Theorem ublbneg 9733

Description: The image under negation of a bounded-above set of reals is bounded below. For a theorem which is similar but also adds that the bounds need to be the tightest possible, see supinfneg 9715. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ublbneg	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem ublbneg

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		breq1 4046	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑦 → (𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
2	1	cbvralv 2737	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎)
3	2	rexbii 2512	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎)
4		breq2 4047	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
5	4	ralbidv 2505	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
6	5	cbvrexv 2738	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
7	3, 6	bitri 184	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
8		renegcl 8332	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℝ → -𝑎 ∈ ℝ)
9		elrabi 2925	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → 𝑦 ∈ ℝ)
10		negeq 8264	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → -𝑧 = -𝑦)
11	10	eleq1d 2273	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (-𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
12	11	elrab3 2929	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} ↔ -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
13	12	biimpd 144	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
14	9, 13	mpcom 36	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
15		breq1 4046	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑏 = -𝑦 → (𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
16	15	rspcv 2872	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (-𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
17	14, 16	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
18	17	adantl 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
19		lenegcon1 8538	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) → (-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
20	9, 19	sylan2 286	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) → (-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
21	18, 20	sylibrd 169	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
22	21	ralrimdva 2585	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℝ → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
23		breq1 4046	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑎 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ -𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
24	23	ralbidv 2505	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑎 → (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
25	24	rspcev 2876	. . . 4 ⊢ ((-𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
26	8, 22, 25	syl6an 1453	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℝ → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
27	26	rexlimiv 2616	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
28	7, 27	sylbir 135	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1372   ∈ wcel 2175  ∀wral 2483  ∃wrex 2484  {crab 2487   class class class wbr 4043  ℝcr 7923   ≤ cle 8107  -cneg 8243

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1469  ax-7 1470  ax-gen 1471  ax-ie1 1515  ax-ie2 1516  ax-8 1526  ax-10 1527  ax-11 1528  ax-i12 1529  ax-bndl 1531  ax-4 1532  ax-17 1548  ax-i9 1552  ax-ial 1556  ax-i5r 1557  ax-13 2177  ax-14 2178  ax-ext 2186  ax-sep 4161  ax-pow 4217  ax-pr 4252  ax-un 4479  ax-setind 4584  ax-cnex 8015  ax-resscn 8016  ax-1cn 8017  ax-1re 8018  ax-icn 8019  ax-addcl 8020  ax-addrcl 8021  ax-mulcl 8022  ax-addcom 8024  ax-addass 8026  ax-distr 8028  ax-i2m1 8029  ax-0id 8032  ax-rnegex 8033  ax-cnre 8035  ax-pre-ltadd 8040

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1375  df-fal 1378  df-nf 1483  df-sb 1785  df-eu 2056  df-mo 2057  df-clab 2191  df-cleq 2197  df-clel 2200  df-nfc 2336  df-ne 2376  df-nel 2471  df-ral 2488  df-rex 2489  df-reu 2490  df-rab 2492  df-v 2773  df-sbc 2998  df-dif 3167  df-un 3169  df-in 3171  df-ss 3178  df-pw 3617  df-sn 3638  df-pr 3639  df-op 3641  df-uni 3850  df-br 4044  df-opab 4105  df-id 4339  df-xp 4680  df-rel 4681  df-cnv 4682  df-co 4683  df-dm 4684  df-iota 5231  df-fun 5272  df-fv 5278  df-riota 5898  df-ov 5946  df-oprab 5947  df-mpo 5948  df-pnf 8108  df-mnf 8109  df-xr 8110  df-ltxr 8111  df-le 8112  df-sub 8244  df-neg 8245

This theorem is referenced by: (None)