶) # (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	reapneg 8919	Real negation respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ -𝐴 # -𝐵))
Theorem	reapcotr 8920	Real apartness is cotransitive. Part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐶)))
Theorem	remulext1 8921	Left extensionality for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	remulext2 8922	Right extensionality for real multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) # (𝐶 · 𝐵) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	apsqgt0 8923	The square of a real number apart from zero is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 # 0) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐴))
Theorem	cru 8924	The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	apreim 8925	Complex apartness in terms of real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) # (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷)))
Theorem	mulreim 8926	Complex multiplication in terms of real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) · (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷))) = (((𝐴 · 𝐶) + -(𝐵 · 𝐷)) + (i · ((𝐶 · 𝐵) + (𝐷 · 𝐴)))))
Theorem	apirr 8927	Apartness is irreflexive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ¬ 𝐴 # 𝐴)
Theorem	apsym 8928	Apartness is symmetric. This theorem for real numbers is part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴))
Theorem	apcotr 8929	Apartness is cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐶)))
Theorem	apadd1 8930	Addition respects apartness. Analogue of addcan 8500 for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐶) # (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	apadd2 8931	Addition respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐴) # (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	addext 8932	Strong extensionality for addition. Given excluded middle, apartness would be equivalent to negated equality and this would follow readily (for all operations) from oveq12 6088. For us, it is proved a different way. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷) → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷)))
Theorem	apneg 8933	Negation respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ -𝐴 # -𝐵))
Theorem	mulext1 8934	Left extensionality for complex multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	mulext2 8935	Right extensionality for complex multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) # (𝐶 · 𝐵) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	mulext 8936	Strong extensionality for multiplication. Given excluded middle, apartness would be equivalent to negated equality and this would follow readily (for all operations) from oveq12 6088. For us, it is proved a different way. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) # (𝐶 · 𝐷) → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷)))
Theorem	mulap0r 8937	A product apart from zero. Lemma 2.13 of [Geuvers], p. 6. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0) → (𝐴 # 0 ∧ 𝐵 # 0))
Theorem	msqge0 8938	A square is nonnegative. Lemma 2.35 of [Geuvers], p. 9. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴))
Theorem	msqge0i 8939	A square is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴)
Theorem	msqge0d 8940	A square is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴))
Theorem	mulge0 8941	The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵)) → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	mulge0i 8942	The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	mulge0d 8943	The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	apti 8944	Complex apartness is tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	apne 8945	Apartness implies negated equality. We cannot in general prove the converse (as shown at neapmkv 17092), which is the whole point of having separate notations for apartness and negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	apcon4bid 8946	Contrapositive law deduction for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 # 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	leltap 8947	≤ implies 'less than' is 'apart'. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴))
Theorem	gt0ap0 8948	Positive implies apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	gt0ap0i 8949	Positive means apart from zero (useful for ordering theorems involving division). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 < 𝐴 → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	gt0ap0ii 8950	Positive implies apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 # 0
Theorem	gt0ap0d 8951	Positive implies apart from zero. Because of the way we define #, 𝐴 must be an element of ℝ, not just ℝ*. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	negap0 8952	A number is apart from zero iff its negative is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 # 0 ↔ -𝐴 # 0))
Theorem	negap0d 8953	The negative of a number apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	ltleap 8954	Less than in terms of non-strict order and apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 # 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltap 8955	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝐵 # 𝐴)
Theorem	gtapii 8956	'Greater than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 # 𝐴
Theorem	ltapii 8957	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 # 𝐵
Theorem	ltapi 8958	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 # 𝐴)
Theorem	gtapd 8959	'Greater than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 # 𝐴)
Theorem	ltapd 8960	'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 𝐵)
Theorem	leltapd 8961	≤ implies 'less than' is 'apart'. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴))
Theorem	ap0gt0 8962	A nonnegative number is apart from zero if and only if it is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) → (𝐴 # 0 ↔ 0 < 𝐴))
Theorem	ap0gt0d 8963	A nonzero nonnegative number is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)
Theorem	apsub1 8964	Subtraction respects apartness. Analogue of subcan2 8545 for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) # (𝐵 − 𝐶)))
Theorem	subap0 8965	Two numbers being apart is equivalent to their difference being apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) # 0 ↔ 𝐴 # 𝐵))
Theorem	subap0d 8966	Two numbers apart from each other have difference apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) # 0)
Theorem	cnstab 8967	Equality of complex numbers is stable. Stability here means ¬ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵 as defined at df-stab 843. This theorem for real numbers is Proposition 5.2 of [BauerHanson], p. 27. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → STAB 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	aprcl 8968	Reverse closure for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ))
Theorem	apsscn 8969*	The points apart from a given point are complex numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2023.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 # 𝐵} ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	lt0ap0 8970	A number which is less than zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 0) → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	lt0ap0d 8971	A real number less than zero is apart from zero. Deduction form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	aptap 8972	Complex apartness (as defined at df-ap 8904) is a tight apartness (as defined at df-tap 7609). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2025.)
⊢ # TAp ℂ
4.3.7  Reciprocals
Theorem	recextlem1 8973	Lemma for recexap 8975. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 23-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) · (𝐴 − (i · 𝐵))) = ((𝐴 · 𝐴) + (𝐵 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	recexaplem2 8974	Lemma for recexap 8975. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) # 0) → ((𝐴 · 𝐴) + (𝐵 · 𝐵)) # 0)
Theorem	recexap 8975*	Existence of reciprocal of nonzero complex number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 # 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Theorem	mulap0 8976	The product of two numbers apart from zero is apart from zero. Lemma 2.15 of [Geuvers], p. 6. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 # 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 # 0)) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0)
Theorem	mulap0b 8977	The product of two numbers apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 # 0 ∧ 𝐵 # 0) ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0))
Theorem	mulap0i 8978	The product of two numbers apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 # 0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 # 0    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0
Theorem	mulap0bd 8979	The product of two numbers apart from zero is apart from zero. Exercise 11.11 of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 # 0 ∧ 𝐵 # 0) ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0))
Theorem	mulap0d 8980	The product of two numbers apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0)
Theorem	mulap0bad 8981	A factor of a complex number apart from zero is apart from zero. Partial converse of mulap0d 8980 and consequence of mulap0bd 8979. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)
Theorem	mulap0bbd 8982	A factor of a complex number apart from zero is apart from zero. Partial converse of mulap0d 8980 and consequence of mulap0bd 8979. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 # 0)
Theorem	mulcanapd 8983	Cancellation law for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) = (𝐶 · 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	mulcanap2d 8984	Cancellation law for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) = (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	mulcanapad 8985	Cancellation of a nonzero factor on the left in an equation. One-way deduction form of mulcanapd 8983. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 # 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 · 𝐴) = (𝐶 · 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	mulcanap2ad 8986	Cancellation of a nonzero factor on the right in an equation. One-way deduction form of mulcanap2d 8984. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 # 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) = (𝐵 · 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	mulcanap 8987	Cancellation law for multiplication (full theorem form). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 # 0)) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) = (𝐶 · 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	mulcanap2 8988	Cancellation law for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 # 0)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) = (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	mulcanapi 8989	Cancellation law for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 # 0    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 · 𝐴) = (𝐶 · 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	msqap0 8990	A number is apart from zero iff its square is apart from zero. (Contributed by Matthew House, 28-Jun-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((𝐴 · 𝐴) # 0 ↔ 𝐴 # 0))
Theorem	msq0 8991	A number is zero iff its square is zero. (Contributed by Matthew House, 28-Jun-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((𝐴 · 𝐴) = 0 ↔ 𝐴 = 0))
Theorem	muleqadd 8992	Property of numbers whose product equals their sum. Equation 5 of [Kreyszig] p. 12. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐴 − 1) · (𝐵 − 1)) = 1))
Theorem	receuap 8993*	Existential uniqueness of reciprocals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 # 0) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐵 · 𝑥) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mul0eqap 8994	If two numbers are apart from each other and their product is zero, one of them must be zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 0 ∨ 𝐵 = 0))
Theorem	recapb 8995*	A complex number has a multiplicative inverse if and only if it is apart from zero. Theorem 11.2.4 of [HoTT], p. (varies), generalized from real to complex numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 # 0 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
4.3.8  Division
Syntax	cdiv 8996	Extend class notation to include division.
class /
Definition	df-div 8997*	Define division. Theorem divmulap 8999 relates it to multiplication, and divclap 9002 and redivclap 9055 prove its closure laws. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1995.) Use divvalap 8998 instead. (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Apr-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ / = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℂ (𝑦 · 𝑧) = 𝑥))
Theorem	divvalap 8998*	Value of division: the (unique) element 𝑥 such that (𝐵 · 𝑥) = 𝐴. This is meaningful only when 𝐵 is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 # 0) → (𝐴 / 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐵 · 𝑥) = 𝐴))
Theorem	divmulap 8999	Relationship between division and multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 # 0)) → ((𝐴 / 𝐶) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 · 𝐵) = 𝐴))
Theorem	divmulap2 9000	Relationship between division and multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 # 0)) → ((𝐴 / 𝐶) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 · 𝐵)))