P. 97 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 9601-9700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
4.4.11  Upper sets of integers
Syntax	cuz 9601	Extend class notation with the upper integer function. Read "ℤ≥‘𝑀 " as "the set of integers greater than or equal to 𝑀".
class ℤ≥
Definition	df-uz 9602*	Define a function whose value at 𝑗 is the semi-infinite set of contiguous integers starting at 𝑗, which we will also call the upper integers starting at 𝑗. Read "ℤ≥‘𝑀 " as "the set of integers greater than or equal to 𝑀". See uzval 9603 for its value, uzssz 9621 for its relationship to ℤ, nnuz 9637 and nn0uz 9636 for its relationships to ℕ and ℕ0, and eluz1 9605 and eluz2 9607 for its membership relations. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ℤ≥ = (𝑗 ∈ ℤ ↦ {𝑘 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘})
Theorem	uzval 9603*	The value of the upper integers function. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) = {𝑘 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝑁 ≤ 𝑘})
Theorem	uzf 9604	The domain and codomain of the upper integers function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ℤ≥:ℤ⟶𝒫 ℤ
Theorem	eluz1 9605	Membership in the upper set of integers starting at 𝑀. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)))
Theorem	eluzel2 9606	Implication of membership in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	eluz2 9607	Membership in an upper set of integers. We use the fact that a function's value (under our function value definition) is empty outside of its domain to show 𝑀 ∈ ℤ. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz1i 9608	Membership in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁))
Theorem	eluzuzle 9609	An integer in an upper set of integers is an element of an upper set of integers with a smaller bound. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	eluzelz 9610	A member of an upper set of integers is an integer. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	eluzelre 9611	A member of an upper set of integers is a real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	eluzelcn 9612	A member of an upper set of integers is a complex number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝑁 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	eluzle 9613	Implication of membership in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)
Theorem	eluz 9614	Membership in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↔ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁))
Theorem	uzid 9615	Membership of the least member in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzidd 9616	Membership of the least member in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzn0 9617	The upper integers are all nonempty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ran ℤ≥ → 𝑀 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	uztrn 9618	Transitive law for sets of upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))
Theorem	uztrn2 9619	Transitive law for sets of upper integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑍)
Theorem	uzneg 9620	Contraposition law for upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → -𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘-𝑁))
Theorem	uzssz 9621	An upper set of integers is a subset of all integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⊆ ℤ
Theorem	uzss 9622	Subset relationship for two sets of upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uztric 9623	Trichotomy of the ordering relation on integers, stated in terms of upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∨ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)))
Theorem	uz11 9624	The upper integers function is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ↔ 𝑀 = 𝑁))
Theorem	eluzp1m1 9625	Membership in the next upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	eluzp1l 9626	Strict ordering implied by membership in the next upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → 𝑀 < 𝑁)
Theorem	eluzp1p1 9627	Membership in the next upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1)))
Theorem	eluzaddi 9628	Membership in a later upper set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Nov-2007.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾)))
Theorem	eluzsubi 9629	Membership in an earlier upper set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Nov-2007.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾)) → (𝑁 − 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	eluzadd 9630	Membership in a later upper set of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾)))
Theorem	eluzsub 9631	Membership in an earlier upper set of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝐾))) → (𝑁 − 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzm1 9632	Choices for an element of an upper interval of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 = 𝑀 ∨ (𝑁 − 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)))
Theorem	uznn0sub 9633	The nonnegative difference of integers is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 − 𝑀) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	uzin 9634	Intersection of two upper intervals of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∩ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) = (ℤ≥‘if(𝑀 ≤ 𝑁, 𝑁, 𝑀)))
Theorem	uzp1 9635	Choices for an element of an upper interval of integers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))))
Theorem	nn0uz 9636	Nonnegative integers expressed as an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ℕ0 = (ℤ≥‘0)
Theorem	nnuz 9637	Positive integers expressed as an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ℕ = (ℤ≥‘1)
Theorem	elnnuz 9638	A positive integer expressed as a member of an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘1))
Theorem	elnn0uz 9639	A nonnegative integer expressed as a member an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0))
Theorem	eluz2nn 9640	An integer is greater than or equal to 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 3-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluz4eluz2 9641	An integer greater than or equal to 4 is an integer greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → 𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	eluz4nn 9642	An integer greater than or equal to 4 is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → 𝑋 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluzge2nn0 9643	If an integer is greater than or equal to 2, then it is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eluz2n0 9644	An integer greater than or equal to 2 is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝑁 ≠ 0)
Theorem	uzuzle23 9645	An integer in the upper set of integers starting at 3 is element of the upper set of integers starting at 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	eluzge3nn 9646	If an integer is greater than 3, then it is a positive integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	uz3m2nn 9647	An integer greater than or equal to 3 decreased by 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → (𝑁 − 2) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	1eluzge0 9648	1 is an integer greater than or equal to 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 1 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0)
Theorem	2eluzge0 9649	2 is an integer greater than or equal to 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 2 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0)
Theorem	2eluzge1 9650	2 is an integer greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 2 ∈ (ℤ≥‘1)
Theorem	uznnssnn 9651	The upper integers starting from a natural are a subset of the naturals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ⊆ ℕ)
Theorem	raluz 9652*	Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	raluz2 9653*	Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexuz 9654*	Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexuz2 9655*	Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	2rexuz 9656*	Double existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑚 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	peano2uz 9657	Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	peano2uzs 9658	Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ 𝑍)
Theorem	peano2uzr 9659	Reversed second Peano axiom for upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzaddcl 9660	Addition closure law for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	nn0pzuz 9661	The sum of a nonnegative integer and an integer is an integer greater than or equal to that integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 + 𝑍) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑍))
Theorem	uzind4 9662*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzind4ALT 9663*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The last four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are the basis and the induction step. Either uzind4 9662 or uzind4ALT 9663 may be used; see comment for nnind 9006. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzind4s 9664*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑘]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑘]𝜑)
Theorem	uzind4s2 9665*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. Use this instead of uzind4s 9664 when 𝑗 and 𝑘 must be distinct in [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑗]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → ([𝑘 / 𝑗]𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑗]𝜑)
Theorem	uzind4i 9666*	Induction on the upper integers that start at 𝑀. The first four give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. This is a stronger version of uzind4 9662 assuming that 𝜓 holds unconditionally. Notice that 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) implies that the lower bound 𝑀 is an integer (𝑀 ∈ ℤ, see eluzel2 9606). (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	indstr 9667*	Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)
Theorem	infrenegsupex 9668*	The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴 is the negative of the supremum of the negatives of its elements. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -sup({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supinfneg 9669*	If a set of real numbers has a least upper bound, the set of the negation of those numbers has a greatest lower bound. For a theorem which is similar but only for the boundedness part, see ublbneg 9687. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ 𝐴} ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ 𝐴}𝑧 < 𝑦)))
Theorem	infsupneg 9670*	If a set of real numbers has a greatest lower bound, the set of the negation of those numbers has a least upper bound. To go in the other direction see supinfneg 9669. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ 𝐴} ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ 𝐴}𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	supminfex 9671*	A supremum is the negation of the infimum of that set's image under negation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -inf({𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑤 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	infregelbex 9672*	Any lower bound of a set of real numbers with an infimum is less than or equal to the infimum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧))
Theorem	eluznn0 9673	Membership in a nonnegative upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eluznn 9674	Membership in a positive upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ. (Contributed by JJ, 1-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluz2b1 9675	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 1 < 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz2gt1 9676	An integer greater than or equal to 2 is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 1 < 𝑁)
Theorem	eluz2b2 9677	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 1 < 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz2b3 9678	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 1))
Theorem	uz2m1nn 9679	One less than an integer greater than or equal to 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	1nuz2 9680	1 is not in (ℤ≥‘2). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ¬ 1 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)
Theorem	elnn1uz2 9681	A positive integer is either 1 or greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)))
Theorem	uz2mulcl 9682	Closure of multiplication of integers greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑀 · 𝑁) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	indstr2 9683*	Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). The first two hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)
Theorem	eluzdc 9684	Membership of an integer in an upper set of integers is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → DECID 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	elnn0dc 9685	Membership of an integer in ℕ0 is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → DECID 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	elnndc 9686	Membership of an integer in ℕ is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → DECID 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	ublbneg 9687*	The image under negation of a bounded-above set of reals is bounded below. For a theorem which is similar but also adds that the bounds need to be the tightest possible, see supinfneg 9669. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	eqreznegel 9688*	Two ways to express the image under negation of a set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℤ → {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
Theorem	negm 9689*	The image under negation of an inhabited set of reals is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
Theorem	lbzbi 9690*	If a set of reals is bounded below, it is bounded below by an integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	nn01to3 9691	A (nonnegative) integer between 1 and 3 must be 1, 2 or 3. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 1 ≤ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 3) → (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = 2 ∨ 𝑁 = 3))
Theorem	nn0ge2m1nnALT 9692	Alternate proof of nn0ge2m1nn 9309: If a nonnegative integer is greater than or equal to two, the integer decreased by 1 is a positive integer. This version is proved using eluz2 9607, a theorem for upper sets of integers, which are defined later than the positive and nonnegative integers. This proof is, however, much shorter than the proof of nn0ge2m1nn 9309. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Aug-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 2 ≤ 𝑁) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ)
4.4.12  Rational numbers (as a subset of complex numbers)
Syntax	cq 9693	Extend class notation to include the class of rationals.
class ℚ
Definition	df-q 9694	Define the set of rational numbers. Based on definition of rationals in [Apostol] p. 22. See elq 9696 for the relation "is rational". (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ℚ = ( / “ (ℤ × ℕ))
Theorem	divfnzn 9695	Division restricted to ℤ × ℕ is a function. Given excluded middle, it would be easy to prove this for ℂ × (ℂ ∖ {0}). The key difference is that an element of ℕ is apart from zero, whereas being an element of ℂ ∖ {0} implies being not equal to zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ( / ↾ (ℤ × ℕ)) Fn (ℤ × ℕ)
Theorem	elq 9696*	Membership in the set of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑥 / 𝑦))
Theorem	qmulz 9697*	If 𝐴 is rational, then some integer multiple of it is an integer. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 · 𝑥) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	znq 9698	The ratio of an integer and a positive integer is a rational number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qre 9699	A rational number is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	zq 9700	An integer is a rational number. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)