Theorem ublbneg 10023

Description: The image under negation of a bounded-above set of reals is bounded below. For a theorem which is similar but also adds that the bounds need to be the tightest possible, see supinfneg 10005. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ublbneg	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem ublbneg

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		breq1 4133	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑦 → (𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
2	1	cbvralv 2786	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎)
3	2	rexbii 2557	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎)
4		breq2 4134	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
5	4	ralbidv 2550	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
6	5	cbvrexv 2787	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
7	3, 6	bitri 184	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
8		renegcl 8589	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℝ → -𝑎 ∈ ℝ)
9		elrabi 2979	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → 𝑦 ∈ ℝ)
10		negeq 8521	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → -𝑧 = -𝑦)
11	10	eleq1d 2307	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (-𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
12	11	elrab3 2983	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} ↔ -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
13	12	biimpd 144	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
14	9, 13	mpcom 36	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
15		breq1 4133	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑏 = -𝑦 → (𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
16	15	rspcv 2925	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (-𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
17	14, 16	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
18	17	adantl 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
19		lenegcon1 8796	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) → (-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
20	9, 19	sylan2 286	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) → (-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
21	18, 20	sylibrd 169	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
22	21	ralrimdva 2630	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℝ → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
23		breq1 4133	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑎 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ -𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
24	23	ralbidv 2550	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑎 → (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
25	24	rspcev 2929	. . . 4 ⊢ ((-𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
26	8, 22, 25	syl6an 1483	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℝ → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
27	26	rexlimiv 2662	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
28	7, 27	sylbir 135	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  ∀wral 2528  ∃wrex 2529  {crab 2532   class class class wbr 4130  ℝcr 8179   ≤ cle 8362  -cneg 8500

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-cnex 8271  ax-resscn 8272  ax-1cn 8273  ax-1re 8274  ax-icn 8275  ax-addcl 8276  ax-addrcl 8277  ax-mulcl 8278  ax-addcom 8280  ax-addass 8282  ax-distr 8284  ax-i2m1 8285  ax-0id 8288  ax-rnegex 8289  ax-cnre 8291  ax-pre-ltadd 8296

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-pnf 8363  df-mnf 8364  df-xr 8365  df-ltxr 8366  df-le 8367  df-sub 8501  df-neg 8502

This theorem is used by: (None)