Theorem ublbneg 9687

Description: The image under negation of a bounded-above set of reals is bounded below. For a theorem which is similar but also adds that the bounds need to be the tightest possible, see supinfneg 9669. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ublbneg	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem ublbneg

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		breq1 4036	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑦 → (𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
2	1	cbvralv 2729	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎)
3	2	rexbii 2504	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎)
4		breq2 4037	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
5	4	ralbidv 2497	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
6	5	cbvrexv 2730	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
7	3, 6	bitri 184	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
8		renegcl 8287	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℝ → -𝑎 ∈ ℝ)
9		elrabi 2917	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → 𝑦 ∈ ℝ)
10		negeq 8219	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → -𝑧 = -𝑦)
11	10	eleq1d 2265	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (-𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
12	11	elrab3 2921	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} ↔ -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
13	12	biimpd 144	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
14	9, 13	mpcom 36	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → -𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
15		breq1 4036	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑏 = -𝑦 → (𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ↔ -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
16	15	rspcv 2864	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (-𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
17	14, 16	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
18	17	adantl 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
19		lenegcon1 8493	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) → (-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
20	9, 19	sylan2 286	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) → (-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ -𝑦 ≤ 𝑎))
21	18, 20	sylibrd 169	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → -𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
22	21	ralrimdva 2577	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℝ → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
23		breq1 4036	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑎 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ -𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
24	23	ralbidv 2497	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑎 → (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦))
25	24	rspcev 2868	. . . 4 ⊢ ((-𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}-𝑎 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
26	8, 22, 25	syl6an 1445	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℝ → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
27	26	rexlimiv 2608	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
28	7, 27	sylbir 135	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2167  ∀wral 2475  ∃wrex 2476  {crab 2479   class class class wbr 4033  ℝcr 7878   ≤ cle 8062  -cneg 8198

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-13 2169  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-sep 4151  ax-pow 4207  ax-pr 4242  ax-un 4468  ax-setind 4573  ax-cnex 7970  ax-resscn 7971  ax-1cn 7972  ax-1re 7973  ax-icn 7974  ax-addcl 7975  ax-addrcl 7976  ax-mulcl 7977  ax-addcom 7979  ax-addass 7981  ax-distr 7983  ax-i2m1 7984  ax-0id 7987  ax-rnegex 7988  ax-cnre 7990  ax-pre-ltadd 7995

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-eu 2048  df-mo 2049  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ne 2368  df-nel 2463  df-ral 2480  df-rex 2481  df-reu 2482  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-sbc 2990  df-dif 3159  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-pw 3607  df-sn 3628  df-pr 3629  df-op 3631  df-uni 3840  df-br 4034  df-opab 4095  df-id 4328  df-xp 4669  df-rel 4670  df-cnv 4671  df-co 4672  df-dm 4673  df-iota 5219  df-fun 5260  df-fv 5266  df-riota 5877  df-ov 5925  df-oprab 5926  df-mpo 5927  df-pnf 8063  df-mnf 8064  df-xr 8065  df-ltxr 8066  df-le 8067  df-sub 8199  df-neg 8200

This theorem is referenced by: (None)